packersfan
Footballguy
No link yet but one should be hitting the wires shortly.
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.
How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
Wow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
Are you taking issue with the fact the waiver wire was active already? Or that Grant was available?If it's the first, I haven't played ina league that didn't start off with either blind bids or a waiver wire order before free for all in quite some time, tho some people prefer it that way.Wow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
I am in more dynasty leagues than i wish to admit at the moment, but it is about 50/50 as to whether Ryan Grant is available or not. Until the rumors of early last week, wasn't Grant the number 3 or 4 RB on one of the worst rushing teams in the league.Wow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
Ryan Grant is avialable in my WCOFF league this week. Your league is way to cool for you to even be posting here.Wow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
Wow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
THey are competitive. 12 year league, decent money, I think 8 different winners. It's called staying on top of thingsWow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
We do our waivers via fights to the death every week which is pretty exciting but leads to high owner turnover.I think the point Phurfer was making is whats the deal with your league's Waiver system.I play in two big money leagues and one uses waivers from Kickoff until midnight tuesday. The other only uses waivers when a player is dropped, which does make it harder for teams who cant be around a computer 24/7.
Well does Ryan Grant running over me in HS count as anything? I was able to see his cleats -- so my league gave him to me out of respect.Kidding about the latter part of my comment, serious about the firstWow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?I picked him up back in 2001 in the eighteenth round of my league's supplemental draft after his sophomore year at Don Bosco Preparatory H.S. and have patiently stashed him away for the last six years just waiting for him to get an opportunity. :X at the these guppies who think they're on top of their game because they managed to snag him today.
Wow. How about that? He is available in mine, too. We must all suck in that league.Ryan Grant is avialable in my WCOFF league this week. Your league is way to cool for you to even be posting here.Wow, that's good news considering I just picked up Grant off the waiver wire last night in my dynasty league.How common are these leagues? What is the point? Do these leagues maintain a competative balance? Are they all free Yahoo leagues? It seem pretty counter productive to me.Well that sucks for him personally, but I was able to grab RG immediately -- always nice to have a starting RB on the roster. What does this do for Ryan Grant's stock?
I'm hoping this situation will be the same as Samkon Gado taking over for GB, and that actually turned out good. Either or, a RB getting the bulk of carries is always worth a roster spot in Fantasy Football.Should Grant really be jumped on? He's approx 3/4th in line of a avg/mediocre group of running backs who are in a system that has barely rushed all year. Many, including I, have benefited in the past when a starter goes down and his backup explodes (ala Portis then Betts) but this situation is a starter who was iffy at best and only got oppurtunties from other injuries, going down and another backup getting a chance. He did look good though, but it was against a poor def...
Yeah, I like your points, but something you also should consider is the mere fact that ANY starting running back is valuable -- if only for matchups such as last night. For instance, if Grant can hold onto the starting job and be productive, he has a decent schedule coming later in the year, beginning with week 12.12 Thu, Nov 22 @ Detroit 13 Thu, Nov 29 @ Dallas 14 Sun, Dec 9 Oakland 15 Sun, Dec 16 @ St. Louis 16 Sun, Dec 23 @ Chicago 17 Sun, Dec 30 Detroit I think that if he can be productive, and you have unfavorable matchups with your other RBs, then he is definitely worth something in larger, deeper leagues.Should Grant really be jumped on? He's approx 3/4th in line of a avg/mediocre group of running backs who are in a system that has barely rushed all year. Many, including I, have benefited in the past when a starter goes down and his backup explodes (ala Portis then Betts) but this situation is a starter who was iffy at best and only got oppurtunties from other injuries, going down and another backup getting a chance. He did look good though, but it was against a poor def...
In a pinch, not a bad pickup...and not bad to have some depth.If he is getting the carries.Their schedule gets a bit better against the run than it has been before last night.Should Grant really be jumped on? He's approx 3/4th in line of a avg/mediocre group of running backs who are in a system that has barely rushed all year. Many, including I, have benefited in the past when a starter goes down and his backup explodes (ala Portis then Betts) but this situation is a starter who was iffy at best and only got oppurtunties from other injuries, going down and another backup getting a chance. He did look good though, but it was against a poor def...
