Farve vs. Philly (1 Viewer)

[Beau Tocks]

Do any of you know where I can get Brett's performances vs. the Eagles over the past 5 years or so?

Thanks

 

[Snotbubbles]

2006: 205 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

2005: 171 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs

2004: 131 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

2003: 109 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT

2003 (playoff): 180 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

2006: 205 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs2005: 171 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs2004: 131 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs2003: 109 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT2003 (playoff): 180 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

Wow, that's terrible.

 

[David Yudkin]

2006

22-44-205-0-2, 1-0-0

2005

15-33-171-1-2, 1-4-0

2004

14-29-131-0-2, 0-0-0

2003

14-22-109-1-1, 2-8-0

2003 Playoffs

15-28-180-2-1, 1-3-0

 

[Jeff Haseley]

Do any of you know where I can get Brett's performances vs. the Eagles over the past 5 years or so?

Thanks

The Data Dominator has this. But so does NFL.com you just have to go to each year under game splits.

 

[Illegal Pants Downfield]

2006: 205 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

2005: 171 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs

2004: 131 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

2003: 109 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT

2003 (playoff): 180 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

IIRC, that game in '03 was played in torrential rains...both offenses were ugly that game.Even in the other games, those are some underwhelming numbers, though...

 

[parrot]

Wow, informative. May have to rethink starting him this week.

 

[Aaronstory]

Jim Johnson owns Favre. Always has, always will.

Having said that, he will put up a ton of yardage. If your league does not penalize for INTs, he's serviceable, but only just.

 

[trader jake]

The Packers had some real issues at safety and were exploited in the passing game the last few seasons against Philly. It hasn't been pretty.

 

[Illegal Pants Downfield]

The Packers had some real issues at safety and were exploited in the passing game the last few seasons against Philly. It hasn't been pretty.

McNabb KILLED the Pack last year...http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=2892...6&week=REG4

Almost 300 yards passing, 2 pass TDs, 2 rush TDs...GB had no answer...

 

[Kleck.]

The Packers had some real issues at safety and were exploited in the passing game the last few seasons against Philly. It hasn't been pretty.

McNabb KILLED the Pack last year...http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=2892...6&week=REG4

Almost 300 yards passing, 2 pass TDs, 2 rush TDs...GB had no answer...

McNabb has killed the Pack the past four times he's played them. 4-0, 10 TDs, plus another 3 rushing.

 

[Snotbubbles]

The Packers had some real issues at safety and were exploited in the passing game the last few seasons against Philly. It hasn't been pretty.

McNabb KILLED the Pack last year...http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=2892...6&week=REG4

Almost 300 yards passing, 2 pass TDs, 2 rush TDs...GB had no answer...

And in 2004.He had 303 yards passing and 5 TDs IN THE FIRST HALF.

 

[Kleck.]

Philly's DBs are pretty good, and they could stay in nickle packages all game and still hold the running game to a minimum. I don't see this looking good for Favre and the Pack.

 

[packersfan]

I wouldn't advise starting Favre this week. As shown above his history against Johnson's defenses has been pretty ugly. The only chance he has is production through sheer volume of passes since I expect him to have to air it out a ton. Unfortunately, if you're in a league that penalizes for TOs, Favre could be good for a couple of INTs this week. If you don't lose points for turnovers he's a safer play but again, I don't think there's much upside with him this week. I'd only consider starting him in the largest of leagues or if your QBs are weak.