If you aren't cheating, you aren't trying....LHUCKS said:Play by the rules...he said the top 70. Jennings is ranked #58Cheaters!!cr8f said:Jennings should start.

If you aren't cheating, you aren't trying....LHUCKS said:Play by the rules...he said the top 70. Jennings is ranked #58Cheaters!!cr8f said:Jennings should start.
Isn't that the official credo of SEC football?If you aren't cheating, you aren't trying....LHUCKS said:Play by the rules...he said the top 70. Jennings is ranked #58Cheaters!!cr8f said:Jennings should start.![]()
I said the same thing about him for that last three seasons. dissappoints every year.I'm going out on a limb and saying this is Tim Carter's year. He bumps Toomer via injury or due to stellar play.Yeah maybe it's a wacky prediction but so be it
Down to Marshall/Kircus. Watts Cut.Whoever manages to get the WR#3 on the Broncos--Marshall/Kircus/Watts could be a nice sleeper with Walker getting back after the injury and Smith getting up there in age.
How do you see this playing out Shick!Does Engram move up in the WR pecking order, or does he retain his role & Hackett leap frogs him?Seattle passing game will be effective. Hasselbeck passing for less than 24 touchdowns would be a shocker. Lots of potential there now. With Jackson questionable at best right now, there's room for someone to emerge.I've been a fan of DJ Hackett for two years. He's got the skill set to be a big time contributor. However, Maurice Mann was the most impressive Seattle during the preseason. Hackett spent the first three games on the bench with a hamstring injury, but looked great in extended action during the fourth preseason game including a great catch in the back of the endzone.
I'm not shy about letting folks know I think Engram will lead the team in targets should Jackson not see the field. Without Jackson in the mix I see the WR target pecking order like this: Engram (40%), Burleson(35%), Hackett (25%). Engram more between the 20s. Hackett more in the redzone.That said, I still think Jackson will play and play well.How do you see this playing out Shick!Does Engram move up in the WR pecking order, or does he retain his role & Hackett leap frogs him?Seattle passing game will be effective. Hasselbeck passing for less than 24 touchdowns would be a shocker. Lots of potential there now. With Jackson questionable at best right now, there's room for someone to emerge.I've been a fan of DJ Hackett for two years. He's got the skill set to be a big time contributor. However, Maurice Mann was the most impressive Seattle during the preseason. Hackett spent the first three games on the bench with a hamstring injury, but looked great in extended action during the fourth preseason game including a great catch in the back of the endzone.
Ward is now questionable for the opener. Bump Wlson and maybe even Nate Washington. I just have a feeling this hammy issue for Ward is going to linger for a while.Nice Value - Terry Glenn
Sleeper - Cedric Wilson
Deep deep sleeper. Sam Hurd
Davis is going to play for the Bears in the slot a lot, and will be returning kicks. Berrian will start the season as the #2, but he can't seem to stay on the field, so I think Davis will have some opportunites to make plays, but given that the Bears love to run the ball, and aren't know for big passing numbers, it would be a shocker to see him put up the kind of numbers that would be useful in fantasy football, unless you're getting points for kick returns, and he's pretty good at that.I am liking Rashied Davis a lot.
I think I did a while back too, didn't last year(don't think so) but....this is the year IMO.I had the pleasure of speaking with someone recently that told me that when they drafted Moss, the next day they started drawing up plays just for him. He's been dinged up, as you know. To start camp, they had Carter running in those plays figuring the offense better know them for when Moss returns. Well, Carter did great and those plays are still there. Very interesting to know that a guy that low on the food chain has plays just for him now(and Moss too if he ever plays).I said the same thing about him for that last three seasons. dissappoints every year.I'm going out on a limb and saying this is Tim Carter's year. He bumps Toomer via injury or due to stellar play.Yeah maybe it's a wacky prediction but so be it
I might be wrong but I don't think so...didn't you say this last year? Or was it your excitement for Hackett? or both?Jax's injury woes are nothing new. Both he and Engram have been in Seattle a while, why is he going to come thru big now Shick?I'm not shy about letting folks know I think Engram will lead the team in targets should Jackson not see the field. Without Jackson in the mix I see the WR target pecking order like this: Engram (40%), Burleson(35%), Hackett (25%). Engram more between the 20s. Hackett more in the redzone.That said, I still think Jackson will play and play well.How do you see this playing out Shick!Does Engram move up in the WR pecking order, or does he retain his role & Hackett leap frogs him?Seattle passing game will be effective. Hasselbeck passing for less than 24 touchdowns would be a shocker. Lots of potential there now. With Jackson questionable at best right now, there's room for someone to emerge.I've been a fan of DJ Hackett for two years. He's got the skill set to be a big time contributor. However, Maurice Mann was the most impressive Seattle during the preseason. Hackett spent the first three games on the bench with a hamstring injury, but looked great in extended action during the fourth preseason game including a great catch in the back of the endzone.
what if I said pick someone not a Cowboy, who would you replace Hurd and Glenn with?curiousNice Value - Terry GlennSleeper - Cedric WilsonDeep deep sleeper. Sam Hurd
He's looked better than Berrian and Bradley throughout camp and the preseason. Not entirely sure who will be the #2 to begin the year, but Davis has overcome the very long-shot odds to at least earn the opportunity. I'm not real concerned with the supposed Bears lack of a #2. Someone in that group will emerge IMO. I just hope Moose is more consistent than last season.I am liking Rashied Davis a lot.
