Flying Spaghetti Monster
Footballguy
Has this board not changed any?
People haven't had much time to evolve since the beginning of this threadHas this board not changed any?
She went to another zoo.Wow. That woman is so dense, light bends around her.
“Look, I found a dragon!” she exclaims as she examines what appears to be an iguana. “Spikes, claws, scales, nails – it’s a dragon!”
“ANOTHER SWEATER SHOWS ALTERNATIVE TAKE on dragons and what they eat,” Fox wrote about a sweater showing a Tyrannosaurus rex eating a reindeer. “This one shows dragons and reindeer interacting. Can scientists prove this never happened?”
She argued that the recent discovery of a species of frog in New Jersey should undercut any claims to authority by scientists.
“Sure feels like there are a lot of scientists in New Jersey,” Fox said. “But, they missed this frog for all those decades (if not centuries). A few things are always interesting to remember in moments like these: (1) scientists don’t know everything and are ‘surprised’ by something seemingly every day; (2) there are more animals that exist that have not been ‘discovered’ than scientists would have you believe; (3) if scientists don’t know about every animal alive right now then how could they know what animals existed back in the caveman prehistoric days?”
It's Alive! Fish Discovered Under Half-Mile of Antarctic Ice
Researchers drilling through a half mile of ice in west Antarctica came upon a surprising discovery: a population of fish and other invertebrates living deep beneath the ice sheet in extreme cold and perpetual darkness. It's the farthest south that fish have ever been found, scientists said. The discovery was made earlier this month by researchers with Whillans Ice Stream Subglacial Access Research Drilling, or WISSARD. The National Science Foundation-funded team is investigating the "grounding zone" — the place where Antarctic ice, land and sea all converge — of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, roughly 530 miles (850 kilometers) from the edge of the Ross Ice Shelf in Antarctica's Ross Sea.
Using a specially designed hot-water drill, the team bored through nearly 2,500 feet (740 meters) of the Ross Ice Shelf — the world's largest body of floating ice, the size of France. They became the first ever to reach and sample the grounding zone. Submersible cameras sent down the drilling hole on Jan. 16 revealed fish and marine crustaceans living under the ice in dark, 28-degree Fahrenheit (-2 Celsius) waters, NSF said.
"I have been investigating these types of environments for much of my career, and although I knew it would be difficult, I had been wanting to access this system for years because of its scientific importance," Ross Powell, chief scientist with the WISSARD project and a researcher at Northern Illinois University, said in an NSF press release. "Findings such as these — gaining an understanding of the ice sheet dynamics and its interaction with ocean and sediment, as well as establishing the structure of its ecosystem — are especially rewarding. It's a big payoff in delayed gratification."
Researchers will examine samples of sediment taken in the grounding zone to learn more about ice sheets and their potential effects on sea-level rise. As for the fish, researchers want to know how the creatures are able to thrive in such an extreme environment, practically devoid of sunlight. The site is the closest to the South Pole where such marine life has been documented, researchers said.
Published in the journal Science, the survey found that 31% of the US public believed that humans had existed in their present form since the beginning, with a further 24% stating that humans had evolved under the guiding hand of a supreme being. In contrast, only 2% of AAAS scientists said humans had not evolved in their time on Earth.
The proportion of the public who believed evolution had happened through natural processes, as described by Charles Darwin more than 150 years ago, was only slightly greater than a third at 35%.
The science isn't settled yet.Oof31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)
It's just a theory.The science isn't settled yet.Oof31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)
![]()
Supported by actual evidence.It's just a theory.The science isn't settled yet.Oof31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)![]()
![]()
Still just a theory.Supported by actual evidence.It's just a theory.The science isn't settled yet.Oof31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)![]()
![]()
Better than I would have guessed.New poll on evolution:
35% believe in evolution through natural processes
24% believe in creator guided evolution
31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)
Published in the journal Science, the survey found that 31% of the US public believed that humans had existed in their present form since the beginning, with a further 24% stating that humans had evolved under the guiding hand of a supreme being. In contrast, only 2% of AAAS scientists said humans had not evolved in their time on Earth.
The proportion of the public who believed evolution had happened through natural processes, as described by Charles Darwin more than 150 years ago, was only slightly greater than a third at 35%.
