What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty Wr #10/11 Runoff (1 Viewer)

Who is Wr #10?

  • Marques Colston

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Terrell Owens

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Tick

Footballguy
These are consensus dynasty rankings for year 2007 standard FBGs scoring no PPR

If you vote other, please specify.

Also, please comment on your vote, and list any player that should be nominated for the next round.

I like the chatter going on in the 1st thread. So lets keep that going as we vote. I droped some players who didn't get votes in the last one.

1. Steve Smith

2. Chad Johnson

3. Larry Fitzgerald

4. Torry Holt

5. Reggie Wayne

6. Roy Williams

7. Anquan Boldin

8. Andre Johnson

9. Javon Walker

Results:

Marques Colston [ 49 ] ** [73.13%]

Terrell Owens [ 18 ] ** [26.87%]

Colston 10th, Owens 11th.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is a funny runoff - it seems to me that with Owens, if you have six guys he's against in the polls, he'll win soon. If you pick any of those six players and do a 1v1, Owens will lose. He's got something like 25% of people who like a very good but old player, and 75% of people who would vote for any very good player under 25 before they'd take a great player over 32.

 
This is a funny runoff - it seems to me that with Owens, if you have six guys he's against in the polls, he'll win soon. If you pick any of those six players and do a 1v1, Owens will lose. He's got something like 25% of people who like a very good but old player, and 75% of people who would vote for any very good player under 25 before they'd take a great player over 32.
:goodposting: That's an interesting analysis. The key thing here is the way we want these players to be compared to each other. I think the way we do it with large groups and occasional runoffs is probably the best practical way.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top