I don't like it.My first attempt for this week. I'm 0-2 though so maybe do the opposite of me. Lol
50/50
Rodgers
Lynch
Ap
Cobb
J. Brown
S. Johnson
Woodhead
Escobar
Sea defense
Thanks for your opinion. Anybody like it?I don't like it.This is for a 50/50 so you are hurting yourself by stacking Rodgers and Cobb. That really raises your variance. RB and WR from the same team usually hurts you more than it helps.My first attempt for this week. I'm 0-2 though so maybe do the opposite of me. Lol
50/50
Rodgers
Lynch
Ap
Cobb
J. Brown
S. Johnson
Woodhead
Escobar
Sea defense
You can do better than Escobar.
Alright Mr variancelet me know which 50/50s you guys are in so I can get an easy cash. Variance is your enemy people!
Sproles has been dynamite for the last 6 years. For his price so far this year, he's been a good play with Murray in.Mile High said:Sproles now a good play with the Murry injury news?
that's a decent cash team except for Johnson AND Woodhead. Both of those guys are competing for the same receptions.need2know said:Alright Mr variancedavidkyle said:let me know which 50/50s you guys are in so I can get an easy cash. Variance is your enemy people!
I entered another with this
Rodgers
Lynch
Woodhead
A. Brown
Moncrief
S. Johnson
Kelce
D. Lewis
Jets def
Yes, Moncrief has been producing, but because TY Hilton has had some serious coverage to deal with. I think TY will outperform Moncrief this game, but he is still a talented player.How about this one for cash? Gives a 165 in the value chart which is the highest I've been able to come up with so far. I think this is damn strong if Lacy doesn't go.
You just have to put Antonio in your lineup
I like the Brady-Edelman stack, even for cash
Lynch and Seattle D together. I see them dominating their home opener against the Bears
Even more SEA with Baldwin, but he is a cheap high floor guy
Moncrief and Reed are both producing already
Brady
Starks
Lynch
Edelman
Antonio Brown
Moncrief
Reed
Baldwin
Seahawks
ETA: I've won all of my double-ups first 2 weeks by just plugging in Dodds' and Wood's lineups.
DraftKings landing page. They do about 10 FBGs each week. Week 3 is up for 7 of them, but Dodds isn't up yet.Yes, Moncrief has been producing, but because TY Hilton has had some serious coverage to deal with. I think TY will outperform Moncrief this game, but he is still a talented player.How about this one for cash? Gives a 165 in the value chart which is the highest I've been able to come up with so far. I think this is damn strong if Lacy doesn't go.
You just have to put Antonio in your lineup
I like the Brady-Edelman stack, even for cash
Lynch and Seattle D together. I see them dominating their home opener against the Bears
Even more SEA with Baldwin, but he is a cheap high floor guy
Moncrief and Reed are both producing already
Brady
Starks
Lynch
Edelman
Antonio Brown
Moncrief
Reed
Baldwin
Seahawks
ETA: I've won all of my double-ups first 2 weeks by just plugging in Dodds' and Wood's lineups.
Where do Dodds and Wood post lineups?
Are you talking about this page? http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2015/15draftkings3.phpDraftKings landing page. They do about 10 FBGs each week. Week 3 is up for 7 of them, but Dodds isn't up yet.Yes, Moncrief has been producing, but because TY Hilton has had some serious coverage to deal with. I think TY will outperform Moncrief this game, but he is still a talented player.How about this one for cash? Gives a 165 in the value chart which is the highest I've been able to come up with so far. I think this is damn strong if Lacy doesn't go.
You just have to put Antonio in your lineup
I like the Brady-Edelman stack, even for cash
Lynch and Seattle D together. I see them dominating their home opener against the Bears
Even more SEA with Baldwin, but he is a cheap high floor guy
Moncrief and Reed are both producing already
Brady
Starks
Lynch
Edelman
Antonio Brown
Moncrief
Reed
Baldwin
Seahawks
ETA: I've won all of my double-ups first 2 weeks by just plugging in Dodds' and Wood's lineups.
Where do Dodds and Wood post lineups?
I don't see any I really like so the lineup above is my own concoction from some of the more often selected players in those lineups.
