Does a commish veto this? (1 Viewer)

[dawrecker]

deleted - thanks for everyone's input!

 

[Phurfur]

I see nothing wrong with that trade. I like what Team 1 got but it is fair.

 

[Jimmy James]

What is your league doing allowing trades past week 11 in the first place?

I don't see anything obviously wrong with the deal unless there is more than what you wrote. I don't think being a bit of a homer is against the spirit of a league.

 

[Sinners]

The team getting Housh made out big time. Two good QB's top WR, good RB. etc.... for Farve and filler.

 

[Romulan]

Is this a redraft league? if it is then I see nothing wrong but if it isnt then it is a bad trade long term...

 

[encaitar]

What is your league doing allowing trades past week 11 in the first place?I don't see anything obviously wrong with the deal unless there is more than what you wrote. I don't think being a bit of a homer is against the spirit of a league.

Any league sitll allowing trades at this point is flawwed anyway.

 

[Eviloutsider]

First off, I like trading all the way up to playoff elimination. Every league has preferences and many will not have the same exact settings. Kudos to your league for doing something different. Second, I am not 100 percent sure what team made out better so I think thats a sign that it is fair.

 

[radballs]

Wrong forum and not enough info given.

 

[lion_crazz]

I see nothing wrong with the deal. On paper, it looks heavily lop-sided, but you need to break it down.

Jason Campbell is nothing much (just recently came on really strong), Matt Schaub (injury waiting to happen), Coles and Housh (just got injured).

The other team got one of the best QB's, a very good TE, an average RB, and a middle tier WR.