What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bloom's Three Round Mock (1 Viewer)

I would be satisfied with the Vikings haul if they got Gaines Adams, Jason Hill, and Aundrae Allison. :lmao:

I've debated the top 10 to death, so no comment there.

Our 11-19 are pretty much the same. So, good job! ;)

Meriweather ahead of Griffin?

Kalil to the Browns when they just re-upped Fraley for four years?

Otherwise, looks good.

 
Solid. :lmao:

Question on this:

57. Philadelphia - Tony Hunt, RB, PSU

67. Cleveland - Antonio Pittman, RB, Ohio State

75. Atlanta - Michael Bush, RB, Louisville

78. Green Bay - Kenny Irons, RB, Auburn

Most 'experts' I've seen don't have Tony Hunt that high. Just wondering why you think he'll go ahead of the others listed.

ETA: Missed the Brian Leonard to NE pick...very surprising. Not sure about that one either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
;) Only things that :lmao: me is Giants going first round WR and NE going first round RB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:wub: Only things that :thumbup: me is Giants going first round WR and NE going first round RB.
I like both those picks. Who do the Giants have other than Burress?Who do the Patriots have other than Maroney - who may have a bad shoulder? Brian Leonard is a really intriguing player.
 
Best pick IMO

29. Baltimore - Joe Staley, OT, Central Michigan

Staley now has a solid chance of getting in the first with his outstanding pro day. He's probably passed Tony Ugoh as the OT3.

Worst Pick IMO

31. Chicago - Drew Stanton, QB, Michigan State

The Bears can afford to gamble on Stanton recovering from his 2006 tailspin and giving them a long term upgrade from Rex Grossman

 
You have Beason with the wrong college. 3 Canes in the 1st, I like it, Go "U"!

32. Indianapolis - Jon Beason, LB, Indianapolis

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Solid. :thumbup: Question on this:57. Philadelphia - Tony Hunt, RB, PSU67. Cleveland - Antonio Pittman, RB, Ohio State75. Atlanta - Michael Bush, RB, Louisville78. Green Bay - Kenny Irons, RB, AuburnMost 'experts' I've seen don't have Tony Hunt that high. Just wondering why you think he'll go ahead of the others listed.ETA: Missed the Brian Leonard to NE pick...very surprising. Not sure about that one either.
Hunt is supposedly falling because of his pro day, but like Leonard, his value is more in his versatility than his physical attributes. Hunt would be a perfect compliment to Westbrook (as would Leonard). Hunt could fall to the second day, but he's also a great fit for certain teams, so the possible range of the pick he goes at is large.
 
if the Texans came out of the first day of draft with AP and Eric Wright id be very happy. Ben Patrick going to the eagle I would not like.(think that would be a waste).

Jammaal Anderson

Dwayne Jarrett

Eric Weddle

Micheal Bush

And if all these cards play out for the Falcons they would get an A+ for day one of the draft. IMO

 
:lmao: Only things that :lmao: me is Giants going first round WR and NE going first round RB.
I like both those picks. Who do the Giants have other than Burress?Who do the Patriots have other than Maroney - who may have a bad shoulder? Brian Leonard is a really intriguing player.
Only Sammy Morris (presumably signed to be the primary backup), Kevin Faulk (has about 1-2 seasons worth of moderate value left in the tank), Heath Evans (fullback type), Patrick Pass (IR)
 
I think the Pats would take Beason at #28. I know, I know: The Pats don't draft LBs in the first round. But I've got a hunch they'd like his versatility since he's played inside and outside. Kind of a younger version of Mike Vrabel.

 
You have Beason with the wrong college. 3 Canes in the 1st, I like it, Go "U"!32. Indianapolis - Jon Beason, LB, Indianapolis
thanks, sorry for the sloppiness folks, this has occupied my entire day and my proofreading skills are suffering for my lack of energy right now.
 
