Data.com Vs. Hoovers, anyone use both these services? Opinions? (1 Viewer)

[skycriesmary]

I'm looking to implement a lead generation system to interface with Salesforce. Any FBG's who have used both, willing to offer opinions? I've read the reviews, but looking for something objective.

 

[chauncey]

 

[chauncey]

I have used reference usa for leads but never the sources you list in the op. Interested in the ffa consensus as well.

 

[skycriesmary]

We're going to go with Hoovers. They actually supply the raw data to data.com, which was formally Jigsaw. If you plan on going through a good amount of leads per month, i.e. have 3 or more salespeople, Hoovers is the way to go, IMO. They offer unlimited leads for a flat rate per user, while Data.com wants to sell you them in bundles of 300 for $125.

 

[trader jake]

We're going to go with Hoovers. They actually supply the raw data to data.com, which was formally Jigsaw. If you plan on going through a good amount of leads per month, i.e. have 3 or more salespeople, Hoovers is the way to go, IMO. They offer unlimited leads for a flat rate per user, while Data.com wants to sell you them in bundles of 300 for $125.

Are they the Glengarry leads? If so, Mitch & Murray got a deal at $125.

 

[skycriesmary]

We're going to go with Hoovers. They actually supply the raw data to data.com, which was formally Jigsaw. If you plan on going through a good amount of leads per month, i.e. have 3 or more salespeople, Hoovers is the way to go, IMO. They offer unlimited leads for a flat rate per user, while Data.com wants to sell you them in bundles of 300 for $125.

Are they the Glengarry leads? If so, Mitch & Murray got a deal at $125.

If only. I'm sure most will require jackass repellent.