The really big Javon Walker year statistically was 2004. Here is his stat line (after I list the year you refer to in your email):YR TM G RSH YD Y/R TD TRG REC YD Y/R TD FPT RANK 2004 GB 16 0 0 0.0 0 138 89 1382 15.5 12 210 2 2003 GB 16 2 1 0.5 0 74 41 716 17.5 9 126 21 Here is how DD's years stacked up.2004 GB 16 3 4 1.3 0 134 84 1208 14.4 9 175 10 2003 GB 15 5 51 10.2 0 87 52 621 11.9 2 79 51 At first glance you would think there is a parallel here. But you are missing a very key piece of the puzzle:2003 GB 16 355 1883 5.3 15 60 50 367 7.3 5 345 2 What stat line is that you might ask? Well, that is Ahman Green's career year of over 20 TDs and over 2000 combined yards. He also gobbled up 50 receptions that year. He was the number 2 fantasy RB that year to Priest Holmes and his 27 rushing TDs. Comparing his first 6 games of 2003 (704 yards rushing, 5.37 ypc, 8 TDs, 24 receptions for 167 yards and a TD) to 2006 (219/3.78/0 and 17/138/1) is laughable. The running game in Green Bay is NOT what it was in 2003. When you have a rushing game like that going, there isn't a need to throw as much. In fact, that year Favre threw for less yards than any of his years in GB except his first two. He threw 500 less yards than his terrible year last year. It was also his third lowest total for completions in a season. Plus Favre really spread the ball around that year. His TD passes were spread among 9 different players. That would bring a tear to Andy Reid's eye. In fact, if you look at DD's first 6 games of last year and his first 6 games of this year, his numbers are staggeringly similar. The yards are different by 1, his TDs by 1, and his receptions by three. Having Jennings on the other side of the field helps him, it doesn't hurt him. Jennings first 6 games are already better than Walker's the year you refer to by over 40% in terms of fantasy points. He has already "broken out" and Driver's production hasn't really suffered. Favre knows Driver is the straw that stirs his drink. Jennings is good, and will have a good year statistically....but it won't be at the cost of Driver's numbers.
