What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Buffalo Bills 2006 Offseason (1 Viewer)

Aaron Rudnicki

Keep Walking™
Staff member
Need a single thread to keep track and discuss all of the offseason developments for the Bills this year, so this will be it.

Pretty interesting news about the defense the team plans to run next year. I think the personnel in place (for the back 7 at least) is a pretty good fit for the Tampa 2 scheme.

Jauron to run 4-3 defense next season

By MARK GAUGHAN

News Sports Reporter

2/3/2006 

DETROIT - Buffalo Bills head coach **** Jauron said Thursday he will run a 4-3 defense and employ a scheme in the mold of the successful defenses in Tampa Bay, Indianapolis and Chicago.

Jauron has his coaching staff almost in place after a flurry of hirings the past week.

His defensive coordinator, Perry Fewell, will be running a defense for the first time in the NFL. But Fewell has extensive experience coaching in the "Tampa Cover 2" scheme that Colts coach Tony Dungy first popularized while he was coaching the Buccaneers. Jauron, who stopped by the Super Bowl XL media center for an interview, said that's what he was looking for in his defensive chief.

"He's been in positions with teams that run a scheme that I like," Jauron said of Fewell and the two-deep zone system. "I've always had a lot of respect for it. It's specific. It follows a teaching progression, I like that. You play fast in it, I like all those things. I trust Perry. It's time for him. I think he'll do a tremendous job."

Fewell, 43, comes to Buffalo from Chicago where he was defensive backs coach under Lovie Smith, who is a protege of Dungy. Fewell also worked in St. Louis with Smith, and so did the Bills' new defensive line coach, Bill Kollar. Jauron got to know Fewell when the two were assistants in Jacksonville in 1998.

"I have a relationship with Perry from Jacksonville and have kept in touch with him and watched him develop," Jauron said. "He's a very smart guy, a very straightforward guy, high energy. I like all those things about him. He's a very honest guy."

Jauron, who is a defensive coach, said Fewell will be calling the defensive signals on game day. Also calling signals will be offensive coordinator Steve Fairchild, who formerly was offensive coordinator under Mike Martz in St. Louis.

"I have all the say, but I don't go in there and dictate," Jauron said of play calling. "I feel like you hire an expert and you guide him. You try to give him your opinion but it's his area of expertise. . . . There aren't very many times in a game in my past where I've said, "I don't want this.' But it does happen. Don't do this. Don't call this. That will happen once in awhile."

The Bills moved quickly last week to sign Fairchild, who already had offers from New Orleans and the Jets.

"The pressure [in the interview process] comes when you have that guy in, and he has a really good interview," Jauron said. "And you have other people you might want to interview but you know he's been to two places previously and you know he's been offered at two places. And then he's sitting in your facility and you have to decide. Are you going to let him go out the door? . . . We did not let him go out the door. We liked him that much."

Fairchild spent eight years as offensive coordinator at run-oriented Colorado State, then coached running backs in Buffalo for two years. Then he worked under Martz the past three seasons.

"I like Steve because I like his background," Jauron said. "I like the variety of ways he's coached. I'm a big believer in the fact you've got to do it all to win in our league. You've got to be able to throw it creatively but you've got to be able to run it. He's had a background in both."
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060203/2044810.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
With this news, franchising Clements should be a no-brainer.

Cost to 'franchise' Clements drops by $2.91 million

By MARK GAUGHAN

News Sports Reporter

2/3/2006

DETROIT - It will not cost the Bills as much as expected to use a franchise tag on cornerback Nate Clements, if they choose to use it to retain his rights.

The NFL Players Association on Thursday released the values for the franchise and transition tags for prospective free agents this offseason.

The cost of putting a franchise tag on a cornerback is $5.89 million. Last year the tag for cornerbacks cost $8.8 million. The franchise tag represents the average of the top five salary cap figures for the position the previous season. Denver's Champ Bailey signed a giant contract with an $18 million bonus in 2004. That inflated the cap figure. It came back down this offseason because fewer top cornerbacks hit the open market in 2005.

Clements is the top Bills player whose contract is up. The franchise tag essentially takes a free agent off the market but forces the team using it to pay the player the average of the top five at the position for the upcoming season.
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060203/1044853.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, I really thought this off-season was going to be a mess. Things are looking pretty good early on. I like both the O and D coordinator hires. Chicago arguably had the best defense in the league last year, especially with that horrible offense, and the Rams' offense has been one of the most explosive in recent years. I'd definitely put the tag on Clements, even though I don't think he deserves that kind of $. I'm really just hoping that JP can get things together...

 
So if they go to a 4-3/Tampa 2 is a healthy Spikes the 'D.Brooks' LB? Fletcher's numbers go down?

 
So if they go to a 4-3/Tampa 2 is a healthy Spikes the 'D.Brooks' LB? Fletcher's numbers go down?
Yes, I think this would mean Spikes should put up more tackles (D.Brooks, M.Peterson/C.June, L.Briggs), but Fletcher will still be very productive (S.Quarles, G.Brackett, B.Urlacher). I think Crowell will move into the starting lineup at SLB...although they could consider moving Spikes over to that side, which would wind up hurting his fantasy value and making Crowell a stud.
 
Losman, Holcomb to compete for starting Bills QB job

Associated Press

2/14/2006

ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. (AP) - J.P. Losman won't be handed the Buffalo Bills starting quarterback job for next season. This time, he's going to have to earn it from Kelly Holcomb.

Newly hired coach **** Jauron said he'll open the job to a competition this spring between Losman and Holcomb, the veteran journeyman with the hope of having a starter ready by the start of training camp.

"Somebody will be named heading into camp, but there is always going to be competition," Jauron said Monday. "We'll try to name that guy going through the spring, but if we don't, we don't. We hope to have a feeling."

Jauron noted that Losman, who is entering his third season, will have to improve.

"You have a veteran quarterback in Kelly, who is comfortable with his game," Jauron said. "J.P. is a young quarterback and plays like one. ... He needs to be better for what he went though last year."

Jauron's desire for competition is a departure from a year ago when former coach Mike Mularkey awarded the starting job to Losman, the second of Buffalo's two 2004 first-round draft picks.

The decision to start Losman led to the Bills granting Drew Bledsoe's request to be released. Bledsoe had an inconsistent year starting for Dallas, while Mularkey abruptly resigned as Bills coach last month.

Despite an intensive off-season work regimen, Losman struggled as a first-year starter, finishing the season on the bench after losing the No. 1 job to Holcomb, a 10-year journeyman.

In a 5-11 season, Holcomb went 4-4 as a starter and Losman 1-7, although Losman engineered Buffalo's 14-3 win over Kansas City after Holcomb was hurt during the game. Holcomb finished with a better completion percentage (67.4 to Losman's 49.6), threw for two more touchdowns (10-8) and had a far superior quarterback rating (85.6-64.9).

http://www.ap.org

 
Meh. Didn't they do this last season?
Jauron's desire for competition is a departure from a year ago when former coach Mike Mularkey awarded the starting job to Losman, the second of Buffalo's two 2004 first-round draft picks.
 
Meh.  Didn't they do this last season?
Jauron's desire for competition is a departure from a year ago when former coach Mike Mularkey awarded the starting job to Losman, the second of Buffalo's two 2004 first-round draft picks.
Sure, I know that going in Losman was the starter but once the season began didn't they kind of waffle between the two? Losman for a few games, then Holcomb for a few, then back to Losman and finally Holcomb closed the season out.
 
Meh.  Didn't they do this last season?
Jauron's desire for competition is a departure from a year ago when former coach Mike Mularkey awarded the starting job to Losman, the second of Buffalo's two 2004 first-round draft picks.
Sure, I know that going in Losman was the starter but once the season began didn't they kind of waffle between the two? Losman for a few games, then Holcomb for a few, then back to Losman and finally Holcomb closed the season out.
Exactly.On the one hand you have Holcomb who most likely won't improve much from what he has shown already - this is your startign point.

On the other hand you have what boils down to a second year starter who has just begun the journey to improvement and who at least initialy was belieed to have a ceiling higher than Holcombs.

Before Losman is thrown under the proverbial transportation vehicle he should get more than 8 games under his belt...

 
Not surprised. There's no way JP should just be given the starting job again. Holcomb is the consistent veteran who won't make a lot of mistakes, but Losman has the potential. Holcomb is obviously the front-runner. Being a Bills homer, I'd love to see JP have a great off-season/pre-season and be the starter. However, I can't stand to see them faulter on awful games by the kid. I guess I really don't care who ends up the starter, as long as they win. If Losman doesn't improve next year we'll have to go shopping in '07, or hope to get a good enough draft pick to get a top-tier rookie QB (gasp!). I say we can them both and get Brees if San Diego lets him go! That'd be ideal, but improbable.

