mad sweeney
Footballguy
Funny how people seem to think that Dallas would've/could've scored on their next drive (and a second one to boot) despite being stymied the whole game. Even if they had timeouts, their best case scenario was one play before the two minute warning if the kickoff didn't run it down there already.Yet most people refer to Romo's fumbled FG hold as losing the game for the Cowboys. Despite the fact that the Seahawks would've had a minute, a timeout and had marched down the field quickly their last two possessions for scores and would've only needed a FG to win from a kicker with several 50+ yard game winners under his belt. I tend to think the way the game had gone that even if the ball had gone back to Dallas they probably wouldn't have scored anyways. But the smart move was to not let them even try.I dont know if it was said in this thread, and it may be obvious - havent read through - but that cost Romo, TO, Witten, Crayton, MBIII owners too, as they probably would have mounted a TD drive to tighten it back up for an onsides kick...
Last edited by a moderator: