NYGus
Footballguy
Skip Bayless' fantasy predictions make Peter King's predictions look smart.

Last edited by a moderator:
Skip Bayless' fantasy predictions make Peter King's predictions look smart.
Were you talking to me?where's your response to that since your such a 'thinker"Did Tim Rattay have McAllister, Bush, Colston, Henderson, and Meacham? Do you ever see him being anything more than a safety valve?"Sorry, Reggie, looks like a quiet week for you this Sunday, we have to get the injury-prone TE involved...."Bayless is an idiot but he's far from exaggerating.There are a boatload of clueless people in here I see. Provided Johnson can play a full 16 games with no injury...HUGE if, he could catch 80 balls. Don't you people even realize he caught 82 - 3 years ago with TIM RATTAYand that team SUCKED BAD? Wow, you people are not thinkers, you are reactors.Absolutely not outside the realm of possibility. We're not talking about Robert Royal here,He was a very nice TE for the 49ers when he played. If he's the #1 TE in NOR and is used in a pass catching role, he could see 50 easy.
I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.
Looks like it was just a few of us with a clue. I got a chuckle out of that 1st page.The comments in this thread are comedy.
I'm talking about the rush to call Skip Bayless out for being a moron (whether or not thats true) and not analyzing Eric Johnson's potential. Lot of football to be played between now and week 17, but EJ will be the most picked up TE off waivers.I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.
What rush? Bayless has proved he's a moron for years!I'm talking about the rush to call Skip Bayless out for being a moronI'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.
SF local here: healthy, it will be a first. I really doubt it but anything is possible.If Johnson stays healthy he's gonna end up as a top 10 TE in PPR leagues.
I make no guarantee about his health, I'm just saying that he has the talent & opportunity to put up top 10'ish numbers if he plays 16 games.SF local here: healthy, it will be a first. I really doubt it but anything is possible.If Johnson stays healthy he's gonna end up as a top 10 TE in PPR leagues.
God himself couldnt guarantee this guy's healthI make no guarantee about his health, I'm just saying that he has the talent & opportunity to put up top 10'ish numbers if he plays 16 games.SF local here: healthy, it will be a first. I really doubt it but anything is possible.If Johnson stays healthy he's gonna end up as a top 10 TE in PPR leagues.
I dunno man. Did you see their D? I didn't.Anthony Borbely said:The Saints will not be way behind like this every week.
They played the Colts. I know the defense is not that good, but this was the Colts they played. Their offense was out of sync; that is likely to change.I dunno man. Did you see their D? I didn't.Anthony Borbely said:The Saints will not be way behind like this every week.
Burning Sensation said:Alot of people from that first page feeling pretty stupid right now. I love it when people not only go out of their way to disagree with someone, but actually call him names in the proccess, only to have it backfire in their face....and you know who you are.![]()
And EJ still had 3 catches when the game was close. Sounds like he was involved either way.Anthony Borbely said:Eric Johnson caught 5 passes in the 4th quarter after the Colts went up 34-10...and thus were playing deep coverages. Brees was throwing short because of this
We have no way of knowing this. Don't overreact to last season's results.Again, not saying he'll catch 80 but he looked involved in the offense.The Saints will not be way behind like this every week. Don't overreact to one game.
Anthony Borbely said:Eric Johnson caught 5 passes in the 4th quarter after the Colts went up 34-10...and thus were playing deep coverages. Brees was throwing short because of this. The Saints will not be way behind like this every week. Don't overreact to one game.
NOTAnthony Borbely said:Eric Johnson caught 5 passes in the 4th quarter after the Colts went up 34-10...and thus were playing deep coverages. Brees was throwing short because of this. The Saints will not be way behind like this every week. Don't overreact to one game.![]()
I know its only one game but there receivers could not get open all game and it could stay that way with how young they are, Johnson is going to be a big part of this offense if he can stay on the field.Anthony Borbely said:Eric Johnson caught 5 passes in the 4th quarter after the Colts went up 34-10...and thus were playing deep coverages. Brees was throwing short because of this. The Saints will not be way behind like this every week. Don't overreact to one game.
Reality check time.Only four TEs last year had 68 catches (these 8 plus another 4 per game) last year.Only one TE had 80 catches (Skip Bayless's number).Even taking last night into account, does anyone here really think that he's going to be a top-two or top-five TE for the year?I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.