 
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?.../s141854S29.DTL

J.P. Losman won't be handed the Buffalo Bills starting quarterback job for next season. This time, he's going to have to earn it from Kelly Holcomb.

Newly hired coach **** Jauron said he'll open the job to a competition this spring between Losman and Holcomb, the veteran journeyman with the hope of having a starter ready by the start of training camp.

"Somebody will be named heading into camp, but there is always going to be competition," Jauron said Monday. "We'll try to name that guy going through the spring, but if we don't, we don't. We hope to have a feeling."

Jauron noted that Losman, who is entering his third season, will have to improve.

"You have a veteran quarterback in Kelly, who is comfortable with his game," Jauron said. "J.P. is a young quarterback and plays like one. ... He needs to be better for what he went though last year."

Jauron's desire for competition is a departure from a year ago when former coach Mike Mularkey awarded the starting job to Losman, the second of Buffalo's two 2004 first-round draft picks.

The decision to start Losman led to the Bills granting Drew Bledsoe's request to be released. Bledsoe had an inconsistent year starting for Dallas, while Mularkey abruptly resigned as Bills coach last month.

Despite an intensive offseason work regimen, Losman struggled as a first-year starter, finishing the season on the bench after losing the No. 1 job to Holcomb, a 10-year journeyman.

In a 5-11 season, Holcomb went 4-4 as a starter and Losman 1-7, although Losman engineered Buffalo's 14-3 win over Kansas City after Holcomb was hurt during the game. Holcomb finished with a better completion percentage (67.4 to Losman's 49.6), threw for two more touchdowns (10-8) and had a far superior quarterback rating (85.6-64.9).

 
In a 5-11 season, Holcomb went 4-4 as a starter and Losman 1-7, although Losman engineered Buffalo's 14-3 win over Kansas City after Holcomb was hurt during the game. Holcomb finished with a better completion percentage (67.4 to Losman's 49.6), threw for two more touchdowns (10-8) and had a far superior quarterback rating (85.6-64.9).
This will be a losing battle for Losman. I just don't think he's got it.I know Losman's young and all, but Kelly Holcomb is pretty much mediocrity personified at the QB position. When your stats are that much worse than Holcomb's, in the same situation, you've got problems.

 
Holcomb is a stopgap...for a rebuilding team with a new coaching staff, I still think Losman gets the nod if its close in training camp. He definitely showed signs of improvement after sitting out for a few games. He led the comeback against KC and threw 3 TD passes on the Dolphins in the 1st quarter. He got injured early in the New England game and played terribly and never saw the field again. I'm not convinced he's going to be a solid QB yet, but its far too soon to write him off.

Many good NFL QBs got a chance to sit for a few years before even playing (Hasselbeck is a perfect example)...just like many WRs don't really do anything until their 3rd season. If Losman doesn't continue to show signs of improvement this year, then its probably time to start looking elsewhere...but, I just think a team with Holcomb will never be better than 8-8 and what's the point of that? I think the potential reward of developing Losman into a quality QB is worth the risk of suffering through another potential losing season.j

EDIT: Its a tricky situation, however, because many of the veterans on the team apparently don't really believe in Losman either and they feel as though Holcomb played well enough this year to earn a good shot at the starting job next year. So, Losman will have to win some people in the locker room over at some point if he really wants this team to get behind him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If they Sit Losman they wasted 2 first round picks. I realize, best man wins, blah blah blah...

But 7 or 8 starts does not prove anything to anyone EXCEPT Losman can throw a great long ball, and that people, can't be thrown by Holcombe and his noodle arm.

Until you give this kid a full season without a moron coach like Malarkey, then you can call him a bust... but you peg it on the horrible management and coaching staff of the Bills.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Until you give this kid a full season without a moron coach like Malarkey,
I would imagine Jauron has his detractors here. You don't have Holmgren or Shanny or Kubiak or Fassel or some supposed QB guru, you've got Jauron. How do you want the team to proceed? (IIRC The Bills went from Wyche to Schonert as QBs coach too)
 
New general manager Marv Levy and coach **** Jauron have a long ways to go before they get a firm handle on the roster they inherited from Tom Donahoe and Mike Mularkey. Unfortunately for the Bills' new brain trust, time isn't on their side in all instances.

With free agency opening on March 3, Buffalo has a decision to make very soon on young starting cornerback Nate Clements, the team's top unrestricted free agent who is on record as saying he wants to be the highest-paid player at his position.

The Bills have determined they want Clements back. But how do they do it?

"We will make every effort to retain him, every effort," Levy said. "**** has expressed the same and other coaches (here have). He's a talented player who can get better."

Clements, just 26, was Buffalo's first-round pick in 2001. He has 20 career interceptions, 49 pass breakups, 444 tackles and has been durable, appearing in 80 games with 75 starts. He's a playmaker with four career touchdowns.

He struggled at times in single coverage last season and had just two interceptions. But Clements also added a career-best 127 tackles in support of a weakened defensive line and linebacker corps.

The Bills have been negotiating with agent Todd France, but working out a deal for the numbers that have been thrown out by March 3 doesn't appear likely. What does appear likely is Levy and Jauron buying more time by slapping the franchise tag on Clements. That deadline is Feb. 23.

"It's an option and if we use it, that's the likely person we use it on," Levy said. "We hope we can do a contract that goes beyond that. Sometimes you have to put the franchise tag on and work on the contract part of it."

Putting the franchise tag on Clements would essentially take him off the market and guarantee he earn the average of the top five corners in 2006. That figure is $5.89 million, said the NFL Players Association, and a bargain compared to 2005 when Champ Bailey's record deal with Denver inflated the franchise tag figure to $8.8 million.

Bailey's deal with the Broncos is seven years, $63 million with an $18 million signing bonus.

Jauron plans to put in place the defense used by Tony Dungy and Monte Kiffin in Tampa Bay. Even though that defense uses a lot of two-deep zone, Jauron said it still requires a lot of top-shelf coverage men and at least one elite corner who can take away the opponent's best receiver.

That would justify an eight-figure bonus for Clements.

"Absolutely," Jauron said. "In our league, when you go to a game, you see five receivers on the field, a lot of four, three receivers. You see empty (backfield) in every situation. So if you don't have at least three really good (corners), it'll be long Sundays."

Meanwhile, Jauron said he does see a place for 32-year-old wide receiver Eric Moulds on his team. Moulds is Buffalo's second all-time receiver and despite a series of run-ins with the previous coaching staff, he still finished as the club's most dependable threat with 81 catches for 816 yards and four touchdowns.

"He's a high-quality player," Jauron said. "As of right now, I certainly do (see a place for him). He's been an integral part of it here for a long time."

Bringing him back for an 11th season, however, is complicated by his $10.8 million salary cap figure. He's under contract two more years so there is room to bring that figure down. But how long the Bills want to push money into the future is an important decision, since it could impact their cap long after Moulds has finished playing.

"I know Eric had an unsettling season, but he finished strong," said Levy, who drafted Moulds in 1996 when he was still Buffalo's coach. "Last season is behind him and we hope we can work something out so that he can be here."

—After just missing the playoffs in 2004 with a 9-7 record, the Bills crashed to 5-11 last season. They finished ranked 28th in offense and 29th in defense. They showed statistical drops in 22 categories overall.

So, were the Bills really that bad or did they underachieve?

Was their talent better than it showed, something the previous regime of GM Tom Donahoe and coach Mike Mularkey always insisted?

According to new coach **** Jauron, the Bills were a five-win team and extenuating circumstances such as injuries or bad bounces don't really matter.

"I've had a saying I've used with other teams, 'What should've happened on Sunday did happen,'" said the former Chicago Bears boss. "Talk all you want about, 'If this happened or that happened.' This is what we were and that's what we are. It's the year we wrote. Nothing we can do can change that year, so let's go on. Hopefully we'll learn from it and leave the stuff we can't control behind. But there's no other way to say it."

General manager Marv Levy had gotten through analyzing about 65 percent of the roster through his first six weeks on the job, breaking down tape and talking with staff that was around.

His early conclusion why the Bills regressed after making progress the previous season is that the offensive line wasn't good enough, nor was the defense, to hand the reigns over to an untested quarterback in J.P. Losman.

