Are you predicting a fall from the top3 and top5 respectively, because I think even if they are not the #1 per position their owners are not going to be disappointed.Buckeyedawgs said:I think there will be a lot of dissapointed Brady owners this year. Moss too.
But if Brady is being drafted in the first round, even if he finishes as a top-3 QB, behind say Manning and Romo, the owner will be upset, because he overpaid, and lost out on a better player.Are you predicting a fall from the top3 and top5 respectively, because I think even if they are not the #1 per position their owners are not going to be disappointed.Buckeyedawgs said:I think there will be a lot of dissapointed Brady owners this year. Moss too.
Getting 2nd round performance from your 1st round pick is a helluva lot better then getting 4th round or worse performance - I am speaking from a 16 team league perspective (4QB taken between 1.11 and 2.11 last year in our league - all TD's 6pt non-ppr), YMMV based on league size and scoring.But if Brady is being drafted in the first round, even if he finishes as a top-3 QB, behind say Manning and Romo, the owner will be upset, because he overpaid, and lost out on a better player.Are you predicting a fall from the top3 and top5 respectively, because I think even if they are not the #1 per position their owners are not going to be disappointed.Buckeyedawgs said:I think there will be a lot of dissapointed Brady owners this year. Moss too.
Yeah, being a late first round pick in a 16 team league is like being a second round pick in a 12 team league (I only play in 12 teams leagues) so I understand that. I've seen some have him as player 5 or 6 on their board. Just go look at the First Round Risk thread and see where he has Brady. Crazy.Second round with Manning is where he belongs in a 12 team league.Getting 2nd round performance from your 1st round pick is a helluva lot better then getting 4th round or worse performance - I am speaking from a 16 team league perspective (4QB taken between 1.11 and 2.11 last year in our league - all TD's 6pt non-ppr), YMMV based on league size and scoring.But if Brady is being drafted in the first round, even if he finishes as a top-3 QB, behind say Manning and Romo, the owner will be upset, because he overpaid, and lost out on a better player.Are you predicting a fall from the top3 and top5 respectively, because I think even if they are not the #1 per position their owners are not going to be disappointed.Buckeyedawgs said:I think there will be a lot of dissapointed Brady owners this year. Moss too.
Anyone concerned with Brady's foot? I'm not sure which one it is - is it the one he plants on when throwing? Face it, Brady has never had the strongest arm, and a lot of Moss' great catches were on underthrown balls. Is Brady's foot going to negatively impact him more?Also... end of last season teams learned how to take Moss out of the game. I'm convinced the Pats will not have the success they did last year, I would doubt Brady hits high 30s in TDs. But that's just my opinion.I'm not saying brady is going to throw 50 again.... but anyone using old data as a baseline is fooling themselves. Short of a major injury to brady / moss / welker brady's nearly a lock for 4000/37
4450 / 42 TD / 13 INTs
In 6pt Pass TD leagues? No way.Second round with Manning is where he belongs in a 12 team league.
I love how you clip out my analogy and refuse to address it and istead fall back to the ol "injury issue" line. You'll never change Switz...Anyone concerned with Brady's foot? I'm not sure which one it is - is it the one he plants on when throwing? Face it, Brady has never had the strongest arm, and a lot of Moss' great catches were on underthrown balls. Is Brady's foot going to negatively impact him more?Also... end of last season teams learned how to take Moss out of the game. I'm convinced the Pats will not have the success they did last year, I would doubt Brady hits high 30s in TDs. But that's just my opinion.I'm not saying brady is going to throw 50 again.... but anyone using old data as a baseline is fooling themselves. Short of a major injury to brady / moss / welker brady's nearly a lock for 4000/37
4450 / 42 TD / 13 INTs
I love how you can't have a converstation with you, without you being an arrogant jerk... it was an honest question, there was no need for you to get snarky. I didn't fall back on the "injury issue" - you brought it up, I merely asked if Brady's current injury was anything of concern. Man, you are part of the problem with your attitude on these boards.I love how you clip out my analogy and refuse to address it and istead fall back to the ol "injury issue" line. You'll never change Switz...Anyone concerned with Brady's foot? I'm not sure which one it is - is it the one he plants on when throwing? Face it, Brady has never had the strongest arm, and a lot of Moss' great catches were on underthrown balls. Is Brady's foot going to negatively impact him more?Also... end of last season teams learned how to take Moss out of the game. I'm convinced the Pats will not have the success they did last year, I would doubt Brady hits high 30s in TDs. But that's just my opinion.I'm not saying brady is going to throw 50 again.... but anyone using old data as a baseline is fooling themselves. Short of a major injury to brady / moss / welker brady's nearly a lock for 4000/37
4450 / 42 TD / 13 INTs![]()
Why are you getting so pissy about it? It's been reported all over the place. What on earth is wrong with you?Brady has a "Foot problem" like Moss had a whatever it was problem last year. Come on. You new here? Show me some details about this phantom foot injury. What part of the foot? How did he hurt it? What is the prognosis? Good luck with that. He'll play week 1 on. .... and yet you rank him alongside Manning who's got a very real bum knee and may not even start week 1?