:lmao: Only things that :lmao: me is Giants going first round WR and NE going first round RB.
I like both those picks. Who do the Giants have other than Burress?Who do the Patriots have other than Maroney - who may have a bad shoulder? Brian Leonard is a really intriguing player.
Only Sammy Morris (presumably signed to be the primary backup), Kevin Faulk (has about 1-2 seasons worth of moderate value left in the tank), Heath Evans (fullback type), Patrick Pass (IR)
In other words, next to nothing.
 
I think the Pats would take Beason at #28. I know, I know: The Pats don't draft LBs in the first round. But I've got a hunch they'd like his versatility since he's played inside and outside. Kind of a younger version of Mike Vrabel.
I definitely see the Pats going with some kind of multiuse LB on the first day. I gave them Tim Shaw at the end of the 3rd, but Beason would make sense. When it comes right down to it, the Pats are just about the hardest team to mock, and them having two firsts makes it even harder. I expect them to trade one of them for a 2008 first +, thats just the way they roll, trading down out of a surplus of picks to create a surplus for the next season.
 
You have Beason with the wrong college. 3 Canes in the 1st, I like it, Go "U"!

32. Indianapolis - Jon Beason, LB, Indianapolis
thanks, sorry for the sloppiness folks, this has occupied my entire day and my proofreading skills are suffering for my lack of energy right now.
It's a lot harder than it looks.At least you didn't call Manuel Ramirez Manuel Rodriguez and have Anthony Spencer taken twice like I did yesterday.

 
Your GB picks are spot on. If they can snag Irons in the 3rd, I'll be happy, and I'd be ecstatic with Revis in the 1st.

As an aside, what do you (and Andy "Jason" Dufrene) do for a living that you have the time to do these mocks? Very impressive efforts.

 
As an aside, what do you (and Andy "Jason" Dufrene) do for a living that you have the time to do these mocks? Very impressive efforts.
I'm a computer programmer that's given about 3 hours of work to do per week that I milk into 40.I'm terribly overpaid, but don't tell anyone okay?
 
I know a lot of people are high on Kalil but #23 is awfully high for a center.

Also, I was kind of hoping he would slide to the Cards in round 2...a nice little reunion with Latui and Leinart.

 
I know a lot of people are high on Kalil but #23 is awfully high for a center.Also, I was kind of hoping he would slide to the Cards in round 2...a nice little reunion with Latui and Leinart.
I had Kalil at 36 originally. Kalil is definitely on a par with Mangold, who went in the first last year. Arizona would make sense too.
 
As an aside, what do you (and Andy "Jason" Dufrene) do for a living that you have the time to do these mocks? Very impressive efforts.
I'm a computer programmer that's given about 3 hours of work to do per week that I milk into 40.I'm terribly overpaid, but don't tell anyone okay?
That was my story until three months ago when I quit my programming job. Right now I do some law stuff and computer stuff part time, but Im really a full time football writer at this point (I cashed in my retirement to buy a year to get rolling), spending most of my day getting NFLDG off the ground - Im one part Joe/David one part Clayton one part Bloom over there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know for purpose of mocking it's difficult to project trades, but I would bet my left arm that the Cards don't take Brown at #5...a lot of talk locally about them trading down or takin a DL at #5 if Thomas is not available.

 
As an aside, what do you (and Andy "Jason" Dufrene) do for a living that you have the time to do these mocks? Very impressive efforts.
I'm a computer programmer that's given about 3 hours of work to do per week that I milk into 40.I'm terribly overpaid, but don't tell anyone okay?
I hate you. :mellow:
to be honest with you, it kinda sucks from time to time. But if I switched jobs, I'd have to work twice as hard to earn half as much so, here I am!
 
To pick nits, I don't see the Pats taking a first round RB after just burning a first rounder on Maroney last year.
Precious few saw them burning a first rounder on Maroney last year when they already had Dillon.
:mellow: I think they were mocked most times taking RB. Most times it was Addai IIRC.
Oh yeah. You're right. My bad.Still, the two back system worked well for them until Maroney got hurt. And now they have no Dillon, so they're back to having one back again.
 
