Game Thread - CHI @ SD (1 Viewer)

[thayman]

Pfft...SD is just another RBBC team.

QBBC too.

Good point. At least the Bears don't have to resort to sandlot ball to win.

It was a nice trick play.....get over it. If CHI hadn't turned the ball over 4 times it wouldn't be an issue

 

[KnowledgeReignsSupreme]

Stay classy Bears.

 

[GrossmanToHester]

Pfft...SD is just another RBBC team.

QBBC too.

Good point. At least the Bears don't have to resort to sandlot ball to win.

It's a joke, guy.

 

[jurb26]

SD will not win this game only going to LT and Gates on offense. Chi is too good on D.

There are some real gems in this thread.

Right, because the 4 turnovers had nothing to do with the win.

 

[GrossmanToHester]

Bears fans.

Don't let the doorknob hit you on the way out, nozzle.

 

[ditka311]

Is Adrian Peterson the lovechild of Whoopi Goldberg and JarJar Binks?

 

[flapgreen]

Pfft...SD is just another RBBC team.

QBBC too.

Good point. At least the Bears don't have to resort to sandlot ball to win.

It's a joke, guy.

They rode the short bus, bro. Give em a little time.

 

[The Gator]

SD will not win this game only going to LT and Gates on offense. Chi is too good on D.

There are some real gems in this thread.

Right, because the 4 turnovers had nothing to do with the win.

Here comes a jurb back track.

 

[Despyzer]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

 

[thayman]

Pfft...SD is just another RBBC team.

QBBC too.

Good point. At least the Bears don't have to resort to sandlot ball to win.

It's a joke, guy.

ahh...I'm sorry, I did not get your poor attempt at humor....good one though

 

[jurb26]

SD will not win this game only going to LT and Gates on offense. Chi is too good on D.

There are some real gems in this thread.

Right, because the 4 turnovers had nothing to do with the win.

Here comes a jurb back track.

Here comes my stalker, with nothing logical to say again. Having a stalker on the internet is rather flattering I must say.

 

[Pygmy Marmoset]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

I'd like to understand what he's saying, but I don't. "Grossman played well enough to win."???12/23 145 yards, 0 TD, 1INT.How is that good enough to win against the Chargers?

 

[GrossmanToHester]

Pfft...SD is just another RBBC team.

QBBC too.

Good point. At least the Bears don't have to resort to sandlot ball to win.

It's a joke, guy.

ahh...I'm sorry, I did not get your poor attempt at humor....good one though

How could it be poor and good at the same time?

 

[jonessed]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

The fumbles killed them.

 

[Despyzer]

Makes me wonder if the Bears would be willing to give up two 1st round picks for Michael Turner.

 

[Ghost Rider]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

Well, the two fumbles by Benson and Peterson in the second half were pretty huge...

 

[KnowledgeReignsSupreme]

Run the score up Turner. It's been a long time since you actually won against a good team.

 

[jonessed]

Turner just embarrassed someone.

 

[flapgreen]

Good defense. Poor offense. Turnovers are what cost us the game.

On a positive note, I'm ok with Grossman's performance.

 

[GrossmanToHester]

Turner ragdolled somebody...uke:

 

[The Gator]

SD will not win this game only going to LT and Gates on offense. Chi is too good on D.

There are some real gems in this thread.

Right, because the 4 turnovers had nothing to do with the win.

Here comes a jurb back track.

Here comes my stalker, with nothing logical to say again. Having a stalker on the internet is rather flattering I must say.

Your posts are funny, not on purpose, but they are. Keep it up.

 

[Pygmy Marmoset]

Defense - OVVNED by Turner on that run.

 

[thayman]

nice run by Turner

Chicago just looks worn out

 

[Despyzer]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

Well, the two fumbles by Benson and Peterson in the second half were pretty huge...

True. I just thought the timing was interesting.

 

[fatness]

Norv Turner has a scary hair thing going on.

 

[JZilla]

Norv Turner has a scary everything going on.

fixed

 

[jurb26]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

Chi lost this game on TOs. Plan and simple. They gave up the ball at the SD 48, their own 29, their own 32 and their own 40. All of SDs points came off of those TOs and you just can't put a team as good as SD (let alone any team) in scoring position that often and expect to win.

 

[thayman]

Pfft...SD is just another RBBC team.

QBBC too.

Good point. At least the Bears don't have to resort to sandlot ball to win.

It's a joke, guy.

ahh...I'm sorry, I did not get your poor attempt at humor....good one though

How could it be poor and good at the same time?

