Denver at Arizona (Preseason week 4) (1 Viewer)

[posty]

Discuss...

 

[Raging Alpaca]

It's the Bell v. Bell. v. Cobbs showdown!

 

[Futility]

It's the Bell v. Bell. v. Cobbs showdown!

I prefer the term "cluster####."

 

[posty]

It's the Bell v. Bell. v. Cobbs showdown!

I prefer the term "cluster####."

Yeah, this sounds better...

 

[Trey]

Bell vs. Bell vs. Cobbs in a Triple Threat Steel Caged Match to become the UNDISPUTED HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION OF THE WORLD!

Just thought I'd give it a little Vince McMahon flavor.

 

[LawFitz]

C'mon Mike. Give 'em Hell.

 

[3C's]

C'mon Ced. Give 'em Hell.

Fixed

 

[TURFPACK]

Let's get this party started!!!!! i'm looking for the warvier wire move of the year to appear tonight!!!!

 

[OldMilwaukee]

Hello?

Is there anybody out there?

Not to worry....I am not in your league!!!

 

[Brock Middlebrook]

Let's go Bell!

 

[moleculo]

Let's get this party started!!!!! i'm looking for the warvier wire move of the year to appear tonight!!!!

this will be interesting indeed.BTW: game can be heard on 850 KOA.

announcing starting line-up right now -

and the starting RB is...Mike Bell.

 

[Trey]

down with mike!

up with cedric!

 

[Gr00vus]

It's a rhetorical question really - but how much extra interest is this game getting stricty from fantasy football droolers (like myself) looking at the Denver RB situation?

I figure it's a non-trivial number.

 

[Dirty Weasel]

I will be glued to my computer, hoping that the little Denver helmet scurrying down the field on nfl.com is Mike Bell. Come on Mike! For those that can watch the game, updates will be much appreciated.

 

[Brock Middlebrook]

It's a rhetorical question really - but how much extra interest is this game getting stricty from fantasy football droolers (like myself) looking at the Denver RB situation?I figure it's a non-trivial number.

It's a preseason game and it involbves the Cardinals. Unless somebody has a family member on the roster bubble, I couldn't see how anyone could care about this game w/o fantasy football.

 

[Brock Middlebrook]

bang!

 

[moleculo]

I will be glued to my computer, hoping that the little Denver helmet scurrying down the field on nfl.com is Mike Bell. Come on Mike! For those that can watch the game, updates will be much appreciated.

13 yard run by bell...announcers talked about quick feet and cutback ability.

 

[Gr00vus]

It's a rhetorical question really - but how much extra interest is this game getting stricty from fantasy football droolers (like myself) looking at the Denver RB situation?I figure it's a non-trivial number.

It's a preseason game and it involbves the Cardinals. Unless somebody has a family member on the roster bubble, I couldn't see how anyone could care about this game w/o fantasy football.

Right - I'm just wondering what kind of numbers we're talking about. Impossile to measure I'm sure, but still something I found interesting to consider.

 

[Dirty Weasel]

I will be glued to my computer, hoping that the little Denver helmet scurrying down the field on nfl.com is Mike Bell. Come on Mike! For those that can watch the game, updates will be much appreciated.

13 yard run by bell...announcers talked about quick feet and cutback ability.

So far, NFL.com shows runs of 5, 2, 29, and 1 yard for Mike

 

[Trey]

if you take away bell's long run he sucks tonight

 

[moleculo]

I will be glued to my computer, hoping that the little Denver helmet scurrying down the field on nfl.com is Mike Bell. Come on Mike! For those that can watch the game, updates will be much appreciated.

13 yard run by bell...announcers talked about quick feet and cutback ability.

So far, NFL.com shows runs of 5, 2, 29, and 1 yard for Mike

I know...I 'm pretty sure NFL.com is wrong.

 

[azcards33]

talk about over-RATED

 

[Dirty Weasel]

5 for 38 and no fumbles on the 1st drive for Mike Bell. Not a bad start, but did have runs of 1, 1, and 2 yards. Let's see what happens on Denver's next possession.

 

[duaneok66]

you mean 5,2,13,1,1??

5 for 22

 

[3C's]

I will be glued to my computer, hoping that the little Denver helmet scurrying down the field on nfl.com is Mike Bell. Come on Mike! For those that can watch the game, updates will be much appreciated.

13 yard run by bell...announcers talked about quick feet and cutback ability.

So far, NFL.com shows runs of 5, 2, 29, and 1 yard for Mike

I know...I 'm pretty sure NFL.com is wrong.

They'd have to be. Play by play shows the play before being on the Denver 45, a 2yard run by Cutler with a 5 yard penalty on AZ. Next play is a 29 yard run to the 29.

 

[Dirty Weasel]

NFL.com has changed it to 5 for 22. Good thing we have someone with eyes on the game. Thanx, Moleculo

 

[moleculo]

NFL.com has changed it to 5 for 22. Good thing we have someone with eyes on the game. Thanx, Moleculo

I do what I can, I can what I do.

 

[moleculo]

Cutler to Kircus - 84 yds, TD

 

[Brewdude]

That play sounded exciting on the iRadio. Cutler to Kircus for 84 & TD.

 

[Brock Middlebrook]

:(

 

[Hellfire Snail]

Cutler to Kircus - 84 yds, TD

I think it's plain to see that Cutler will be starting as soon as week 2. Plummer's days are clearly numbered.

 

[Brewdude]

Wow, this NFL Network No Huddle is pretty cool.

As soon as I submitted my last post, they showed the play. Kircus got behind two defenders to get the ball, then just ran away from them. Pass looked to be about 40 yards in the air.

