Dodds is a BOLD man (1 Viewer)

[MLBrandow]

The current projections have corrected the obvious mistake from the preliminary cheatsheet.

I don't subscribe to FBG.I still agree with Dodds.This game will be a blowout.If Holmes were starting and not NW, we'd be talking about his breakout game right now.Is NW even in the same galaxy as Holt? Not a chance.Will it matter two weeks from now? Nope.Does it matter Sunday? You'd better believe it for anyone trying to make their fantasy playoffs.This is a hit or miss WW pickup with a high possibility of exploding for WR1 this week.

 

[SCGiants]

That IS a bold projection. Not getting on your case FF, but thread topics like this is why I think there should be a subscribers forum. Way too much paid info given away by just thread topics this year.

To be honest next year I may not subscribe with all of the info getting related here anyway in one way or the other.. if you have the time anything you want pretty much ends up here.. just takes time to read through.

 

[SCGiants]

That IS a bold projection. Not getting on your case FF, but thread topics like this is why I think there should be a subscribers forum. Way too much paid info given away by just thread topics this year.

Btw what ever happened to the never bench your studs theory? Holt may be in a mimi-slump but he's still HOLT! With some playoff spots possibly on the line I could never see benching Holt for most WRs...

 

[[scooter]]

4/65/1 for Holt with most of the 2nd half yet to play...

Dodds must think Nate is in for a HUGE game today...

 

[billyjoe]

The current projections have corrected the obvious mistake from the preliminary cheatsheet.

I don't subscribe to FBG.I still agree with Dodds.This game will be a blowout.If Holmes were starting and not NW, we'd be talking about his breakout game right now.Is NW even in the same galaxy as Holt? Not a chance.Will it matter two weeks from now? Nope.Does it matter Sunday? You'd better believe it for anyone trying to make their fantasy playoffs.This is a hit or miss WW pickup with a high possibility of exploding for WR1 this week.

Here's a tip for you.Don't pickup a guy from the WW and bench Holt to start him.Take it to the bank.

 

[Gamblor]

' date='Dec 3 2006, 02:47 PM' post='6001773'] 4/65/1 for Holt with most of the 2nd half yet to play... Dodds must think Nate is in for a HUGE game today...

Why would he think this since the current projections have Washington well below Holt?

 

[David Dodds]

It should be noted that my final cheatsheets have Holt at 17 (5 for 75 and 0.5 TDs) and Nate Washington at 35 (4 for 55 and 0.4 TDs). With the early Thursday games, my first numbers are mostly math (as I have a full day less to analyze everything). I loved this matchup, but was overtstating the Pittsburgh passing game because Ward was out. When I corrected things due to injuries (and more info from deeper analysis), Washington moved down considerably (to 35th best WR).

That said, Nate Washington does have 2 catches for 42 yards at halftime.

 

[MLBrandow]

Here's a tip for you.Don't pickup a guy from the WW and bench Holt to start him.Take it to the bank.

NW almost broke an 80yarder in the 1st half, and right now he's got 80 yards on 3 catches.No one is saying Holt is bad, just that NW has a high probability of putting up very good numbers.Maybe if you had read what I wrote instead of spending all your time trying to think of something clever to say...And welcome to the boards, sir.

 

[Otis]

Here's a tip for you.Don't pickup a guy from the WW and bench Holt to start him.Take it to the bank.

NW almost broke an 80yarder in the 1st half, and right now he's got 80 yards on 3 catches.No one is saying Holt is bad, just that NW has a high probability of putting up very good numbers.Maybe if you had read what I wrote instead of spending all your time trying to think of something clever to say...And welcome to the boards, sir.

I'm a huge fan of seniority shtick around here #340