 

[ditka311]

Well, that was disappointing.

Those last 3 runs directly at the pile by Benson and Peterson got me really ticked off. But, I am over it now. Looking forward to this week's remaining games.

 

[KnowledgeReignsSupreme]

I guess LT's commercial wasn't enough bulletin board material for the Bears.

 

[saintsfan]

The whole flap with the Bears feeling "disrespected" by the Nike commercial makes me happy that they lost.

 

[fatness]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

Joe Buck doesn't know his ### from third base either. He's an embarrassment as an announcer. He won't criticize Grossman, who's clearly the biggest problem on the Chicago offense. Earlier in the game he criticized Berrian for giving up on his pattern when Grossman threw the ball right to a defender.

 

[Despyzer]

I guess LT's commercial wasn't enough bulletin board material for the Bears.

And the biggest talker in that whole thing was Urlacher. I barely heard his name called, finished with just 5 tackles.

 

[JZilla]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

Joe Buck doesn't know his ### from third base either. He's an embarrassment as an announcer. He won't criticize Grossman, who's clearly the biggest problem on the Chicago offense. Earlier in the game he criticized Berrian for giving up on his pattern when Grossman threw the ball right to a defender.

I meant to say something about that too.Dumb ### Berrian, should have used the Force

 

[jurb26]

Joe Buck is blaming the loss on the Bears' inability to run the ball. Then the producers throw up a graphic about how the Bears have 20 more rushing yards than the Chargers.

Joe Buck doesn't know his ### from third base either. He's an embarrassment as an announcer. He won't criticize Grossman, who's clearly the biggest problem on the Chicago offense. Earlier in the game he criticized Berrian for giving up on his pattern when Grossman threw the ball right to a defender.

Wasn't that Aikman saying it was Berrian's fault?

 

[Widbil83]

What happened to using Hester on offense. I saw him for one play and they threw to the opposite side of the field.

 

[fatness]

Those last 3 runs directly at the pile by Benson and Peterson got me really ticked off.

I don't blame you. It was crappy playcalling, and also crappy O-line play.

 

[BroadwayG]

About time they cut from the Bears to a real team. The Raiders.

 

[fatness]

Wasn't that Aikman saying it was Berrian's fault?

It was both announcers agreeing about it.

 

[j3r3m3y]

SD will not win this game only going to LT and Gates on offense. Chi is too good on D.

There are some real gems in this thread.

Right, because the 4 turnovers had nothing to do with the win.

Here comes a jurb back track.

Here comes my stalker, with nothing logical to say again. Having a stalker on the internet is rather flattering I must say.

Your posts are funny, not on purpose, but they are. Keep it up.

Get a room you two.

 

[fatness]

Dumb ### Berrian, should have used the Force

 

[GroveDiesel]

Cedric Benson stinks. It was pretty clear that Peterson is a much more explosive RB. He also seemed to be more powerful. How long until Adrian Peterson takes over as the #1 and how big of a tantrum does Benson throw when he's demoted?

 

[GrossmanToHester]

Makes me wonder if the Bears would be willing to give up two 1st round picks for Michael Turner.

I doubt it. We're going to need to use one of those picks on another crappy QB.

 

[KnowledgeReignsSupreme]

Bears last place in their division all by themselves right now.

 

[GrossmanToHester]

Pfft...SD is just another RBBC team.

QBBC too.

Good point. At least the Bears don't have to resort to sandlot ball to win.

It's a joke, guy.

ahh...I'm sorry, I did not get your poor attempt at humor....good one though

How could it be poor and good at the same time?

Wait...which part was sarcastic? The "poor" or the "good"?

 

[Pygmy Marmoset]

Makes me wonder if the Bears would be willing to give up two 1st round picks for Michael Turner.

I doubt it. We're going to need to use one of those picks on another crappy QB.

You're letting the terrorists win.

 

[Despyzer]

Bears last place in their division all by themselves right now.

 

[KnowledgeReignsSupreme]

I guess LT's commercial wasn't enough bulletin board material for the Bears.

And the biggest talker in that whole thing was Urlacher. I barely heard his name called, finished with just 5 tackles.

Next commercial will feature LT spiking the ball at Urlacher's feet.

 

[Despyzer]

I guess LT's commercial wasn't enough bulletin board material for the Bears.

And the biggest talker in that whole thing was Urlacher. I barely heard his name called, finished with just 5 tackles.

Next commercial will feature LT spiking the ball at Urlacher's feet.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Bears last place in their division all by themselves right now.