Out of curiosity, what kind of players are people holding onto and passing over RG on the wire? Like what did you weigh as too costly of a drop for you to pass over Grant? Looking forward to a homer's perspective.I'm not going to jump on him. This is a RBBC team. Grant may start, but your going to see Jackson and Morency (when healthy) in the mix too. I totally agree with it because it keeps guys fresh as the season wears on. IMO Grant isn't going to warrant the numbers for a waiver pickup, especially on a team that is clearly pass heavy at this point. Remember we faced the 32nd ranked rush D last night. IMO the jury is still out whether we can really run the ball or not.
I'm contemplating cutting Ahman Green for him, still a bit indecisive.Out of curiosity, what kind of players are people holding onto and passing over RG on the wire? Like what did you weigh as too costly of a drop for you to pass over Grant? Looking forward to a homer's perspective.I'm not going to jump on him. This is a RBBC team. Grant may start, but your going to see Jackson and Morency (when healthy) in the mix too. I totally agree with it because it keeps guys fresh as the season wears on. IMO Grant isn't going to warrant the numbers for a waiver pickup, especially on a team that is clearly pass heavy at this point. Remember we faced the 32nd ranked rush D last night. IMO the jury is still out whether we can really run the ball or not.
Cha - Ching.I took over a last place team in a dynasty league last year, and this week, after 22 weeks, I will finally be able to start two starting RBs in a game for the first time.Ryan Grant wins the job if only by default!
** Packers RB DeShawn Wynn (shoulder) was placed on IR. Something tells us this wasn't all about the injury. There are rumors that Wynn is not, well... just not all there mentally at times. Enough about him: Ryan Grant is the clear-cut #1 Green Bay RB with Vernand Morency locked in as the backup/3rd down guy. This backfield has cleared up nicely. This was an e-mail form Draftsharks. I'm assuming that this means he is stupid. Anyone else seen or heard anything like this about Wynn.from rotoworldackers placed RB DeShawn Wynn on injured reserve with an unspecified injury, ending his season.Wynn pulled himself out of Monday's game with a shoulder injury. The seventh-rounder flashed pro talent since his first camp, but an endless array of injuries limits his long-term potential. The move clears the way for Ryan Grant to be the starter moving forward, with Vernand Morency seeing third down action. Grant should be owned in all leagues.
This is exactly the move I made last night before the game was even over - Green won't play next week, then he has his BYE. Houston is in disarray right now because of injuries and even when Ahman has played he's been largely disappointing. Wynn being placed on IR just solidifies my bet. The Pack hasn't been running because they couldn't run. What I saw last night, despite being against DEN, is that they now have options with Grant they didn't have with Jackson or Morency. This does not look like a RBBC situation to me.I'm contemplating cutting Ahman Green for him, still a bit indecisive.Out of curiosity, what kind of players are people holding onto and passing over RG on the wire? Like what did you weigh as too costly of a drop for you to pass over Grant? Looking forward to a homer's perspective.I'm not going to jump on him. This is a RBBC team. Grant may start, but your going to see Jackson and Morency (when healthy) in the mix too. I totally agree with it because it keeps guys fresh as the season wears on. IMO Grant isn't going to warrant the numbers for a waiver pickup, especially on a team that is clearly pass heavy at this point. Remember we faced the 32nd ranked rush D last night. IMO the jury is still out whether we can really run the ball or not.
I'm not going to jump on him. This is a RBBC team. Grant may start, but your going to see Jackson and Morency (when healthy) in the mix too. I totally agree with it because it keeps guys fresh as the season wears on. IMO Grant isn't going to warrant the numbers for a waiver pickup, especially on a team that is clearly pass heavy at this point. Remember we faced the 32nd ranked rush D last night. IMO the jury is still out whether we can really run the ball or not.
Dump Buckhalter for Grant.It's much better having 2 starting RBs on your rosterrather than one starter and his oft injured handcuff.The only spot I have for him would be to drop Buckhalter who I have as insurance to Westbrook(my #1) if he gets hurt. I have Edge and Jamal Lewis also. It would be nice to add another full time starter to the group, but if(Westbrook got hurt) I would be in trouble without Buck as I beleive Buckhalter could step in and be a decent 1 or 2 RB. But if I don't have him and am stuck with a Lewis or Grant as my new starter, it would be a downgrade. So in the end, I think its safer just to stick with Buckhalter as Grants not going to overtake any of my other backs anyway.