With regard to Hackett?Talent and opportunity. Last year he was WR5 in Seattle behind Jackson, Engram, Jurevicious, and Engram. If Jackson is a no go and they have to rely on him he'll have an opportunity (assuming they don't make a trade). I continue to like what I see from Hackett. If we don't trust our own observations, what's the point?Here's his log of games from last year as a rookie. Many games he didn't see the field because he was buried on the depth chart.I might be wrong but I don't think so...didn't you say this last year? Or was it your excitement for Hackett? or both?Jax's injury woes are nothing new. Both he and Engram have been in Seattle a while, why is he going to come thru big now Shick?
+----------+--------+-------------+----+| WK OPP | RSHYD | REC YD | TD |+----------+--------+-------------+----+| 4 was | 0 | 0 0 | 0 || 5 stl | 0 | 5 43 | 0 || 6 hou | 0 | 0 0 | 0 || 7 dal | 0 | 4 36 | 0 || 9 ari | 0 | 0 0 | 0 || 10 stl | 0 | 2 78 | 1 || 11 sfo | 0 | 6 67 | 1 || 12 nyg | 0 | 2 47 | 0 || 13 phi | 0 | 1 42 | 0 || 14 sfo | 0 | 3 43 | 0 || 15 ten | 0 | 0 0 | 0 || 16 ind | 0 | 1 5 | 0 || 17 gnb | 0 | 4 39 | 0 |+----------+--------+-------------+----+| TOTAL | 0 | 28 400 | 2 |+----------+--------+-------------+----+
fixeddeep deep deep sleepering.... David Boston![]()
I'll say it again.Nate Washington.Nate Washington
He looked good on the TD, but is he a guy that will produce much with Ward and Miller garnering most of the looks?. Plus, I imagine that they'll want to work Holmes in more given his 1st round draft spot.One thing is for sure though is that Cedric Wilson was all but invisible last night.I'll say it again.Nate Washington.Nate Washington
Santonio Holmes.as long as he stays out of jail, he's going to be the guy to have.buy now.CrossEyed said:I'll say it again.Nate Washington.Nate Washington
When Ben gets back and as Washington and Holmes get more comfortable, I think you're going to see more of a 50/50 split with the Steelers offense. There are just too many weapons in the passing game. And it will keep the defense more honest, which will open up more room for FWP. I'm not saying they'll turn into Air Coryell II, but I think the Steeler WR who emerges as the #2 will have more value than people are used to. Right now I'm thinking Washington is going to be that guy this year.zamboni said:He looked good on the TD, but is he a guy that will produce much with Ward and Miller garnering most of the looks?. Plus, I imagine that they'll want to work Holmes in more given his 1st round draft spot.One thing is for sure though is that Cedric Wilson was all but invisible last night.CrossEyed said:I'll say it again.Nate Washington.Nate Washington
you could be right for most of this year.did Washington play much after Ward came back though?When Ben gets back and as Washington and Holmes get more comfortable, I think you're going to see more of a 50/50 split with the Steelers offense. There are just too many weapons in the passing game. And it will keep the defense more honest, which will open up more room for FWP. I'm not saying they'll turn into Air Coryell II, but I think the Steeler WR who emerges as the #2 will have more value than people are used to. Right now I'm thinking Washington is going to be that guy this year.zamboni said:He looked good on the TD, but is he a guy that will produce much with Ward and Miller garnering most of the looks?. Plus, I imagine that they'll want to work Holmes in more given his 1st round draft spot.One thing is for sure though is that Cedric Wilson was all but invisible last night.CrossEyed said:I'll say it again.Nate Washington.Nate Washington
Came back?you could be right for most of this year.did Washington play much after Ward came back though?When Ben gets back and as Washington and Holmes get more comfortable, I think you're going to see more of a 50/50 split with the Steelers offense. There are just too many weapons in the passing game. And it will keep the defense more honest, which will open up more room for FWP. I'm not saying they'll turn into Air Coryell II, but I think the Steeler WR who emerges as the #2 will have more value than people are used to. Right now I'm thinking Washington is going to be that guy this year.zamboni said:He looked good on the TD, but is he a guy that will produce much with Ward and Miller garnering most of the looks?. Plus, I imagine that they'll want to work Holmes in more given his 1st round draft spot.One thing is for sure though is that Cedric Wilson was all but invisible last night.CrossEyed said:I'll say it again.Nate Washington.Nate Washington
seemed like he played a lot more in the second half. i don't know how to check this things out though.Came back?you could be right for most of this year.did Washington play much after Ward came back though?When Ben gets back and as Washington and Holmes get more comfortable, I think you're going to see more of a 50/50 split with the Steelers offense. There are just too many weapons in the passing game. And it will keep the defense more honest, which will open up more room for FWP. I'm not saying they'll turn into Air Coryell II, but I think the Steeler WR who emerges as the #2 will have more value than people are used to. Right now I'm thinking Washington is going to be that guy this year.zamboni said:He looked good on the TD, but is he a guy that will produce much with Ward and Miller garnering most of the looks?. Plus, I imagine that they'll want to work Holmes in more given his 1st round draft spot.One thing is for sure though is that Cedric Wilson was all but invisible last night.CrossEyed said:I'll say it again.Nate Washington.Nate Washington