TobiasFunke
Footballguy
You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."
![]()
Ayn Rand- How is This Still a Thing?
You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."
![]()
John Oliver is a liberal ninny. Of course he hates Ayn Rand.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."
![]()
Ayn Rand- How is This Still a Thing?
Almost everyone with a basic understanding of psychology and economics hates Ayn Rand.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."![]()
eye-nHow is her first name pronounced?
Is it like "Ann" like normal?
Or more like "AIN" like rain/rain/train?
Easy, Beej.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."![]()
I thought you'd reserved all your hatred for rapists. This makes sense.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."![]()
Who are the economists that have given you your basic understanding? Krugman?You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."![]()
Rhymes with DawnHow is her first name pronounced?
Is it like "Ann" like normal?
Or more like "AIN" like rain/rain/train?
Neither.Rhymes with DawnHow is her first name pronounced?
Is it like "Ann" like normal?
Or more like "AIN" like rain/rain/train?
That's way off. It's actually more like Don.Rhymes with DawnHow is her first name pronounced?
Is it like "Ann" like normal?
Or more like "AIN" like rain/rain/train?
No.That's way off. It's actually more like Don.Rhymes with DawnHow is her first name pronounced?
Is it like "Ann" like normal?
Or more like "AIN" like rain/rain/train?
What was Ayn's degree in again?Jack White said:You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:Henry Ford said:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."Jack White said:![]()
Plenty of geniuses in the world without degrees.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:Jack White said:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."Henry Ford said:![]()
So no degree in economics I take it.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."Jack White said:![]()
I'll give her mine. It's only rightly used when one has just flushed somewhere. She can have it posthumously.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."![]()
I'm sure she'd appreciate your charity and generosity while pretending not to.You might also enjoy this bit from Last Week with John Oliver if you haven't seen it yet:"...the patron saint of people who don't tip."![]()
You're forgetting that's it's a selfish act of mine. I don't care about the degree, and even though she was good friends with Hazlitt and von Mises, who both complimented her, she'd know I was doing it for my own reasons relating to prerequisites for genius on an obscure thread somewhere on a fantasy football website.I'm sure she'd appreciate your charity and generosity while pretending not to.I'll give her mine. It's only rightly used when one has just flushed somewhere. She can have it posthumously.
I was forgetting that. Deep. Apparently I have to revisit her work. Hopefully that doesn't mean I also need refreshers on ska music and handjobs.You're forgetting that's it's a selfish act of mine. I don't care about the degree, and even though she was good friends with Hazlitt and von Mises, who both complimented her, she'd know I was doing it for my own reasons relating to prerequisites for genius on an obscure thread somewhere on a fantasy football website.I'm sure she'd appreciate your charity and generosity while pretending not to.I'll give her mine. It's only rightly used when one has just flushed somewhere. She can have it posthumously.
Really, she can have it. It's a selfish act of mine to give it to her.
Listened to tons of ska music while reading Ayn's word. You've pretty much nailed that it was undergrad and for some dumb "thesis" that nobody but the poor professor would ever have to read. But you're wrong about the hand jobs. Total non-starter on that end, even WITH the conservative girlfriend.I was forgetting that. Deep. Apparently I have to revisit her work. Hopefully that doesn't mean I also need refreshers on ska music and handjobs.You're forgetting that's it's a selfish act of mine. I don't care about the degree, and even though she was good friends with Hazlitt and von Mises, who both complimented her, she'd know I was doing it for my own reasons relating to prerequisites for genius on an obscure thread somewhere on a fantasy football website.I'm sure she'd appreciate your charity and generosity while pretending not to.I'll give her mine. It's only rightly used when one has just flushed somewhere. She can have it posthumously.
Really, she can have it. It's a selfish act of mine to give it to her.
Actually she reached the height of her influence in the 1960s. But I'm inclined to agree with you.In all seriousness, I've read both everything Rand and Rousseau ever wrote at one point in my life, though I forget (and never understood) a lot of it. She's not as stupid nor ignorant as people are painting her in this thread. She was a force in 1950's America, and for that, I'm grateful.
That was from the Last Week bit I linked above. Although I liked the Super Sweet Sixteen comparison a bit more.Listened to tons of ska music while reading Ayn's word. You've pretty much nailed that it was undergrad and for some dumb "thesis" that nobody but the poor professor would ever have to read. But you're wrong about the hand jobs. Total non-starter on that end, even WITH the conservative girlfriend.I was forgetting that. Deep. Apparently I have to revisit her work. Hopefully that doesn't mean I also need refreshers on ska music and handjobs.You're forgetting that's it's a selfish act of mine. I don't care about the degree, and even though she was good friends with Hazlitt and von Mises, who both complimented her, she'd know I was doing it for my own reasons relating to prerequisites for genius on an obscure thread somewhere on a fantasy football website.I'm sure she'd appreciate your charity and generosity while pretending not to.I'll give her mine. It's only rightly used when one has just flushed somewhere. She can have it posthumously.
