What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cold feet? (1 Viewer)

7 come 11

Footballguy
The Bears were evidently poised to jump in front of Kansas City and take "their guy" and then something happened and they didn't follow through and confirm the trade. My theory is that the Bears were going to take a WR (likely Baldwin)and got wind that KC was also looking at WRs, hence the motive to trade up to Baltimore's slot. Then, they evidently changed their minds (cold feet on selecting Baldwin) and decided they could get an adequate WR later in the draft. Thoughts?

 
The Bears were evidently poised to jump in front of Kansas City and take "their guy" and then something happened and they didn't follow through and confirm the trade. My theory is that the Bears were going to take a WR (likely Baldwin)and got wind that KC was also looking at WRs, hence the motive to trade up to Baltimore's slot. Then, they evidently changed their minds (cold feet on selecting Baldwin) and decided they could get an adequate WR later in the draft. Thoughts?
Pretty sure the Bears were planning on taking an OL since probably last August.
 
The Bears were evidently poised to jump in front of Kansas City and take "their guy" and then something happened and they didn't follow through and confirm the trade. My theory is that the Bears were going to take a WR (likely Baldwin)and got wind that KC was also looking at WRs, hence the motive to trade up to Baltimore's slot. Then, they evidently changed their minds (cold feet on selecting Baldwin) and decided they could get an adequate WR later in the draft. Thoughts?
Pretty sure the Bears were planning on taking an OL since probably last August.
This.They were coming up for Carimi, Angelo screwed something up with the formalities, and they ended up getting him anyway.
 
The explaination:

Truth behind the mixup

SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- Before I get to the story of the night, the mega-trade between Cleveland and Atlanta that I'm sure made Sean Payton cringe, an explanation of the weirdness that happened with Baltimore on the clock at pick 26, weirdness that is not over:

Chicago, picking 29th, and Baltimore, at 26, finalized a trade that would have had them switch slots, with the Ravens getting the Bears' fourth-round pick in return. Chicago would take Wisconsin tackle Gabe Carimi, and the Ravens, if Colorado cornerback Jimmy Smith was still on the board, would take Smith at 29. With two minutes left in the Ravens' period, the deal was done.

Under NFL rules, each team has to report the trade to NFL draft headquarters at Radio City Music Hall. The Ravens called it in. They assumed Chicago called it in, but due to a miscommunication in the Bears' draft room, no one from Chicago ever called the league. As the clock ticked down to zero, and with Chicago on the phone with Carimi to tell him he was going to be their pick, Baltimore noticed no one at the league had announced the trade and Chicago's pick of Carimi. Meanwhile, Kansas City, with the 27th pick, rushed its card to the desk at Radio City, taking Pittsburgh wideout Jonathan Baldwin.

Ravens GM Ozzie Newsome, on an open line to New York, demanded to know why the trade hadn't gone through. Chicago never called to confirm it, Newsome was told. Baltimore was infuriated. The league didn't allow the trade. The Ravens picked Smith at 27 (not 26; Kansas City was awarded the 26th pick and took Baldwin, because the Chiefs got the pick in before the Ravens did), and the Bears got lucky, getting Carimi at 29.

"Whatever you hear, Baltimore did everything the right way," Bears GM Jerry Angelo told Chicago media. "There were a lot of things happening in the draft room. We were getting a lot of calls, we just ... dropped the ball. I dropped the ball. I can't say anything more than that."

All's well that ends well, you say? Not so fast. Angelo called Baltimore owner Steve Bisciotti to apologize, but Bisciotti wanted the fourth-round pick anyway, claiming it was part of the deal they'd agreed to. In fact, I'm told Bisciotti today will push to get the fourth-round pick, or to make the situation right in some way.

The league is under no obligation to do so, because the trade was never official. And maybe all's fair in love and draft-night trades, but as far as Baltimore's concerned, I don't think this one's over. I think the Ravens will ask the league to award them some compensation from Chicago before the draft resumes at 6 p.m. Eastern today. Stay tuned.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, but Baltimore should not get CRAP from the Bears.

They were on the clock again at 27 and both players involved in the original trade were still in play, so they still could have done the 27 for 29 deal instead of the 26 for 29. The fact that they instead took their guy they wanted at 29 at 27 and let the Bears assume the Risk that Carimi would be gone at 28 leaves them out of luck as far as the 4th rounder goes.

Sorry, but if you REALLY wanted that trade done, then it was your responsibility to make sure Chicago did everything required on their end. Baltimore was the team on the clock, not Chicago.

 
Sorry, but Baltimore should not get CRAP from the Bears.They were on the clock again at 27 and both players involved in the original trade were still in play, so they still could have done the 27 for 29 deal instead of the 26 for 29. The fact that they instead took their guy they wanted at 29 at 27 and let the Bears assume the Risk that Carimi would be gone at 28 leaves them out of luck as far as the 4th rounder goes.Sorry, but if you REALLY wanted that trade done, then it was your responsibility to make sure Chicago did everything required on their end. Baltimore was the team on the clock, not Chicago.
:goodposting: Even though it sounds like it was the Bears' mistake, ultimately Baltimore was still responsible for making a pick in lieu of a trade. There's really no precedent for this as far as I know, but I can't see the league mandating the Bears to give up a 4th rounder here. Likely the only way this really hurts the Bears is it may make future deals harder to come by as teams could be reluctant to deal with them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top