Losman was benched after four games but by then Buffalo was 1-3.

"The defense went to pot and everything went down hill from there, in my opinion," Levy said.

Levy said a lot of roster changes are on the horizon, but there would've been a lot had Donahoe and Mularkey remained in charge. Levy said the Bills, about $10 million under the cap, will be very active in free agency which opens March 3 but that he won't be throwing money around indiscriminately.

"It's our intention to make the playoffs and darn right, there's no waiting time," he said. "The good news is that you can get better faster in the NFL today than you used to because of free agency and as far as the salary cap, this club is in is pretty good shape and that's good news."

Jauron said that all current players under contract can rest assured they have clean slates with him, to a point.

"I'm not overly interested in other people's opinions, I'd like us to form our own opinions as we move forward," he said. "I'd like the players to know that, to some degree, they won't be judged on what they did (last year). To some point they will be. But we know there are circumstances about last year, and I wasn't a part of that. I want them to know they're going to have a shot to show us they deserve to be on the field."

NOTES, QUOTES

—Coach **** Jauron said he hoped to have a starting quarterback picked between veteran Kelly Holcomb and third-year pro J.P. Losman before training camp opens in July. "I will say on the first day of camp, there's a first team penciled in there but if somebody beats you out, they're going to get the job," Jauron said.

—DeMontie Cross, outside linebackers coach at Iowa State, will join the Bills as a defensive and special teams assistant, the college's website reported. Cross is likely to concentrate on linebackers with the Bills, who lost Johnny Holland to the Houston Texans.

—Longtime Bills backup QB Alex Van Pelt has been hired as the team's offensive quality control coach. Van Pelt, who played for the Bills from 1995-2003, appearing in 31 games, has been knocking on a lot of doors, trying to coach in the NFL. While working as a radio analyst on Bills' broadcasts last season, he broke down game tape for former coach Mike Mularkey. Last spring and summer, he was QB coach for the Frankfurt Galaxy of NFL Europe and called plays. Van Pelt was a hit on the radio, reading defenses for fans before each snap, and his insights will be missed. But folks in the Bills front office are very high on his coaching potential.

—Charlie Coiner, who worked as the Chicago Bears offensive quality control coach under **** Jauron in Chicago from 2001-03, is Buffalo's new tight ends coach. Coiner was the Bears' assistant special teams coach the past two seasons. He has 18 years of college coaching experience.

—New quarterbacks coach Turk Schonert is giving the Bills a second go-around and he can only hope it's as eventful as the first one. Schonert was Buffalo's QB coach under Wade Phillips from 1998-2000, coaching Doug Flutie's rise to NFL stardom after years in Canada. The Bills made the playoffs in two of Flutie's three seasons that were also marked by an ongoing feud with Rob Johnson. Schonert walks into a similar situation this time, with the Bills trying to chose between a veteran (Kelly Holcomb) and a young prospect that cost a first-round pick (J.P. Losman). After leaving Buffalo, Schonert coached QBs for the Giants and Saints. Jauron and Schonert were briefly teammates in Cincinnati.

—GM Marv Levy said that John Guy would remain in his role as director of pro personnel. Guy joined the Bills five years ago under Tom Donahoe. Guy's knowledge of the free agent market is invaluable for Levy as this juncture, given the fact Levy has been out of the NFL for eight years. "I've been very favorably impressed with the work John's done in studying and categorizing," Levy said. "His input will be listened to and absorbed by the coaches and me. Nobody has better knowledge of pro personnel in our organization right now than John Guy."

—Jauron has a lot to fix on offense and defense but the special teams he inherited in Buffalo remain the best in the NFL. For the first time since the Dallas Morning News began compiling comprehensive special teams rankings 16 years ago, the Bills are the first repeat winner of the top spot. Teams are ranked in 22 categories and assigned points. Buffalo finished first with 217 points, 44 1/2 better than the runner-up New York Giants. Buffalo was the only club to rank in the top 10 in the four major return categories: kickoff (first) and punt (fifth) return and kickoff (fourth) and punt (seventh) coverage. It's little wonder why Jauron wisely kept on special teams coach Bobby April and promoted him to assistant head coach.

—Jauron's offseason workout program will start March 20. As a new coach, he's allowed three minicamps. One will take place before the NFL draft April 29-30, he said.

QUOTE TO NOTE: "When I left, free agency was just kicking in and the salary cap. It's changed the game. The good part is that you can get better quicker in today's game, maybe than you cold back in that time, unless you walked into a room where there's a young Jim Kelly, Bruce Smith and Andre Reed. I was fortunate to do that once." - Bills GM Marv Levy, who retired as coach after the 1997 season.

STRATEGY AND PERSONNEL

GM Marv Levy said fixing Buffalo's offensive line is a top priority. "The offensive line needs improving, it's obvious," Levy said.

How does tackle/guard Mike Williams figure into the picture? That's up to him, Levy indicated.

"Is he intrinsically motivated? That's what we have to find out," Levy said. "It's not, 'Can we get him motivated?' I'm reflecting something (felt) by the whole coaching staff, too."

Williams, the No. 4 overall pick in the 2002 draft, struggled with injuries last season and eventually lost his starting RT job to former college street free agent Jason Peters, a converted tight end. While the Bills hate to give up on a still-young player, Williams' $10.8 million salary cap figure complicates matters. Williams said he's willing to re-do his deal but has not mentioned taking a pay reduction.

TEAM NEEDS/OFFSEASON STRATEGY

Addressing the offensive and defensive lines will consume the Bills' attention this off-season but it will be time well spent. Buffalo was 28th in total offense and 29th in total defense last season.

Their most urgent need, however, is retaining young star CB Nate Clements, their top unrestricted free agent, who is expected to get the franchise tag by the Feb. 23 deadline.

There is only one other UFA that is a starter, center Trey Teague. The Bills are likely to let the veteran go and hand the job to Duke Preston, one of their top rookies from a year ago.

The team's leading salary cap issues relate to veteran WR Eric Moulds and fifth-year offensive lineman Mike Williams, who each carry a $10.8 million cap number. Buffalo is $7 million to $10 million under the cap and can do business in free agency without worrying immediately about Moulds and Williams, at least until June.

1. Offensive line: The Bills set a record for fewest yards gained in a 16-game, non-strike season with 4,122, setting the stage for a major overhaul of their front wall.

2. Defensive line: Buffalo fell from seventh to 31st in the rankings last season in stopping the run. DT Sam Adams needs help.

3. Safety: Be it strong or free, the Bills need to groom the replacement for Lawyer Milloy, 33, and Troy Vincent, 35, and get stronger up the middle.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/bills/home.htm

 
Until you give this kid a full season without a moron coach like Malarkey,
I would imagine Jauron has his detractors here. You don't have Holmgren or Shanny or Kubiak or Fassel or some supposed QB guru, you've got Jauron. How do you want the team to proceed? (IIRC The Bills went from Wyche to Schonert as QBs coach too)
Jauron is a defensive coach.Fairchild seemed to do a decent job with Fitzpatrick this year.

 
Until you give this kid a full season without a moron coach like Malarkey,
I would imagine Jauron has his detractors here. You don't have Holmgren or Shanny or Kubiak or Fassel or some supposed QB guru, you've got Jauron. How do you want the team to proceed? (IIRC The Bills went from Wyche to Schonert as QBs coach too)
Jauron is a defensive coach.Fairchild seemed to do a decent job with Fitzpatrick this year.
I'm not following ya here. I know he's a defensive minded head coach but he's still the HC.
 
Until you give this kid a full season without a moron coach like Malarkey,
I would imagine Jauron has his detractors here. You don't have Holmgren or Shanny or Kubiak or Fassel or some supposed QB guru, you've got Jauron. How do you want the team to proceed? (IIRC The Bills went from Wyche to Schonert as QBs coach too)
Jauron is a defensive coach.Fairchild seemed to do a decent job with Fitzpatrick this year.
I'm not following ya here. I know he's a defensive minded head coach but he's still the HC.
he's almost certainly going to delegate offensive control to Fairchild and the offensive staff. I just don't think Jauron is going to have that big of an effect on the development of Losman.
 
I just don't think Jauron is going to have that big of an effect on the development of Losman.
I don't think this is reasonable.
why?he has no particular experience or expertise with developing QBs, coaching QBs, or even coaching offensive football players or playcalling. His entire background comes on the defensive side of the game. While he was the head coach in Chicago, he gave nearly complete offensive control to his OCs Gary Crowton and John Shoop (with often disastrous results). What made Marv Levy a great head coach was his willingness to delegate and let his coordinators do their thing, rather than interfering and micromanaging his staff. I believe this hire indicates that he feels Jauron will have a similar coaching style.

