What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Broncos hire Josh McDaniels (1 Viewer)

My main question would be, who gets the Welker type routes?
My guess would be Brandon Stokley.
I would have to say Eddie Royal. Even though he has a little bit more of the "homerun" threat to him than Welker. I am sure that there will be plenty of passes to go around though.
Welker's a slot WR. The question is, who's better in the slot, Stokely or Royal? I suspect Stokely is a better fit for that role, but I didn't watch much of Royal this year so I'm not absolutely sure of that.
Stokley might be the best slot guy right now, but will be 33 next year. I'd put Royal in the slot while he is young and fast, get another good WR on the outside, and seek to dominate in the passing game with Cutler and McDaniels leading the charge.This offense could be very interesting.
 
My main question would be, who gets the Welker type routes?
My guess would be Brandon Stokley.
I would have to say Eddie Royal. Even though he has a little bit more of the "homerun" threat to him than Welker. I am sure that there will be plenty of passes to go around though.
Welker's a slot WR. The question is, who's better in the slot, Stokely or Royal? I suspect Stokely is a better fit for that role, but I didn't watch much of Royal this year so I'm not absolutely sure of that.
Stokley might be the best slot guy right now, but will be 33 next year. I'd put Royal in the slot while he is young and fast, get another good WR on the outside, and seek to dominate in the passing game with Cutler and McDaniels leading the charge.This offense could be very interesting.
if I had do pick one Bronco WR to use as a down field threat and one WR to throw screen passes to and let him make some moves and rack up the RAC, I'm sending Royal downfield and giving the screens to Marshall.
 
I'm happy for McDaniels. Hopefully he has a chance to succeed in Denver. They have good pieces in place and a franchise QB. McDaniels is young but has the reputation of being very good with QBs so hopefully it is a positive for Cutler.
:lmao: I think this is clearly the rationale for the hiring. Shanahan had his pick of 3 different guys to replace Elway (Griese, then Plummer, then Cutler) and couldn't win playoff games with any of these guys. Cutler has a ton of potential and after how the Patriots brought along Matt Cassel to be Brady's replacement this year the Denver organization must be thinking that Cutler can go to a new level of play with McDaniels as the HC. My. 02.
"Couldn't win playoff games" with Cutler? This doesn't make a lot of sense. Griese was clearly limited even early in his career, and Plummer, a veteran, was more or less a known quantity who Shanny nevertheless extracted every bit of performance he could out of him. Cutler, who I very much like, looks like the real deal. I think we can all say that the Broncos have found their next franchise QB. With that in mind, why right now at this early date in Cutler's career would we assume that Shanny was holding him back regarding playoffs and playoff wins? Cutler's been the starter there for less than three seasons. There are plenty of QB's who took longer to win in the playoffs than that, most notably Peyton Manning. I've been on who's been critical of Shanahan's mediocre post-Elway record, but if the rationale is that he's somehow "failed with Cutler", I think that's premature. I think this firing probably has more to do with pouring resources into one of the highest payrolls in the league for a decade and having very little to show for it. Looking only at the QB position misses that, particularly the huge amounts of money spent on defenses that achieved little for the most part.
:yes: I guess it was a cruel irony that Shanny had good defenses there in Denver for much of the last decade, but never had the QB to put the team over the top, and then as soon as he finally got that stud QB, the defense went to ####. Bad timing, I guess.
 
Draft Percy Harvin as the new Wes Welker.
Not necessary. Denver does not need to draft another WR. The defense should be the focus of draft, FA and any trades this offseason. Denver already has an explosive offense and if they do take an offensive player, it should be center or RB.An interesting side note that I haven't seen brought up here is McDaniels actually came into NE as a defensive assistant. Out of all seven interviewees, he may have been the most well-rounded as far as X's and O's. The only detriment I can see right now is his age. I'm not sure how the players will respond to him.
 
Let's just clear up one thing really quick: while Shanahan the coach was fired, it was more like throwing the baby out with the bath water, if I may butcher that particular analogy. It was Shanahan the GM that was truly fired.

