Kevin Ashcraft
Footballguy
And Kansas City says Thank You to Seattle.....the loss in CLEV was just softened a bit.
Apparently bothOf the NFC 2nd seed race or of the Broncos' season.What a mess Holmgren has made here.![]()
Sorry.. meant a Denver win is better.... course the "defense" lost this game.:whoosh:Yeah... like it didn't matter, even when Plummer had them in the playoff hunt. No it will. He was gifted that., he's done about 80% to lose, 10% nuetral, and 10% of good QB'ing. But, a Denver is better.a win by Cutler = a win by Cutler.If the Broncos win, how Cutler looked inhis first game won;t mater.Jake wins this game. Period. End of story. 2 INTS and a fumble like Cutler... but he still moves the ball. These are crushing!![]()
Don't forget, Jake also wasn't getting 100+ yard Tatum Bell games recently. Plummer has been bad, but I remember thinking last week that it was the defense and the running game that really was losing that game.
ETA: Without editing, Cutler now looks great because of horrific coverage and poor tackling. He looks great and Marshall did everything.
![]()
![]()
Me too. Time to sign him to an extension. 4 game-winning FG's this year.IJosh Brown.
Just call them as I see them! I think it's funny that someone who has NO SHOT of EVER stepping foot on a professional football field would have the nerve to critcize. That is so poor.Hey big fella. I'd forgotten how little value you add to the board.Like you could do better. Give me a break!It looks like the tacklers were diving at each other and either hit each other or were afraid to. That's so poor.![]()
Jags and Cincie said it much louder and with much more "oomph" after actaully WINNING this week.With losses by the Colts Denver and Chiefs, the AFC just got a LOT weaker.And Kansas City says Thank You to Seattle.....the loss in CLEV was just softened a bit.
That's the baffling thing. Allegedly, the whole point of going to Cutler was to open up the offense and enable the passing game to show more life than it had with Plummer - specifically making better use of Javon Walker. But you wouldn't have known that from the gameplan tonight. It doesn't make a lot of sense to bench Plummer if you're going to regress in terms of the gameplan. If Bell hadn't played so well and the defense didn't stand out for three quarters, the Broncos get blown out of this game tonight.I really do not know what to say.....you make a change, but you dumb down the offense so much that you play not to lose??
I do.I've had a few drinks and your avatar suddenly is very very disturbing to me.I really do not know what to say
agreed - what do you all think - is there something wrong with Hass such that they weren't taking shots on third and long?That was an odd game. I've never seen such an uninspired performance by the Seahawks offense. Even when the offense is bad, they're usually spectaculary bad. Tonight it was if they were just going through the motions.
It couldn't be any other way. It's not like Romo or Rivers who have had time to learn the offense. Putting Cutler in was tossing away any shot at the playoffs. I figured Denver fans realized this and were just happy to give Cutler the experience. He was not going to walk in here and put up the ridiculous 300/3 numbers people were saying were his upside. It was never going to happen. Denver ####ed up their chance this year when they made Plummer the goat.I really do not know what to say.....you make a change, but you dumb down the offense so much that you play not to lose??I mean, with this performance, you have to run the table or get help to make the playoffs. Why make the change if you are not going to try and win?
AmenIt couldn't be any other way. It's not like Romo or Rivers who have had time to learn the offense. Putting Cutler in was tossing away any shot at the playoffs. I figured Denver fans realized this and were just happy to give Cutler the experience. He was not going to walk in here and put up the ridiculous 300/3 numbers people were saying were his upside. It was never going to happen. Denver ####ed up their chance this year when they made Plummer the goat. He was never the problem.I really do not know what to say.....you make a change, but you dumb down the offense so much that you play not to lose??I mean, with this performance, you have to run the table or get help to make the playoffs. Why make the change if you are not going to try and win?
Me too. Time to sign him to an extension. 4 game-winning FG's this year.IJosh Brown.
He said in an interview after the game that they kept running the ball because they were reading blitz, then denver would pull out. He said he felt fine.agreed - what do you all think - is there something wrong with Hass such that they weren't taking shots on third and long?That was an odd game. I've never seen such an uninspired performance by the Seahawks offense. Even when the offense is bad, they're usually spectaculary bad. Tonight it was if they were just going through the motions.
Nah, it was stripped right before Brown hit em. Good stick though, prevented him from retrieving his own fumble.Me too. Time to sign him to an extension. 4 game-winning FG's this year.IJosh Brown.
He even got a Forced fumble and got on the horse trailer!