I also think the hiring of Alex Van Pelt as an offensive quality control coach will pay off for Losman. He broke Marino's records at Pitt, was always very well liked by his teammates and had a solid career. He should be a good sounding board and potential mentor for Losman.

 
Q&A - Offensive Coordinator Steve Fairchild

Chris Brown, buffalobills.com

02/15/2006 12:20 PM

(Buffalo's new offensive coordinator, Steve Fairchild, is a busy man these days. Entrusted with resurrecting a Bills' offense that finished 28th last season, Fairchild is diligently assessing the current personnel on the roster on tape. The spring camps, which begin in late March or early April, will really allow him to begin to put the pieces together. But Fairchild has some familiarity with this organization after serving as Buffalo's running backs coach from 2001-02. Buffalo's new offensive mind took a few minutes out of his tight schedule to share some of his feelings about the offensive talent he inherits and what he plans to do with it.)

Q: How does it feel to come back to Buffalo? Is there a sense in your mind that there's unfinished business here for you?

Steve Fairchild: "It feels good just because I know a lot of the people and what good people there are in this building and what a good organization it is. I also have a real good feeling about the talent level and maybe the kind of team we'll have next year."

Q: You developed a strong running game background while coaching at Colorado State and you worked under Mike Martz in St. Louis gaining valuable knowledge of a proven deep passing game. Do you believe you can find a way to combine the two schools of thought into one system?

SF: "I think everybody does that to some degree. It's just picking what you want to try to accomplish within the system. I think teams that run the ball still try to throw it deep and pass teams still try to run it. It's just a matter of us finding that right mix and the identity of who we are."

Q: Might some of the deep passing game principles need to be compromised knowing you'll be playing at least 10 of your 16 games every year in outdoor stadiums in the northeast instead of half in an indoor stadium in St. Louis?

SF: "I don't know if 'compromised' is the right word. I think you always try to have that explosive element in your offense regardless of the conditions. However, I think anytime you talk to anybody about playing in the AFC East, having a good, solid run game has to be a foundation."

Q: Could offensive quality control coach Alex Van Pelt be of some help in that area having played in this stadium to tell you what's realistic in December with respect to the passing game?

SF: "I think Alex can be a great sounding board on a number of issues having played here and been part of this organization as long as he has."

Q: Coach Jauron has mentioned that he'd prefer a system that is easily understood and executed by his players with the turnover of the roster from year to year. What does a coordinator need to do to accomplish that?

SF: "Well the number one thing everyone wants is strong execution. To get that we have to focus on the things we do well. As a staff we'll be able to assess those things that have the greatest chance for success once we become more familiar with the personnel on the roster."

Q: Are you anticipating a quarterback competition in training camp, or will one of the quarterbacks be deemed the starter based on the work in the spring camps?

SF: "There is always competition in any setting in football. I think we'll work toward determining who could be the starter in the offseason, but there's competition at every position."

Q: The offensive line for the Bills has been subpar for a long time. Marv Levy and **** Jauron both recognize that. You've worked with some pretty good lines in St. Louis. Alex Barron was the team's top pick last year. They made sure to re-sign reliable veterans and didn't let a franchise tackle like Orlando Pace get away. If you were asked by Marv Levy or coach Jauron for your input on building a stronger offensive line what might your answer be? What does your experience tell you?

SF: "I think we've addressed that already in the meetings that we've had. You've got to have athletic tackles and you need a physical inside three (guard, center, guard). I think the offensive line just sets a tone for your whole football team. We'll do everything we can to make it a strong unit."

Q: What do you see in Willis McGahee as a player?

SF: "A very, very good running back that has good vision and plays smart. He has good quickness, and good size. I'm excited about the chance to work with him."

Q: The receiving corps is relatively young and could be a whole lot younger if Eric Moulds can't come to an agreement on a renegotiated contract. Does a receiving corps need a proven veteran be it Eric Moulds or someone else?

SF: "I think you always would like a veteran, but I think Lee Evans is a very talented guy. There's some ability there it's just a matter of sorting it out and seeing where we're going with it.

Q: It's a long way off from now, but what do you hope to be saying about this offense at the end of season one in terms of its development?

SF: "I just want to see us play smart football, protect the ball, be a physical hard-nosed running team that has some big play capability."
http://www.buffalobills.com/news/news.jsp?news_id=3604
 
What about Coy Wire getting in there at SS. He was a fairly high draft pick from 2002 (97 overall). That is a pretty high pick for a safety. If I remember correctly he was set to be their SS before NE cut Milloy. After the Bills signed Milloy they tried Wire at FS, but he wasn't a good fit. Unless they have soured on Wire I would think he should be the heir apparent at SS?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about Coy Wire getting in there at SS. He was a fairly high draft pick from 2002 (97 overall). If I remember correctly he was set to be their SS before NE cut Milloy. After the Bills signed Milloy they tried Wire at FS, but he wasn't a good fit. Does wire have the talent to take over the SS spot?
I think they'll stick with Milloy another year...Wire is a solid special teams player and a good backup but I don't think he's anything special as a player. He's a good blitzer and tackler, but he's a liability in coverage.
 
I just don't think Jauron is going to have that big of an effect on the development of Losman.
I don't think this is reasonable.
why?
He's the coach, IMO it is as simple as that. Who recently said that Losman is not guaranteed to be the starter in 06? Fairchild or Jauron?
okif Marv Levy had said that there would be a QB competition to determine the starter, would you say that he will be in charge of developing Losman?

 
I just don't think Jauron is going to have that big of an effect on the development of Losman.
I don't think this is reasonable.
why?
He's the coach, IMO it is as simple as that. Who recently said that Losman is not guaranteed to be the starter in 06? Fairchild or Jauron?
okif Marv Levy had said that there would be a QB competition to determine the starter, would you say that he will be in charge of developing Losman?
No, why would he say that?The premise was not WHO will be developping Losman but whether or not Jauron would have an effect on his development. He is the head coach of the team. He will affect every single Bills player's development.

If NFLE coach Alex Van pelt can teach Losman to be a better QB than he ever was, then cool. If Schonert can teach him as well as he taught Flutie, cool. It won't mean a darn thing if the guy doesn't play or get ample practice time.

 
I just don't think Jauron is going to have that big of an effect on the development of Losman.
I don't think this is reasonable.
why?
He's the coach, IMO it is as simple as that. Who recently said that Losman is not guaranteed to be the starter in 06? Fairchild or Jauron?
okif Marv Levy had said that there would be a QB competition to determine the starter, would you say that he will be in charge of developing Losman?
No, why would he say that?The premise was not WHO will be developping Losman but whether or not Jauron would have an effect on his development. He is the head coach of the team. He will affect every single Bills player's development.

If NFLE coach Alex Van pelt can teach Losman to be a better QB than he ever was, then cool. If Schonert can teach him as well as he taught Flutie, cool. It won't mean a darn thing if the guy doesn't play or get ample practice time.
General Managers often talk about things like that. Heck, Ralph Wilson could say the exact same thing. The point I was trying to make was that just b/c Jauron said there would be a competition to determine the starter doesn't necessarily mean that idea originated from him. There is a chain of command in place and I imagine Levy will have some input in how things are done, just as Jauron will have some input on how the offense is run...but, in general, Fairchild will probably have a lot of autonomy when it comes to running things on the offensive side of the ball. That's just the way Jauron did things in Chicago so I don't expect a major change now.Can you explain the type of involvement and impact you think Jauron will have on Losman's play?

I didn't mean to imply that he wouldn't have a say in whether Losman starts or not as that goes without question...I just don't think he'll be coaching him individually all that much, watching film with him, designing plays for him, calling the plays that he runs when he does get to play, etc. Clearly, playing time can be a huge factor for developing a young QB...but, I'm talking about all the work that goes into getting him ready for when that time comes and making sure he doesn't blow it again.

 
If they Sit Losman they wasted 2 first round picks.  I realize, best man wins, blah blah blah...

But 7 or 8 starts does not prove anything to anyone EXCEPT Losman can throw a great long ball, and that people, can't be thrown by Holcombe and his noodle arm.

