What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Big trade (1 Viewer)

dynasty88

Footballguy
Should I do this trade for my team in Dynasty?

Geno/Adams/Etienne for Chase

This is Superflex and will leave me with just Tua and Lance but also thinking that I will probably never get a chance at a WR1 like Chase and could just trade for a QB later on.

See team below

Tua
Geno
Lance

Lamb
Waddle
Adams
Kirk
Mclaurin

Henry
Etienne
Swift
Akers

Schultz
Njoku
 
I don't think I would do it in your position. Lance is droppable at this point and probably not even worth a roster spot and you will be at a disadvantage not starting 2 Qbs. Geno can finish as a top 10 again this year and you already have 2 great young WRs in Lamb and Waddle. Lastly, your RBs are not strong if you lose Etienne, swift and akers definitely have some questions surrounding how good they'll be and Henry is getting old.
 
Looks like I might be able to get Mac Jones lol

You're probably right tho but thinking about Having Chase/Lamb/Waddle in Dynasty excites me
 
Depends on how the scoring goes. Are QB's a must start in the SF? Are 15 of the 20 highest scoring players QB's? If not, and playing a non-QB in the SF spot is possible then I make this trade. If you essentially have to play a QB in the SF spot because of the scoring then it's a tough choice. I may still pull the trigger but its closer to 50-50.
 
QBs are not must start in SF spot and only the top QBs (Mahomes, Allen, Hurts etc) are in the top 15-20.

I was able to change it to Henry instead of Etienne. Does that make it a smash accept?
 
QBs are not must start in SF spot and only the top QBs (Mahomes, Allen, Hurts etc) are in the top 15-20.

I was able to change it to Henry instead of Etienne. Does that make it a smash accept?
I am not sure if it makes the deal better or worse. Obviously ETN theoretically is the better long term asset but not so sure he is better for the next year or two. Either way with QB scoring not being dominant I would make either trade.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top