I think there is a big split among KC fans, media, etc.There are really three groups.1. Stay with Croyle, let Huard walk, start out 07 with Trent and see how far he goes, and when he inevitably get injured (and most think he will) then the Croyle era begins.2. Re-sign Huard to be the starter, ask Trent to restructure or trade him to a DET or WASH, as he does not fit Herm's system. Croyle would basically stay as a backup.3. Croyle is not the answer.....let Huard walk, as he is 34. Have Trent restructure, and go after a younger veteran QB, i.e. David Carr.Personally, I think Huard, who will be 34, should not be re-signed. Trent, who will be 37, as well as a bad fit for the offensive system, should either take a pay cut and remian as a backup or be traded. Keep in mind his buddy Terry Shea was let go as QB's coach last month.That leaves Croyle, and we really only have two samples to go from. In the preseason and the 4th QTR of the Pittsburgh game. In neither situation was he much to get excited over. he threw a pick 6 in Pittsburgh. I think Croyle will be a nice backup QB here, but I don't see him being the starter.I personally think David Carr would be my choice for KC QB.