I'm on a lot of the less obvious guys in your lineup. Don't agree with your TY Hilton example. That's recency bias. Why was TY Hilton low last week? Because he was shadowed by Revis. He won't be this week. Whether he is healthy or not is a different story.First time posting here but I've been lerking around the boards for the past couple of weeks. It's been a great two weeks for me. I've won 100% of my 50/50s. I've been basing my picks off 1.) Average Targets Per game (I won't pick someone with a low catch % example: T.Y. Hilton) 2.) Great Rushing / Passing Matchups for the week recommended by football guys and 3.) If I think they will get me the minimum points for me to win my 50/50's (3 points per 1,000 spent)
Here is my line up this week:
Cam Newton (6800)
Latavius Murray (5800)
Danny Woodhead (4400)
Julian Edelman (7,000)
Larry Fitzgerald (5,800)
Brandon Marshall (6,200)
Kyle Rudolph (3,300)
Jarvis Landry (6,400)
Cardinal's Defense (3,100)
I'm still changing things around but looks like I'll take some kind of arrangement from the above. Thoughts?
* I'm also struggling to do anything with Blount, Lewis, Bell or Williams.
I know Eifert has a good projection, but Baltimore has been keeping TE points to a minimum on the road. I think there are better options for less.This is the line up so far for my cash game. Plugged it in, and has 166.8 projected points:
Brady
Lynch
Woodhead
Marshall
Fitz
Edelman
Eifert
J.Starks
Seattle
I'm have Gronk in about 20% of my cash games, my projections said fade him but decided with the huge game possibility I wouldn't fade him completely. Prefer cheaper guy like Cook, Reed, or Olson.Thoughts on fading Gronk in cash? Using Gronk makes it harder to fit certain players but he will likely be highly owned and if he goes off you want him.
If Lacy doesn't play I think Starks is a must play. The only question mark is if Lacy is a GTD and does play then being its a Monday night game you are left either playing Starks anyway(probably best) or having very limited options to replace him(Montgomery or R Rodgers)I know Eifert has a good projection, but Baltimore has been keeping TE points to a minimum on the road. I think there are better options for less.This is the line up so far for my cash game. Plugged it in, and has 166.8 projected points:
Brady
Lynch
Woodhead
Marshall
Fitz
Edelman
Eifert
J.Starks
Seattle
I love Starks for the price, and I know he will be super high owned, but for some reason my gut tells me he will be Week 3's Abdullah. I have nothing empirical to back this feeling up.
He is averaging 52.4% of his catches right now and that is week 1 and 2. I'd stay away from T.Y. Hilton because of that. I guess the biggest thing is consistency. The people that are consistent right now are fitz, landry, marshall, brown, etc.I'm on a lot of the less obvious guys in your lineup. Don't agree with your TY Hilton example. That's recency bias. Why was TY Hilton low last week? Because he was shadowed by Revis. He won't be this week. Whether he is healthy or not is a different story.First time posting here but I've been lerking around the boards for the past couple of weeks. It's been a great two weeks for me. I've won 100% of my 50/50s. I've been basing my picks off 1.) Average Targets Per game (I won't pick someone with a low catch % example: T.Y. Hilton) 2.) Great Rushing / Passing Matchups for the week recommended by football guys and 3.) If I think they will get me the minimum points for me to win my 50/50's (3 points per 1,000 spent)
Here is my line up this week:
Cam Newton (6800)
Latavius Murray (5800)
Danny Woodhead (4400)
Julian Edelman (7,000)
Larry Fitzgerald (5,800)
Brandon Marshall (6,200)
Kyle Rudolph (3,300)
Jarvis Landry (6,400)
Cardinal's Defense (3,100)
I'm still changing things around but looks like I'll take some kind of arrangement from the above. Thoughts?
* I'm also struggling to do anything with Blount, Lewis, Bell or Williams.
Ginn has only pulled in 6/16 passes which brings him at a whooping 34.7%! If he'd pull in his average 6.5 targets he'd be a beast! I'm digging the line up but what's the 411 with D. Lewis?Projected around 181
Rodgers
Lynch
D. Lewis
A. Brown
Larry Fitzgerald
T. Ginn Jr
Kelce
Woodhead
Jets def
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/draftkings-staff-lineups.phpAre you talking about this page? http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2015/15draftkings3.phpDraftKings landing page. They do about 10 FBGs each week. Week 3 is up for 7 of them, but Dodds isn't up yet.Yes, Moncrief has been producing, but because TY Hilton has had some serious coverage to deal with. I think TY will outperform Moncrief this game, but he is still a talented player.How about this one for cash? Gives a 165 in the value chart which is the highest I've been able to come up with so far. I think this is damn strong if Lacy doesn't go.