Not too surprising, considering the Colts have good safeties and decent staring CBs, but mediocre LBs.I'm sure this won't be the game plan against every team they face.NOTAnthony Borbely said:Eric Johnson caught 5 passes in the 4th quarter after the Colts went up 34-10...and thus were playing deep coverages. Brees was throwing short because of this. The Saints will not be way behind like this every week. Don't overreact to one game.![]()
The entire Saints passing game was underneath routes last night. While this probably won't be the norm, they didn't throw the ball deep at all against the Colts.
Why the "reality check"? He's already had an 80-catch season on a much worse offense. I don't see how this is so outlandish.Reality check time.Only four TEs last year had 68 catches (these 8 plus another 4 per game) last year.Only one TE had 80 catches (Skip Bayless's number).Even taking last night into account, does anyone here really think that he's going to be a top-two or top-five TE for the year?I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.
So you honestly believe he could be the second-most prolific TE in the entire NFL this year?Why the "reality check"? He's already had an 80-catch season on a much worse offense. I don't see how this is so outlandish.Reality check time.Only four TEs last year had 68 catches (these 8 plus another 4 per game) last year.Only one TE had 80 catches (Skip Bayless's number).Even taking last night into account, does anyone here really think that he's going to be a top-two or top-five TE for the year?I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.![]()
If by prolific you mean catch the 2nd most passes this year of TEs, then I would say yes he has a chance. Getting 8 in week one is a big jump on the competition. 73 catches by Todd Heap was #2 last year. To reach 74 catches he would need 4.4 a game or almost half of what he did last night each week. Your telling me you dont see Brees completing a pass to his TE once a quarter on average? Like people have said before, E Johnson already has a season in which he caught 82 passes for 825 yds and two scores; and he was on SF at the time. *Since no one drafted him early he is going to provide exceptional in every game he plays this year.So you honestly believe he could be the second-most prolific TE in the entire NFL this year?Why the "reality check"? He's already had an 80-catch season on a much worse offense. I don't see how this is so outlandish.Reality check time.Only four TEs last year had 68 catches (these 8 plus another 4 per game) last year.Only one TE had 80 catches (Skip Bayless's number).Even taking last night into account, does anyone here really think that he's going to be a top-two or top-five TE for the year?I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.![]()
He's not going to put up big TD #'s, just receptions as an outlet for Brees. Heck, if he takes the abuse of last night, he won't make 16 games. He got drilled hard a few times last night.So you honestly believe he could be the second-most prolific TE in the entire NFL this year?
Because this is SERIOUS BUSINESS.Why the "reality check"? He's already had an 80-catch season on a much worse offense. I don't see how this is so outlandish.Reality check time.Only four TEs last year had 68 catches (these 8 plus another 4 per game) last year.I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.
Only one TE had 80 catches (Skip Bayless's number).
Even taking last night into account, does anyone here really think that he's going to be a top-two or top-five TE for the year?![]()
On that offense? Why not. Folks are predicting Vernon Davis will have absurdly high numbers, and that's based on what? I'm not saying I don't think Davis is good, but Johnson is a guy on (1) a much better offense and (2) who has done it before.abrecher said:So you honestly believe he could be the second-most prolific TE in the entire NFL this year?Why the "reality check"? He's already had an 80-catch season on a much worse offense. I don't see how this is so outlandish.Reality check time.Only four TEs last year had 68 catches (these 8 plus another 4 per game) last year.Only one TE had 80 catches (Skip Bayless's number).Even taking last night into account, does anyone here really think that he's going to be a top-two or top-five TE for the year?I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.![]()
KnowledgeReignsSupreme said:Because this is SERIOUS BUSINESS.Why the "reality check"? He's already had an 80-catch season on a much worse offense. I don't see how this is so outlandish.Reality check time.Only four TEs last year had 68 catches (these 8 plus another 4 per game) last year.I'm being completely serious. For him to finish around the #10 TE (I have #10 at 141 points in a PPR) he'd need to average around 4 catches for 30 yds and score once a month from this point on. We're not talking big numbers here and I did say "If he stays healthy."The comments in this thread are comedy.
Only one TE had 80 catches (Skip Bayless's number).
Even taking last night into account, does anyone here really think that he's going to be a top-two or top-five TE for the year?![]()
He'll probably wind up with more yardage and receptions than Vernon Davis (again).
Hi.He'll probably wind up with more yardage and receptions than Vernon Davis (again).![]()
![]()
80 receptions or 80 targets?I am starting EJ this week, so I hope he catches a fewPer Skip Bayless.