Thoughts on McDaniels:

The McDaniels hiring fits in with Bowlen's m.o. Admittedly its a small sample size, but in two of Bowlen's three other HC hires, he brought in young, relatively unexperienced offensive minds (Dan Reeves and Mike Shanahan). Wade Phillips was the link between those two, and he was an in-house hire after Reeves left. (Aside: why the hell does Wade Phillips keep getting HC opportunities!?) Bowlen really seems to want to make a long-term hire. Going young (and maybe malleable?) helps this cause.

As for the DC McDaniels is bringing along, I've read its Dom Capers (isn't Nolan going to the Packers?). Capers has traditionally been a 3-4 coach. The Broncos haven't run the 34 since Wade was patrolling the sideline. If the change does happen, I'm OK with the timing. We don't have the personnel for the switch, but at least we can head into FA and the draft knowing what to look for. And we already have a horrible defense--a switch of systems won't change that much, and provides a relatively bulletproof defense of said crappiness for the first couple of years of the install. This offseason should be a very interesting time on the defensive side of the ball, and outside of a very few exceptions, no one on that squad should feel safe about their job.

Now to the GM issue: Shanahan's firing left a power vacuum with the decision makers already in Denver (the Goodmans' and Brian Xanders). To fill it, Bowlen was comfortable enough to let the three continue to run the front office. So Denver is going to go with a committee approach (the dreaded GMBC). I think those three deserve it on the strength of the 2008 draft alone. I'm looking for marked improvement in FA though, as last year was pretty much a disaster.

I'm skeptical of these moves, but hopeful.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think its hard to have expectations right now. Cutler and co. have to start over learning a new offense. At least the OLine will fit the NE mold for the most part. I expect us to grab a WR in FA or the draft though. But McDaniels strong suit at NE was his ability to alter to the offense to match his personnel. He started calling the plays in New England in 2006 when they had a balanced run/pass offense behind Dillon/Maroney. They didn't have **** at wideout and it cost them dearly in the playoffs that year. In 2007, they added Moss, Welker and Stallworth and installed a spread offense that aggressively attacked downfield, setting an NFL scoring record. This year, it was apparent Cassel wasn't as comfortable in that scheme because he kept checking down and the Patriots only scored more than 20 points once in their first five games. McDaniels stopped trying to stretch the field as much - pissing off Moss - but it helped Cassel blossom and the Patriots scored more than 40 points five times in the next ten games.

 
I think its hard to have expectations right now. Cutler and co. have to start over learning a new offense. At least the OLine will fit the NE mold for the most part. I expect us to grab a WR in FA or the draft though. But McDaniels strong suit at NE was his ability to alter to the offense to match his personnel. He started calling the plays in New England in 2006 when they had a balanced run/pass offense behind Dillon/Maroney. They didn't have **** at wideout and it cost them dearly in the playoffs that year. In 2007, they added Moss, Welker and Stallworth and installed a spread offense that aggressively attacked downfield, setting an NFL scoring record. This year, it was apparent Cassel wasn't as comfortable in that scheme because he kept checking down and the Patriots only scored more than 20 points once in their first five games. McDaniels stopped trying to stretch the field as much - pissing off Moss - but it helped Cassel blossom and the Patriots scored more than 40 points five times in the next ten games.
Denver based much of its wide-open, stretch-the-field attack this past season on what the Pats did in 2007. Jeremy Bates is also going to be kept on board (he was the QB coach and play caller). I do wonder, though, how McDaniels and the offensive coaching staff are going to get along. Will Bates still call plays or will he give that up to McDaniels? I don't understand why anyone would think Denver would invest a draft pick in a WR when they don't need one. I think the draft and most offseason personnel moves will be devoted to defense.
 
McDaniels + no 'D' = throw, throw.....throw some more. :lmao: Get yourself some Cutler, Marshall, Royal ASAP.
Agree. I don't see how it can be any other way, atleast for 2009, especially if they are going to be in the 1st year of a switch to the 3-4 Defense.
 