 

[Brewdude]

Cutler to Kircus - 84 yds, TD

I think it's plain to see that Cutler will be starting as soon as week 2. Plummer's days are clearly numbered.

 

[meeka]

It's a rhetorical question really - but how much extra interest is this game getting stricty from fantasy football droolers (like myself) looking at the Denver RB situation?I figure it's a non-trivial number.

It's a preseason game and it involbves the Cardinals. Unless somebody has a family member on the roster bubble, I couldn't see how anyone could care about this game w/o fantasy football.

Right - I'm just wondering what kind of numbers we're talking about. Impossile to measure I'm sure, but still something I found interesting to consider.

If you look on nfl.com gamecenter after each kickoff it shows you how many viewers that game has. The Broncos game has 1500 or so. I saw that the seahawks game was a little under that, but the Cowboys game was at 6,000. Just though you would like to know.

 

[3C's]

Tatum was in on that series. All one play of it.

 

[azcards33]

Cutler to Kircus - 84 yds, TD

I think it's plain to see that Cutler will be starting as soon as week 2. Plummer's days are clearly numbered.

Who needs Javon Walker when you've got David 'Circus' Kircus???

 

[Brewdude]

It's a rhetorical question really - but how much extra interest is this game getting stricty from fantasy football droolers (like myself) looking at the Denver RB situation?I figure it's a non-trivial number.

It's a preseason game and it involbves the Cardinals. Unless somebody has a family member on the roster bubble, I couldn't see how anyone could care about this game w/o fantasy football.

Right - I'm just wondering what kind of numbers we're talking about. Impossile to measure I'm sure, but still something I found interesting to consider.

If you look on nfl.com gamecenter after each kickoff it shows you how many viewers that game has. The Broncos game has 1500 or so. I saw that the seahawks game was a little under that, but the Cowboys game was at 6,000. Just though you would like to know.

Hmmm...never noticed this before. Is it a new feature this year? I bounce between the regular season games so much, it'd be impossible to count me for listening to a game.

 

[Brewdude]

If you look on nfl.com gamecenter after each kickoff it shows you how many viewers that game has. The Broncos game has 1500 or so. I saw that the seahawks game was a little under that, but the Cowboys game was at 6,000. Just though you would like to know.

The numbers are almost exactly opposite here though...tells you what the sharks are paying attention to. Broncos vs. Cards:

72 User(s) are reading this topic (28 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)44 Members: Brewdude, jonessed, 3C's, Hellfire Snail, Titanium, beerrun, Dirty Weasel, Trap Play, skillz, Real Man of Genius, Screamin' SphinX, prelate, The Ref, Mike Noyes, red, einstein2u, pheagles, Unwrittenlaw, bsm123, meeka, Ted Lange as your Bartender, SDJohnny, Porkos, azcards33, citsalp, RonMexico, MXM34, Larock, Land Rush 101, br0nc080, pantagrapher, cantstop1999, oukurt, GoFishTN, Maik Jeaunz, LordHusker, Rounders, valence, billymays, Sabertooth, tommyGunZ, gman8343, JSUF, Revo

Vikes vs. Cowboys:

22 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)14 Members: Brewdude, culdeus, danatbud, FTRWRTR, Chaos Commish, Neofight, Shelomojo, pigskinliquors, nephilim, FFLOA, Stonedog, scratcher, Cowboys#1, Marms

 

[RabidRabbit]

if you take away bell's long run he sucks tonight

You're right a 4.4 Avg sucks rocks.Everyone just pipe down. He's had one series and Denver moved the ball with him in there.As long as he keeps moving the chains and his series end in points he'll remain the starter."Its still a close call for starting RB." Everyone said this is fodder for T Bell to be motivated.It really is to make surethe rook understands, week in and week out he has to bring it,. As soonas he doesn't there is a guy waiting to take his place. He'll get the most carries of any Denv back against StL.FYI: M Bell owner. Thought you should know

 

[Chaos Commish]

They can take Boldin out now.

 

[RabidRabbit]

How about Warner to Boldin.

He's clearly the favorite target. Boldin will have a monster season in Ariz.

Okay, FYI: I'm also a "Warner as my #2 QB" and Boldin owner

 

[Dirty Weasel]

OK, let's hope the DEN running game gets some action this drive....

 

[moleculo]

OK, let's hope the DEN running game gets some action this drive....

Tatum in for this drive.

 

[fflnut]

Sack, but no play according to Sportsline. Anyone see if it happened to be Tater that missed a block?

 

[phillzphan]

So if Tatum has a MONSTER game, its going to be nullified by the fact that hes in with 2nd team guys. How does Shanny expect to see anything?

 

[azcards33]

Prediction:

The only reason Shanahan and the Broncos were speaking so highly of Cedric Cobbs was so that they could trade him

This guy is bench fodder

 

[phillzphan]

And if he has a terrible game it could be the line......are we going to know ANYthing?

 

[fflnut]

He didn't do much on that series. Would love to hear how Cutler got sacked (Def holding on the play). Was it due to the hold or did our dear friend Tatum have anything to do with it?

 

[phillzphan]

wow tatum. 6, 0, -2 ....

anyone seeing whats happenin?

 

[moleculo]

So if Tatum has a MONSTER game, its going to be nullified by the fact that hes in with 2nd team guys. How does Shanny expect to see anything?

Shanahan has seen all he needs to see about Tatum over the past two years. He is not in the mix for #1 position right now. It is between Mike Bell and Ced Cobbs (basically, all MBell needs to do is not screw up too bad and the job is his.).