Until you give this kid a full season without a moron coach like Malarkey, then you can call him a bust... but you peg it on the horrible management and coaching staff of the Bills.
I thought this might be pertinent to repost in this thread. I disagree with you, and think Mularky is a fine football coach. I believe the problem was clearly Tom Donahue.==============================

I think the biggest issue was the offensive line. In the handfull of games I saw, the quarterbacks were running for they're lives, and Mcghaee wasn't getting any room to run.
You know, and it's funny that you mention that because Bledsoe and Henry were solid, and rather than work on the OL, they draft McGahee, then dump Henry, then draft Losman and dump Bledsoe.Because of their terrible OL, they really aren't in a position to succeed for "fantasy stardom".

Here's some interesting numbers:

2002 - 8-8

2003 - 6-10

2004 - 9-7

2005 - 5-11

Bledsoe:

2003 - 58.2% completion, 2860 yards, 11TD/12INT, 73.0QBRAT

2004 - 56.9% completion, 2932 yards, 20TD/16INT, 76.6QBRAT

Losman (2005 adjusted):

2005 - 49.6% completion, 2522 yards, 15TD/15INT, 64.9 QBRAT

Henry:

2002 - 325 att, 4.4ypc, 1438 yards, 13TD; 43 rec, 309 yards, TD; 11FUM, 8FL; 6 100+ games

2003 (15G) - 331 att, 4.1ypc, 1356 yards, 10TD; 28 rec, 158 yards, TD; 7FUM, 3FL; 5 100+ games

McGahee (2004 adjusted):

2004 - 379 att, 4.0ypc, 1504 yards, 17TD; 29 rec, 225 yards; 6FUM, 3FL; 9 100+ games

2005 (15G) - 325 att, 3.8ypc, 1247 yards, 5TD; 28 rec, 178 yards; 1FUM, 1FL; 5 100+ games

Clearly the Bills haven't gotten any better from their recent first round picks (I left Evans out because of the 3-yr WR rule, and it's only his 2nd, and he's not a WR1 until next year).

In fact, I'd go so far as to say they've regressed a bit. See, this is what happens when you go for QB, RB etc rather than OT, OG. The Bills still have a terrible OL now, still have (for the sake of argument), about the same production, except they've wasted two first-round picks to do it.

To answer your question, no they aren't on the verge of fantasy stardom. Evans is probably going to have a decent year next year (1100 / 6 judging from Moulds' dropoff after Price left, and then a couple other young WR1s without reliable compliments in Andre Johnson and Michael Clayton), but other than that, it's just going to be the same thing until they fix their real needs and stop wasting draft picks on upgrading positions that needn't be upgraded.

Even with a little offensive line help, who knows? Maybe, but past history indicates they would rather draft Jay Cutler or DeAngelo Williams and go 6-10.

 
Last edited:
What about Coy Wire getting in there at SS.  He was a fairly high draft pick from 2002 (97 overall).  If I remember correctly he was set to  be their SS before NE cut Milloy.  After the Bills signed Milloy they tried Wire at FS, but he wasn't a good fit.  Does wire have the talent to take over the SS spot?
I think they'll stick with Milloy another year...Wire is a solid special teams player and a good backup but I don't think he's anything special as a player. He's a good blitzer and tackler, but he's a liability in coverage.
Wire is a good Run supporting Saftey, but struggles in pas coverage, and was burned many times when Milloy was out. That is why he struggled being FS.
 
See, this is what happens when you go for QB, RB etc rather than OT, OG. The Bills still have a terrible OL now, still have (for the sake of argument), about the same production, except they've wasted two first-round picks to do it.
The Bills spent the #4 overall pick on Mike Williams and two of their biggest free agent signings the past couple years were Bennie Anderson and Chris Villarial. One of the best coaching hires was also bringing in Jim McNally. Its not like they ignored the position to bring in skill guys, Williams and Anderson just turned out to be major busts.
 
Five shopping months left for Bills

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Many positions up for assessment

By MARK GAUGHAN

News Sports Reporter

2/19/2006

The Buffalo Bills are hoping they can make a relatively quick turnaround from their 5-11 season.

In introducing Marv Levy as the team's new general manager, Bills owner Ralph C. Wilson Jr. said, "As far as I'm concerned I have to hark back to what was said by George Allen, who Marv worked with at the Redskins: "As far as we're concerned, the future is now for the Buffalo Bills.' "

If the future is now, the Bills are going to have to make a lot of smart roster decisions over the next five months because they were a long way away from Super Bowl contention this year.

The Bills were outgained by more yards in 2005 than in any season in their history. Their average of 257 yards a game was the franchise's lowest ever in a 16-game season, even lower than the 2-14 years of 1984 and '85. Their average of 343 yards a game allowed was the fifth worst ever.

So how many starting players are the Bills from being a legitimate contender to win the AFC?

How about two offensive linemen, one outstanding quarterback, one starting receiver, at least two good starters in the defensive front seven and one starting cornerback?

That's arguably seven key players.

Obviously the quarterback might be in the fold, if J.P. Losman can blossom into a good player. The cornerback probably is in the fold, too, presuming the Bills prevent Nate Clements from hitting the free-agent market. The receiver might be in the fold, but don't count on it. The Bills would have to surprise everyone and keep Eric Moulds.

Here's a look at the Bills' starting positions that are uncertain heading into the offseason:

• Receiver: Moulds is scheduled to receive $7.1 million in cash this year and have a cap figure of $10.8 million. The Bills could let those numbers stand, but paying that much to Moulds will hinder their free-agent shopping to some degree. The team is virtually certain to ask Moulds to take a significant pay cut. That's when Moulds must ask himself: Do I make a good salary in Buffalo and hope Losman matures fast, or do I refuse a pay reduction, force the Bills to release me and go play my last few seasons with a playoff contender? Moulds probably could find a job with a contender like Philadelphia, Atlanta or New England if he was willing to work for slightly under market value. The problem for the Bills is the crop of receivers available in free agency this offseason is expected to be thin. Josh Reed is a free agent and probably won't be back. Roscoe Parrish is strictly a No. 3 slot receiver.

• Left tackle: Mike Gandy was a bargain for the Bills, considering they paid him a mere $800,000 signing bonus. However, is he good enough to be an asset at tackle on a playoff team? It didn't look like it in 2005. On the other hand, Gandy started for **** Jauron in Chicago. Does Jauron think he's good enough? The Bills will be able to find a tackle prospect at some point in the draft. They also could decide to shift Jason Peters over from the right side to the left. That would be another big shift for the young guy. Everybody in the Bills building - teammates and coaches - was wowed by Peters at right tackle and thinks he could be a star. Levy suggested this week the Bills may take their time assessing Mike Williams' future. He's due a big bonus July 1. But given cap concerns it's hard to imagine Williams coming back.

• Left guard: Bennie Anderson struggled in pass protection. The Bills tried to replace him with Williams at midseason. It didn't work. Anderson is signed for two more years. Considering all the other team needs, this is a spot the Bills may try to fill from within. One possibility is shifting Gandy over from tackle and letting him compete with Anderson.

It appears the Bills don't have to worry about right guard. Chris Villarrial, an exceptional pass protector, had an injury-plagued season but says he's not ready to retire.

"I'd like to come back and play," Villarrial said. "I don't think going out on a sour note like this is the way to go."

• Center: Trey Teague is set to become a free agent after starting 60 games for the Bills. He's smart, and he did a better job than people give him credit for over the past four years. But the Bills drafted Duke Preston in the fourth round last year to be their center. Preston impressed the coaches. Despite never playing the position in college, Preston filled in capably at guard during parts of seven games. Center is his natural position. If the Bills don't like their options at left guard, they could move Preston over there and try to bring Teague back.

Quarterback: The question is, how will the team handle any competition for the starting job between Losman and Kelly Holcomb? And can Losman make a big step forward in Year Three? Before Jauron arrived, it seemed certain the Bills would look for a younger No. 3. Shane Matthews is a free agent. Matthews played for Jauron in Chicago. We'll see.

Cornerback: Clements did not have a very good year in '05. However, he's 26, he had a great year in '04 and he has 20 interceptions and 10 forced fumbles in five seasons. The Bills aren't likely to find someone as good anytime soon. It's going to cost a fortune to sign him to a long-term deal; pick a signing bonus - $10 million, $15 million? The chances of a long-term deal are almost nil without a collective bargaining extension because any deal can only be spread out over four years. The franchise tag will cost $5.9 million. At the least, that would take care of a starting position for a year while the Bills work on filling all their other holes.

