What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (2 Viewers)

All over NE tonight, -7(-110) for the game and -5.5(-110) for the 1st half. Also have NE in all my teasersTeasers(so far) for NFLX week 3NE -7 or -7.5Was +5KC +1.5Cle +2.5Buf +3TB +2.5Sea +5.5ETA: Den +2 added to the teaser list
ATL added to the teaser list, NE loss last night was a kick in the junk
 
big syndicate sharp power play on Niese o 4.5 k's :bag:
Thank! On this heavy...need a big win!So looks like we have a lot of guys at 5dimes, huh? Pretty significant juice movement on this one...worse than Sportsbook even...
My name is Big Meech, and i move lines :(
I was personally thinking you're more like Larry Hoovah.
Meech is a hometown guy, getting his start about 10-15 minutes away from my prop mansion. He was a big cocaine (lines) mover :popcorn: ohhhhhh the irony.
 
big syndicate sharp power play on Niese o 4.5 k's :rolleyes:
Thank! On this heavy...need a big win!So looks like we have a lot of guys at 5dimes, huh? Pretty significant juice movement on this one...worse than Sportsbook even...
My name is Big Meech, and i move lines :lmao:
I was personally thinking you're more like Larry Hoovah.
Meech is a hometown guy, getting his start about 10-15 minutes away from my prop mansion. He was a big cocaine (lines) mover :goodposting: ohhhhhh the irony.
Hoovah was a total badass, but I can understand the sentimentality towards your hometown hero.
 
All over NE tonight, -7(-110) for the game and -5.5(-110) for the 1st half. Also have NE in all my teasersTeasers(so far) for NFLX week 3NE -7 or -7.5Was +5KC +1.5Cle +2.5Buf +3TB +2.5Sea +5.5ETA: Den +2 added to the teaser list
ATL added to the teaser list, NE loss last night was a kick in the junk
I hope others played these, after the NE failure ever other team covered. 3 more lines made it into teaser ranger yesterday, Ten, SF, and Dallas. Dallas failed to cover but the other 2 covered.after a +60 unit weekend last weekend i'm at +50 units already this weekend with 28 more bets at +180 tonight on Denver +8. Even if denver doesn't cover tonight it's still a +22 unit week. I played a 10u hedge on Pit -2.5.So denver covers i'm looking at +90u weekendDenver doesn't cover +32u weekendPit wins by 3-7 pts, +110u weekend
 
All over NE tonight, -7(-110) for the game and -5.5(-110) for the 1st half. Also have NE in all my teasersTeasers(so far) for NFLX week 3NE -7 or -7.5Was +5KC +1.5Cle +2.5Buf +3TB +2.5Sea +5.5ETA: Den +2 added to the teaser list
ATL added to the teaser list, NE loss last night was a kick in the junk
I hope others played these, after the NE failure ever other team covered. 3 more lines made it into teaser ranger yesterday, Ten, SF, and Dallas. Dallas failed to cover but the other 2 covered.after a +60 unit weekend last weekend i'm at +50 units already this weekend with 28 more bets at +180 tonight on Denver +8. Even if denver doesn't cover tonight it's still a +22 unit week. I played a 10u hedge on Pit -2.5.So denver covers i'm looking at +90u weekendDenver doesn't cover +32u weekendPit wins by 3-7 pts, +110u weekend
Congrats lump! :lmao: I've been working my ### off and haven't had a chance to post much. Are you doing all these teasers in Round Robin fashion? i.e. EVERY team is teased with EVERY other team so you're likely to have a big winning week or a big losing week?Hope you are gonna post these in the regular season also. I love teasers.
 
