Fantasy Squad Depth (1 Viewer)

[Fantaholic]

Sometimes I wonder whether having the best overall team every year is a good thing or a bad thing.

Roster:

3 QB

6 RB

6 WR

Etc

Start:

1 QB

2 RB

3 WR

You do all your homework. You make all the moves before everyone else does. You end up with a team that has so much depth that you can interchange almost anyone on your roster on any given week. Is that good or bad. Sometimes I envy the idiots that have no depth and have no choice who they start because their team only has a few viable options. No decision making on their part. Cuts the room for error tremendously in my opinon. Am I being dramatic, or do I have some people with me on this one?

 

[my man otis]

Sometimes I wonder whether having the best overall team every year is a good thing or a bad thing.

Roster:

3 QB

6 RB

6 WR

Etc

Start:

1 QB

2 RB

3 WR

You do all your homework. You make all the moves before everyone else does. You end up with a team that has so much depth that you can interchange almost anyone on your roster on any given week. Is that good or bad. Sometimes I envy the idiots that have no depth and have no choice who they start because their team only has a few viable options. No decision making on their part. Cuts the room for error tremendously in my opinon. Am I being dramatic, or do I have some people with me on this one?

ummm, some would say having too much depth is not a wise allocation of resources. trade to improve your starters. who's the idiot then?oh, and

 

[Fantaholic]

Sometimes I wonder whether having the best overall team every year is a good thing or a bad thing.

Roster:

3 QB

6 RB

6 WR

Etc

Start:

1 QB

2 RB

3 WR

You do all your homework. You make all the moves before everyone else does. You end up with a team that has so much depth that you can interchange almost anyone on your roster on any given week. Is that good or bad. Sometimes I envy the idiots that have no depth and have no choice who they start because their team only has a few viable options. No decision making on their part. Cuts the room for error tremendously in my opinon. Am I being dramatic, or do I have some people with me on this one?

ummm, some would say having too much depth is not a wise allocation of resources. trade to improve your starters. who's the idiot then?oh, and

No one trades with the shark of the league, you should know that. Or do you?

 

[my man otis]

Sometimes I wonder whether having the best overall team every year is a good thing or a bad thing.

Roster:

3 QB

6 RB

6 WR

Etc

Start:

1 QB

2 RB

3 WR

You do all your homework. You make all the moves before everyone else does. You end up with a team that has so much depth that you can interchange almost anyone on your roster on any given week. Is that good or bad. Sometimes I envy the idiots that have no depth and have no choice who they start because their team only has a few viable options. No decision making on their part. Cuts the room for error tremendously in my opinon. Am I being dramatic, or do I have some people with me on this one?

ummm, some would say having too much depth is not a wise allocation of resources. trade to improve your starters. who's the idiot then?oh, and

No one trades with the shark of the league, you should know that. Or do you?

okey dokey