What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

[DYNASTY] DB #16 (1 Viewer)

DB #16

  • Ronde Barber

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rodney Harrison

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kerry Rhodes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nate Clements

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nick Collins

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Josh Bullocks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Terrance Kiel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Stuart Schweigert

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Champ Bailey

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Erik Coleman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Tick

Footballguy
Please comment on your vote, and list any player that should be nominated for the next round. If you must assume a scoring system, go with 0.5 points per half-tackle, 3 points per sack / INT / FF / FR.Cornerbacks and Safeties are rolled together.1. Troy Polamalu2. Adrian Wilson3t. Ed Reed3t. Gibril Wilson5. Roy Williams6. Charles Tillman7. Bob Sanders8. Madieu Williams9t. Mike Brown9t. Michael Lewis11. Sean Taylor12. Terrence McGee13. Brian Dawkins14. Adam Archuleta15. Michael BoulwareWho's #16?(note: list some guys to be added soon or comment on these guys who've been mentioned: Greg Wesley*, Antoine Winfield*, Tony Parrish*, Gamble, Dunta, Darrent Williams)* = removed from the list for a round due to getting 0 votes.Final results:Ronde Barber [ 5 ] [19.23%] Rodney Harrison [ 0 ] [0.00%] Kerry Rhodes [ 9 ] [34.62%] Nate Clements [ 0 ] [0.00%] Nick Collins [ 0 ] [0.00%] Josh Bullocks [ 0 ] [0.00%] Terrance Kiel [ 5 ] [19.23%] Stuart Schweigert [ 2 ] [7.69%] Champ Bailey [ 3 ] [11.54%] Erik Coleman [ 2 ] [7.69%] Other [ 0 ] [0.00%] Kerry Rhodes wins.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

snarfsnarf

Footballguy
How the hell is Kerry Rhodes clobbering Eric Coleman in the voting.2004 Coleman: 100 tackles, 2 sacks, 4 int2005 Coleman: 121 tackles, 0 sacks, 2 int2005 Rhodes: 105 tackles, 1 sack, 1 intThey're on the same team so the SOS arguement goes out the door.

 

Aaron Rudnicki

Keep Walking™
Staff member
How the hell is Kerry Rhodes clobbering Eric Coleman in the voting.

2004 Coleman: 100 tackles, 2 sacks, 4 int

2005 Coleman: 121 tackles, 0 sacks, 2 int

2005 Rhodes: 105 tackles, 1 sack, 1 int

They're on the same team so the SOS arguement goes out the door.
good point. I guess I didn't realize Coleman had that great of a season this year, but his 11 solo tackles in week 17 certainly didn't hurt. I do recall reading reports that he wasn't playing nearly as well this year as he had during his rookie season and was even in danger of losing playing time at one point. Not sure what to make of that though.I think SS generally are more valuable than FS, but I agree that these two should definitely be much closer in value than this poll indicates.

 

snarfsnarf

Footballguy
How the hell is Kerry Rhodes clobbering Eric Coleman in the voting.

2004 Coleman:  100 tackles, 2 sacks, 4 int

2005 Coleman:  121 tackles, 0 sacks, 2 int

2005 Rhodes:  105 tackles, 1 sack, 1 int

They're on the same team so the SOS arguement goes out the door.
good point. I guess I didn't realize Coleman had that great of a season this year, but his 11 solo tackles in week 17 certainly didn't hurt. I do recall reading reports that he wasn't playing nearly as well this year as he had during his rookie season and was even in danger of losing playing time at one point. Not sure what to make of that though.I think SS generally are more valuable than FS, but I agree that these two should definitely be much closer in value than this poll indicates.
There was alot of Rhodes hype in the beginning of the year, and I think he outplayed coleman from a stats standpoint early on. But Coleman was money for my team from about midseason on, for whatever reason his perception never improved as his numbers did....he was consistenly ranked very low on the cheatsheets even in 2nd half of year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top