EVILGRIN'S BIG TIME FIRST ROUND MOCK w/ COMMENTARY (1 Viewer)

[Peyton Marino]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

damn straight! when you play werewolf you're the man!! you don't have to take this!!!!1

 

[Fla\/\/ed]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

damn straight! when you play werewolf you're the man!! you don't have to take this!!!!1

 

[Fla\/\/ed]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

 

[Pat Patriot]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

I agree 100% with this.....he has made a lot of attacks on other people in the past. I do think his mock is good.......nothing really different or out of the ordinary in this mock. I don't think Gin will go that high, and I don't think the Vikings would pick someone with a similar skill set to Williamson. Just my opinion.

What exactly is the NFLDraftGuys selection criteria for STAFF? Any stooge/kiss ### that posts a MOCK?

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

I agree 100% with this.....he has made a lot of attacks on other people in the past. I do think his mock is good.......nothing really different or out of the ordinary in this mock. I don't think Gin will go that high, and I don't think the Vikings would pick someone with a similar skill set to Williamson. Just my opinion.

What exactly is the NFLDraftGuys selection criteria for STAFF? Any stooge/kiss ### that posts a MOCK?

if someone takes the time to compose a mock with good explanations that are entertaining, we will run it. We don't have official "staff" designations like FBG yet. Right now we just want to get the good content coming from the community out to a larger audience. If you have something to contribute, send it over, and if its good, we'll post it.

 

[5Rings]

Nice jobe EG.

Probably the best mock I've seen on this board so far.

Only questionable pick, IMO, is Ginn to Minny....but the FO in Minny is pretty much pulling a "Major League" on that team, so I could see it happening.

Nice to see Branch at 11. Love to see it happen, and love to see somebody not putting Carriker on that spot. Branch/Willis/Meachem then Carriker

 

[Capella]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

I agree 100% with this.....he has made a lot of attacks on other people in the past. I do think his mock is good.......nothing really different or out of the ordinary in this mock. I don't think Gin will go that high, and I don't think the Vikings would pick someone with a similar skill set to Williamson. Just my opinion.

What exactly is the NFLDraftGuys selection criteria for STAFF? Any stooge/kiss ### that posts a MOCK?

why do you care?

 

[chris1969]

That's a really good mock draft EG. I think your Steelers will go after Moss at 15 though. I don't think Carriker will fall that far. He's got enough athletic ability to play 4-3 or 3-4, so a lot of teams will have him on their short list.

 

[Pat Patriot]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

I agree 100% with this.....he has made a lot of attacks on other people in the past. I do think his mock is good.......nothing really different or out of the ordinary in this mock. I don't think Gin will go that high, and I don't think the Vikings would pick someone with a similar skill set to Williamson. Just my opinion.

What exactly is the NFLDraftGuys selection criteria for STAFF? Any stooge/kiss ### that posts a MOCK?

if someone takes the time to compose a mock with good explanations that are entertaining, we will run it. We don't have official "staff" designations like FBG yet. Right now we just want to get the good content coming from the community out to a larger audience. If you have something to contribute, send it over, and if its good, we'll post it.

I wasnt proposing to have something posted. Just wondering what your criteria is. Thanks for the explanation. I posted a mock here about a month ago. I might do another soon.

 

[Pat Patriot]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

I agree 100% with this.....he has made a lot of attacks on other people in the past. I do think his mock is good.......nothing really different or out of the ordinary in this mock. I don't think Gin will go that high, and I don't think the Vikings would pick someone with a similar skill set to Williamson. Just my opinion.

What exactly is the NFLDraftGuys selection criteria for STAFF? Any stooge/kiss ### that posts a MOCK?

why do you care?

Technically I dont. However, I'm deciding now whether NFLDraftGuys will be an information resource that I use going forward. The quality of people they have posting articles there is a big barometer of their credibility. If they post anything sent to them without review then why would I bother to go there?I personally dont think EG is that credible.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

BGP - My sig is primarily comprised of your quotes. If there are any personal attacks there, they're attacks you launched at me. All I'm doing is quoting you. Give it up.