All over NE tonight, -7(-110) for the game and -5.5(-110) for the 1st half. Also have NE in all my teasersTeasers(so far) for NFLX week 3NE -7 or -7.5Was +5KC +1.5Cle +2.5Buf +3TB +2.5Sea +5.5ETA: Den +2 added to the teaser list
ATL added to the teaser list, NE loss last night was a kick in the junk
I hope others played these, after the NE failure ever other team covered. 3 more lines made it into teaser ranger yesterday, Ten, SF, and Dallas. Dallas failed to cover but the other 2 covered.after a +60 unit weekend last weekend i'm at +50 units already this weekend with 28 more bets at +180 tonight on Denver +8. Even if denver doesn't cover tonight it's still a +22 unit week. I played a 10u hedge on Pit -2.5.So denver covers i'm looking at +90u weekendDenver doesn't cover +32u weekendPit wins by 3-7 pts, +110u weekend
Congrats lump! :thumbup: I've been working my ### off and haven't had a chance to post much. Are you doing all these teasers in Round Robin fashion? i.e. EVERY team is teased with EVERY other team so you're likely to have a big winning week or a big losing week?Hope you are gonna post these in the regular season also. I love teasers.
Most of these are Wong teasers, although Lumpy did a bit more here. (Great weekend, Lump!) Wong teasers:Tease anything -7.5 through -8.5 to get to -1.5 to -2.5, crossing the key numbers of 3 and 7.Similarly, tease anything +1.5 through +2.5 to get to 7.5 to 8.5, crossing the same key numbers. You'll notice that a lot of books try to avoid setting lines at 7.5, 8, 8.5 or 1.5, 2, 2.5. Instead you'll see things like -7 +110 and +3 -130. Teasing through 7 and 10 (like Lumpy did with the +5 and +5.5) is historically not profitable if you do them blindly, since 10 is not as key of a number as 3 and 7. However, it can work better with games that have low totals, and when combined with some handicapping of your own. Getting 11 or 11.5 in a game lined at a total in the mid 30s is pretty solid. Do NOT tease through zero. It is not profitable long term and is a mistake that I see often. The common square thought is to take a team favored by 3 and tease it so that they are getting 3. NOT profitable long term. Some people like to tease off of our onto the 3 and the 7 (ex: teasing -9 to -3 or teasing +1 to +7). Not as good since you're not going THROUGH the 3 or the 7, you're just getting on or off of it. But again, when combined with some handicapping of your own, it can work well - I just wouldn't do it blindly. If you are teasing 2 teams, you should be able to find -110. Teasing 3 teams at +180 is better. And yes, as you said, if you get a weekend with multiple games that are in teaser range, it can be a very good weekend, as teaser bettors had the last 2 weeks, or a very bad weekend.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Most of these are Wong teasers, although Lumpy did a bit more here. (Great weekend, Lump!)

Wong teasers:

Tease anything -7.5 through -8.5 to get to -1.5 to -2.5, crossing the key numbers of 3 and 7.

Similarly, tease anything +1.5 through +2.5 to get to 7.5 to 8.5, crossing the same key numbers.

You'll notice that a lot of books try to avoid setting lines at 7.5, 8, 8.5 or 1.5, 2, 2.5. Instead you'll see things like -7 +110 and +3 -130.

Teasing through 7 and 10 (like Lumpy did with the +5 and +5.5) is historically not profitable if you do them blindly, since 10 is not as key of a number as 3 and 7. However, it can work better with games that have low totals, and when combined with some handicapping of your own. Getting 11 or 11.5 in a game lined at a total in the mid 30s is pretty solid.

Do NOT tease through zero. It is not profitable long term and is a mistake that I see often. The common square thought is to take a team favored by 3 and tease it so that they are getting 3. NOT profitable long term.

Some people like to tease off of our onto the 3 and the 7 (ex: teasing -9 to -3 or teasing +1 to +7). Not as good since you're not going THROUGH the 3 or the 7, you're just getting on or off of it. But again, when combined with some handicapping of your own, it can work well - I just wouldn't do it blindly.

If you are teasing 2 teams, you should be able to find -110. Teasing 3 teams at +180 is better.

And yes, as you said, if you get a weekend with multiple games that are in teaser range, it can be a very good weekend, as teaser bettors had the last 2 weeks, or a very bad weekend.
Week 1 of NFLx was very bad, I think only 5 of 9 covered, i lost ~50u. Got it back the last 2 weekends though :excited: The houston texans have cost me almost 12k the last 2 weeks :wall:

I've evolved from betting only wongs to adding others in. There aren't often a lot of "wong" lines during a regular season NFL week and i really like gambling on the NFL so i may force some bets that are marginal but it's worth the entertainment for me. The rest of the year i gamble on sports i don't enjoy watching when i wager so i treat myself for football season. :banned:

 
Moeller +4.5 tonight vs Huber Heights WayneIts HS football on ESPN.Pretty big bet for me.
Live Dog!!!!Moeller is from the GCL along with Elder, St X, and LaSalle (My alma mater....we are easily the doormat here)I will bet these guys all day long against other competition in Ohio.
 
Most of these are Wong teasers, although Lumpy did a bit more here. (Great weekend, Lump!)

Wong teasers:

Tease anything -7.5 through -8.5 to get to -1.5 to -2.5, crossing the key numbers of 3 and 7.