In the current issue of Nature Chemistry, Sutherland’s team reports that itcreated nucleic acid precursors starting with just hydrogen cyanide (HCN), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and ultraviolet (UV) light. What is more, Sutherland says, the conditions that produce nucleic acid precursors also create the starting materials needed to make natural amino acids and lipids. That suggests a single set of reactions could have given rise to most of life’s building blocks simultaneously.
Where do the 2% work?Better than I would have guessed.New poll on evolution:
35% believe in evolution through natural processes
24% believe in creator guided evolution
31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)
Published in the journal Science, the survey found that 31% of the US public believed that humans had existed in their present form since the beginning, with a further 24% stating that humans had evolved under the guiding hand of a supreme being. In contrast, only 2% of AAAS scientists said humans had not evolved in their time on Earth.
The proportion of the public who believed evolution had happened through natural processes, as described by Charles Darwin more than 150 years ago, was only slightly greater than a third at 35%.
https://answersingenesis.org/Where do the 2% work?Better than I would have guessed.New poll on evolution:
35% believe in evolution through natural processes
24% believe in creator guided evolution
31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)
Published in the journal Science, the survey found that 31% of the US public believed that humans had existed in their present form since the beginning, with a further 24% stating that humans had evolved under the guiding hand of a supreme being. In contrast, only 2% of AAAS scientists said humans had not evolved in their time on Earth.
The proportion of the public who believed evolution had happened through natural processes, as described by Charles Darwin more than 150 years ago, was only slightly greater than a third at 35%.
more likely the Discovery Institutehttps://answersingenesis.org/Where do the 2% work?Better than I would have guessed.New poll on evolution:
35% believe in evolution through natural processes
24% believe in creator guided evolution
31% deny evolution entirely (compared to 2% of scientists)
Published in the journal Science, the survey found that 31% of the US public believed that humans had existed in their present form since the beginning, with a further 24% stating that humans had evolved under the guiding hand of a supreme being. In contrast, only 2% of AAAS scientists said humans had not evolved in their time on Earth.
The proportion of the public who believed evolution had happened through natural processes, as described by Charles Darwin more than 150 years ago, was only slightly greater than a third at 35%.
Beautiful.Have there ever been any human fossils found Cretaceous rock?
Yes and No.
Cretaceous rock is the layer of rock that many geologists say dinosaurs are found in. But they don't have any accurate way of telling how old a layer of rock is (see my page on Carbon dating). They say it is Cretaceous rock only because dinosaurs are in it.
So if a layer of rock has dinosaurs in it then they say it is 165 million years old.
If humans are in it they say it is about 1 million years old.
The circular reasoning doesn't even cross their minds.
So if humans lived at the same time as dinosaurs, but lived in different places, they would be fossilized in different places as well.
Evolutionists believe that Dinosaurs died millions of years ago. But there is a great amount of evidence that dinosaurs lived only a few thousand years ago.![]()
One of these pieces of evidence is a blood report from a t-rex with intact hemoglobin. Hemoglobin breaks down rapidly and could not last millions of years.
I have had a few people email me trying to disprove this, but a more recent (2005) find shows not only dinosaur blood, but soft, fibrous tissue, and complete blood vessels!
There have also been a few dinosaur like creatures, and numerous other animals thought to be extinct) caught in recent years (please see my page on "living fossils").![]()
These amazing finds have caused the Scientific community to seriously rethink what they believed about the dinosaurs.
If they had read their Bibles, they would have known all along that God created man at the same time as the dinosaurs.
Take that, Creationism!msommer said:http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2015/03/researchers-may-have-solved-origin-life-conundrum
If so creationism just got a bloody nose...
Thing is, they've taken shot after shot after shot, right to the jaw, but they won't go down. The manager really needs to throw in the towel!Take that, Creationism!msommer said:http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2015/03/researchers-may-have-solved-origin-life-conundrum
If so creationism just got a bloody nose...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/evolution/origins-of-complex-life-uncovered-in-the-ocean-deep/
Origins of Complex Life Uncovered in the Ocean Deep
Scientists have just discovered a missing link between two branches on the evolutionary tree of life hiding deep under the sea, one that we’ve been looking for since 1977.
Ever since microbiologist Carl Woese, the greatest scientist you’ve never heard of, added a third branch, archaea, to the existing two of prokaryotes (bacteria) and eukaryotes (which have more complex cells like our own), scientists have searched for the evolutionary connection between archaea and eukaryotes. While the reigning theory is that eukaryotes evolved from the simpler archaea, the ancestral parent of eukaryotes has remained elusive.