The Scientist - SB XL was over a year ago. Get over it.

Pat Patriot - Live and let live. Why you feel the need to constantly stir up the pot is beyond my understanding. I'm not going to dignify your denigrating comments with a response. If you don't think my mocks are valid or that I'm credible, just don't click on it. It's really that simple.

That's all I'm going to say about that nonsense... as for those who posted regarding the draft.. thanks for the kind words. Ginn at #7 is again contingent on his individual workout, and I am also becoming more convinced that Willis is going to be gone by the time Buffalo chooses, so that will affect some change in the next version of the mock.

 

[ImTheScientist]

BGP - My sig is primarily comprised of your quotes. If there are any personal attacks there, they're attacks you launched at me. All I'm doing is quoting you. Give it up.The Scientist - SB XL was over a year ago. Get over it.Pat Patriot - Live and let live. Why you feel the need to constantly stir up the pot is beyond my understanding. I'm not going to dignify your denigrating comments with a response. If you don't think my mocks are valid or that I'm credible, just don't click on it. It's really that simple.That's all I'm going to say about that nonsense... as for those who posted regarding the draft.. thanks for the kind words. Ginn at #7 is again contingent on his individual workout, and I am also becoming more convinced that Willis is going to be gone by the time Buffalo chooses, so that will affect some change in the next version of the mock.

EG - SB XL was over a year ago. Get over it.

 

[QuizGuy66]

Good mock spoiled by cheap shot at Cincy (which was expected).

I'm confounded a number of mocks I've seen that have us taking a TE in round 1. While we have need at the position, a pass-catcher there would be a luxury as our offense has run pretty damn well without targeting there. Kelly is key to our run-blocking which is why he kept him on. You can discover a good TE later in the draft. With no 3rd round pick, it's that much less likely we'd not select defense in both of the first 2 rounds. By the way other than tranferring schools, what exactly is the character knock on Olsen? A funnier take woulda been noting his major (criminology).

The needs on defense are much more pronounced and a CB or DT is the mosti likely way we'll go, though LB certainly is a possibility as well with the uncertain status of an Odell return (I think they'll plan like he WON'T be back) and the likelihood that if he played, Pollack would probably switch to DE (I respect his courage, but man I still think Pollack would be crazy to come back).

-QG

 

[Evilgrin 72]

BGP - My sig is primarily comprised of your quotes. If there are any personal attacks there, they're attacks you launched at me. All I'm doing is quoting you. Give it up.The Scientist - SB XL was over a year ago. Get over it.Pat Patriot - Live and let live. Why you feel the need to constantly stir up the pot is beyond my understanding. I'm not going to dignify your denigrating comments with a response. If you don't think my mocks are valid or that I'm credible, just don't click on it. It's really that simple.That's all I'm going to say about that nonsense... as for those who posted regarding the draft.. thanks for the kind words. Ginn at #7 is again contingent on his individual workout, and I am also becoming more convinced that Willis is going to be gone by the time Buffalo chooses, so that will affect some change in the next version of the mock.

EG - SB XL was over a year ago. Get over it.

The good guys won. I'm not the one who needs to leave it in the past.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

Good mock spoiled by cheap shot at Cincy (which was expected).I'm confounded a number of mocks I've seen that have us taking a TE in round 1. While we have need at the position, a pass-catcher there would be a luxury as our offense has run pretty damn well without targeting there. Kelly is key to our run-blocking which is why he kept him on. You can discover a good TE later in the draft. With no 3rd round pick, it's that much less likely we'd not select defense in both of the first 2 rounds. By the way other than tranferring schools, what exactly is the character knock on Olsen? A funnier take woulda been noting his major (criminology).The needs on defense are much more pronounced and a CB or DT is the mosti likely way we'll go, though LB certainly is a possibility as well with the uncertain status of an Odell return (I think they'll plan like he WON'T be back) and the likelihood that if he played, Pollack would probably switch to DE (I respect his courage, but man I still think Pollack would be crazy to come back).-QG