Defensive tackle: Sam Adams still gets plenty of respect from his peers, who picked him as an alternate to the Pro Bowl. Ironically, Adams was only an alternate on his own team. Adams was in the doghouse of the coaching staff, which made him a healthy scratch for the Carolina game and relegated him to a backup role the last five games. Adams still has the talent to do so much more for the Bills. He does not have an onerous contract. He's due $3.5 million in cash this year with a cap figure of $3.8 million. The Bills have broached the subject of a pay cut with him. If the Bills demand that he take a pay cut, Adams probably will opt to be released.

The Bills must decide on the other spot, too. How much better do they think Tim Anderson can get? If he were the No. 3 behind someone the caliber of Pat Williams, that would look pretty good. The Bills will have to give serious consideration to taking a DT with the eighth overall pick. Ron Edwards is a free agent who may well return. But he's coming off a second shoulder surgery in three years. Justin Bannan is a free agent and would be a worthy depth player to bring back.

Strong-side linebacker: Jeff Posey is signed for one more year at a reasonable cost. In the Bills' scheme, his role has largely been to hold the point of attack and force the play toward middle linebacker London Fletcher. Still, the Bills need more plays from the strong side. Posey has just three tackles for losses, four sacks and one forced fumble the past two years. Posey's backup is Mario Haggan, who was not able to push Posey for any snaps on defense. Angelo Crowell can play weak side or middle but doesn't have the size to play strong side.

Safety: The Bills' tandem is getting older. Troy Vincent will be 35 in June. Lawyer Milloy will be 33 in November. Still, with all their other needs, it's hard to see the Bills finding anyone better than those two. They're both highly paid, but the team would have no trouble handling their cap numbers - $4 million for Milloy and $3.2 million for Vincent. Milloy's status probably would only be threatened if the Bills opted to keep Moulds or Williams at a high cost.
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060219/1021036.asp
 
INSIDE THE NFL

Bills nearly pull off the Special Teams Grand Slam

2/19/2006

By MARK GAUGHAN

The good news about the Buffalo Bills' special teams is they have kept one of the top position coaches in the NFL in place by retaining Bobby April. And most of the key members of their special teams unit should be back, including Pro Bowl punter Brian Moorman.

The only bad news regarding the bomb-squad units is the Bills have failed to parlay two of the greatest special teams seasons in team history into a playoff berth the last two years.

For the second straight year, the Bills finished No. 1 in the NFL in overall special teams, according to the Dallas Morning News ranking system, which is treated as official by most of the special teams coaches in the league. The system assigns points from 1 to 32 in 22 categories, and the club with the lowest total score wins.

The Bills actually finished with a better score than they did in 2004.

In 2005, the Bills were No. 1 with 217 points, which was 41.5 better than the New York Giants. In '04, the Bills led the ranking with 232 points. The NFL's top 10 this year looked like this:

1. Buffalo. 2. N.Y. Giants. 3. Houston. 4. Miami. 5. Tennessee. 6. Cleveland. 7. San Francisco. 8. Jacksonville. 9. Carolina. 10. Washington.

Super Bowl champion Pittsburgh was No. 13. The bottom three teams were: 30. Seattle. 31. New Orleans. 32. Green Bay.

The Bills almost pulled off the Grand Slam of Special Teams in '05, nearly ranking No. 1 in all four main coverage and return categories. They were No. 1 in kickoff return average, No. 5 in punt return average, No. 4 in kickoff coverage and No. 1 in net punting.

Last year, they were No. 2 in kickoff return average, No. 5 in punt returns, No. 2 in kickoff coverage and No. 11 in net punting.

Even though the overall statistics were slightly better in '05, the '04 season was superior, because the Bills scored six special-teams touchdowns and gave up no scores.

In '05, the Bills units scored one TD (Terrence McGee's kickoff return in Cincinnati) and gave up one TD (the decisive kickoff return by the Jets in the season finale).

The Bills are the first repeat winner in the 16 years the Dallas paper has compiled the ranking.

"It's a long season, 16 games, and to be able to be on top for 32 straight games is quite an accomplishment," Moorman said. "It's something you shoot for all year. It's something we take a lot of pride in. Bobby's coaching style is so positive. He's not a guy to ever bring a guy down no matter what mistake he makes. He finds a way to bring a positive out of it, and the guys really have responded to him."

Having a head coach who is willing to give the special teams coach enough practice time on the field is a big key to having good special teams.

With Marv Levy in charge again in Buffalo, there's little doubt the Bills' commitment to April will remain strong. Levy and Bruce DeHaven, of course, oversaw the "golden era" of Bills special teams. The Bills had the No. 1 kickoff coverage unit from 1987 through '90, and the '91 Bills team still holds the NFL punt coverage record for a 16-game season. The Bills were No. 1 in the Dallas ranking in '96. (In Levy's four years as a special teams coach from '69 to '72, his units blocked seven punts.)

"Pittsburgh has been successful on special teams, but Bill Cowher doesn't give as much time to it as we did here," said long-snapper Mike Schneck, who came to the Bills last year from Pittsburgh.

New Bills coach **** Jauron had a solid special-teams track record during his stint in Chicago. The Bears were in the top eight in the NFL in either punt coverage or net punting four of his five years. They were in the top 17 in kickoff coverage four of his five years (including No. 1 in '99). They were in the top 13 in kickoff return average four of his five years.

Jauron recognized April's value by giving him the added title of assistant head coach. That's something Mike Mularkey planned to do before he resigned. April was still under contract, so Jauron didn't have to add the title.

Another coach who has used special teams to build success is the Giants' Tom Coughlin. The Giants had not ranked higher than 20th five straight years before Coughlin joined them in 2004. They were 17th last year and runner-up this year. Over his last seven years as the head coach of Jacksonville, the Jags had five top-10 finishes in the ranking.

Oakland vs. Buffalo

The Bills raised ticket prices for 2006 but they're still among the lowest priced tickets in the league. It's almost comical how low in comparison with some teams.

Oakland is somewhat similar to Buffalo in terms of its economy. The Raiders announced last week they have eliminated their personal-seat licenses, the contract season-ticket holders must purchase simply for the right to buy tickets. Those PSLs ranged from $25 to $400 a year and sold poorly for the past decade. Oakland fans who were used to no PSLs in the '60s and '70s balked at them when the team moved back from Los Angeles. Meanwhile, the Raiders raised some ticket prices for 2006.

The bottom line is most sideline seats in Oakland now will cost $96 a game for season-ticket holders. Lower bowl sideline seats in Buffalo will cost season-ticket holders $47 a game. For individual games, those seats in Buffalo are $58. Most end-zone seats in Oakland will cost season-ticket holders $61 a game. End zone seats on the scoreboard side in Buffalo will cost $36 a game for season tickets, $45 for individual games.
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060219/2015531.asp
 
Aaron, is Terrence McGee going to continue to return kicks for the Bills since they don't have anyone better than him?

Hypothetically speaking, lets say the Bills put the franchise tag on Nate Clements, who will be the so-called Ronde Barber/Nick Harper of the defensive backfield.

Thanks Aaron!

RAPTURE

 
The irony is the tampa-2 is a perfect fit for antoine winfield. Speaking of vikings, I wonder if Pat Williams playing in minn had anything to do with the bills failings against the run.

Donahoe had made good decisions at points in his career, but lately he has made some real poor ones (although not much really coulda been done about winfield)

 
Aaron, is Terrence McGee going to continue to return kicks for the Bills since they don't have anyone better than him?

Hypothetically speaking, lets say the Bills put the franchise tag on Nate Clements, who will be the so-called Ronde Barber/Nick Harper of the defensive backfield.

Thanks Aaron!

RAPTURE
The guy was arguably the best kick returner in the league the past 2 years...I can't imagine them replacing him.Teams were much more willing to throw at Clements in 2005 than they were in 2004. But, both CBs are good tacklers so I wouldn't be surprised to see them both be productive just like Tillman and Vasher were in Chicago this year.

 
The irony is the tampa-2 is a perfect fit for antoine winfield. Speaking of vikings, I wonder if Pat Williams playing in minn had anything to do with the bills failings against the run.

Donahoe had made good decisions at points in his career, but lately he has made some real poor ones (although not much really coulda been done about winfield)
They let Williams go because of his age, but it was absolutely a huge loss and one they never really recovered from. Adding Ngata on draft day would hopefully make up for that decision.
 
CAPOLOGY 2006

Bills - (Moulds + Williams) = free agents

By MARK GAUGHAN

News Sports Reporter

2/22/2006

The Buffalo Bills are going to have money to spend on free agents this offseason, but they're eventually going to have to cut some salaries to get it.

