What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Do you WANT Barry Bonds to break the HR record? (1 Viewer)

Well?

  • Sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • HELL no

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I want him to tie it, but not break it

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Barry is KingThat is all.
fixed.
Nope. Pretty sure it was correct the way I wrote it. No need to fix.
Shouldn't you be juicing up for you game vs the Dodgers on Tuesday Barry?Stop wasting your time trying to convince people that you don't cheat, cheater.You don't cheat in the same way OJ isn't a killer.You may be the best offensive player of the steroid era buy you aren't worthy to hold Willie Mays jock.As far as defense, as Rome loves to point out, you couldn't throw out Sid Bream from deep short to make the world series. You suck Barry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stat geeks interpret data far better than you emotional folk who want to give Aaron an edge because of history and ambassadorship.

One of the simplest stats to comprehend is OPS+. Take a look at it.

Bonds dominated like nobody else not named Babe Ruth. Deal with it. He won 7 MVPs and 8 GGs.

Admitting Bonds is a fantastic ballplayer does not take anything away from Hank Aaron.
As soon as we get stat geekdom involved, everything begins and ends with Babe Ruth.When you look at what Ruth did in the context of era, he just crushes everyone else as far being the best home run hitter and the best all-around offensive player ever.

I'm not really concerned with whether or not Bonds breaks the record. Without taking their eras and other factors into context, who hit the most home runs is a fairly meaningless stat. Put it all in context, and neither Bonds nor Aaron hold a candle to the Sultan of Swat.

 
Stat geeks interpret data far better than you emotional folk who want to give Aaron an edge because of history and ambassadorship.

One of the simplest stats to comprehend is OPS+. Take a look at it.

Bonds dominated like nobody else not named Babe Ruth. Deal with it. He won 7 MVPs and 8 GGs.

Admitting Bonds is a fantastic ballplayer does not take anything away from Hank Aaron.
As soon as we get stat geekdom involved, everything begins and ends with Babe Ruth.When you look at what Ruth did in the context of era, he just crushes everyone else as far being the best home run hitter and the best all-around offensive player ever.

I'm not really concerned with whether or not Bonds breaks the record. Without taking their eras and other factors into context, who hit the most home runs is a fairly meaningless stat. Put it all in context, and neither Bonds nor Aaron hold a candle to the Sultan of Swat.
:)
 
Bonds is easily the best hitter since Tef Williams, and quite possibly since the Babe. And he's got 8 gold gloves, which arent necessarily a good indicator of great defensive play (see Jeter), but he's only recently become a stiff in the OF.

All that said, I'd prefer he not break the record. But hopefully he won't hold it for long. Go A-Rod!

 
I find that Major League Baseball's ignoring the pursuit of the record rather insulting....

...to the legacy of Hank Aaron. Shouldn't we take the period of time between now and when Bond (seemingly inevitably) breaks the record to remind everyone of what kind of player Aaron was, what kind of hell he went through pursuing Babe Ruth's record, and how he has been a reminder, a thorn in the side of how far baseball and society still needs to go with race relations?

I was saddened by the complete neglect of the pursuit of 714, and now baseball is making the same mistake. The steroid scandal in baseball might be shameful, but Bud Selig and the rest of MLB's leadership are at least as much to blame for celebrating and profiting from the steroid years as any player. So to "punish" Bonds at the expense of Ruth and Aaron is just par for the course for these hypocrites.

 
I find that Major League Baseball's ignoring the pursuit of the record rather insulting.......to the legacy of Hank Aaron. Shouldn't we take the period of time between now and when Bond (seemingly inevitably) breaks the record to remind everyone of what kind of player Aaron was, what kind of hell he went through pursuing Babe Ruth's record, and how he has been a reminder, a thorn in the side of how far baseball and society still needs to go with race relations? I was saddened by the complete neglect of the pursuit of 714, and now baseball is making the same mistake. The steroid scandal in baseball might be shameful, but Bud Selig and the rest of MLB's leadership are at least as much to blame for celebrating and profiting from the steroid years as any player. So to "punish" Bonds at the expense of Ruth and Aaron is just par for the course for these hypocrites.
This is a great point. Celebrating a record being broken is almost as much about the player being passed as it is the guy breaking the record. How many great Lou Gehrig montages and stories did we get to hear when Ripken Jr. broke that record? That was great. And Hershiser breaking Drysdale's consecutive scoreless streak was the same way. I'd love to hear the great stories of Aaron's pursuit and career. Instead, we're getting stories of how bitter he and Bud Selig are about Bonds. Not fun.
 
I really do not care if he beaks it or not, but I don`t want Bonds drug induced stats to be part of the HOF.

Snub Bonds just like Mcguire.

The sad thing is that Bonds may have hit 600 without all the juice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No "hell yes" option?
:thumbup: For everyone complaining about Bonds holding on to the record I don't think it will be for long. ARod will overtake the record before his career is over with (as long as he stays healthy).
The bolded part is really the biggest issue with steriods for me. Not only would Bonds have been smaller and weaker without the roids, he would have been injured more and out longer when he was injured.This is also why Aaron was so great. He had longevity of success. That was the big deal with Cal Ripken as well. One of the most underrated part of steriods is it's work to speed the healing process. Both A-Rod and Pujols will have a good chance at running down 800 HR's IF they can stay healthy. And that is the biggest if and that is why I don't want Bonds getting the record. He shouldn't even still be playing, much less be able to hit 25 + HR's this season. Hopefully he'll break his arm and be unable to heal quickly without the roids. Then again, he'll be taking whatever he can to cheat and get away with it, so he'd probably just get better and come back even stronger and hit 100 HR's this season.