I also took shots at Cleveland and Baltimore - I do it in all my mocks. Don't take it seriously (sounds like you didn't) - it's all in the name of division rivalry. I also took shots at Minnesota and Joey Porter, among others - it's simply to try to make the mock entertaining.Cincinnati will probably go defense in round 1, and Olsen will probably be off the board by 18. If not, though, if I were Cincinnati, I'd address defense later in the draft (Eric Wright from UNLV is a potential lockdown corner with character issues that are dropping him into round 2 - he looks like a by the numbers Cincinnati pick.) Olsen, in my estimation, has the potential to be a star in the NFL - he's big, he's extremely fast for a TE, and he has hands of glue. Someone like him would make Cincinnati's offense downright frightening.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

Good mock spoiled by cheap shot at Cincy (which was expected).I'm confounded a number of mocks I've seen that have us taking a TE in round 1. While we have need at the position, a pass-catcher there would be a luxury as our offense has run pretty damn well without targeting there. Kelly is key to our run-blocking which is why he kept him on. You can discover a good TE later in the draft. With no 3rd round pick, it's that much less likely we'd not select defense in both of the first 2 rounds. By the way other than tranferring schools, what exactly is the character knock on Olsen? A funnier take woulda been noting his major (criminology).The needs on defense are much more pronounced and a CB or DT is the mosti likely way we'll go, though LB certainly is a possibility as well with the uncertain status of an Odell return (I think they'll plan like he WON'T be back) and the likelihood that if he played, Pollack would probably switch to DE (I respect his courage, but man I still think Pollack would be crazy to come back).-QG

Cincinnati will probably go defense in round 1, and Olsen will probably be off the board by 18. If not, though, if I were Cincinnati, I'd address defense later in the draft (Eric Wright from UNLV is a potential lockdown corner with character issues that are dropping him into round 2 - he looks like a by the numbers Cincinnati pick.) Olsen, in my estimation, has the potential to be a star in the NFL - he's big, he's extremely fast for a TE, and he has hands of glue. Someone like him would make Cincinnati's offense downright frightening.

People need to remember/realize - Teams don't always draft for need.Adding a pass catching TE may make the offense so much better that it offsets any defensive deficiencies. Look at what Indianapolis did this year. Should they have drafted defense in the draft last year because it was a BIGGER need than another running back?

 

[Evilgrin 72]

Good mock spoiled by cheap shot at Cincy (which was expected).I'm confounded a number of mocks I've seen that have us taking a TE in round 1. While we have need at the position, a pass-catcher there would be a luxury as our offense has run pretty damn well without targeting there. Kelly is key to our run-blocking which is why he kept him on. You can discover a good TE later in the draft. With no 3rd round pick, it's that much less likely we'd not select defense in both of the first 2 rounds. By the way other than tranferring schools, what exactly is the character knock on Olsen? A funnier take woulda been noting his major (criminology).The needs on defense are much more pronounced and a CB or DT is the mosti likely way we'll go, though LB certainly is a possibility as well with the uncertain status of an Odell return (I think they'll plan like he WON'T be back) and the likelihood that if he played, Pollack would probably switch to DE (I respect his courage, but man I still think Pollack would be crazy to come back).-QG

Cincinnati will probably go defense in round 1, and Olsen will probably be off the board by 18. If not, though, if I were Cincinnati, I'd address defense later in the draft (Eric Wright from UNLV is a potential lockdown corner with character issues that are dropping him into round 2 - he looks like a by the numbers Cincinnati pick.) Olsen, in my estimation, has the potential to be a star in the NFL - he's big, he's extremely fast for a TE, and he has hands of glue. Someone like him would make Cincinnati's offense downright frightening.

People need to remember/realize - Teams don't always draft for need.Adding a pass catching TE may make the offense so much better that it offsets any defensive deficiencies. Look at what Indianapolis did this year. Should they have drafted defense in the draft last year because it was a BIGGER need than another running back?