You just have to put Antonio in your lineup
I like the Brady-Edelman stack, even for cash
Lynch and Seattle D together. I see them dominating their home opener against the Bears
Even more SEA with Baldwin, but he is a cheap high floor guy
Moncrief and Reed are both producing already
Brady
Starks
Lynch
Edelman
Antonio Brown
Moncrief
Reed
Baldwin
Seahawks
ETA: I've won all of my double-ups first 2 weeks by just plugging in Dodds' and Wood's lineups.
Where do Dodds and Wood post lineups?
I don't see any I really like so the lineup above is my own concoction from some of the more often selected players in those lineups.
I'm not seeing anything with specific lineups made.
Like this one quite a bit.This is the line up so far for my cash game. Plugged it in, and has 166.8 projected points:
Brady
Lynch
Woodhead
Marshall
Fitz
Edelman
Eifert
J.Starks
Seattle
Use a 2nd TE as a flex, then you'll differentiate vs other Gronk owners.Thoughts on fading Gronk in cash? Using Gronk makes it harder to fit certain players but he will likely be highly owned and if he goes off you want him.
Was surprised to see Jones ownership close to 20% in Thursday contests, lots of people chasing points I guess. My only Thursday play was Reed who did alright could of been great if Cousins was a good QB. Randle clearly would of been a nice play but very few people when there. Thought OBJ ownership would of been a little higher.Matt Jones, oof.
4x+ is what you're looking for, but yea, it could have been huge if Cousins wouldn't have missed those 2 tdsjandyt said:Was surprised to see Jones ownership close to 20% in Thursday contests, lots of people chasing points I guess. My only Thursday play was Reed who did alright could of been great if Cousins was a good QB. Randle clearly would of been a nice play but very few people when there. Thought OBJ ownership would of been a little higher.chauncey said:Matt Jones, oof.
Actually in cash games x3 is fine by me but thanks for tip.4x+ is what you're looking for, but yea, it could have been huge if Cousins wouldn't have missed those 2 tdsjandyt said:Was surprised to see Jones ownership close to 20% in Thursday contests, lots of people chasing points I guess. My only Thursday play was Reed who did alright could of been great if Cousins was a good QB. Randle clearly would of been a nice play but very few people when there. Thought OBJ ownership would of been a little higher.chauncey said:Matt Jones, oof.
Oh, yea true 3x is totally fine for cash. I just meant 4x as a good benchmark in general but more specific to multipliers and gppActually in cash games x3 is fine by me but thanks for tip.4x+ is what you're looking for, but yea, it could have been huge if Cousins wouldn't have missed those 2 tdsjandyt said:Was surprised to see Jones ownership close to 20% in Thursday contests, lots of people chasing points I guess. My only Thursday play was Reed who did alright could of been great if Cousins was a good QB. Randle clearly would of been a nice play but very few people when there. Thought OBJ ownership would of been a little higher.chauncey said:Matt Jones, oof.
My stats from the first couple weeks would show X3 for your lineup is money in triple ups or less. For quint ups I find X3 is going to put you right around the cutline so X4 is a safer target. For GPP your probably looking for X4 at least because to finish near the top you will likely need even more. This is based on low dollar contests for larger dollar contests I am guessing X3 might typically fall below the cut line for quints and might be close to the cut line for triple ups.Oh, yea true 3x is totally fine for cash. I just meant 4x as a good benchmark in general but more specific to multipliers and gppActually in cash games x3 is fine by me but thanks for tip.4x+ is what you're looking for, but yea, it could have been huge if Cousins wouldn't have missed those 2 tdsjandyt said:Was surprised to see Jones ownership close to 20% in Thursday contests, lots of people chasing points I guess. My only Thursday play was Reed who did alright could of been great if Cousins was a good QB. Randle clearly would of been a nice play but very few people when there. Thought OBJ ownership would of been a little higher.chauncey said:Matt Jones, oof.
Loved Lynch, but a game time decision in a game that could get ugly...no thanks. Seems to risky. Woodhead scares me a bit too. Gordon is going to start eating up more touches.Like this one quite a bit.This is the line up so far for my cash game. Plugged it in, and has 166.8 projected points:
Brady
Lynch
Woodhead
Marshall
Fitz
Edelman
Eifert
J.Starks
Seattle