What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Columbine - 10 years later (1 Viewer)

The "loners who took their revenge against bullies" myth has been disproved for a long time.
I don't remember it ever being portrayed that way. Not saying it wasn't, just that my first recollection of the event was not that it was a "getting back at bullies" rampage.As a note, the book "The Hour I First Believed" that recently came out (and sort of centers on Columbine) is fantastic.
Absolutely. Wally Lamb is a fantastic writer. I thought he tried to cram a bit too much into that book (all the historical stuff about the protagonist's family), but the book as a whole was terrific.I'm shocked you don't realize that's how it's been portrayed. Just the comments of people in this thread are a reminder of the misinformation.
Agree re: "The Hour I First Believed". The sections dealing with Columbine and its immediate aftermath were the most powerful part of the novel. I think Lamb got sidetracked trying to weave in so many big themes that the plot and characters become contrived. It was still a rewarding read but I think he could have benefited from some addition by subtraction.
 
I can't. You don't "need" to shoot someone. You "choose" to shoot someone. There are plenty of other options. They may not be as dramatic and get you as much publicity, but there are plenty of other ways to mess with someone without taking a gun out and shooting someone.The fact that you think there is a point "where you need to shoot someone" really freaks me out, to be quite honest.
I think that is the difference.The people that do this feel the "need" to do it, as this the only way to cope.In their minds there are no other ways of messing with someone.I'm not saying I agree with them, but I can understand the thought.I don't mean to sound that, yes, there is always a reason to take a gun to someones head.As I would understand a woman killing her husband after years or mental and physical abuse.To some people there is no other way out.I'm not saying I agree or advocate, but I think I can understand.
 
17 years ago today.  Pretty much all the kids at the school now weren't even born when the tragedy happened.  Wow, how time flies. 

I actually finished the Cullen book this weekend.  As a parent of a son entering into middle school next year, it makes me really want to stay dialed in to how he is doing and to talk about any issues he may be dealing with.  It is even more challenging these days with all the social media, texting, etc. that kids do these days that didn't exist back in 1999.  Although schools are very proactive these days with the anti-bullying campaigns. 

 
I watched an interesting documentary on this last week.  It was on Netflix or Amazon Prime Video, can't remember.  There were some details I didn't know about.  For example, they videotaped themselves pretending to help a student getting bullied by shooting the bully atbthe school.  They also wrote on a journal that there were maybe 80 people at the school who they liked and would not kill.

 
I watched an interesting documentary on this last week.  It was on Netflix or Amazon Prime Video, can't remember.  There were some details I didn't know about.  For example, they videotaped themselves pretending to help a student getting bullied by shooting the bully atbthe school.  They also wrote on a journal that there were maybe 80 people at the school who they liked and would not kill.
A little trim would have went a long way with those weirdos

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top