Also, keep in mind, it's a seven round draft. A team doesn't have to draft a need position in round one. Cincinnati could take Olsen and then spend its next 6 picks on defensive players if it so chooses.

 

[QuizGuy66]

Good mock spoiled by cheap shot at Cincy (which was expected).

I'm confounded a number of mocks I've seen that have us taking a TE in round 1. While we have need at the position, a pass-catcher there would be a luxury as our offense has run pretty damn well without targeting there. Kelly is key to our run-blocking which is why he kept him on. You can discover a good TE later in the draft. With no 3rd round pick, it's that much less likely we'd not select defense in both of the first 2 rounds. By the way other than tranferring schools, what exactly is the character knock on Olsen? A funnier take woulda been noting his major (criminology).

The needs on defense are much more pronounced and a CB or DT is the mosti likely way we'll go, though LB certainly is a possibility as well with the uncertain status of an Odell return (I think they'll plan like he WON'T be back) and the likelihood that if he played, Pollack would probably switch to DE (I respect his courage, but man I still think Pollack would be crazy to come back).

-QG

I also took shots at Cleveland and Baltimore - I do it in all my mocks. Don't take it seriously (sounds like you didn't) - it's all in the name of division rivalry. I also took shots at Minnesota and Joey Porter, among others - it's simply to try to make the mock entertaining.Cincinnati will probably go defense in round 1, and Olsen will probably be off the board by 18. If not, though, if I were Cincinnati, I'd address defense later in the draft (Eric Wright from UNLV is a potential lockdown corner with character issues that are dropping him into round 2 - he looks like a by the numbers Cincinnati pick.) Olsen, in my estimation, has the potential to be a star in the NFL - he's big, he's extremely fast for a TE, and he has hands of glue. Someone like him would make Cincinnati's offense downright frightening.

I take things as seriously as you can with a football message board And hell, at least I found out your also a Jersey guy If we traded down or moved Justin Smith to get more picks I think the possibility of Olsen would increase, but if we only have 2 picks in the first 3 rounds like we do now, I just think it's a luxury we can't afford. Hobson's mailbag at bengals.com actually addresses Olsen this week and as usual Geoff has a pretty good take on it: Hobson's Choice.

I was gonna make a playoff motorcycle shot back at ya, btw, but couldn't find any draftable players from Sturgis, SD

-QG

 

[Chaos Commish]

Fwiw, Marvin Lewis has been very clear on his teams needs at TE. He wants a run blocker. Last year, with a far more impressive crop, he was disinterested. He even asked a question: "Can you show me a team with two 1000+ yard WRs and a 1000+ yard RB that has a highly productive TE?" There's just not enough balls to go around in Cincy to worry about a TE catching the ball. He's loaded with weapons on offense and happy with the situation. TE is only a need if he can find a great run blocker and pass protector who doesn't care much for catching the ball.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

Fwiw, Marvin Lewis has been very clear on his teams needs at TE. He wants a run blocker. Last year, with a far more impressive crop, he was disinterested. He even asked a question: "Can you show me a team with two 1000+ yard WRs and a 1000+ yard RB that has a highly productive TE?" There's just not enough balls to go around in Cincy to worry about a TE catching the ball. He's loaded with weapons on offense and happy with the situation. TE is only a need if he can find a great run blocker and pass protector who doesn't care much for catching the ball.

Other than the Indianapolis Colts, I can't think of one.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

Fwiw, Marvin Lewis has been very clear on his teams needs at TE. He wants a run blocker. Last year, with a far more impressive crop, he was disinterested. He even asked a question: "Can you show me a team with two 1000+ yard WRs and a 1000+ yard RB that has a highly productive TE?" There's just not enough balls to go around in Cincy to worry about a TE catching the ball. He's loaded with weapons on offense and happy with the situation. TE is only a need if he can find a great run blocker and pass protector who doesn't care much for catching the ball.

