true, but the Raiders at least have Jerry Porter.Most likely......but the Raiders are giving them a run for their $$$.
I'd take Jordan/Rhodes/Curry/Porter(and I don't even like Porter) over any Titan RB/WR.Most likely......but the Raiders are giving them a run for their $$$.
there is no way he busts unless he gets injured. And even so, Chester Taylor is 5X better than any titans WR or RB.Vikings come close if you think Peterson's gonna be a bust (I do).
Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.
Unlikely. They have a bad defense, an average-at-best- offensive line, and lost their 2 of their 3 most talented skill players. They have a complete lack of talent on both sides of the ball.-OZ- said:Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.
Average O-line? That shows you know nothing about titans football.Unlikely. They have a bad defense, an average-at-best- offensive line, and lost their 2 of their 3 most talented skill players. They have a complete lack of talent on both sides of the ball.-OZ- said:Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.
His comment "complete lack of talent on both sides of the ball" confirms it.Average O-line? That shows you know nothing about titans football.Unlikely. They have a bad defense, an average-at-best- offensive line, and lost their 2 of their 3 most talented skill players. They have a complete lack of talent on both sides of the ball.-OZ- said:Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.
and Curry and Jordan and Rhodes. Heck, Crockett and Fargas have proven more than anyone of the Titan roster.a_troll00 said:true, but the Raiders at least have Jerry Porter.Weiner Dog said:Most likely......but the Raiders are giving them a run for their $$$.
Slingblade said:-OZ- said:Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.Fisher can work with literal crap and still go .500
I think he'd have a hard time, and get very dirty, working with literal crap.Slingblade said:-OZ- said:Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.Fisher can work with literal crap and still go .500
What part of being ranked 27th in offense and 32nd in defense in 2006 negates that statement?His comment "complete lack of talent on both sides of the ball" confirms it.Average O-line? That shows you know nothing about titans football.Unlikely. They have a bad defense, an average-at-best- offensive line, and lost their 2 of their 3 most talented skill players. They have a complete lack of talent on both sides of the ball.-OZ- said:Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.
Ouch. Npw that hurts.obxlegends said:To simply answer the question... yes.Jordan, Rhodes and Porter (998, ok?) all have 1,000 yard seasons to their credit. Heck, even Travis Taylor is more accomplished than any WR on the Titans roster.
Not even close. Fred Taylor and MJD? A healthy Greg Jones might even win the RB battle in TEN.They aren't very good, but I think Jacksonville is in the running as well.
Yeah, that's all the Titans need is a WR headcase to interfere with the development of their many young WRs.You laugh but he is just one year removed from a 1000 Yard season and looked like one of the up and coming WR in the league.
Not really. Tennessee is 17-31 over the last 3 seasons.Slingblade said:-OZ- said:Probably.My sub-question: Will it matter? sub-answer: NO. Tennessee will still finish .500 or better.Fisher can work with literal crap and still go .500
Porter and Curry take the Raiders out of the discussion, IMO.I think factoring in TE, the Raiders and Dolphins give Tennessee a run for their money. Particularly with Brown re-signing today.