The two most obvious casualties are their two most expensive players - receiver Eric Moulds and tackle Mike Williams. Moulds has a cap figure of $10.85 million, and Williams' is $10.81 million.

For financial reasons alone, it's hard to envision either of those players being back with the Bills this season unless they agreed to big pay cuts.

The Bills' salary cap total stands at about $87.5 million for the 2006 season, according to News estimates. That's just an estimate, because the team does not release figures and there could be bonus money due to players this year based on performance in 2005 that affects the team's total.

In addition, the cap situation is even harder to gauge entering this offseason because of "transition rules" that are in place under the collective bargaining agreement between the players and owners. The two sides are in negotiations on an extension.

If no deal is struck, this will be the last year of the salary cap, and 2007 will be an "uncapped" year. One of the ramifications is teams can only spread out money in any new contract signed this year over four years, as opposed to six and seven in past offseasons.

The Bills' total includes a $3 million bonus Williams is scheduled to get if he's still on the roster on July 1. So the Bills' cap total actually will be about $84.5 million if Williams still is on the roster when the NFL's new cap year begins on March 3.

The NFL salary cap is not yet set, but it's expected to be about $93 million. Some are projecting it could be as high as $95 million. The final figure is expected to be released within a week.

The Bills have some additional cap costs they must incur before March 3.

They will surely want to put a franchise tag on Nate Clements in order to prevent him from being an unfettered free agent. That will cost $5.89 million.

They have some restricted and exclusive-rights free agents they will want to keep. They need to make minimum offers to those players by March 2 to keep them off the open market. The exclusive rights free agents, players with less than two full years experience, include tackle Jason Peters, receiver Jonathan Smith, cornerback Jabari Greer, running back Shaud Williams and guard Lawrence Smith. The restricted free agents are receiver Sam Aiken and linebackers Josh Stamer and Mario Haggan. Making offers to most of those players will add about $1.7 more to the Bills' current cap total.

The Bills will need about $1.5 million in extra space - above what's already being counted for the top 51 players on the roster - to sign all their draft choices. Those costs won't hit the Bills' cap until July or August when the rookies sign their deals.

The cost for Clements, the tender offers for young free agents and the rookies adds up to about $9 million.

That puts the Bills at $93.5 million, not counting Williams' big July bonus.

So it's easy to see why Williams must take a big cut, and some other restructuring must take place.

Williams is signed through 2007. Cutting him would save $4.9 million. He still would count $5.9 million against the cap, because past bonus money he already has received that is being credited to the Bills' books in 2006 and 2007 would "roll into" this year's cap.

The Bills decided Williams was better suited at guard last season. He's not eager to play guard. He sat out the last five games last year with a back injury, to the dismay of former coach Mike Mularkey, who insisted on calling it a chest injury. Williams is widely viewed as a bust within the locker room. He has not shown the temperament to be outstanding. It's likely he would rather have a change of scenery.

Moulds is signed through 2007 as well. Cutting him would save $5.5 million, and he still would count $5.3 million against the cap.

Cutting both Williams and Moulds would put the Bills at about $86 million, counting all the charges for Clements, the draft picks and the restricted players. That would be roughly $7 million under a cap of $93 million, plenty to do some serious free-agent shopping.

Moulds is scheduled to make a base salary of $6 million. It would be no surprise if the Bills asked him to reduce that to $2 million or $3 million. That would give Moulds the chance to refuse a pay cut and leave for some other team that has more realistic playoff hopes in 2006.

Where else might the Bills save money? Defensive tackle Sam Adams ranks tied for sixth on the Bills' cap pay scale, with a cost of $3.87 million. He would be a certain cut if Mike Mularkey still were the coach, but Mularkey's departure changes the outlook. The Bills could use Adams. If they ask him to take a significant pay cut he could depart. Because Mularkey relegated Adams to a spot-duty reserve the second half of the season, Adams lost out on at least $500,000 in a playing-time bonus.

If the Bills released Williams, Moulds and Adams or significantly reduced their contracts, there probably would not be a great need to find more savings elsewhere on the roster. Safety Lawyer Milloy is eighth on the cap list at $3.75 million. He's due to receive $2.5 million this year. Strong-side linebacker Jeff Posey is in the last year of his contract with a cap figure of $2.18 million. His release would save $1.75 million, but the Bills don't have an obvious replacement for him.

In past years, teams could save money by cutting veterans with more than one year left on their contracts after June 1. The amortization of signing bonus money in future years of the contract did not hit the cap until the next year. However, since there has been no extension of the collective bargaining agreement between the players and owners, the 2007 season is scheduled to be an uncapped year. So there is no June 1 rule this offseason. Teams can't soften the blow of cutting players with long-term deals. All of the amortized bonus rolls back and hits the cap this year.
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060222/1070955.asp
 
Bills put franchise tag on Clements

BUFFALO, N.Y. (AP) -- Cornerback Nate Clements' plan to pursue a lucrative contract on the free agent market was put on hold when the Buffalo Bills designated him their franchise player Wednesday.

The move was expected and means the Bills have retained the rights to Clements by offering the five-year starter and 2004 Pro Bowl selection a one-year contract worth $5.89 million.

"We consider Nate a valuable member of our defense and believe he will play an important role in re-establishing our defense as one of the toughest units in the league," general manager Marv Levy said in a press release. Levy added he remains optimistic the Bills can negotiate a long-term deal with Clements.

Clements' agent, Todd France, declined comment except to tell The Associated Press that he and his client will weigh their options. Adding he was not surprised by the Bills' decision, France said he might meet with Bills management while attending the NFL Combine in Indianapolis this week.

Clements' options include accepting the offer or attempting to negotiate a long-term deal. He also has the right to bide his time, meaning he would not be required to attend team functions, including minicamps and training camp, until accepting the offer.

Such a decision would mean that Clements would miss valuable time learning the Bills' defensive philosophy under new head coach **** Jauron, who took over last month following Mike Mularkey's resignation.

The Bills have the right to pull back the offer at any time, which would make Clements an unrestricted free agent.

Although the move makes Clements one of the NFL's top-paid cornerbacks next season, the salary is well below what the player envisioned getting when free agency opens March 3.

Clements created a stir during training camp last summer, saying he considered himself the NFL's best cornerback and wanted a deal similar to the seven-year, $63 million contract that included an $18 million bonus that Denver's Champ Bailey signed in 2004.

Selected 21st overall in the 2001 draft out of Ohio State, Clements has 20 career interceptions and started 72 consecutive games since landing the starter's job midway through his rookie season.

Also a threat returning punts, Clements leads the Bills with six career touchdown returns, including four by interception.

Clements is coming off a down year. He finished third on the team with a career-low two interceptions -- the first time he failed to lead the Bills in that category -- and third with 127 tackles.

He was also burned several times in pass coverage in a defensive unit that finished 29th in the NFL in yards allowed. That's a significant drop off after the Bills had finished second in the league in 2003 and '04.

Buffalo, which also struggled on offense, finished 5-11 and failed to make the playoffs for the sixth straight year.

Part of Clements' struggles were the result of an injury-plagued defense that lost two starters -- linebacker Takeo Spikes (torn Achilles' tendon) and Ron Edwards (shoulder) -- in the first month of the season.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/foot...s.ap/index.html
 
Bust stops here: Bills cut Williams

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Salary cap, playing woes end No. 4 pick's days

By ALLEN WILSON

News Sports Reporter

2/24/2006

INDIANAPOLIS - Move over Walt Patulski and Tony Mandarich. You have a new member to the list of the biggest busts in NFL history. Mike Williams officially joined that infamous company following his release by the Buffalo Bills on Thursday.

The 6-foot-6, 360-pound offensive tackle never came close to living up to the expectations of being the fourth overall selection in the 2002 draft. A starter for 47 of the 51 games in which he appeared, his career was marred by injuries and inconsistent play. He was hyped as a dominant run blocker, but his pass protection skills were often lacking.

"This is something we've been talking about for some time," Bills General Manager Marv Levy said Thursday at the NFL Scouting Combine. "One of the most difficult and unpleasant parts of coaching or being a general manager is having to tell a player you are going to place him on waivers. But it's time for us to move forward, and we wish him well."

Now that Williams is out, Eric Moulds may not be far behind. The Bills have expressed a desire to keep Moulds, but they haven't spoken to the veteran wide receiver or his representatives.