Understood, but the Steelers spent decades with strictly run-blocking TEs until the opportunity came to draft one that could stretch the field, and they did so. It helped their offense significantly in a number of key games, a fact that I doubt is lost on Marvin Lewis. Now, maybe he really has no interest in a pass catching TE, but you can't necessarily predict how a situation is going to play out. Plus, I'm a BPA guy and higher on Olsen than most, so perhaps that's why I projected him there. It's actually more likely he goes to Carolina at #14, so this pick will change in my next mock anyway.

 

[QuizGuy66]

Fwiw, Marvin Lewis has been very clear on his teams needs at TE. He wants a run blocker. Last year, with a far more impressive crop, he was disinterested. He even asked a question: "Can you show me a team with two 1000+ yard WRs and a 1000+ yard RB that has a highly productive TE?" There's just not enough balls to go around in Cincy to worry about a TE catching the ball. He's loaded with weapons on offense and happy with the situation. TE is only a need if he can find a great run blocker and pass protector who doesn't care much for catching the ball.

Understood, but the Steelers spent decades with strictly run-blocking TEs until the opportunity came to draft one that could stretch the field, and they did so. It helped their offense significantly in a number of key games, a fact that I doubt is lost on Marvin Lewis. Now, maybe he really has no interest in a pass catching TE, but you can't necessarily predict how a situation is going to play out. Plus, I'm a BPA guy and higher on Olsen than most, so perhaps that's why I projected him there. It's actually more likely he goes to Carolina at #14, so this pick will change in my next mock anyway.

What Criminology Major will we get next mock? -QG

 

[Evilgrin 72]

Fwiw, Marvin Lewis has been very clear on his teams needs at TE. He wants a run blocker. Last year, with a far more impressive crop, he was disinterested. He even asked a question: "Can you show me a team with two 1000+ yard WRs and a 1000+ yard RB that has a highly productive TE?" There's just not enough balls to go around in Cincy to worry about a TE catching the ball. He's loaded with weapons on offense and happy with the situation. TE is only a need if he can find a great run blocker and pass protector who doesn't care much for catching the ball.

Understood, but the Steelers spent decades with strictly run-blocking TEs until the opportunity came to draft one that could stretch the field, and they did so. It helped their offense significantly in a number of key games, a fact that I doubt is lost on Marvin Lewis. Now, maybe he really has no interest in a pass catching TE, but you can't necessarily predict how a situation is going to play out. Plus, I'm a BPA guy and higher on Olsen than most, so perhaps that's why I projected him there. It's actually more likely he goes to Carolina at #14, so this pick will change in my next mock anyway.

What Criminology Major will we get next mock? -QG

I never know until I do it. Possibly Hall, Revis, or Houston, possibly Posluszny, possibly Beason, possibly Timmons, possibly Moss.

 

[Chaos Commish]

Now, maybe he really has no interest in a pass catching TE, but you can't necessarily predict how a situation is going to play out.

Agreed, but he proved to be sincere on the point last year. I made the point in mock after mock where they had Cincy taking first round TEs, and I admitted it could possibly be smoke, but the more I watched that offense the more clear Marv's sentiments became.

Plus, I'm a BPA guy and higher on Olsen than most, so perhaps that's why I projected him there. It's actually more likely he goes to Carolina at #14, so this pick will change in my next mock anyway.

I think he's soft. He gets nothing in the redzone because he needs wide open space. I TD in his last 50+ receptions and it was from 40 yards out, and he has a couple dozen redzone targets with nothing to show for it. He gets bumped off his route very easily, btw. With plenty of space it doesn't matter as few LBs can run with him, but in the muck with timing crucial, he's pretty worthless. Nice hands though. I wouldn't consider him until late in the 2nd round... if at all. People want to blame the quarterbacking, and that's fine, but they did throw 15 TDs in Miami last last year. And Olsen did catch one.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

Now, maybe he really has no interest in a pass catching TE, but you can't necessarily predict how a situation is going to play out.

Agreed, but he proved to be sincere on the point last year. I made the point in mock after mock where they had Cincy taking first round TEs, and I admitted it could possibly be smoke, but the more I watched that offense the more clear Marv's sentiments became.