Similarly, tease anything +1.5 through +2.5 to get to 7.5 to 8.5, crossing the same key numbers.

You'll notice that a lot of books try to avoid setting lines at 7.5, 8, 8.5 or 1.5, 2, 2.5. Instead you'll see things like -7 +110 and +3 -130.

Teasing through 7 and 10 (like Lumpy did with the +5 and +5.5) is historically not profitable if you do them blindly, since 10 is not as key of a number as 3 and 7. However, it can work better with games that have low totals, and when combined with some handicapping of your own. Getting 11 or 11.5 in a game lined at a total in the mid 30s is pretty solid.

Do NOT tease through zero. It is not profitable long term and is a mistake that I see often. The common square thought is to take a team favored by 3 and tease it so that they are getting 3. NOT profitable long term.

Some people like to tease off of our onto the 3 and the 7 (ex: teasing -9 to -3 or teasing +1 to +7). Not as good since you're not going THROUGH the 3 or the 7, you're just getting on or off of it. But again, when combined with some handicapping of your own, it can work well - I just wouldn't do it blindly.

If you are teasing 2 teams, you should be able to find -110. Teasing 3 teams at +180 is better.

And yes, as you said, if you get a weekend with multiple games that are in teaser range, it can be a very good weekend, as teaser bettors had the last 2 weeks, or a very bad weekend.
Week 1 of NFLx was very bad, I think only 5 of 9 covered, i lost ~50u. Got it back the last 2 weekends though :) The houston texans have cost me almost 12k the last 2 weeks ;)

I've evolved from betting only wongs to adding others in. There aren't often a lot of "wong" lines during a regular season NFL week and i really like gambling on the NFL so i may force some bets that are marginal but it's worth the entertainment for me. The rest of the year i gamble on sports i don't enjoy watching when i wager so i treat myself for football season. :rolleyes:
I think maybe my question was misunderstood.I fully understand that the primary goal is to have the best "ending number" in a teaser... +7.5, +10.5, -2.5, etc. I have been doing that for years, always looking for the best number.

My question was in regards to all the teams he listed. Does Team A get teased with Team B... then Team B gets teased with team C, etc. etc. all the way down until the last team gets teased back to Team A?

That's the Round Robin hammer principle in play here, right?

 
Most of these are Wong teasers, although Lumpy did a bit more here. (Great weekend, Lump!)

Wong teasers:

Tease anything -7.5 through -8.5 to get to -1.5 to -2.5, crossing the key numbers of 3 and 7.

Similarly, tease anything +1.5 through +2.5 to get to 7.5 to 8.5, crossing the same key numbers.

You'll notice that a lot of books try to avoid setting lines at 7.5, 8, 8.5 or 1.5, 2, 2.5. Instead you'll see things like -7 +110 and +3 -130.

Teasing through 7 and 10 (like Lumpy did with the +5 and +5.5) is historically not profitable if you do them blindly, since 10 is not as key of a number as 3 and 7. However, it can work better with games that have low totals, and when combined with some handicapping of your own. Getting 11 or 11.5 in a game lined at a total in the mid 30s is pretty solid.

Do NOT tease through zero. It is not profitable long term and is a mistake that I see often. The common square thought is to take a team favored by 3 and tease it so that they are getting 3. NOT profitable long term.

Some people like to tease off of our onto the 3 and the 7 (ex: teasing -9 to -3 or teasing +1 to +7). Not as good since you're not going THROUGH the 3 or the 7, you're just getting on or off of it. But again, when combined with some handicapping of your own, it can work well - I just wouldn't do it blindly.

If you are teasing 2 teams, you should be able to find -110. Teasing 3 teams at +180 is better.

And yes, as you said, if you get a weekend with multiple games that are in teaser range, it can be a very good weekend, as teaser bettors had the last 2 weeks, or a very bad weekend.
Week 1 of NFLx was very bad, I think only 5 of 9 covered, i lost ~50u. Got it back the last 2 weekends though :hot: The houston texans have cost me almost 12k the last 2 weeks :wall:

I've evolved from betting only wongs to adding others in. There aren't often a lot of "wong" lines during a regular season NFL week and i really like gambling on the NFL so i may force some bets that are marginal but it's worth the entertainment for me. The rest of the year i gamble on sports i don't enjoy watching when i wager so i treat myself for football season. :)
I think maybe my question was misunderstood.I fully understand that the primary goal is to have the best "ending number" in a teaser... +7.5, +10.5, -2.5, etc. I have been doing that for years, always looking for the best number.