I think the only way to stop this freak is to decapitate him. :sharpenssword:

 
No "hell yes" option?
:ph34r: For everyone complaining about Bonds holding on to the record I don't think it will be for long. ARod will overtake the record before his career is over with (as long as he stays healthy).
The bolded part is really the biggest issue with steriods for me. Not only would Bonds have been smaller and weaker without the roids, he would have been injured more and out longer when he was injured.This is also why Aaron was so great. He had longevity of success. That was the big deal with Cal Ripken as well. One of the most underrated part of steriods is it's work to speed the healing process. Both A-Rod and Pujols will have a good chance at running down 800 HR's IF they can stay healthy. And that is the biggest if and that is why I don't want Bonds getting the record. He shouldn't even still be playing, much less be able to hit 25 + HR's this season. Hopefully he'll break his arm and be unable to heal quickly without the roids. Then again, he'll be taking whatever he can to cheat and get away with it, so he'd probably just get better and come back even stronger and hit 100 HR's this season.

I think the only way to stop this freak is to decapitate him. :sharpenssword:
That is another thing that people do not realize about steroids and growth hormones. They give your body the ability to recover faster than the average player does.So not only are you bigger and stronger than you normally would be, your muscles do not need the recovery period than normal MLB players need when they are worn down.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No "hell yes" option?
:popcorn: For everyone complaining about Bonds holding on to the record I don't think it will be for long. ARod will overtake the record before his career is over with (as long as he stays healthy).
The bolded part is really the biggest issue with steriods for me. Not only would Bonds have been smaller and weaker without the roids, he would have been injured more and out longer when he was injured.This is also why Aaron was so great. He had longevity of success. That was the big deal with Cal Ripken as well. One of the most underrated part of steriods is it's work to speed the healing process. Both A-Rod and Pujols will have a good chance at running down 800 HR's IF they can stay healthy. And that is the biggest if and that is why I don't want Bonds getting the record. He shouldn't even still be playing, much less be able to hit 25 + HR's this season. Hopefully he'll break his arm and be unable to heal quickly without the roids. Then again, he'll be taking whatever he can to cheat and get away with it, so he'd probably just get better and come back even stronger and hit 100 HR's this season.

I think the only way to stop this freak is to decapitate him. :sharpenssword:
That is another thing that people do not realize about steroids and growth hormones. They give your body the ability to recover faster than the average player does.So not only are you bigger and stronger than you normanlly would be, your muscles do not need the recovery period than normal MLB players need when they are worn down.
The body isn't all muscle. Steroids have been prevent to have adverse effects on ligaments and tendons. While stunting bone growth in major leaguers isn't really an issue, there are numerous reasons why steroids are a controlled substance. BTW, which would you rather have to recover from, a pulled quad or a torn ACL? There is a reason Bond's knee took forever to heal.
 
Bonds is/was twice the hitter that Hank Aaron was...I don't have a problem with it.
Is commisholio an alias of yours or are you just drinking the same cool-aid?? Seriously, I take nothing away from roid boy and his HRs he's accumulated, but the bottom line is, Aaron was twice the PLAYER Bonds could ever be. Not only was he well over 3600 hits for his career (might have been over 3700 not exactly sure), he could also field his position and he made the players around him better. Bonds, however, laced up his cement shoes and stood in the outfield.
career batting average and OBP down?This isn't close.

Hank's career totals are obviously impressive but Bonds is better in almost every facet of the game except late career defense.
:suds: I am pretty confident he was close to his prime when good ole Sid outran that arm of his. He is a one trick pony dominates at the plate (in a league that has crappy pitching as a whole compared to the time of Aaron) and completely worthless in the field. Sorry you can't see that. I'll take a career .305 hitter in Aaron (with 12364 ABs) over a .300 hitter in Bonds (with 9140 AB) any day. You can have OBP, but it's foolish to hang your hat on such a subjective stat. To each his own I suppose :mellow:
:lmao: That wiffle ball, 15-hop throw barely made it to the pitcher's mound.
 
No "hell yes" option?

Voted yes. Bonds is perhaps the greatest baseball player of all time. Steroid usage is irrelevant.

And if Bonds holding the homerun record causes heartburn for the holier-than-thou baseball fan, well, that's just gravy.
:thanks: Bond's isn't even the greatest baseball player in his family.
Oh come on. Hate on Barry all you want, but he's a demonstrably better ballplayer than his dad. Bring some argument if you want to make that assertion.
Either A, this is :no: or B. you don't know that Willie Mays is in his family. Either way, you should really read your posts and think about them before you hit that "add reply" button.
:goodposting:
This again? WILLIE MAYS IS NOT RELATED TO BARRY BONDS. Mays is Bonds' godfather. There is no blood relationship. Jeez.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top