Plus, I'm a BPA guy and higher on Olsen than most, so perhaps that's why I projected him there. It's actually more likely he goes to Carolina at #14, so this pick will change in my next mock anyway.

I think he's soft. He gets nothing in the redzone because he needs wide open space. I TD in his last 50+ receptions and it was from 40 yards out, and he has a couple dozen redzone targets with nothing to show for it. He gets bumped off his route very easily, btw. With plenty of space it doesn't matter as few LBs can run with him, but in the muck with timing crucial, he's pretty worthless. Nice hands though. I wouldn't consider him until late in the 2nd round... if at all. People want to blame the quarterbacking, and that's fine, but they did throw 15 TDs in Miami last last year. And Olsen did catch one.

This is why CC is gold. I love a totally contrarian and fearless assessment. I see where your concerns come from, but I think the kid has the raw talent to be another Tony Gonzalez. He may never live up to that, but he has the best combination of speed and hands I've seen recently in a TE - better than Winslow, IMO. He cuts and moves like a receiver and catches anything that comes his way.Who knows.... that's why mocking is so much fun. Thanks for the comments and the info here, CC.....

 

[Chaos Commish]

Now, maybe he really has no interest in a pass catching TE, but you can't necessarily predict how a situation is going to play out.

Agreed, but he proved to be sincere on the point last year. I made the point in mock after mock where they had Cincy taking first round TEs, and I admitted it could possibly be smoke, but the more I watched that offense the more clear Marv's sentiments became.

Plus, I'm a BPA guy and higher on Olsen than most, so perhaps that's why I projected him there. It's actually more likely he goes to Carolina at #14, so this pick will change in my next mock anyway.

I think he's soft. He gets nothing in the redzone because he needs wide open space. I TD in his last 50+ receptions and it was from 40 yards out, and he has a couple dozen redzone targets with nothing to show for it. He gets bumped off his route very easily, btw. With plenty of space it doesn't matter as few LBs can run with him, but in the muck with timing crucial, he's pretty worthless. Nice hands though. I wouldn't consider him until late in the 2nd round... if at all. People want to blame the quarterbacking, and that's fine, but they did throw 15 TDs in Miami last last year. And Olsen did catch one.

This is why CC is gold. I love a totally contrarian and fearless assessment. I see where your concerns come from, but I think the kid has the raw talent to be another Tony Gonzalez. He may never live up to that, but he has the best combination of speed and hands I've seen recently in a TE - better than Winslow, IMO. He cuts and moves like a receiver and catches anything that comes his way.Who knows.... that's why mocking is so much fun. Thanks for the comments and the info here, CC.....

Thanks and my contrarianism is at very uncomfortable heights this year. This stuff has no bearing on my opinion of your credibilitythough... lol. I have been a fan of your mocks and commentary (and honest search for solid information) since I started posting here. Them whiners need to get over themselves... of course, that's just my opinion even if it's contrary.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

Fwiw, Marvin Lewis has been very clear on his teams needs at TE. He wants a run blocker. Last year, with a far more impressive crop, he was disinterested. He even asked a question: "Can you show me a team with two 1000+ yard WRs and a 1000+ yard RB that has a highly productive TE?" There's just not enough balls to go around in Cincy to worry about a TE catching the ball. He's loaded with weapons on offense and happy with the situation. TE is only a need if he can find a great run blocker and pass protector who doesn't care much for catching the ball.

Other than the Indianapolis Colts, I can't think of one. :(

I'd like someone to ask Marvin if two 1000+ yard WRs and a 1000+ yard RB are a pre-requisite for a Super Bowl (or even just playoff) winner. Would you take yards away from those guys and give them to a TE if it resulted in more wins?

 

[MiamiShaps]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

 

[Limp Dogg Bizkits]

Good call on Ginn getting picked in the top 10. Inly mock that I saw him that high.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

Thanks, but what the hell are you doing here?

 

[Evilgrin 72]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

Thanks, but what the hell are you doing here? This dude is a whiny tool, so is Pat Patriot. You have to take everything they say (particularly where it applies to me) with a grain of salt.