My question was in regards to all the teams he listed. Does Team A get teased with Team B... then Team B gets teased with team C, etc. etc. all the way down until the last team gets teased back to Team A?

That's the Round Robin hammer principle in play here, right?
Yes3 teams - 1 bet

4 teams - 3 bets

5 teams - 10 bets

6 teams - 20 bets

7 teams - 35 bets

8 teams - 56 bets

9 teams - 84 bets

And that's significantly expanded if you also bet 4,5,6 etc team combinations at their respective numbers

I only bet 3 teamers at +180 at this point to reduce the variance a little. If some of the teaser legs are good subsets(home dogs, low totals) I'll add a 4 teamer but that almost never happens.

 
Nice job by sportsbook this football season. They opened their NFL season player props at $25 max bet, then moved it to $100, then $200 and now currently at $300. I don't think any of the lines moved with $25 bets but i've seen movement since then.

Only 1 I really like right now is Brady +1.5td over romo(greek has brady -3td over romo)

 
Raider Nation said:
lumpy19 said:
Most of these are Wong teasers, although Lumpy did a bit more here. (Great weekend, Lump!)

Wong teasers:

Tease anything -7.5 through -8.5 to get to -1.5 to -2.5, crossing the key numbers of 3 and 7.

Similarly, tease anything +1.5 through +2.5 to get to 7.5 to 8.5, crossing the same key numbers.

You'll notice that a lot of books try to avoid setting lines at 7.5, 8, 8.5 or 1.5, 2, 2.5. Instead you'll see things like -7 +110 and +3 -130.

Teasing through 7 and 10 (like Lumpy did with the +5 and +5.5) is historically not profitable if you do them blindly, since 10 is not as key of a number as 3 and 7. However, it can work better with games that have low totals, and when combined with some handicapping of your own. Getting 11 or 11.5 in a game lined at a total in the mid 30s is pretty solid.

Do NOT tease through zero. It is not profitable long term and is a mistake that I see often. The common square thought is to take a team favored by 3 and tease it so that they are getting 3. NOT profitable long term.

Some people like to tease off of our onto the 3 and the 7 (ex: teasing -9 to -3 or teasing +1 to +7). Not as good since you're not going THROUGH the 3 or the 7, you're just getting on or off of it. But again, when combined with some handicapping of your own, it can work well - I just wouldn't do it blindly.

If you are teasing 2 teams, you should be able to find -110. Teasing 3 teams at +180 is better.

And yes, as you said, if you get a weekend with multiple games that are in teaser range, it can be a very good weekend, as teaser bettors had the last 2 weeks, or a very bad weekend.
Week 1 of NFLx was very bad, I think only 5 of 9 covered, i lost ~50u. Got it back the last 2 weekends though :confused: The houston texans have cost me almost 12k the last 2 weeks :wall:

I've evolved from betting only wongs to adding others in. There aren't often a lot of "wong" lines during a regular season NFL week and i really like gambling on the NFL so i may force some bets that are marginal but it's worth the entertainment for me. The rest of the year i gamble on sports i don't enjoy watching when i wager so i treat myself for football season. :banned:
I think maybe my question was misunderstood.I fully understand that the primary goal is to have the best "ending number" in a teaser... +7.5, +10.5, -2.5, etc. I have been doing that for years, always looking for the best number.

My question was in regards to all the teams he listed. Does Team A get teased with Team B... then Team B gets teased with team C, etc. etc. all the way down until the last team gets teased back to Team A?

That's the Round Robin hammer principle in play here, right?
Yes I misunderstood - sorry. Well, hopefully my post helped someone else at least.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
2.5 more days til College FB starts :banned:
:banned: ... so pumped up!ESPN had their choice of games Thursday night and they chose Southern Miss @ South Carolina over Pittsburgh @ Utah??? :X Is the Ol' Ball Coach really that big of a draw? I can't be the only one who would rather watch the Panthers and Utes. That game is on Versus anyway.Then USC @ Hawai'i at midnight!!! :banned:
 
Johnny "I'm not here to spam but I have links to my blog and tout site, please go to them and subscribe" Detroit, you're not welcome. :D
LOL at "running anybody off the site". Not a fan of people advertising for free and I was just calling him on it. Look, he advertises here, whether you like it or not. When he continues to claim he doesn't, all the while having links in his sig, then I feel like it's okay to call him on it.Again, whether you like his stuff or not, is a totally different story/topic.I have to laugh at you saying I was being "un-excellent", like I broke a big rule, when really my point of contention is that he is doing just that, with free spam on a board he doesn't own. And cherry-picking one comment of mine (from AWHILE back no less) to try and prove your point that I ran someone off is hilarious, in so many ways. Anyway, fear not, your boy is still here!
 
