What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread - CHI @ SD (1 Viewer)

that could have cost the chargers the game.
Stop. The score is 3-0. There is still plenty of ball to be played. And there is no guarantee that the Chargers would have scored a TD there, especially given how dominant the Bears 'D' has been.
This is very true. If the Chargers end up losing it. It's not due to this call.
This is sarcasm, right?
Not really. The Chargers' offense has been out of synch all game. The line isn't busting open the holes they did last year. Tomlinson is obviously rusty. Rivers threw an INT. If they lose, it's because of what happened the other 59 and half minutes.
I am not disagreeing with you on the fact that Chicago is dominating the Chargers O. I am disagreeing that if they lose by 7 or less they have a legitimate gripe. They were on the 1 inch line.
 
that could have cost the chargers the game.
Stop. The score is 3-0. There is still plenty of ball to be played. And there is no guarantee that the Chargers would have scored a TD there, especially given how dominant the Bears 'D' has been.
This is very true. If the Chargers end up losing it. It's not due to this call.
This is sarcasm, right?If they lose by 7 or less, I think they might have a legitimate gripe.I still cannot believe how a linesman, who is looking right at the line of scrimmage could miss that call. Or the back judge for that matter. Or any referee out there.
Bad calls happen, good teams overcome diversity.
 
that could have cost the chargers the game.
Stop. The score is 3-0. There is still plenty of ball to be played. And there is no guarantee that the Chargers would have scored a TD there, especially given how dominant the Bears 'D' has been.
This is very true. If the Chargers end up losing it. It's not due to this call.
This is sarcasm, right?If they lose by 7 or less, I think they might have a legitimate gripe.I still cannot believe how a linesman, who is looking right at the line of scrimmage could miss that call. Or the back judge for that matter. Or any referee out there.
Bad calls happen, good teams overcome diversity.
Oh please.
 
Can't have a fumble if the ball is never snapped. How do officials possibly miss that?
Center's arm is moving with the ball in it... I think the defender was offsides, but by no more than 1/15th of a second. Too close for the human eye to really tell if it was at the same time or not.
Do you know how long 1/15th of a second is? Maybe your vision just sucks.
The HD cameras record at 60 frames per second. I counted the clicks forward on the slow-mo replay.Harris' helmet moved 4 "clicks" on the slow-mo before the center's hand moved. 4/60=1/15th of a second.
:fishing:
:shrug: I do this professionally, man. Check out the camera that was lined up on the neutral zone. 4 frames between the helmet entering the neutral zone and the ball's movement.

 
Replay confirms Bears were WAY offsides.... SD got screwed there. Any bears homers not acknowledging this have zero credibility.
True. Sucks for SD. Better them than us.Sidenote: I've got LT on my fantasy team. I'm willing to lose my FF game if it means a Bears win.
A TRUE Bears Fan.
Although I did bench the Bears D for Minnesota...who got me 24 FF pts.
:fishing: Minn D > Chi. Real sharks know this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't have a fumble if the ball is never snapped. How do officials possibly miss that?
Center's arm is moving with the ball in it... I think the defender was offsides, but by no more than 1/15th of a second. Too close for the human eye to really tell if it was at the same time or not.
Do you know how long 1/15th of a second is? Maybe your vision just sucks.
The HD cameras record at 60 frames per second. I counted the clicks forward on the slow-mo replay.Harris' helmet moved 4 "clicks" on the slow-mo before the center's hand moved. 4/60=1/15th of a second.
:fishing:
:shrug: I do this professionally, man. Check out the camera that was lined up on the neutral zone. 4 frames between the helmet entering the neutral zone and the ball's movement.
Take a break during the TO?
 
I am not disagreeing with you on the fact that Chicago is dominating the Chargers O. I am disagreeing that if they lose by 7 or less they have a legitimate gripe. They were on the 1 inch line.
Even then... as bad as the Chargers' offense has looked at times, there is no way I would have guaranteed a TD at that point. I guess you could make an argument that they should have easily had 3, but they already had one FG blocked in the 1st quarter, so no guarantee there either.
 
Replay confirms Bears were WAY offsides.... SD got screwed there. Any bears homers not acknowledging this have zero credibility.
True. Sucks for SD. Better them than us.Sidenote: I've got LT on my fantasy team. I'm willing to lose my FF game if it means a Bears win.
A TRUE Bears Fan.
Although I did bench the Bears D for Minnesota...who got me 24 FF pts.
:fishing: Minn D > Chi. Real sharks know this.
Any FF Def vs Falcons >>>>> Any FF Def vs SD
 
Jackson just isn't very good.

Having a terrible game.. hit him right in the shoulder.

EDIT: Nevermind... very light tip on that play

Nice catch to follow

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would have been tough for Jackson to catch that ball.. I hate it when they hit me on the numbers in the end zone.

 
They keep losing Gates. I wish Rivers was having a better game because he has time and Gates is open a lot.

 
you may stop me from running, put a dent in me on the catching, but I'll get you with passing...love LT

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top