Really, she can have it. It's a selfish act of mine to give it to her.![]()
Now I've got to watch it. But I already had. How did I forget? Oh yeah, ask me something about Rand's philosophy, that'll clear up how I forgot.That was from the Last Week bit I linked above. Although I liked the Super Sweet Sixteen comparison a bit more.Listened to tons of ska music while reading Ayn's word. You've pretty much nailed that it was undergrad and for some dumb "thesis" that nobody but the poor professor would ever have to read. But you're wrong about the hand jobs. Total non-starter on that end, even WITH the conservative girlfriend.I was forgetting that. Deep. Apparently I have to revisit her work. Hopefully that doesn't mean I also need refreshers on ska music and handjobs.You're forgetting that's it's a selfish act of mine. I don't care about the degree, and even though she was good friends with Hazlitt and von Mises, who both complimented her, she'd know I was doing it for my own reasons relating to prerequisites for genius on an obscure thread somewhere on a fantasy football website.I'm sure she'd appreciate your charity and generosity while pretending not to.I'll give her mine. It's only rightly used when one has just flushed somewhere. She can have it posthumously.
Really, she can have it. It's a selfish act of mine to give it to her.![]()
Gates actually made something while Rand was ####ed in the head and could only blather on for hundreds of pages about how great it is to be a sociopath.She got as much out of her economics degree as Gates got out of his technology degree.
That's not a point in her favor.NC, your comment about Rand having no economics degree is beneath you. Especially when her main economic ideas were basically in line with Ludwig Von Mises, FE Hayek, and Milton Freidman, among others. We're talking about some pretty brilliant people here.
It's also of note that Alan Greenspan was one of Ayn Rand's protégés and a close personal friend.
Another one of her proteges, Nathaniel Branden, likely murdered his 2nd wife.That's not a point in her favor.NC, your comment about Rand having no economics degree is beneath you. Especially when her main economic ideas were basically in line with Ludwig Von Mises, FE Hayek, and Milton Freidman, among others. We're talking about some pretty brilliant people here.
It's also of note that Alan Greenspan was one of Ayn Rand's protégés and a close personal friend.
Rand took the worst parts of Nietzsche and treated it like she came up with something original.In all seriousness, I've read both everything Rand and Rousseau ever wrote at one point in my life, though I forget (and never understood) a lot of it. She's not as stupid nor ignorant as people are painting her in this thread. She was a force in 1950's America, and for that, I'm grateful.
Funny, her beloved capitalism rewards plenty of incompetent people completely out of proportion.Easy to rip her for s million reasons and you guys seem to have a lot of fun with it.
One aspect of her fiction which I really enjoyed was the struggle between the competent people and the incompetent. I've never understood why so many people who don't know anything about stuff are allowed to #### things up in practically every walk of life. Rand attempts to shed light on this.
No, it is not.Rand loved capitalism and hated aristocracy but is not a capitalism a form of aristocracy?
Sure, because people who advocate liberty and voluntary, mutually beneficial exchange are sociopaths.Gates actually made something while Rand was ####ed in the head and could only blather on for hundreds of pages about how great it is to be a sociopath.She got as much out of her economics degree as Gates got out of his technology degree.
Everything you wrote is wrong. You get no credit.No, it is not.Rand loved capitalism and hated aristocracy but is not a capitalism a form of aristocracy?
Just about everything you have that's good in your life was made available to you because of capitalism.
And never forget that the state has no resources of its own; everything it has is taken by force from the productive class: capitalists, entrepreneurs and workers who voluntarily trade their labor for compensation.
How is it wrong? Please explain. Though I doubt you can.Everything you wrote is wrong. You get no credit.No, it is not.Rand loved capitalism and hated aristocracy but is not a capitalism a form of aristocracy?
Just about everything you have that's good in your life was made available to you because of capitalism.
And never forget that the state has no resources of its own; everything it has is taken by force from the productive class: capitalists, entrepreneurs and workers who voluntarily trade their labor for compensation.
Yeah it's so silly that people hate someone who they believe influences the powerful yet feeble-minded to adopt a destructive worldview!I find it funny how people hate her so much. She certainly didn't advocate the gulag. I mean, she escaped it and her worldview was then shaped by what she had witnessed and escaped.
I remember finding Anthem her most palatable work, until I read Zamyatin's We. But the Ayn Rand hate is predictably strong among religionists and collectivists, the two things she detested more than anything in the world.
If one subscribes to think that nothing in life is richer than defining one's self by one's enemies, her life's work was a success.
Well, it's wrong because what you wrote is false. Not true. Lacking in nuance and genuine understanding/intellect.How is it wrong? Please explain. Though I doubt you can.Everything you wrote is wrong. You get no credit.No, it is not.Rand loved capitalism and hated aristocracy but is not a capitalism a form of aristocracy?
Just about everything you have that's good in your life was made available to you because of capitalism.