Lump - just posted up at sportsbetting. Any tips on what kind of bets I am looking to beat?
no idea, they cut me on everything a few months ago so i haven't been there in a while.Their live NFL betting was good
What did you used to bet on?
everything. you might be late to the party, they've cut limits on everything and increased their vig on the fun stufflast year in CBB you could watch RAS move a line and they'd be sitting their with a stale line and 1k limits(greek/bookmaker had $500 limits)so great but i think they got hit so hard that they've slashed their limits. I opened up a "new" acct there and it wasn't worth my time with the limits they put on everything. $25 on live betting lines :goodposting: Not sure if it's going to change for football season.
 
Mark Ingram out atleast week 1 with arthro-knee surgery...will they rush him back with such a capable backup to play Penn State?

some of the ingram prop bets become interesting

yards vs. Ryan Williams

and his season rushing TD props are heavy on the over 13 side...anyone have a take?

 
Mark Ingram out atleast week 1 with arthro-knee surgery...will they rush him back with such a capable backup to play Penn State?some of the ingram prop bets become interestingyards vs. Ryan Williamsand his season rushing TD props are heavy on the over 13 side...anyone have a take?
I do not believe Ingram will play week 2 and am a fan of 8-13.
 
Where's mo? Kuroda is no-hitting the Phils in the 8th. :P
:thumbdown: Yup, me and my account balance are both well aware of that game last night. You have to love that team though, they get swept by the Astosd at home, and then come around and sweep the Padres in San Diego :loco: .
 
I just got some mammy emails so it looks like we are still getting some.
For this week only, Only $395 to continue on for the year.
tough crowd. He emails those sheets for free, gives 100% match CASH at SIA up to $500 last year and 100% match freeplay up to $500 at betus. I don't care if he gets a cut of that, it's $1000 for me.you don't HAVE to subscribe to his tout service.
 
STL is toast....time to try and figure out a way to get Cincy winning the central. Even if STL sweeps this weekend they're still 4 games back.

Shocking to me that a team with STL's rotation isn't better than they are.

 
I think I'm done.....here's my NFL and NCAA win total futures. Some of these are still available and some aren't.

buf u5.5 wins -130

Denver u7.5 wins -120

SD u11 wins -140

NYJ u9.5 wins +110

SF to win NFC west +120

college

Wiconsin o9 wins +100

Florida St o7.5 wins -140

Georgia o8.5 wins -110

WVU o8.5 wins -145

wisconsin national champion +4600

boise state national champion +1200

BC ACC champion +1050

Florida national champion +2500

Washington u6.5 wins -140

Nebraska to win big 12 north -105

Texas A&M o7 wins +130

Auburn u9 wins -125

Minnesota u5 wins -110

Michigan u7 wins -130

BYU u8 wins +105

UCLA u5.5 wins +100

Arizona u7.5 wins +120

 
Played Eddie Wide (Utah) u 18.5 carries -115 and -130. Getting ready to fire things up again, please holler if interested. Only a couple spots available. Thanks!

 
I got an email about a 20% reload bonus (> $250 deposit) for one of sportsbook.com sister books. Usually the promo codes are good for any sportsbook.com book (they all use same processor). Its good through Sunday, you might want to verify the code is good for the book you are depositing at. I'm gonna try it out tomorrow, will report back.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Played Eddie Wide (Utah) u 18.5 carries -115 and -130. Getting ready to fire things up again, please holler if interested. Only a couple spots available. Thanks!
Like this bet a lotUtes have Matt Asiata back healthy, and this is going to be a pretty even splitThey also have Shakerin who is going to get some carriesPlus Pitt has a solid D:goodposting:
 
I got an email about a 20% reload bonus (> $250 deposit) for one of sportsbook.com sister books. Usually the promo codes are good for any sportsbook.com book (they all use same processor). Its good through Sunday, you might want to verify the code is good for the book you are depositing at. I'm gonna try it out tomorrow, will report back.
I bet 1 prop at brobury and they cut me to $25 already, 1 prop :thumbup:have you had any issues with them cutting props at sister books?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top