Scoresman
Footballguy
Those of us who auction draft know that one of the most important benefits of the format is the ability to get any player you want, and to create a draft plan accordingly.
I used Excel Solver to come up with the optimal drafted team using ESPN/Yahoo pricing. Basically, you give it estimated player pricing, projected points scored, and lineup details. The Solver goes through every possible team permutation that fits under the cap and roster requirements and it spits out the team that will give you the max total points.
One note is that I dont use this to target a specific team of players to draft. This is projection based, and projections dont account for range of outcomes. What this is valuable for is to find out what general draft strategies the optimal team is employing. Should you spend up at QB? Spend up at TE? Spend most of your dollars at RB or WR? This has really helped me formulate my draft plans the last couple years.
The constraints I used:
- PPR Scoring, 1 QB / 2 RB / 2 WR / 1 TE / 1 Flex.
- Kickers and defense are excluded since I only spend a buck here anyway.
- This only gives optimal starters. Bench not included.
- $185 cap since I would normally allocate that much for starters.
Optimal ESPN Team
Optimal Yahoo Team
Analysis
Some different teams here entirely due to the different pricing found on each site. ESPN seems to favor a more stud/dud approach. Both sites suggest splitting your RB pricing among 2nd-3rd tier RBs, avoiding the top dollar players. ESPN favors a more stud/dud approach at WR2 than Yahoo does.
Both site's pricing agrees to spend up at both QB and TE. I also found this to be true in my own auction league's analysis that does not use ESPN or Yahoo. Even if I tweak the QB and TE prices a bit higher than expected, it still spits out teams with both QB and TE favoring the top 3 options.
As mentioned since this is projection based, you have to know what you are looking at and adjust accordingly based on your risk tolerance and player ceilings. For example, this is using the median projection for a player like Tet McMillan, but since his ceiling is through the roof, he probably provides more value than the solver can account for. For players like this that I want to target, I just look at their estimated price and see how they could fit into the optimal team making it better.
I find this to be a really valuable tool for auction prep. Highly recommend if you know how to use Excel solver. Even better if you can tweak the estimated player prices based on your league's historical drafts. For example I know to make Raiders and 49ers a bit more expensive than usual since we have a few fans of both in our league and this has historically been the case for those players.
Anyway, I'm happy to run this for other sites that do auction draft and have estimated prices or even other roster requirements.
I used Excel Solver to come up with the optimal drafted team using ESPN/Yahoo pricing. Basically, you give it estimated player pricing, projected points scored, and lineup details. The Solver goes through every possible team permutation that fits under the cap and roster requirements and it spits out the team that will give you the max total points.
One note is that I dont use this to target a specific team of players to draft. This is projection based, and projections dont account for range of outcomes. What this is valuable for is to find out what general draft strategies the optimal team is employing. Should you spend up at QB? Spend up at TE? Spend most of your dollars at RB or WR? This has really helped me formulate my draft plans the last couple years.
The constraints I used:
- PPR Scoring, 1 QB / 2 RB / 2 WR / 1 TE / 1 Flex.
- Kickers and defense are excluded since I only spend a buck here anyway.
- This only gives optimal starters. Bench not included.
- $185 cap since I would normally allocate that much for starters.
Optimal ESPN Team
POS | NAME | $$$ | Pts |
---|---|---|---|
QB | Lamar Jackson | 30 | 373 |
RB1 | Chase Brown | 27 | 275 |
RB2 | Alvin Kamara | 18 | 244 |
WR1 | Ja'Marr Chase | 59 | 337 |
WR2 | DeVonta Smith | 8 | 229 |
TE1 | Brock Bowers | 34 | 257 |
Flex | Courtland Sutton | 9 | 228 |
Optimal Yahoo Team
POS | Name | $$$ | Pts |
---|---|---|---|
QB | Jalen Hurts | 19 | 361 |
RB1 | De'von Achane | 43 | 297 |
RB2 | Chase Brown | 33 | 275 |
WR1 | Tyreek Hill | 21 | 260 |
WR2 | Davante Adams | 17 | 251 |
TE1 | Brock Bowers | 37 | 257 |
Flex | Alvin Kamara | 15 | 244 |
Analysis
Some different teams here entirely due to the different pricing found on each site. ESPN seems to favor a more stud/dud approach. Both sites suggest splitting your RB pricing among 2nd-3rd tier RBs, avoiding the top dollar players. ESPN favors a more stud/dud approach at WR2 than Yahoo does.
Both site's pricing agrees to spend up at both QB and TE. I also found this to be true in my own auction league's analysis that does not use ESPN or Yahoo. Even if I tweak the QB and TE prices a bit higher than expected, it still spits out teams with both QB and TE favoring the top 3 options.
As mentioned since this is projection based, you have to know what you are looking at and adjust accordingly based on your risk tolerance and player ceilings. For example, this is using the median projection for a player like Tet McMillan, but since his ceiling is through the roof, he probably provides more value than the solver can account for. For players like this that I want to target, I just look at their estimated price and see how they could fit into the optimal team making it better.
I find this to be a really valuable tool for auction prep. Highly recommend if you know how to use Excel solver. Even better if you can tweak the estimated player prices based on your league's historical drafts. For example I know to make Raiders and 49ers a bit more expensive than usual since we have a few fans of both in our league and this has historically been the case for those players.
Anyway, I'm happy to run this for other sites that do auction draft and have estimated prices or even other roster requirements.