Assessing Two Trade Offers (1 Viewer)

[qdaddyo]

14-team PPR

QB - Carr, Fields
RB - Gibbs, Montgomery, Warren, Steele, Corum, Ray Davis, Benson
WR - London, Nabers, Jamo, Quentin Johnson, Puka
TE - Pitts
PK - Prater
DF - Houston

Both of these would help me field a competitive lineup during the week 5 bye.

Would love to know if these deals are both good, and which one is preferable.

Option 1

This deal was offered to me and I can accept via our app anytime.

I get Rachaad White, Xavier Worthy, and Bucky Irving.
I give David Montgomery, Quentin Johnston, and Ray Davis.

Option 2

This deal is being pondered by the other owner.

I get Devon Achane, Ray-Ray Mcloud, and Caleb Williams.
I give David Montgomery, Quentin Johnston, and Justin Fields.

 

[Jaruby]

Option 2 is worth waiting for. Option 1 is fine, literally nothing else to say. It’s fair if you like it do it.
Personally I would try a different offer to get Achane after he rejects it, if he’s thinking about it I’d keep trying to get Achane over any of the other minor improvements from option 1. I always want the best player in the trade even if I give up too much to get em.

 

[Littlegiant]

Option 2, by far. Achane is worth going after, especially if someone is willing to deal him for what you are offering.

Option 1 is Ok, but not going to make your season, IMO.

 

[Gally]

I would not go Option 1 but I am not a Rachaad guy. I think he is built solely on volume and that will be going away soon. Option 2 is fine but I think QJ has turned things around and probably woulnd't do that trade either. Fields is also looking good and will be good for fantasy purposes. I don't think he loses the job.

 

[dello131]

Personally, I wouldn't be interested in either one of those trades. Montgomery is the most valuable piece of the trade due to his consistency week to week plus opportunities to boom beyond that. Achane has week winning upside each week, but until he shows he can last at an entire season I'll take the established vet with lower upside but higher consistency. If you are really hot for the trade, I'd offer up Gibbs instead...but that is just personal preference. I see Gibbs and Anchane kind of interchangeably.

 

[BLOCKED_PUNT]

Personally, I wouldn't be interested in either one of those trades.

option 2 is better than option 1 though

 

[TheWinz]

I like #2

 

[SunsOut]

Hard pass on option 1.

Option 2 has the better player with Achane.

 

[acartina37]

I liked option 1 better before Rashee Rice went down. I like the Trade even more with Rashee rice down. Im high on Bucky Irving taking over and being more valuable then Montgomery by EOS