What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eric Johnson to get 80 receptions (1 Viewer)

Must be true then.... wait a minute, 80 receptions is impossible. How can anyone catch 80 balls while only playing in 4 games? :thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.

 
Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,

He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.

 
I try not to beat up on any "pundit" for saying something bold because, after all, I'm wrong a helluva lot too.

But that's just HILARIOUS.

 
I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
I certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:Tight EndE. Johnson, #82M. Campbell, #80B. Miller, #83J. Owens, #86
 
I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
I certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:

Tight End

E. Johnson, #82

M. Campbell, #80

B. Miller, #83

J. Owens, #86
July 31, 2007, 17:12 Saints :: OL

Saints Tight End Update

New Orleans Times-Picayune - [Full Article]

There are four tight ends in camp for the New Orleans Saints. So far, returning veterans Mark Campbell and Billy Miller have the upper hand over newcomer Eric Johnson at this point because of their familiarity with the offense and QB Drew Brees. Johnson needs to develop that rapport over the next few weeks to jump ahead.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 4, 2007, 14:19

Saints :: TE

Chemistry Not There For Saints TE E. Johnson

Jimmy Smith, New Orleans Times-Picayune - [Full Article]

New Orleans Saints TE Eric Johnson caught more passes from the Jugs machine than he did from QB Drew Brees at the team's recent minicamp. "Building that kind of chemistry, you've got to be in there repping, taking reps with (Brees), catching the ball in the offseason," Johnson said. "Right now, we're not really building that chemistry because I'm trying to learn all the plays, running in the second and third group, trying to get all the lingo." Johnson still has work to do in order to pass TE Billy Miller for playing time when the season starts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a buddy of mine that I'm in three leagues with tell me the other day that he was thinking about Eric Johnson as his #1 tight end this year (he's normally a shark, but is busy this year and he is not on FBG's).

I hope he hears about this comment and it solidifies his ideas.

 
Is there a worse football opinion out there than a Skip Bayless opinion?

Biggest clown on TV.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
I certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:

Tight End

E. Johnson, #82

M. Campbell, #80

B. Miller, #83

J. Owens, #86
Here are some recent news stories on the Saints TEs:Johnson picks quickest route

Camp Confidential

The first indicates that Johnson was listed as the top tight end on the pre-camp depth chart, but has been running with the second team behind Mark Campbell. The second states that Campbell and Miller currently have the upper hand over Johnson.

The FBG depth charts represent fantasy expectations rather than official team charts (which are often based on politics). For example, Anthony Thomas is the RB1 on the Bills official depth chart, but do we really expect him to outgain Marshawn Lynch? We don't, so the FBG depth charts list Lynch as RB1. So I think it's correct to list Eric Johnson as TE1 on the FBG depth charts whether or not he's currently getting reps with the first team, if we expect him to end up as the Saints' top TE from a fantasy perspective.

 
I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
I certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:Tight EndE. Johnson, #82M. Campbell, #80B. Miller, #83J. Owens, #86
I think that comes from this news story on the FBG news blog.
July 31, 2007, 17:12Saints :: OLSaints Tight End UpdateNew Orleans Times-Picayune - [Full Article]There are four tight ends in camp for the New Orleans Saints. So far, returning veterans Mark Campbell and Billy Miller have the upper hand over newcomer Eric Johnson at this point because of their familiarity with the offense and QB Drew Brees. Johnson needs to develop that rapport over the next few weeks to jump ahead.
Ultimately, I think he does have a lot of upside. He was a good receiving TE when healthy in SF, and we all know Brees likes big targets. I think 80 might be a bit ridiculous, but 50+ is not out of the question.
 
80 catches is a lot considering the pure number of weapons the Saints have. If healthy, and that is a big if, Johnson could realistically get 50-60 reseptions.

 
As a group, Saint TE's were 45-411-1 last year. I just don't see those numbers changing that much this coming season, except for perhaps the TD's jumping up into the 3 to 5 range.

 
He's not even with the first team right now, he's having trouble with learning the system and saints have made comments that his blocking is leaving much to be desired. So Id say 80 receptions is more then a bit of a stretch at this point. I would expect nothing less from Skip 'football guru' Bayless.

:P

 
From what I've seen personally, the dude can't block. Campbell looks like the #1 as a much more well-rounded player. Meanwhile, Johnson isn't showing anything that Billy Miller doesn't already bring to the table.

I think you'll probably see more of a committee approach to the situation.

 
If the TE position gets more receptions, then an inverse amount is taken away from the WRs and Bush.

Last year was a huge year for Brees, I doubt he equals the numbers he had (about 400-500 less yards, 50 less completions. IMO).

 
brownhelmets said:
80 catches is a lot considering the pure number of weapons the Saints have. If healthy, and that is a big if, Johnson could realistically get 50-60 reseptions.
That's what I'm thinking. And I think that 50-60 is very, very generous. I think he'll have some O-fer games, personally.
 
Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.
 
Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.
Did Tim Rattay have McAllister, Bush, Colston, Henderson, and Meacham? Do you ever see him being anything more than a safety valve?"Sorry, Reggie, looks like a quiet week for you this Sunday, we have to get the injury-prone TE involved...."
 
If EJ gets one catch for every time Skip Bayless yells out another wrong prediction, then yes 80 catches is definitely possible this season.

 
Where are all those people who are always asking for someone to go out on a limb when making predictions?

 
Some of you post as if its so ridiculous, but he's done it before and in a considerably worse offense, no?

And, stranger things have happened. If someone told you Colston was going to do his thing this time last year, what say you?