This whole situation just sucks...How can you fire a guy with a winning record against coaches like Cowher, Bellichek, and Fisher. I feel like I'm being forced to drink a gallon of sour milk. The 2009 season will be strange for this Bronco homer

 
I'm happy for McDaniels. Hopefully he has a chance to succeed in Denver. They have good pieces in place and a franchise QB. McDaniels is young but has the reputation of being very good with QBs so hopefully it is a positive for Cutler.
<_< I think this is clearly the rationale for the hiring. Shanahan had his pick of 3 different guys to replace Elway (Griese, then Plummer, then Cutler) and couldn't win playoff games with any of these guys. Cutler has a ton of potential and after how the Patriots brought along Matt Cassel to be Brady's replacement this year the Denver organization must be thinking that Cutler can go to a new level of play with McDaniels as the HC. My. 02.
but Cutler wasn't, isn't the problem it's their defense and being a former OC it remains to be seen what his staff can do differently to improve that train wreck.
 
Mike Nolan OR Dom Capers OR Mike Nolan + Dom Capers >>>>>>> Bob Slowik

Questions:

Is Jeff/Jim Goodman + Brian Xanders > Mike Shanahan + input from Jeff/Jim Goodman and Brian Xanders?

Is Josh McDaniels + new defensive staff > Shanahan?

 
I'm happy for McDaniels. Hopefully he has a chance to succeed in Denver. They have good pieces in place and a franchise QB. McDaniels is young but has the reputation of being very good with QBs so hopefully it is a positive for Cutler.
:confused: I think this is clearly the rationale for the hiring. Shanahan had his pick of 3 different guys to replace Elway (Griese, then Plummer, then Cutler) and couldn't win playoff games with any of these guys. Cutler has a ton of potential and after how the Patriots brought along Matt Cassel to be Brady's replacement this year the Denver organization must be thinking that Cutler can go to a new level of play with McDaniels as the HC. My. 02.
but Cutler wasn't, isn't the problem it's their defense and being a former OC it remains to be seen what his staff can do differently to improve that train wreck.
Cutler had many games where he played like crap / tried to throw into triple coverage / etc. McDaniels can definitely help Cutler improve, coaching him up, gameplanning, and making in-game adjustments.
 
I'm happy for McDaniels. Hopefully he has a chance to succeed in Denver. They have good pieces in place and a franchise QB. McDaniels is young but has the reputation of being very good with QBs so hopefully it is a positive for Cutler.
:moneybag: I think this is clearly the rationale for the hiring. Shanahan had his pick of 3 different guys to replace Elway (Griese, then Plummer, then Cutler) and couldn't win playoff games with any of these guys. Cutler has a ton of potential and after how the Patriots brought along Matt Cassel to be Brady's replacement this year the Denver organization must be thinking that Cutler can go to a new level of play with McDaniels as the HC.

My. 02.
but Cutler wasn't, isn't the problem it's their defense and being a former OC it remains to be seen what his staff can do differently to improve that train wreck.
I didn't say that Cutler was the problem - I said that Shanahan couldn't win playoff games with any of his hand picked QBs - Griese, Plummer, or Cutler. Excepting 2005, this is true. Once in the playoffs, the Broncos got blown out on both sides of the ball.2008 season: Loss 52-21 to San Diego in AFC West Championship game December 28th, week 17 - QB Cutler

*exception 2005 Win Divisional Playoff vs. NE 27-13; lose to Pittsburgh 34-17 in Conf. - QB Plummer

2004 Loss 49-24 to Indianapolis in Wildcard round - QB Plummer

2003 Loss 41-10 to Indianapolis in Wildcard round - QB Plummer

2000 Loss 21-3 to Baltimore in Wildcard round - QB Griese

Clearly, the Denver D has been pathetic for years, but the offense under Shanahan has also been stale and predictable - especially in the playoffs. In order to nurture Cutler into a Super-Bowl winning QB, the team felt they had to go another direction at head coach, in my opinion. McDaniels certainly has an undeniable track record for raising QB play to "the next level".

 
Let's just clear up one thing really quick: while Shanahan the coach was fired, it was more like throwing the baby out with the bath water, if I may butcher that particular analogy. It was Shanahan the GM that was truly fired.

Thoughts on McDaniels:

The McDaniels hiring fits in with Bowlen's m.o. Admittedly its a small sample size, but in two of Bowlen's three other HC hires, he brought in young, relatively unexperienced offensive minds (Dan Reeves and Mike Shanahan). Wade Phillips was the link between those two, and he was an in-house hire after Reeves left. (Aside: why the hell does Wade Phillips keep getting HC opportunities!?) Bowlen really seems to want to make a long-term hire. Going young (and maybe malleable?) helps this cause.