Seattle is one of the worst 3rd and long teams in the league in my opinion. Their short passing game just isn't built for it. They do a hell of a lot audibles to Strong or Alexander/Morris in those situations. That said it was the rest of the playcalling that had me puzzled. They showed zero aggression on every down, and the one shot down field was against Champ Bailey which was just beyond stupid. Why the hell they didn't attack Williams with Branch and Hackett is beyond me. Hackett has proven that he needs at least one or two shots down field a game.agreed - what do you all think - is there something wrong with Hass such that they weren't taking shots on third and long?That was an odd game. I've never seen such an uninspired performance by the Seahawks offense. Even when the offense is bad, they're usually spectaculary bad. Tonight it was if they were just going through the motions.
And how. It just kills me that he doesn't get more looks. He posts the best stats of all the WRs in Seattle per target. Not even close. Further, he makes plays in clutch situations. There has to be something to this that we don't see. Perhaps he's a terrible practice player.Hackett has proven that he needs at least one or two shots down field a game.
What the hell does this mean?And the whole "Denver was 7-4 and in line to make the playoffs and don't mess with a good thing" argument is flawed. If you've watched the Broncos at all this season, and especially lately, you would have realized the ship was sinking fast. Cutler's performance tonight was very Plummer-esque, anyway. It's silly to assume Plummer would have done better. Remember, Denver had 5 turnovers. Cutler was only responsible for 2 of them.Seattle were set and primed to be smashed tonight but all the stinking idiot-pundits in Denver just had to see Jay Cutler play QB. If you thought you knew football AND wanted Cutler in there, NOW, you know you know nothing about football. With Plummer 39-15, and Denver 7-4, you don't ever start a rookie in his first game. Idiots. And Shanahan, who is usually a great coach, saying that he's not going to put Jake back in. What the F is that crap? Forget about winning. What's important is that when a choice is made you stick with it. Even if everything goes wrong. And if Cutler is so good why play so conservative!!?? Idiots. All idiots.
Why was the ship sinking fast? This seems to be readily accepted by Denver fans as the reason for the change, but losing tight games to the two current AFC leaders and in Arrowhead (a place Denver always struggles) is not something to panic about. Now the season really is lost because Cutler looks like total ####. His mechanics go to Hell when he is under pressure and he is running a dumbed down offense because he hasn't had time to learn the system. You make the playoffs and you have a chance. Denver would have made the playoffs with Plummer, they won't with Cutler.What the hell does this mean?And the whole "Denver was 7-4 and in line to make the playoffs and don't mess with a good thing" argument is flawed. If you've watched the Broncos at all this season, and especially lately, you would have realized the ship was sinking fast. Cutler's performance tonight was very Plummer-esque, anyway. It's silly to assume Plummer would have done better. Remember, Denver had 5 turnovers. Cutler was only responsible for 2 3 of them.Seattle were set and primed to be smashed tonight but all the stinking idiot-pundits in Denver just had to see Jay Cutler play QB. If you thought you knew football AND wanted Cutler in there, NOW, you know you know nothing about football. With Plummer 39-15, and Denver 7-4, you don't ever start a rookie in his first game. Idiots. And Shanahan, who is usually a great coach, saying that he's not going to put Jake back in. What the F is that crap? Forget about winning. What's important is that when a choice is made you stick with it. Even if everything goes wrong. And if Cutler is so good why play so conservative!!?? Idiots. All idiots.
It was painfully obvious that Plummer was incapable of leading that team (particularly when it mattered). And when your QB can't lead, generally speaking, it does not bode well for success. The defense is good, but not nearly good enough to win games on it's own. Your perception apparently differs from mine, but IMO, Denver hasn't looked good for a while now.Why was the ship sinking fast? This seems to be readily accepted by Denver fans as the reason for the change, but losing tight games to the two current AFC leaders and in Arrowhead (a place Denver always struggles) is not something to panic about. Now the season really is lost because Cutler looks like total ####. His mechanics go to Hell when he is under pressure and he is running a dumbed down offense because he hasn't had time to learn the system. You make the playoffs and you have a chance. Denver would have made the playoffs with Plummer, they won't with Cutler.What the hell does this mean?And the whole "Denver was 7-4 and in line to make the playoffs and don't mess with a good thing" argument is flawed. If you've watched the Broncos at all this season, and especially lately, you would have realized the ship was sinking fast. Cutler's performance tonight was very Plummer-esque, anyway. It's silly to assume Plummer would have done better. Remember, Denver had 5 turnovers. Cutler was only responsible for 2 3 of them.Seattle were set and primed to be smashed tonight but all the stinking idiot-pundits in Denver just had to see Jay Cutler play QB. If you thought you knew football AND wanted Cutler in there, NOW, you know you know nothing about football. With Plummer 39-15, and Denver 7-4, you don't ever start a rookie in his first game. Idiots. And Shanahan, who is usually a great coach, saying that he's not going to put Jake back in. What the F is that crap? Forget about winning. What's important is that when a choice is made you stick with it. Even if everything goes wrong. And if Cutler is so good why play so conservative!!?? Idiots. All idiots.