"No one has contacted us with regard to Eric's status with the team," said Greg Johnson, Moulds' adviser. "Until someone does, our position is he is still under contract with the Buffalo Bills."

Williams and Moulds are the Bills' most expensive players, so releasing them would be the obvious move to save salary cap space. Moulds has a cap figure of $10.85 million, while Williams would have counted $10.81 million against this year's cap.

The Bills saved $4.9 million against the cap by cutting Williams, who was signed through 2007, but he still counts as $5.9 million. Cutting Moulds would save $5.5 million, but the team would still take a $5.3 million cap hit. Moulds is also signed through 2007.

Moulds would have to accept a significant pay cut to remain in Buffalo. But the 10-year pro might want to move on to a team with a better chance to compete for a championship.

"I think Eric has a lot left," Levy said. "We hope we can work something out in a contract restructuring situation with Eric. We would like to retain him."

Williams balked at a pay cut last offseason, but Levy said that was not an issue this time. Williams would have received a $600,000 bonus if he was still on the roster March 3 and was due an additional $3 million July 1.

"It just didn't seem like a very viable thing that could get done," Levy said, "so we didn't go there."

Williams' cap number made it necessary for him and the Bills to part ways, but his performance had a lot to do with it as well.

You won't find many critics of the Bills' decision to draft Williams, though some University of Texas observers questioned Williams' toughness and desire. Even Levy expressed uncertainty about Williams' commitment to the game in the past week. Williams rarely played with the fire and intensity needed to excel in the NFL.

He showed signs of finally turning the corner after coming on strong over the second half of 2004. But he regressed last season, starting just five games in nine appearances, and lost his starting right tackle job to Jason Peters, a converted tight end who had never played the position before.

The Bills tried to move Williams to left guard, but he never took to the position and ended up back on the bench. The experiment ended when a back injury sidelined him for the final five games.

Williams' problems extended off the field. In 2003, he missed a game against Houston after injuring his shoulder when his truck flipped over on his way to the stadium.

He skipped several voluntary minicamp sessions in 2004, citing personal reasons, and was demoted to second-team offense at the beginning of training camp that summer. He then was fined by the team for an unexcused absence from camp. Williams also had lost credibility in the locker room as some teammates didn't think he was motivated to be a great player.

Williams' release is another stain on Tom Donahoe's record as president and general manager. No Bills player taken so high in the draft has failed this miserably since Patulski, a defensive lineman taken No. 1 overall in 1972. Williams may go down as the biggest offensive line flop since Mandarich was drafted second overall by Green Bay in 1989.

"It didn't work out as far as him performing to the level that the team had hoped," Levy said. "Every decision doesn't always work out magnificently."

It is uncertain where Williams' future in the NFL will be. His agent, David Dunn, could not be reached for comment.

Williams may be gone, but he didn't leave empty handed. He made $23 million over four years, including $10.5 million in initial signing bonuses. That's more than quarterback Rob Johnson, who left town with $19.85 million of owner Ralph Wilson's money after four years.
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060224/1071279.asp
 
What about Coy Wire getting in there at SS.  He was a fairly high draft pick from 2002 (97 overall).  If I remember correctly he was set to  be their SS before NE cut Milloy.  After the Bills signed Milloy they tried Wire at FS, but he wasn't a good fit.  Does wire have the talent to take over the SS spot?
I think they'll stick with Milloy another year...Wire is a solid special teams player and a good backup but I don't think he's anything special as a player. He's a good blitzer and tackler, but he's a liability in coverage.
Ahh so is/was Milloy.
 
What about Coy Wire getting in there at SS.  He was a fairly high draft pick from 2002 (97 overall).  If I remember correctly he was set to  be their SS before NE cut Milloy.  After the Bills signed Milloy they tried Wire at FS, but he wasn't a good fit.  Does wire have the talent to take over the SS spot?
I think they'll stick with Milloy another year...Wire is a solid special teams player and a good backup but I don't think he's anything special as a player. He's a good blitzer and tackler, but he's a liability in coverage.
Ahh so is/was Milloy.
I agree to some extent, but Milloy brings a lot more experience and leadership to the secondary than a guy like Wire does. I guess I wouldn't be shocked if they dumped Milloy, but it doesn't seem likely at this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Marv Levy calls Bill Polian...

"I called (former Bills and current Colts GM Bill Polian) after I took the job and had three or four questions for him. He was very helpful about structuring the front office and salary cap. Then he said, 'What's your last question?' I said, 'Do you want to trade us Peyton Manning?' He said, 'No.'"

shucks... :)

good try Marv.

 
Marv Levy calls Bill Polian...

"I called (former Bills and current Colts GM Bill Polian) after I took the job and had three or four questions for him. He was very helpful about structuring the front office and salary cap. Then he said, 'What's your last question?' I said, 'Do you want to trade us Peyton Manning?' He said, 'No.'"

shucks... :)

good try Marv.
:lmao: :goodposting:
 
Marv Levy calls Bill Polian...

"I called (former Bills and current Colts GM Bill Polian) after I took the job and had three or four questions for him. He was very helpful about structuring the front office and salary cap. Then he said, 'What's your last question?' I said, 'Do you want to trade us Peyton Manning?' He said, 'No.'"

shucks... :)

good try Marv.
Marvjust keep asking untill he gets so annoyed that he says yes. Than we can watch Manning get sacked 6 times a game. just like every other QB in buffalo.

Buffalo needs to bring in Kitna to help develop losman. Look how kitna helped Palmer.

 
QB spot anyone's to win

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bills' incumbents will have company

By ALLEN WILSON

News Sports Reporter

2/25/2006

INDIANAPOLIS - The Buffalo Bills' starting quarterback job is up for grabs, and the competition may not be limited to J.P. Losman and Kelly Holcomb.

General Manager Marv Levy suggested that a third candidate could be added to the mix. It won't be a high draft pick or a high-profile free agent like Drew Brees, but Levy is considering bringing in someone capable of competing with Losman and Holcomb for the starting job.

"There may be a young one out there," Levy said during a visit with the media at the NFL Scouting Combine. "Is there one or two in free agency that's not necessarily a blow-you-away guy? Not necessarily a Drew Brees, for instance. And if he can come in and compete, great."

The Bills will need a third quarterback since last year's No. 3, Shane Matthews, is expected to retire. But Levy said the guy they bring in will determine his place on the depth chart.

"We're not relegating anyone by saying he's a backup or he's our future starter," Levy said. "Come on in and let's find out what you can do. But we're looking for guys who show us signs that we would like."

Levy hasn't ruled out using a mid- to late-round draft pick on a passer, but the team wouldn't mind a young veteran with experience.

Brees of the San Diego Chargers will be the top quarterback on the market when he becomes an unrestricted free agent Thursday. But he isn't an option for the Bills because he would command a huge contract despite the fact he's recovering from shoulder surgery.

There are a few other available veteran quarterbacks the Bills might consider.

Arizona's Josh McCown has the most upside among the free-agent crop. The 26-year-old McCown played well at times for a bad Arizona team the last two seasons, throwing for nearly 4,400 yards. He is only 10-12 as a starter since 2003, but that doesn't look as bad when compared to the Cardinals' 2-11 record when other quarterbacks started.

Meanwhile, Washington's Patrick Ramsey, New Orleans' Aaron Brooks and Tampa Bay's Brian Griese could be released early next week.

Levy says the Bills' interest in acquiring another quarterback does not mean they have lost confidence in Losman. Levy said Losman has the physical tools to be an outstanding player.

But the new regime isn't going to just hand the starting job to Losman like the previous leadership did.

"The general rule is we're going to look at every position as competitive," new Bills coach **** Jauron said. "We want everyone to feel like they have a shot. In regards specifically to the quarterbacks, it should play out the same way.

"I don't think there is anything to be gained at this point by naming a (starting) guy. Go into the offseason workouts, the spring workouts and let them compete, and then we'll see what happens going into training camp. And if we don't have a guy that we can name a starter then we'll go right into camp with the competition."

Jauron added that someone will go into minicamp penciled in as the starter. Based on last season's performance, Holcomb might be the choice. Losman clearly has more potential and may end up better than anyone the Bills might bring in to challenge for the starting job.

Levy said Losman still has a lot to learn. The only way that will happen is for him to be on the field.

But if Losman is going to start for the Bills next season, he'll have to earn it.

"We want what every Buffalo Bills fan wants, and that's a quarterback who gives us the best chance to win now," Levy said. "We're going to give all of our quarterbacks a chance to compete for the job, and may the best man win."
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060225/1070279.asp
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top