As for the DC McDaniels is bringing along, I've read its Dom Capers (isn't Nolan going to the Packers?). Capers has traditionally been a 3-4 coach. The Broncos haven't run the 34 since Wade was patrolling the sideline. If the change does happen, I'm OK with the timing. We don't have the personnel for the switch, but at least we can head into FA and the draft knowing what to look for. And we already have a horrible defense--a switch of systems won't change that much, and provides a relatively bulletproof defense of said crappiness for the first couple of years of the install. This offseason should be a very interesting time on the defensive side of the ball, and outside of a very few exceptions, no one on that squad should feel safe about their job.

Now to the GM issue: Shanahan's firing left a power vacuum with the decision makers already in Denver (the Goodmans' and Brian Xanders). To fill it, Bowlen was comfortable enough to let the three continue to run the front office. So Denver is going to go with a committee approach (the dreaded GMBC). I think those three deserve it on the strength of the 2008 draft alone. I'm looking for marked improvement in FA though, as last year was pretty much a disaster.

I'm skeptical of these moves, but hopeful.
I agree with you but to nitpick, Reeves was in place before Bowlen bought the team. Bowlen didn't hire Reeves.I'm warming up to the McDaniels hire. I was in the Spags camp, but after thinking about things, going w/O is probably the right move.

The best we can hope for defensively is mediocre, regardless of coach and that's OK. If we have an equivalent O and a mediocre D in 2009, we would be a SB contender for sure.

However, if the O regressed to mediocre, we would again be 8-8, give or take. No improvement.

An offensive hire allows us to play to our strengths,and as long as McDaniels brings in a new DC and turns more focus on the D, we will be OK.

edit to add: we do not have the personnel to run the 3-4 for sure, but I really don't think we have the personnel to run the 4-3 either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's just clear up one thing really quick: while Shanahan the coach was fired, it was more like throwing the baby out with the bath water, if I may butcher that particular analogy. It was Shanahan the GM that was truly fired.

Thoughts on McDaniels:

The McDaniels hiring fits in with Bowlen's m.o. Admittedly its a small sample size, but in two of Bowlen's three other HC hires, he brought in young, relatively unexperienced offensive minds (Dan Reeves and Mike Shanahan). Wade Phillips was the link between those two, and he was an in-house hire after Reeves left. (Aside: why the hell does Wade Phillips keep getting HC opportunities!?) Bowlen really seems to want to make a long-term hire. Going young (and maybe malleable?) helps this cause.

As for the DC McDaniels is bringing along, I've read its Dom Capers (isn't Nolan going to the Packers?). Capers has traditionally been a 3-4 coach. The Broncos haven't run the 34 since Wade was patrolling the sideline. If the change does happen, I'm OK with the timing. We don't have the personnel for the switch, but at least we can head into FA and the draft knowing what to look for. And we already have a horrible defense--a switch of systems won't change that much, and provides a relatively bulletproof defense of said crappiness for the first couple of years of the install. This offseason should be a very interesting time on the defensive side of the ball, and outside of a very few exceptions, no one on that squad should feel safe about their job.

Now to the GM issue: Shanahan's firing left a power vacuum with the decision makers already in Denver (the Goodmans' and Brian Xanders). To fill it, Bowlen was comfortable enough to let the three continue to run the front office. So Denver is going to go with a committee approach (the dreaded GMBC). I think those three deserve it on the strength of the 2008 draft alone. I'm looking for marked improvement in FA though, as last year was pretty much a disaster.

I'm skeptical of these moves, but hopeful.
I agree with you but to nitpick, Reeves was in place before Bowlen bought the team. Bowlen didn't hire Reeves.I'm warming up to the McDaniels hire. I was in the Spags camp, but after thinking about things, going w/O is probably the right move.

The best we can hope for defensively is mediocre, regardless of coach and that's OK. If we have an equivalent O and a mediocre D in 2009, we would be a SB contender for sure.

However, if the O regressed to mediocre, we would again be 8-8, give or take. No improvement.

