somebody loves his corners.

Is it just me, or are you higher on practically every cornerback than the others are? Any particular reason why?
only 11 of my top 40 are corners.I just have 5 corners in the top 10 because I think they are just as likely to finish in the top 10 as the top safeties - Tillman and Winfield are arguably the most consistent IDP DBs over the last fews years, Marshall, Griffin, and Finnegan are ascending talents who are poised for career years as they enter their prime.
Sure, but compare your list to others. I don't disagree with you, I'm really not sure, but you have CBs higher than others. I really like some of these guys. Any chance Dunta Robinson rises back to the top? He did well when he returned last year.
If you'll pardon the intrusion and a little insider-outsider perspective...Those who have been around for a few years have probably started to see some difference in the philosophies of the rankings among staff and the biases therein. Though we're all operating under the same scoring system, each of us have our own slants. Pasquino isn't afraid to make a counter-argument and often takes a big play perspective at the top of his lists. Bloom often does the same, projecting his preference for game-changing NFL talent onto his IDP rankings. Norton grew up old school, tackle-heavy and will often rank solid talent, consistent performances and prime opportunity over more questionable upside plays. I'm a sucker for big upside, particularly tackle upside and will sometimes take scheme projections and details to the extreme. The other guys fall somewhere in the middle. They have their pet players, but are usually more in tune with the masses. That, or I haven't figured out their biases yet.

If I were using this massive set of rankings, here's what I'd do.

Start with Norton, Rudnicki, Baker and Magaw to get a very strong baseline to work with. Then, particularly in dynasty leagues, see where Tony differs and think hard on why. Then, check my list for upside outliers and decide if I'm full of

or not. Then, look at Sig and Jeff for outliers -- big play in particular -- and decide whether you agree with Bloom's projection of talent to the box score and Pasquino's unique take on player value in spots.That's in fact exactly what I do this time of year when this full set of rankings comes out for the first time. Inevitably, I'll decide that I missed the boat on a couple of guys (high or low), but I'll still end up very high on some guys on low on others. Some of you who come from the same big play perspective that Jeff and Sig often do may want to take the exact opposite approach above.I went off on a tangent there, sorry. The original point is meant to be that Bloom, particularly in his DL and DB lists, will look for game changing upside. I think he'd much rather roster a corner with ball skills and opportunity that can blow up in any given game than a safety with question marks and a relatively boring tackle upside. I'm always happy to take a good corner, but I tend to lean more toward angling for tackle upside and safety because I like to roll the dice at linebacker a bit.And I think there might be a lot of value in a roundtable discussion trying to get to the essence of each of our philosophies as we do our redraft rankings...