Chaka said:
I'll take Barber for this year at least and would strongly consider Choice over Jones for the next five years.
I really don't understand this...Can someone please explain to me - if Choice is SO MUCH BETTER - why does he barely touch the field when Barber and Jones are both healthy? Last year 50% his carries, and 60% of his receptions came when Barber and Jones were either both out, or both limited by injury. If he was the better option than either, they would play him. In the PHI playoff game, Choice was limited mostly to Razorback and short yardage until the 4th quarter, Jones was the lead back - in a PLAYOFF GAME. The next game, Choice saw 1 carry. In the playoffs Jones had more touches than Barber and Choice combined.
The theory that Choice is the 3rd down RB, and they need him for that role to save Barber or Jones from pounding doesn't hold up - both by examination of actual play-by-play data, and using logic. If he was better than Barber, then they would have Barber play third down, as he's probably the best blocker of the bunch, and he's a good receiver. If they thought he was better than Jones, then they'd just limit Jones to third down, where they could take advantage of his speed, etc. and keep him healthier.
Note: I don't think Choice is a bad RB, I think he's a good RB. He and Barber are very similar, but Barber gets the veteran nod IMO. I don't think he's better than Jones, and it seems the coaches who see them all daily agree.