You could get pretty deep into the weeds on football and have 11 guys to choose from but ****ty commentators like Collinsworth tend to focus on where the ball went rather than an overview of the play and why it developed into that pass or the running lanes closed. At some point, you have to admit... you've brought this ex player in to analyze the game and his analysis of the game pretty well sucks.
I literally couldn't disagree with you more here. All the things you say you want are exactly the things Collinsworth does 50x more than any other non-Romo announcer.
Yes the Watson thing was silly but anyone talking for 3 hours is going to say some silly stuff. Collinsworth constantly talks about scheme, formations, and a zillion other things, and he almost always notices it all during the play before even a replay is shown. He's the guy that gets giddy when a play ends because he's excited to go through the replay of how the running lane closed out because 2 and a half quarters ago the DT ran a stunt two plays in a row from this formation to set up this play in the 4th quarter where he would line up the same but fake the stunt.
I'm actually blown away by your take, because again, short of
maybe Romo, he's the guy that far and away focuses on those things the most of any commentator.