What the heck are you talking about? Why do you have to go all machismo about an FF conversation?Man, I'm done with you... I asked a freakin' question, and you go all Tarzan about it....I'll gladly make you a wager right now. $500 says end of year Brady is ahead of Manning by at least 5% in FP under the 50yds/pt - 6pt TDs scoring. I'll also wager $250 that Brady finishes in the top 3 QBs under the same scoring.
You willing to back up your talk? Pick whichever one you like. I'm good for it.
Yudkin a day earlier:New England's Tom Brady was hobbled by a high right ankle sprain durin the Super Bowl, but Brady checked out fine in mid-March and hasn’t had any troubles with the bothersome right ankle. He addressed the situation on June 10th, and responded to a direct question about whether his ankle was limiting him by stating "Not at all," he said, adding he will be ready for training camp in six weeks. "My body feels great. My leg feels great. My mind feels great. Yeah, I'm ready." Brady took the night off during the first preseason game but the move was said to be due to the coaching staff wanting a long look at the backup candidates, supposedly. However, it came out prior to the 2nd preseason game that Brady has a sore foot (which is unknown) and therefore did not make the trip to play vs. Tampa Bay. Here's what Brady had to say about the injury on Monday, 8/18/08 "Same side of the body, and same leg, but not the same injury," He also stated that it wasn't related to an Aug. 2 bump during practice, when running back Sammy Morris accidentally kicked him during a drill.
I think Yudkin is 100% on target as to why he was absent from Preseason G2.I don't claim any insider info and this is purely an educated guess, but he was fine earlier in the week. I suspect they are using the foot injury as an excuse for at least 2 reasons. Reason one is to protect him from a potential beating like the one he took in last years pre-season game (2?) against TEN. The OL is really thin and there has been a lot of shuffling of players; It makes a lot of sense not to take any chances. Reason number 2 is they need to make a decision on their backup QB and give Cassell, Gutierrez & O'Connel a long look. Gutierrez was banged up earlier in the week and it will be interesting to see how much he plays.
This is what I believe (hope & pray) is the case, but I would be neglect in my duties if I did not mention that it was reported at least once during TC (2 weeks ago maybe?) that Brady had been hit on the leg and seemed to be in some discomfort. However, Brady returned quickly and I have heard nothing since. IMO, if the team was really worried about Bradys leg they would have brought in a veteran by now.
you get called out on a daily basis from folks for being condescending
The Pats will shut it down weeks 16 and 17 unless they're undefeated. So they will shut it down. 38-40 TDs for Brady, and 11-14 wins for NE.I think he'll get around 36 to 38 TDs. The other teams will have studied film of the Pats offense in the off-season, and most likely most teams will conclude that they'd rather have the Pats offense try to beat them in 12 to 15 play drives than 4 play drives. This will mean fewer offensive possessions, more running of the ball, and lots of short passes to keep the chains moving. Now, I don't expect a 20 TD drop like what happened to Manning in 2005, for two main reasons:1. Randy Moss. When motivated (and he still will be - I think he's found a permanent home) - he makes mediocre QBs look great, and great QBs like like Zeus. 2. The Pats won't shut it down at the end of the regular season like the Colts did in 2005.