Scientists discovered the closest evolutionary relative to eukaryotic cells near a hydrothermal vent.
But just this week, a group of scientists announced that they found that connection buried under the Arctic Ocean near a hydrothermal vent called Loki’s Castle. They named it Lokiarchaeum, and published their findings in the journal Nature.
Here’s Carl Zimmer, reporting for the New York Times:
Analyzing the DNA, the researchers found that Lokiarchaeum is far more closely related to eukaryotes than any other known species of archaea. But even more surprising was that it had genes for many traits only found before in eukaryotes.
Among these genes were many that build special compartments inside eukaryote cells. Inside these compartments, called lysosomes, eukaryote cells can destroy defective proteins.
All eukaryotes also share a cellular skeleton that they constantly build and tear down to change their shape. Dr. Ettema and his colleagues found many genes in Lokiarchaeum that encode the proteins required to build the skeleton.
The scientists are now trying to grow these cells in the lab to understand more about them, but it’s difficult to replicate the conditions of deep ocean hydrothermal vents. In the meantime they’re looking for more archaea that might be even closer relatives of our eukaryotic ancestors, and in turn telling us more about our own origins.
The creationists are like Pacqiao, trying in vain to attack the rock solid defense of Evolution (Mayweather). Ultimately they lose by unanimous decision and everybody feels incredibly dumb to have participated.Who's winning now?
If we evolved from Lokiarchaeum why are there still Lokiarchaeum?Get back to us when these guys can turn Lokiarchaeum into a monkey.
Excellent question. They need to keep all this sciency stuff off the front porch.If we evolved from Lokiarchaeum why are there still Lokiarchaeum?Get back to us when these guys can turn Lokiarchaeum into a monkey.
To complete the analogy, let's sue Creationists for coming to the fight with an unreported injuryThe creationists are like Pacqiao, trying in vain to attack the rock solid defense of Evolution (Mayweather). Ultimately they lose by unanimous decision and everybody feels incredibly dumb to have participated.Who's winning now?
Whoa. Mind blown.I'm not religious, but . . . what if God created evolution?
That's why I don't read itI don't know why I read this thread.
What if evolution created god?I'm not religious, but . . . what if God created evolution?
Why? To trick us? What a ####!I'm not religious, but . . . what if God created evolution?
Not to trick us. To bring us into existence.Why? To trick us? What a ####!I'm not religious, but . . . what if God created evolution?
The creationists are like Pacqiao, trying in vain to attack the rock solid defense of Evolution (Mayweather). Ultimately they lose by unanimous decision and everybody feels incredibly dumb to have participated.Who's winning now?
Why? To trick us? What a ####!I'm not religious, but . . . what if God created evolution?
But don't let facts deter your mocking.![]()
In and of themselves? Not really. As a long trend of continuous snide/snarky comments about religious people being stupid and believing in fairy tales? Yes.Do you feel insulted by those jokes, Jayrod?
I vehemently disagree with the bolded. That supposition at the crux of the argument is a mere personal opinion upon which a man falls one direction or the other. Mr. Sagan believes no God exists while I believe He does. I believe the evidence is not in the stars or in subatomic particles, but in the spiritual world of which Sagan probably doesn't even consider. God chooses the foolish things to shame the wise lest no man should boast. I do not know everything, but I believe this; that life came from God and He exists and that my life is complete in Him. Nothing in science has ever refuted that and nothing in that is at odds with scientific fact.But don't let facts deter your mocking.![]()
![]()
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest. But for us, it's different. Consider again that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity in all this vastness there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known, so far, to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment, the Earth is where we make our stand. It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space, 1997 reprint, pp. xvxvi
For now, try to focus on spiritual growth, especially yours. You have undertaken a challenge to your beliefs, reflected, proposed your thoughts.I vehemently disagree with the bolded. That supposition at the crux of the argument is a mere personal opinion upon which a man falls one direction or the other. Mr. Sagan believes no God exists while I believe He does. I believe the evidence is not in the stars or in subatomic particles, but in the spiritual world of which Sagan probably doesn't even consider.God chooses the foolish things to shame the wise lest no man should boast. I do not know everything, but I believe this; that life came from God and He exists and that my life is complete in Him. Nothing in science has ever refuted that and nothing in that is at odds with scientific fact.But don't let facts deter your mocking.![]()
![]()
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest. But for us, it's different. Consider again that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity in all this vastness there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known, so far, to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment, the Earth is where we make our stand. It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space, 1997 reprint, pp. xvxvi
So laugh all you want, but I guaranty you no one in this thread has put more effort into this topic than I have. I have wrestled with the questions posed and had to come to conclusions I could be intellectually honest with. I haven't blindly held to my faith despite facts like many seem to think. I have dug deep into it and questioned everything.