An offensive hire allows us to play to our strengths,and as long as McDaniels brings in a new DC and turns more focus on the D, we will be OK.

edit to add: we do not have the personnel to run the 3-4 for sure, but I really don't think we have the personnel to run the 4-3 either.
This was my thinking exactly. Better to focus on getting the most out of the young and talented offense, and bring in a new defensive coordinator to improve the defense, if only slightly, than to bring in a defensive minded coach and risk a big regression on offense.
 
McDaniels is an unknown, but me thinks BB and Brady had an awful lot to do with his sucess. I wish him well, but I think he is way too young and the chances of him succeeding are not good.

 
NE_REVIVAL said:
McDaniels is an unknown, but me thinks BB and Brady had an awful lot to do with his sucess. I wish him well, but I think he is way too young and the chances of him succeeding are not good.
Chances of ANY coaching hire to succeed are not good. Let's not forget that Bowlen went out and got Shanny [snuck into the locker room after the 49ers Super Bowl], so his instincts aren't exactly shabby. McDaniels success hinges as much on the players, their health, the Broncos schedule and the assistant coaches he surrounds himself with as any "feeling" we all may have about his age, experience or who he coached under.
 
NE_REVIVAL said:
McDaniels is an unknown, but me thinks BB and Brady had an awful lot to do with his sucess. I wish him well, but I think he is way too young and the chances of him succeeding are not good.
Chances of ANY coaching hire to succeed are not good. Let's not forget that Bowlen went out and got Shanny [snuck into the locker room after the 49ers Super Bowl], so his instincts aren't exactly shabby. McDaniels success hinges as much on the players, their health, the Broncos schedule and the assistant coaches he surrounds himself with as any "feeling" we all may have about his age, experience or who he coached under.
Bowlen will certainly give him the space and time to succeed though. And the cupboard isn't exactly bare. I expect playoffs in 2009. Who am I kidding? I expect the playoffs every year.
 
I keep hearing people bash McDaniels for his age. I don't get that. I've certainly never seen any evidence that supports young NFL hires as being any worse than the average NFL hire. For every Dave Shula there's a John Madden. Heck, even guys like Lane Kiffen who didn't last long in their first stint didn't exactly have to battle for another chance, he got the job at Tennessee replacing Fulmer with ease. Cowher, Jon Gruden also come to mind.

 
NE_REVIVAL said:
McDaniels is an unknown, but me thinks BB and Brady had an awful lot to do with his sucess. I wish him well, but I think he is way too young and the chances of him succeeding are not good.
Chances of ANY coaching hire to succeed are not good. Let's not forget that Bowlen went out and got Shanny [snuck into the locker room after the 49ers Super Bowl], so his instincts aren't exactly shabby. McDaniels success hinges as much on the players, their health, the Broncos schedule and the assistant coaches he surrounds himself with as any "feeling" we all may have about his age, experience or who he coached under.
Agreed that the chances for any new nfl coach to are not good; not sure how pointing that out does anything to weaken the case for those who feel he is not likely to suceed. I also agree that McDaniels sucess hinges on many factors beyond his control; all the more reason to believe his chances of suceeding are not good. IMO, it is not unreasonable to conclude that having BB and Tom Brady while at NE was at the very least, beneficial for McDaniels.The fact that he is 32 and never been a HC before can't be considered strengths.I don't think I said anything unreasonable; it's not as if I don't like the guy, I wish him well. It is a plus that he did not go to a team like the Jets, Denver has a strong owner so he is already way ahead of Mangini in that critical department. BB also thinks very highly of him, as do many others so he may very well prove to be the exception. I wish him and Denver well, except of course when they play the Pats :goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How does this affect Orton/Tebow, if any?
Well...I can see the Broncos trying out a new coach and he will decide. But given what Denver has given up lately, and the season Orton is having, he might be some good trade bait to a team that is struggling at the QB position and allowing the team to either give Tebow a shot or completely rebuild from scratch. Arizona to me seems like a place that would benefit greatly with Orton behind center, but thats only because I own both Orton and Fitz and that combo would be deadly.Cutler has to be laughing his ### off right now though.
 
In his short but turbulent reign. He gutted the offense, got rid of a workhorse running back, the teams only star receiver and brought in a fragile running back who can't run through the tackles. Also he drafted a project at qb in the first round. He must be a genius because that all looks like Richie Kotite moves..... :goodposting:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top