 

[chris1969]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

Thanks, but what the hell are you doing here? This dude is a whiny tool, so is Pat Patriot. You have to take everything they say (particularly where it applies to me) with a grain of salt.

Blah! It's all true! It's the fact that he doesn't admit to it that gives him character. Hell being a Pittsburgh fan will never do it!

 

[Irish]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

This is sig worthy

 

[MiamiShaps]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

Thanks, but what the hell are you doing here?

Saw your message on the board so I figured I would check it out. Actually used your mock draft to help formulate my top ten for the friendly competition me and few others had this weekend at the bars. Actually tied with someone and had to go to the 11th pick for the tie breaker, unfortunately my gamble did not pay off and I lost. Pick up your cell phone next time I call looking for the 11th round pick ###.I see you have stirred the pot, nice job.They are all a bunch of pansies here, but Ill give Pat Patriot credit, I think his avatar is chief jay strongbow.One piece of advice, those smiley faces makes you look a little light in the loafers.

 

[Pat Patriot]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.

I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

Thanks, but what the hell are you doing here?

Saw your message on the board so I figured I would check it out. Actually used your mock draft to help formulate my top ten for the friendly competition me and few others had this weekend at the bars. Actually tied with someone and had to go to the 11th pick for the tie breaker, unfortunately my gamble did not pay off and I lost. Pick up your cell phone next time I call looking for the 11th round pick ###.I see you have stirred the pot, nice job.

They are all a bunch of pansies here, but Ill give Pat Patriot credit, I think his avatar is chief jay strongbow.

One piece of advice, those smiley faces makes you look a little light in the loafers.

Its actually Wahoo McDaniel. But I have a very old picture of me with Chief Jay Strongbow. EG should invest in a dictionary because he apparently has no idea what the word whiny means. I'd like to see a post where I am whining about anything.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.

I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

Thanks, but what the hell are you doing here?

Saw your message on the board so I figured I would check it out. Actually used your mock draft to help formulate my top ten for the friendly competition me and few others had this weekend at the bars. Actually tied with someone and had to go to the 11th pick for the tie breaker, unfortunately my gamble did not pay off and I lost. Pick up your cell phone next time I call looking for the 11th round pick ###.I see you have stirred the pot, nice job.

They are all a bunch of pansies here, but Ill give Pat Patriot credit, I think his avatar is chief jay strongbow.

One piece of advice, those smiley faces makes you look a little light in the loafers.

Its actually Wahoo McDaniel. But I have a very old picture of me with Chief Jay Strongbow. EG should invest in a dictionary because he apparently has no idea what the word whiny means. I'd like to see a post where I am whining about anything.

OK, I admit that - you're not a whiner, just a tool. BGP is a whiny tool.Shaps - this smiley is money :

 

[Evilgrin 72]

For the record I don't advise putting EG72 on some sort of staff-like level at this site. The guy is a bad egg, regardless of what you think of the mock he did. You can always find knowledgeable people, but any guy that puts a personal attack in his sig for over a year is not the sort of guy you want to mix with.I recommend removing his mock from nfldraftguys.

Stop your whining, same goes for BGP as well. Bunch of Sallies.All in all, nice Mock EG72, your Ginn prediction was probably the closest of any mock I saw out there.

Thanks, but what the hell are you doing here?

Saw your message on the board so I figured I would check it out. Actually used your mock draft to help formulate my top ten for the friendly competition me and few others had this weekend at the bars. Actually tied with someone and had to go to the 11th pick for the tie breaker, unfortunately my gamble did not pay off and I lost. Pick up your cell phone next time I call looking for the 11th round pick ###.I see you have stirred the pot, nice job.They are all a bunch of pansies here, but Ill give Pat Patriot credit, I think his avatar is chief jay strongbow.One piece of advice, those smiley faces makes you look a little light in the loafers.

I did a second mock but I got it in too late for Bloom to put it up on nfldraftguys because he was already in New York for the draft. I nailed Levi Brown #5 to the Cards in that one.