I know for purpose of mocking it's difficult to project trades, but I would bet my left arm that the Cards don't take Brown at #5...a lot of talk locally about them trading down or takin a DL at #5 if Thomas is not available.
Honestly if they stay at 5 i see it 25/25/25/25 b/w Branch, Adams, Anderson, and Brown, but the fact that their board would look something like that makes it very smart for them to trade down a team that wants to snipe just one of those guys or a team that just cant live without a Landry/Willis/Peterson.Detroit and Arizona are likely to trade down imo, I just dont project trades in mocks.
 
As an aside, what do you (and Andy "Jason" Dufrene) do for a living that you have the time to do these mocks? Very impressive efforts.
I'm a computer programmer that's given about 3 hours of work to do per week that I milk into 40.I'm terribly overpaid, but don't tell anyone okay?
I hate you. :moneybag:
to be honest with you, it kinda sucks from time to time. But if I switched jobs, I'd have to work twice as hard to earn half as much so, here I am!
I know that I just got sick of having my job not line up with anything I cared about. It was great to have so much free time, but it began to feel real empty.
 
To pick nits, I don't see the Pats taking a first round RB after just burning a first rounder on Maroney last year.
First, Leonard is not just an RB. He's an RB/FB/H-back.Second, I can't say I'm sure what they will do, but I also can't say I'm sure what they won't do. Mocking the Pats is guesswork, and I happen to think Leonard and Pats make a nice marriage, and having two firsts allows them to reach for him (although I dont think late first is a reach for a player like Leonard who will translate to Ws)
 
I know for purpose of mocking it's difficult to project trades, but I would bet my left arm that the Cards don't take Brown at #5...a lot of talk locally about them trading down or takin a DL at #5 if Thomas is not available.
Honestly if they stay at 5 i see it 25/25/25/25 b/w Branch, Adams, Anderson, and Brown, but the fact that their board would look something like that makes it very smart for them to trade down a team that wants to snipe just one of those guys or a team that just cant live without a Landry/Willis/Peterson.Detroit and Arizona are likely to trade down imo, I just dont project trades in mocks.
we're on the same page. :moneybag:
 
Some more thoughts:

You don't think the Lions' tackle rotation of Backus, Scott, and Foster is good enough for a Martz offense?

You seem high on Ikaika Alama-Francis. What catches your eye?

I think David Harris is as much like DeMeco Ryans as Paul Posluszny is.

Josh Beekman hasn't done himself any good in the post season, from what I've read. Is he really a 2nd rounder?

That's a long way for Buster Davis to fall.

 
I just can't see the Lions going safety with their 2nd round pick.
That was more of a BPA than a need pick. I see Griffin falling out of the first, but not very far. I understand your skepticism, and if I re-did this mock right now, that would be one of a few dozen picks that I could very easily change.
 
Some more thoughts:

You don't think the Lions' tackle rotation of Backus, Scott, and Foster is good enough for a Martz offense?
This is the dilemma of not including trades in a mock. Detroit really really should trade down to the highest bidder. Since I won't project that, I take the player that makes the most sense for them at 2, and that's Thomas. The DL they would look at just don't give the bang for the buck - theyre not as much of a bluechipper as Thomas is, and they aren't at as important a position as LT. I feel pretty sure that they won't go with an offensive skill player either. Scott can move inside and play some guard, and Foster is really nothing special.
You seem high on Ikaika Alama-Francis. What catches your eye?
He's basically a rawer version of Jamaal Anderson who happened to tear a pec in the Hula Bowl. He's massive, very athletic, and the player he *could* be is off the charts. I am also giving some props here to Rob Rang who mentioned IAF when I asked who could be a surprise first rounder.Interview with Rob Rang

I think David Harris is as much like DeMeco Ryans as Paul Posluszny is.
I came close to putting Harris much nearer to the top of the second. He answered a lot of questions in the predraft period.

Josh Beekman hasn't done himself any good in the post season, from what I've read. Is he really a 2nd rounder?
He might not be by this point. He's a mauler who projects to play some center too, but chances are he's a 3rd rounder with a chance of falling out of the first day.
That's a long way for Buster Davis to fall.
Harris has passed him, and ILB just dont tend to go that early. Some team could really fall in love with him and take him in the mid to late 2nd.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top