And never forget that the state has no resources of its own; everything it has is taken by force from the productive class: capitalists, entrepreneurs and workers who voluntarily trade their labor for compensation.
I think the hatred for 20th century figures other than her is implied in my comment. Hey, if you've got enough to go around, go ahead, but I think you're mistaken. I don't think anybody who reads a lot of Rand and understands is generally feeble-minded. Doctrinaire, maybe. Dogmatic, possibly. But not feeble-minded.Yeah it's so silly that people hate someone who they believe influences the powerful yet feeble-minded to adopt a destructive worldview!I find it funny how people hate her so much. She certainly didn't advocate the gulag. I mean, she escaped it and her worldview was then shaped by what she had witnessed and escaped.
I remember finding Anthem her most palatable work, until I read Zamyatin's We. But the Ayn Rand hate is predictably strong among religionists and collectivists, the two things she detested more than anything in the world.
If one subscribes to think that nothing in life is richer than defining one's self by one's enemies, her life's work was a success.
And your saying "it's wrong because I say so" is a nuanced and intellectual response?Well, it's wrong because what you wrote is false. Not true. Lacking in nuance and genuine understanding/intellect.How is it wrong? Please explain. Though I doubt you can.Everything you wrote is wrong. You get no credit.No, it is not.Rand loved capitalism and hated aristocracy but is not a capitalism a form of aristocracy?
Just about everything you have that's good in your life was made available to you because of capitalism.
And never forget that the state has no resources of its own; everything it has is taken by force from the productive class: capitalists, entrepreneurs and workers who voluntarily trade their labor for compensation.
Yes, there is some Rand derangement syndrome going on.I find it funny how people hate her so much.
I read the chapter - if the goal was to turn me off on totalitarianism, a little late for that. However, I found this interesting:Sure, because people who advocate liberty and voluntary, mutually beneficial exchange are sociopaths.Gates actually made something while Rand was ####ed in the head and could only blather on for hundreds of pages about how great it is to be a sociopath.She got as much out of her economics degree as Gates got out of his technology degree.
Perhaps you need to read Hayek's The Road To Serfdom, particularly Chaper 10, "Why the Worst Get on Top."
Go ahead, I dare you.
P.S. Rand did actually make things, including a famous book that has sold over seven million copies. What have you produced in your life that people will voluntarily exchange their resources for?
This is true and why I'm against demonization the '1%'. Making money is great - people should be encouraged to do as well as they can financially and we should celebrate their success. We should also tax those who can most afford it to enable others to follow in their path to success.It seems to be almost a law of human nature that it is easier for people to agree on a negative program — on the hatred of an enemy, on the envy of those better off than on any positive task.
You openly admit to favoring totalitarianism. See, now I can respect that.I read the chapter - if the goal was to turn me off on totalitarianism, a little late for that. However, I found this interesting:Sure, because people who advocate liberty and voluntary, mutually beneficial exchange are sociopaths.Gates actually made something while Rand was ####ed in the head and could only blather on for hundreds of pages about how great it is to be a sociopath.She got as much out of her economics degree as Gates got out of his technology degree.
Perhaps you need to read Hayek's The Road To Serfdom, particularly Chaper 10, "Why the Worst Get on Top."
Go ahead, I dare you.
P.S. Rand did actually make things, including a famous book that has sold over seven million copies. What have you produced in your life that people will voluntarily exchange their resources for?
This is true and why I'm against demonization the '1%'. Making money is great - people should be encouraged to do as well as they can financially and we should celebrate their success. We should also tax those who can most afford it to enable others to follow in their path to success.It seems to be almost a law of human nature that it is easier for people to agree on a negative program — on the hatred of an enemy, on the envy of those better off than on any positive task.
By the way, L. Ron Hubbard also wrote and sold millions of books.
I actually agree with Rand on many things but unfortunately she's a extremist, no wonder that her black and white ideas appeal to teenagers.Easy to rip her for s million reasons and you guys seem to have a lot of fun with it.
One aspect of her fiction which I really enjoyed was the struggle between the competent people and the incompetent. I've never understood why so many people who don't know anything about stuff are allowed to #### things up in practically every walk of life. Rand attempts to shed light on this.
The first two I agree wholeheartedly. It's the last two where she lacks nuance and understanding of what it takes for a healthy society to function. Self-interest and capitalism have their place, but if you want to benefit from a society to achieve success then the society has a right to tax a reasonable amount of your success for its continued existence. If someone doesn't like that they have every right to move to a country where the wealthy don't care if the poor die starving in the streets.To wow her young admirers, Rand would often tell a story of how a smart-aleck book salesman had once challenged her to explain her philosophy while standing on one leg. She replied: “Metaphysics—objective reality. Epistemology—reason. Ethics—self-interest. Politics—capitalism.”
Progressive taxation is totalitarianism?You openly admit to favoring totalitarianism. See, now I can respect that.