DenverBroncos
Footballguy
Per Skip Bayless.
Skip Bayless' fantasy predictions make Peter King's predictions look smart.
I certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:Tight EndE. Johnson, #82M. Campbell, #80B. Miller, #83J. Owens, #86I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
Big "if" there.If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
July 31, 2007, 17:12 Saints :: OLI certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
Tight End
E. Johnson, #82
M. Campbell, #80
B. Miller, #83
J. Owens, #86
Here are some recent news stories on the Saints TEs:Johnson picks quickest routeI certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
Tight End
E. Johnson, #82
M. Campbell, #80
B. Miller, #83
J. Owens, #86
I think that comes from this news story on the FBG news blog.I certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:Tight EndE. Johnson, #82M. Campbell, #80B. Miller, #83J. Owens, #86I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
Ultimately, I think he does have a lot of upside. He was a good receiving TE when healthy in SF, and we all know Brees likes big targets. I think 80 might be a bit ridiculous, but 50+ is not out of the question.July 31, 2007, 17:12Saints :: OLSaints Tight End UpdateNew Orleans Times-Picayune - [Full Article]There are four tight ends in camp for the New Orleans Saints. So far, returning veterans Mark Campbell and Billy Miller have the upper hand over newcomer Eric Johnson at this point because of their familiarity with the offense and QB Drew Brees. Johnson needs to develop that rapport over the next few weeks to jump ahead.
Skip Bayless' fantasy predictions make Peter King's predictions look smart.
Improved.LHUCKS said:Is there a worse football sports opinion out there than a Skip Bayless opinion?
Biggest clown on TV.
Fixed.Improved.LHUCKS said:Is there a worse football sports any general opinion out there than a Skip Bayless opinion?
Biggest clown on TV.
That's what I'm thinking. And I think that 50-60 is very, very generous. I think he'll have some O-fer games, personally.brownhelmets said:80 catches is a lot considering the pure number of weapons the Saints have. If healthy, and that is a big if, Johnson could realistically get 50-60 reseptions.
Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
Did Tim Rattay have McAllister, Bush, Colston, Henderson, and Meacham? Do you ever see him being anything more than a safety valve?"Sorry, Reggie, looks like a quiet week for you this Sunday, we have to get the injury-prone TE involved...."Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
Half the reason that team SUCKED BAD is because Eric Johnson was their best weapon.Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD?
I disagree...Eric Johnson's touts this year are very reminiscent of the touts we saw for Hilton last year. Despite numerous reports that he wasn't even atop the depth chart, people pimped his fantasy upside. Johnson is a decent player when healthy (gotta give props to a fellow Ivy Leaguerbrownhelmets said:80 catches is a lot considering the pure number of weapons the Saints have. If healthy, and that is a big if, Johnson could realistically get 50-60 reseptions.
Mike Karney will finish the season with more receptions than Eric Johnson.Where are all those people who are always asking for someone to go out on a limb when making predictions?
Hilton was a Haslett holdover, and even though the offense is dynamic, they need an over the middle threat for when teams cheat into the flats, which they will almost certainly do to try to contain Reggie(see Eagle playoff game). The offense needs a 3rd receiving option. Devery is primarily a deep threat(highest YPC in nearly 30 years) and Copper isn't a #2 WR. That leaves Patten and Meachem, and I doubt either will contribute much this season.Whether they go to Johnson, Miller or a combination of the two, I see 65/800/5 for the Saints TEs.I disagree...Eric Johnson's touts this year are very reminiscent of the touts we saw for Hilton last year. Despite numerous reports that he wasn't even atop the depth chart, people pimped his fantasy upside. Johnson is a decent player when healthy (gotta give props to a fellow Ivy Leaguerbrownhelmets said:80 catches is a lot considering the pure number of weapons the Saints have. If healthy, and that is a big if, Johnson could realistically get 50-60 reseptions.) but to say he's injury prone would be akin to saying Dom Deluise could use a diet. The Saints have such a dynamic offense they are going to err more on the side of blocking prowess than pure receiving talent. Johnson is not, nor has ever been even an average blocking tight end. I would be shocked if he sees the field enough to get past the 40-catch mark, and that assumes he a) stays healthy and b) wins the TE1 job against current odds.
what a stupid statement, why dont you just start a thread stating you are ######ed. No RB in the history of the NFL has come close to 650 carries, and E Johnson had 82 catches in his only healthy year besides his rookie season. Why even bother making such a dumb post?I also heard that Julius Jones is slated for 650 carries. About as likely.
Interesting way to do depth charts.Here are some recent news stories on the Saints TEs:Johnson picks quickest routeI certainly hope that isn't true, FBG's depth charts have had him as the #1 for awhile now. Just checked the NFL.com depth chart:I think he's currently third on the depth chart. Not that he won't be able to move up past Mark Campbell and Billy Miller at some point before the season starts . . . but it's a bit premature to be talking about 80 receptions, IMO.
Tight End
E. Johnson, #82
M. Campbell, #80
B. Miller, #83
J. Owens, #86
Camp Confidential
The first indicates that Johnson was listed as the top tight end on the pre-camp depth chart, but has been running with the second team behind Mark Campbell. The second states that Campbell and Miller currently have the upper hand over Johnson.
The FBG depth charts represent fantasy expectations rather than official team charts (which are often based on politics). For example, Anthony Thomas is the RB1 on the Bills official depth chart, but do we really expect him to outgain Marshawn Lynch? We don't, so the FBG depth charts list Lynch as RB1. So I think it's correct to list Eric Johnson as TE1 on the FBG depth charts whether or not he's currently getting reps with the first team, if we expect him to end up as the Saints' top TE from a fantasy perspective.
There's no question that he's primarily a receiving TE, but word out of camp around here is that the coaching staff has been pleasantly surprised with his blocking instincts and ability. And he's working with the Saints' O-Line coach, who's pretty good at these things.In fact, rampant unsupported speculation around here is that he's not getting #1 TE duties because he's being taught how to block like a lineman and learning the offense at the same time. He just needs a few more weeks.Johnson is not, nor has ever been even an average blocking tight end.
where's your response to that since your such a 'thinker"Did Tim Rattay have McAllister, Bush, Colston, Henderson, and Meacham? Do you ever see him being anything more than a safety valve?"Sorry, Reggie, looks like a quiet week for you this Sunday, we have to get the injury-prone TE involved...."Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
Look, I'll concede that Bush and Colston are reception-stealers, but McAllister's heavy-receiving days are over and I highly doubt that the coaching staff is cutting out the TE because of the speed-receiver with a case of a dropsies and the rookie who had to have knee surgery before camp.ETA: and no, Tim Rattay didn't have those weapons. Maybe you can add in the part about how Tim Rattay's no Drew Brees, too. That might be an interesting part of the breakdown.where's your response to that since your such a 'thinker"Did Tim Rattay have McAllister, Bush, Colston, Henderson, and Meacham? Do you ever see him being anything more than a safety valve?"Sorry, Reggie, looks like a quiet week for you this Sunday, we have to get the injury-prone TE involved...."Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
never..ever happen!Per Skip Bayless.