Let's just clear up one thing really quick: while Shanahan the coach was fired, it was more like throwing the baby out with the bath water, if I may butcher that particular analogy. It was Shanahan the GM that was truly fired.
Thoughts on McDaniels:
The McDaniels hiring fits in with Bowlen's m.o. Admittedly its a small sample size, but in two of Bowlen's three other HC hires, he brought in young, relatively unexperienced offensive minds (Dan Reeves and Mike Shanahan). Wade Phillips was the link between those two, and he was an in-house hire after Reeves left. (Aside: why the hell does Wade Phillips keep getting HC opportunities!?) Bowlen really seems to want to make a long-term hire. Going young (and maybe malleable?) helps this cause.
As for the DC McDaniels is bringing along, I've read its Dom Capers (isn't Nolan going to the Packers?). Capers has traditionally been a 3-4 coach. The Broncos haven't run the 34 since Wade was patrolling the sideline. If the change does happen, I'm OK with the timing. We don't have the personnel for the switch, but at least we can head into FA and the draft knowing what to look for. And we already have a horrible defense--a switch of systems won't change that much, and provides a relatively bulletproof defense of said crappiness for the first couple of years of the install. This offseason should be a very interesting time on the defensive side of the ball, and outside of a very few exceptions, no one on that squad should feel safe about their job.
Now to the GM issue: Shanahan's firing left a power vacuum with the decision makers already in Denver (the Goodmans' and Brian Xanders). To fill it, Bowlen was comfortable enough to let the three continue to run the front office. So Denver is going to go with a committee approach (the dreaded GMBC). I think those three deserve it on the strength of the 2008 draft alone. I'm looking for marked improvement in FA though, as last year was pretty much a disaster.
I'm skeptical of these moves, but hopeful.
I agree with you but to nitpick, Reeves was in place before Bowlen bought the team. Bowlen didn't hire Reeves.I'm warming up to the McDaniels hire. I was in the Spags camp, but after thinking about things, going w/O is probably the right move.
The best we can hope for defensively is mediocre, regardless of coach and that's OK. If we have an equivalent O and a mediocre D in 2009, we would be a SB contender for sure.
However, if the O regressed to mediocre, we would again be 8-8, give or take. No improvement.
An offensive hire allows us to play to our strengths,and as long as McDaniels brings in a new DC and turns more focus on the D, we will be OK.
edit to add: we do not have the personnel to run the 3-4 for sure, but I really don't think we have the personnel to run the 4-3 either.