Rovers
Footballguy
In looking at the cheatsheet rankings this week, I saw Jackson was all the way down at #42. In my PPR scoring system, he put up 18.5 points the last time Philly and NY played. If the Giants have a weakness on D, it's the pass D against speed recievers in my opinion.
The Philly passing matchup vs the Giants is rated as nuetral. The Giants pass D is ranked 10th, but as noted in the matchup article, has not played up to that ranking in recent weeks. McNabb comes off his best performance of the season.
As a comparison, Cotchery is listed as #21 against SF, a favorable matchup. The Jets have been spreading the ball around, especially to Dustin Keller for several weeks now. Favre comes off a bad game.
Both of these WR's have about the same points in 0.5 PPR leagues YTD. I see an over dependence on matchup weighting here.
I think Bloom makes the same miscalculation, with Cotchery at 14 and Jackson at 37.
Basically, I am asking why a team's #1 WR would be ranked so far below another team's WR that has no real #1 or #2 target. Is it based soley on the matchup against a given defense? Or am I missing something?
If one were to ask my opinion, Cotchery would be around #25 and Jackson around #18 on my cheatsheet. This is not a WDIS... LOL... pick another WR to compare to Jackson if you like. I picked Cotchery because I think he's too high, but the point is I think Jackson is WAY too low.
Any feedback on Jackson's ranking from staff (or others) is most welcome.
The Philly passing matchup vs the Giants is rated as nuetral. The Giants pass D is ranked 10th, but as noted in the matchup article, has not played up to that ranking in recent weeks. McNabb comes off his best performance of the season.
As a comparison, Cotchery is listed as #21 against SF, a favorable matchup. The Jets have been spreading the ball around, especially to Dustin Keller for several weeks now. Favre comes off a bad game.
Both of these WR's have about the same points in 0.5 PPR leagues YTD. I see an over dependence on matchup weighting here.
I think Bloom makes the same miscalculation, with Cotchery at 14 and Jackson at 37.
Basically, I am asking why a team's #1 WR would be ranked so far below another team's WR that has no real #1 or #2 target. Is it based soley on the matchup against a given defense? Or am I missing something?
If one were to ask my opinion, Cotchery would be around #25 and Jackson around #18 on my cheatsheet. This is not a WDIS... LOL... pick another WR to compare to Jackson if you like. I picked Cotchery because I think he's too high, but the point is I think Jackson is WAY too low.
Any feedback on Jackson's ranking from staff (or others) is most welcome.