And nope, don't own Johnson

 
brownhelmets said:
80 catches is a lot considering the pure number of weapons the Saints have. If healthy, and that is a big if, Johnson could realistically get 50-60 reseptions.
I disagree...Eric Johnson's touts this year are very reminiscent of the touts we saw for Hilton last year. Despite numerous reports that he wasn't even atop the depth chart, people pimped his fantasy upside. Johnson is a decent player when healthy (gotta give props to a fellow Ivy Leaguer :goodposting: ) but to say he's injury prone would be akin to saying Dom Deluise could use a diet. The Saints have such a dynamic offense they are going to err more on the side of blocking prowess than pure receiving talent. Johnson is not, nor has ever been even an average blocking tight end. I would be shocked if he sees the field enough to get past the 40-catch mark, and that assumes he a) stays healthy and b) wins the TE1 job against current odds.
 
brownhelmets said:
80 catches is a lot considering the pure number of weapons the Saints have. If healthy, and that is a big if, Johnson could realistically get 50-60 reseptions.
I disagree...Eric Johnson's touts this year are very reminiscent of the touts we saw for Hilton last year. Despite numerous reports that he wasn't even atop the depth chart, people pimped his fantasy upside. Johnson is a decent player when healthy (gotta give props to a fellow Ivy Leaguer :moneybag: ) but to say he's injury prone would be akin to saying Dom Deluise could use a diet. The Saints have such a dynamic offense they are going to err more on the side of blocking prowess than pure receiving talent. Johnson is not, nor has ever been even an average blocking tight end. I would be shocked if he sees the field enough to get past the 40-catch mark, and that assumes he a) stays healthy and b) wins the TE1 job against current odds.
Hilton was a Haslett holdover, and even though the offense is dynamic, they need an over the middle threat for when teams cheat into the flats, which they will almost certainly do to try to contain Reggie(see Eagle playoff game). The offense needs a 3rd receiving option. Devery is primarily a deep threat(highest YPC in nearly 30 years) and Copper isn't a #2 WR. That leaves Patten and Meachem, and I doubt either will contribute much this season.Whether they go to Johnson, Miller or a combination of the two, I see 65/800/5 for the Saints TEs.
 
I also heard that Julius Jones is slated for 650 carries. About as likely.
what a stupid statement, why dont you just start a thread stating you are ######ed. No RB in the history of the NFL has come close to 650 carries, and E Johnson had 82 catches in his only healthy year besides his rookie season. Why even bother making such a dumb post?
 
I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
I certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:

Tight End

E. Johnson, #82

M. Campbell, #80

B. Miller, #83

J. Owens, #86
Here are some recent news stories on the Saints TEs:Johnson picks quickest route

Camp Confidential

The first indicates that Johnson was listed as the top tight end on the pre-camp depth chart, but has been running with the second team behind Mark Campbell. The second states that Campbell and Miller currently have the upper hand over Johnson.

The FBG depth charts represent fantasy expectations rather than official team charts (which are often based on politics). For example, Anthony Thomas is the RB1 on the Bills official depth chart, but do we really expect him to outgain Marshawn Lynch? We don't, so the FBG depth charts list Lynch as RB1. So I think it's correct to list Eric Johnson as TE1 on the FBG depth charts whether or not he's currently getting reps with the first team, if we expect him to end up as the Saints' top TE from a fantasy perspective.
Interesting way to do depth charts.
 
He'll be #1 by the end of the preseason. Payton and Brees are both excited about this guy, and talk about it ad nauseum on every local radio show. I'd expect 55-60 balls, probably not 80.

 
Johnson is not, nor has ever been even an average blocking tight end.
There's no question that he's primarily a receiving TE, but word out of camp around here is that the coaching staff has been pleasantly surprised with his blocking instincts and ability. And he's working with the Saints' O-Line coach, who's pretty good at these things.In fact, rampant unsupported speculation around here is that he's not getting #1 TE duties because he's being taught how to block like a lineman and learning the offense at the same time. He just needs a few more weeks.
 
Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.
Did Tim Rattay have McAllister, Bush, Colston, Henderson, and Meacham? Do you ever see him being anything more than a safety valve?"Sorry, Reggie, looks like a quiet week for you this Sunday, we have to get the injury-prone TE involved...."
where's your response to that since your such a 'thinker"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.
Did Tim Rattay have McAllister, Bush, Colston, Henderson, and Meacham? Do you ever see him being anything more than a safety valve?"Sorry, Reggie, looks like a quiet week for you this Sunday, we have to get the injury-prone TE involved...."
where's your response to that since your such a 'thinker"
Look, I'll concede that Bush and Colston are reception-stealers, but McAllister's heavy-receiving days are over and I highly doubt that the coaching staff is cutting out the TE because of the speed-receiver with a case of a dropsies and the rookie who had to have knee surgery before camp.ETA: and no, Tim Rattay didn't have those weapons. Maybe you can add in the part about how Tim Rattay's no Drew Brees, too. That might be an interesting part of the breakdown.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
August 22, 2007, 21:02

Saints :: TE

TE Johnson Developing Rapport With QB Brees

Mike Tripplet, New Orleans Times-Picayune, Sporting News - [Full Article]

TE Eric Johnson won't immediately become the next Antonio Gates now that he's working with QB Drew Brees. But he will put up some nice numbers and give the Saints an added dimension. So far, it appears Johnson is splitting time with TE Mark Campbell in the starting lineup, with backup TE Billy Miller mixing in as well. But it's Johnson who is most likely to be used as a receiver, especially in the red zone, and you can see he is developing a rapport with Brees in practice. The Saints specifically targeted Johnson in free agency because he can get downfield and catch the ball.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top