Liquid Tension said:
My concern as a Commish is that almost everything mentioned is solved with having waivers and not having an open add situation. Also, if you use a bid amount then you are not rewarding the lesser teams (which is the point when going to reverse standings leagues.)
Outside of that, it is all about preference.
To respond to your comments:1-My league on RTS has both. Wed night blind bid waiver at 11pm. Website automatically awards players. Then, from Thurs 8am - Sun 1pm, it's FCFS.
2-You used the word "reward"............I don't WANT to REWARD the lesser teams. And why should we?
In the REAL NFL, Tennessee didn't go out and get Chris Simms because they sucked the 1st week........THEY OFFERED HIM THE BEST CONTRACT (and maybe the only contract). Blind bid is just like NFL FA.......players sign for the most money. I would never play in a league that is worst to first........It's Fantasy Football Welfare and diminishes the importance of the draft and good roster management.
Uh, almost every league that has keepers or dynasty rewards worst to first and so does the NFL for the draft. Baseball does the same thing with released players for waivers...Needless to say I disagree with you
Sorry, GB LT, but all those people are wrong.
Care to elaborate?
This probably isn't the time to rehash the old "abolish the NFL draft" argument beyond my continued assertion that it is increasingly unneccessary in a league with a hard salary cap.And baseball doesn't compare because of its inherent competitive imbalance. Once could probably argue the point that a "worst to first" system is necessary in that sport because of its other problems.
But fantasy football, especially if you're in auction leagues (which I believe you are), create about as even a playing field as a game could have. Everyone has the same opportunities to procure players and blind bidding simply extends this philosophy. By their very natures, a draft or a free agent procurement procedure other than blind bidding, is an artificial helping hand to those who have not been successful
playing by the same rules as everyone else.
I've seen the arguments that worst to first is necessary in dynasty leagues to keep owners from being discouraged but I believe that, if it's as necessary as people say, then it's an example of an inherent flaw in dynasty leagues.