Chaos Commish said:
A little overrated but understandably so considering his contemporaries/competition of the last couple decades. I've tried to get into FF during three different road trips this summer and no. He's great no doubt, but for me anyway there's something blah about the songs. shrug
I like the Foo Fighters, even if they usually stay in their fairly narrow comfort zone. I can see why some would think their songs are blah, but for kick ###, straight-ahead hard rock, you won't find much better these days.
Don't get this narrow comfort zone perspective. How can anyone listen to the two discs of In Your Honor and say they have a narrow comfort zone? They aren't alike.
That's the exception to the rule. The rest of their albums basically all have the exact same sound.
I guess I am thinking of it in relative terms. If I had to make a top 50 favorite bands/artists list, if Foo Fighters would make it (they'd be right at the borderline of making it, TBH), they'd probably be the least diverse band on there.
And I don't really mean it as a criticism. Like I said before, with them, what you see is what you almost always get: kick ### hard rock.
Edit: if you are curious at all whose these 50 bands/artists would be, off the top of my head (in no order): Rush, Porcupine Tree, Steven Wilson, Dream Theater, Pink Floyd, The Beatles, Devin Townsend, Yes, Queen, U2, Muse, Genesis, Flower Kings, Radiohead, Kansas, Blue Oyster Cult, Neal Morse, Zeppelin, Opeth, Spock's Beard, Transatlantic, Camel, Moody Blues, Death Cab, Sabbath, The Police, Judas Priest, Decemberists, Van Halen, Flaming Lips, The Who, dredg, ELP, Tears for Fears, Arcade Fire, Queensryche, Dave Matthews Band, Billy Joel, Styx, Triumph, Peter Gabriel, Prince, Sigur Ros, Pet Shop Boys, Simon & Garfunkel, King Crimson, Talking Heads, Bowie, Doobie Brothers, Rolling Stones. That is 50. I'd have a tough time putting Foo Fighters ahead of any of them, so they'd just barely miss out on my top 50.