What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Darrell Jackson (1 Viewer)

They said he will be sitting out most of , if not all of the preseason, but is trying to make it for the regular season.

With the way this injury has nagged him all off season, I don't expect it to not affect the regular season somewhat.

 
The X-Factor will be Nate Burleson.

The success or failure of the Seahack

passing game may fall squarely on his shoulders.

 
DJax is really falling down my draft board with these knee issues. I think Id rather have Joey Galloway, Santana Moss at this point, so he's at about WR15 in my board.

 
Ron_Mexico said:
The X-Factor will be Nate Burleson.The success or failure of the Seahackpassing game may fall squarely on his shoulders.
Click to expand...
I hope Burleson plays well, but I bet Hasselbeck leans on Engram and Stevens. Also, Mili finally looks healthy again. Won't be shocked to see Seattle use more two TE sets. Peter Warrick is back to full speed after two solid years of being somewhat gimpy. Could be a playmaker is they get him the ball in space.I am still sky high on Jackson. The "procedure" he had done in the off-season wasn't from a new injury. It was only to clean up the knee from the previous surgery. I think he'll be fine and step in at full speed just like he did last year.
 
Jackson was winning me games before he got injured last year, with four consecutive, SOLID games: 6 catches for 65 yards and a tuddie week one, 8 catches for 131 in week two, 8 catches for 125 in week three, and 7 catches for 55 and a tuddie in week four. What did he do in his first game back? Only had 6 catches for 72 and a tuddie. Then he went and had a sparkling playoffs. That is the kind of consistency I salivate over in a head-to-head league. He won't go off for 170 and two touchdowns, but he'll give you rock-solid production every time you play him. He is a suitable #1 and a dynamite #2 reciever.

I see zero reason for that to drop off this year once he is good to go. Hasselbeck knows where he is going when he needs a first down or wants a quick TD strike...their chemistry has grown every year and is peaking. Burleson should be a nice compliment. If Jackson plays 16 games he will finish with absolutely no less than 80 catches for 1100 yards and 10 tds, take it to the bank.

 
Hellfire Snail said:
Jackson was winning me games before he got injured last year, with four consecutive, SOLID games: 6 catches for 65 yards and a tuddie week one, 8 catches for 131 in week two, 8 catches for 125 in week three, and 7 catches for 55 and a tuddie in week four. What did he do in his first game back? Only had 6 catches for 72 and a tuddie. Then he went and had a sparkling playoffs. That is the kind of consistency I salivate over in a head-to-head league. He won't go off for 170 and two touchdowns, but he'll give you rock-solid production every time you play him. He is a suitable #1 and a dynamite #2 reciever.I see zero reason for that to drop off this year once he is good to go. Hasselbeck knows where he is going when he needs a first down or wants a quick TD strike...their chemistry has grown every year and is peaking. Burleson should be a nice compliment. If Jackson plays 16 games he will finish with absolutely no less than 80 catches for 1100 yards and 10 tds, take it to the bank.
Click to expand...
Don't say "tuddie" anymore. TIA
 
This article is why I picked up DJ early in my dynasty draft:

... the Seahawks strive to get closer to the 60-40 pass-to-run ratio that Holmgren prefers in his hybrid of the West Coast offense.

In 2005, the Seahawks ran (519) more than they passed (474) for only the second time in Holmgren's 14 seasons as a head coach in the NFL.
Click to expand...
linkIf the Seahawks look to pass more, that can only mean more targets for DJ (provided he stays healthy) and should make him a top WR.

 
moleculo said:
This article is why I picked up DJ early in my dynasty draft:

... the Seahawks strive to get closer to the 60-40 pass-to-run ratio that Holmgren prefers in his hybrid of the West Coast offense.

In 2005, the Seahawks ran (519) more than they passed (474) for only the second time in Holmgren's 14 seasons as a head coach in the NFL.
Click to expand...
linkIf the Seahawks look to pass more, that can only mean more targets for DJ (provided he stays healthy) and should make him a top WR.
Click to expand...
Why do they want to run LESS after going to the Super Bowl by running MORE? I'm wondering if the other time during Holmgren's tenure was also a SB visit by the Pack.Is it just to save wear and tear on SA? I don't get it. :confused:

 
I heard Matt Hasselbeck and Bobby Engram on Sirius tonight. Hasselbeck stated DJAX is not practicing at all, and won't for a while longer.

I'm not a fan of guys who don't play and practice, I would think most FFrs would drop him down if they aren't Seahawk fans...

No link, it was on the radio...sorry.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Jerk said:
moleculo said:
This article is why I picked up DJ early in my dynasty draft:

... the Seahawks strive to get closer to the 60-40 pass-to-run ratio that Holmgren prefers in his hybrid of the West Coast offense.

In 2005, the Seahawks ran (519) more than they passed (474) for only the second time in Holmgren's 14 seasons as a head coach in the NFL.
Click to expand...
linkIf the Seahawks look to pass more, that can only mean more targets for DJ (provided he stays healthy) and should make him a top WR.
Click to expand...
Why do they want to run LESS after going to the Super Bowl by running MORE? I'm wondering if the other time during Holmgren's tenure was also a SB visit by the Pack.Is it just to save wear and tear on SA? I don't get it. :confused:
Click to expand...
Yeah that reminds me of the Raiders when they went to the Super Bowl and lost next year they came back with a different offensive system and just had a bad season. Age was part of the reason but still similar
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Top 10 percentage? (WARNING: Lots of math talk and poor assumptions)
Replies
9
Views
382
Keith R
Keith R
T
Travdogg's positional rankings (summer edition)
2
Replies
84
Views
5K
wgoldsph
wgoldsph
wgoldsph
Who do you own the most in best ball
Replies
20
Views
672
Desert_Power
Desert_Power

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top