but they still are motivated to show up the league. they lost the superbowl last year. they have an even bigger chip on their shoulder now. you think belichik is going to say, "ok, you got us. we'll play nice now". dream on. also, think what you want about the guy, but he's smarter than every other HC in the league. you think it's as simple as offseason gameplanning for other teams to shut down the pats offense? beli will be a step ahead like he always is.put me down for a 15-1 season at worst, and another 45+ tds. brace yourselves for another year of Belichik spite, folks. you're kidding yourselves if you think otherwise.and i think acting like the TD total from last yer, is the same as comparing to ANY last yr total is lightly disingenuous. Coming off "spygate" this team was motivated to show up the league and run up the score, and it may have ultimately cost them the Lombardi. I don't think Belly-chick and The Kraft Macaroni man make that mistake again.
the odds of them either not being in a race for playoff positioning, or not being undefeated, going into week 16, are pretty close to none. 13-1 is the best, and probably only scenario in which they would be in a position to "shut it down" in week 16.The Pats will shut it down weeks 16 and 17 unless they're undefeated. So they will shut it down. 38-40 TDs for Brady, and 11-14 wins for NE.I think he'll get around 36 to 38 TDs. The other teams will have studied film of the Pats offense in the off-season, and most likely most teams will conclude that they'd rather have the Pats offense try to beat them in 12 to 15 play drives than 4 play drives. This will mean fewer offensive possessions, more running of the ball, and lots of short passes to keep the chains moving. Now, I don't expect a 20 TD drop like what happened to Manning in 2005, for two main reasons:1. Randy Moss. When motivated (and he still will be - I think he's found a permanent home) - he makes mediocre QBs look great, and great QBs like like Zeus. 2. The Pats won't shut it down at the end of the regular season like the Colts did in 2005.
How many times have the Pats "shut it down" in the past? How about . . . once. BB does not believe in not playing his players all 16 games as he feels it messes with the team's chemistry. Brady has not sat in the past (with the ONLY exception being a game they were not trying to win).For those that remember, there was a game in Week 17 one year where NE effectively "lost" to Miami where Brady started but gave way to Matt Cassel (who played well enough to keep the game close). NE benefited by losing and having to play Jacksonville instead of another hot team int he playoffs. But that was the only game where Brady sat for more than a few minutes at the end of a game.The Pats will shut it down weeks 16 and 17 unless they're undefeated. So they will shut it down. 38-40 TDs for Brady, and 11-14 wins for NE.I think he'll get around 36 to 38 TDs. The other teams will have studied film of the Pats offense in the off-season, and most likely most teams will conclude that they'd rather have the Pats offense try to beat them in 12 to 15 play drives than 4 play drives. This will mean fewer offensive possessions, more running of the ball, and lots of short passes to keep the chains moving. Now, I don't expect a 20 TD drop like what happened to Manning in 2005, for two main reasons:1. Randy Moss. When motivated (and he still will be - I think he's found a permanent home) - he makes mediocre QBs look great, and great QBs like like Zeus. 2. The Pats won't shut it down at the end of the regular season like the Colts did in 2005.
15 and 1 at worst?! Wow...just wow. I think he'll have a fine year by standards other than last year. The thing I see hurting the most is the running game. The O-Line woes will negatively effect both the passing numbers as well as the running numbers but I believe they will still have to run the ball better this year. Actually, what I believe is that more teams are going to take chances by bringing more pressure. I think Brady will be hurried a bunch this year and the only way to keep the defenses honest will be to run the ball. Enter Maroney. Now, I also think Brady-to-Moss will continue to be the red-zone game plan but Maroney will get more done between the 20s than last year.but they still are motivated to show up the league. they lost the superbowl last year. they have an even bigger chip on their shoulder now. you think belichik is going to say, "ok, you got us. we'll play nice now". dream on. also, think what you want about the guy, but he's smarter than every other HC in the league. you think it's as simple as offseason gameplanning for other teams to shut down the pats offense? beli will be a step ahead like he always is.put me down for a 15-1 season at worst, and another 45+ tds. brace yourselves for another year of Belichik spite, folks. you're kidding yourselves if you think otherwise.and i think acting like the TD total from last yer, is the same as comparing to ANY last yr total is lightly disingenuous. Coming off "spygate" this team was motivated to show up the league and run up the score, and it may have ultimately cost them the Lombardi. I don't think Belly-chick and The Kraft Macaroni man make that mistake again.