So maybe I'm a bit touchy on the subject, and I shouldn't post in serious topics so late, but to me this goes beyond a scientific discussion to the core of who I am. I believe in God because the sum of my knowledge and personal experiences points to that, not because I'm too scared or weak or stupid to not believe.
I cannot read you and I'm not familiar enough to know if you are being serious or not here.1st you indicate I'm being spiritually immature (won't argue that and tend to agree). Then you seem respectful of my position and finally you compare me to Job, a great hero of believers. But calling me patient seems disingenuous considering the fact that I've been snippy in this thread and the beginning part indicating I need spiritual maturity.For now, try to focus on spiritual growth, especially yours. You have undertaken a challenge to your beliefs, reflected, proposed your thoughts.I vehemently disagree with the bolded. That supposition at the crux of the argument is a mere personal opinion upon which a man falls one direction or the other. Mr. Sagan believes no God exists while I believe He does. I believe the evidence is not in the stars or in subatomic particles, but in the spiritual world of which Sagan probably doesn't even consider.God chooses the foolish things to shame the wise lest no man should boast. I do not know everything, but I believe this; that life came from God and He exists and that my life is complete in Him. Nothing in science has ever refuted that and nothing in that is at odds with scientific fact.But don't let facts deter your mocking.![]()
![]()
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest. But for us, it's different. Consider again that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity in all this vastness there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known, so far, to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment, the Earth is where we make our stand. It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space, 1997 reprint, pp. xvxvi
So laugh all you want, but I guaranty you no one in this thread has put more effort into this topic than I have. I have wrestled with the questions posed and had to come to conclusions I could be intellectually honest with. I haven't blindly held to my faith despite facts like many seem to think. I have dug deep into it and questioned everything.
So maybe I'm a bit touchy on the subject, and I shouldn't post in serious topics so late, but to me this goes beyond a scientific discussion to the core of who I am. I believe in God because the sum of my knowledge and personal experiences points to that, not because I'm too scared or weak or stupid to not believe.
I truly appreciate where you are coming from, even though I disagree.
You have the patience of Job, literally.
Wow, Lutherman goes out of his way to compliment you and this is how you respond? Disgusting.I cannot read you and I'm not familiar enough to know if you are being serious or not here.1st you indicate I'm being spiritually immature (won't argue that and tend to agree). Then you seem respectful of my position and finally you compare me to Job, a great hero of believers. But calling me patient seems disingenuous considering the fact that I've been snippy in this thread and the beginning part indicating I need spiritual maturity.For now, try to focus on spiritual growth, especially yours. You have undertaken a challenge to your beliefs, reflected, proposed your thoughts.I vehemently disagree with the bolded. That supposition at the crux of the argument is a mere personal opinion upon which a man falls one direction or the other. Mr. Sagan believes no God exists while I believe He does. I believe the evidence is not in the stars or in subatomic particles, but in the spiritual world of which Sagan probably doesn't even consider.God chooses the foolish things to shame the wise lest no man should boast. I do not know everything, but I believe this; that life came from God and He exists and that my life is complete in Him. Nothing in science has ever refuted that and nothing in that is at odds with scientific fact.But don't let facts deter your mocking.![]()
![]()
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest. But for us, it's different. Consider again that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity in all this vastness there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known, so far, to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment, the Earth is where we make our stand. It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space, 1997 reprint, pp. xvxvi
So laugh all you want, but I guaranty you no one in this thread has put more effort into this topic than I have. I have wrestled with the questions posed and had to come to conclusions I could be intellectually honest with. I haven't blindly held to my faith despite facts like many seem to think. I have dug deep into it and questioned everything.
So maybe I'm a bit touchy on the subject, and I shouldn't post in serious topics so late, but to me this goes beyond a scientific discussion to the core of who I am. I believe in God because the sum of my knowledge and personal experiences points to that, not because I'm too scared or weak or stupid to not believe.
I truly appreciate where you are coming from, even though I disagree.
You have the patience of Job, literally.
Long story short, you confuse me.