Otis
Footballguy
Just another guy Otis is pimping. He's safe to ignore.HTHWho is this Gore kid?

Just another guy Otis is pimping. He's safe to ignore.HTHWho is this Gore kid?
Because they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
This is incredibly untrue. They ran a lot last year when they were down, and even more, Jackson got a lot of mid-range catches.Small sample size, gentlemen. Relax.Because they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
Jackson hasn't had much room to runBecause they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
I ignore Otis all the time.Just another guy Otis is pimping. He's safe to ignore.HTHWho is this Gore kid?
Gotta be happy if you're a Wilkin owner, not if you're a Jackson owner.wilkins blasts one from 53 that was good from about 60.STL back out in front.
How is this incredibly untrue? They were down 1 point last week and proceeded to run just 2 running plays the final 22 minutes. I said nothing about last year.This is incredibly untrue. They ran a lot last year when they were down, and even more, Jackson got a lot of mid-range catches.Small sample size, gentlemen. Relax.Because they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
Because one game doesn't mean ####. If you don't know that, I can't help you.How is this incredibly untrue? They were down 1 point last week and proceeded to run just 2 running plays the final 22 minutes. I said nothing about last year.This is incredibly untrue. They ran a lot last year when they were down, and even more, Jackson got a lot of mid-range catches.Small sample size, gentlemen. Relax.Because they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
Well, they will lose again this week because they can't run the ball when they have to and they rely on the pass too much.Because one game doesn't mean ####. If you don't know that, I can't help you.How is this incredibly untrue? They were down 1 point last week and proceeded to run just 2 running plays the final 22 minutes. I said nothing about last year.This is incredibly untrue. They ran a lot last year when they were down, and even more, Jackson got a lot of mid-range catches.Small sample size, gentlemen. Relax.Because they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
See, they need to be able to run in order to eat the clock. Not have incomplete passes and turn over on downs.Well, they will lose again this week because they can't run the ball when they have to and they rely on the pass too much.Because one game doesn't mean ####. If you don't know that, I can't help you.How is this incredibly untrue? They were down 1 point last week and proceeded to run just 2 running plays the final 22 minutes. I said nothing about last year.This is incredibly untrue. They ran a lot last year when they were down, and even more, Jackson got a lot of mid-range catches.Small sample size, gentlemen. Relax.Because they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
I agree. I do not know why they are not involving Jackson more in the passing game right now.Jackson is NOT happy with the play calling.. Venting at one of the coaches.Can't say I blame him, the Rams offense is much more efficient when he is catching and running the ball.
What do you know, same thing againOf course, with a chance to create some space at the end of the game, we get three Gore runs (clearly going nowhere).
The way it stands now. St. Louis down by 1 with 18 minutes left- SJAX with 5 rushes. Same thing as last week, same result.See, they need to be able to run in order to eat the clock. Not have incomplete passes and turn over on downs.Well, they will lose again this week because they can't run the ball when they have to and they rely on the pass too much.Because one game doesn't mean ####. If you don't know that, I can't help you.How is this incredibly untrue? They were down 1 point last week and proceeded to run just 2 running plays the final 22 minutes. I said nothing about last year.This is incredibly untrue. They ran a lot last year when they were down, and even more, Jackson got a lot of mid-range catches.Small sample size, gentlemen. Relax.Because they are now down. Like last week when they were down by 1, Jackson got 2 carries over the last 22 minutes. The Rams are too one demensional. The abandon the run too early.Can someone please explain why Jackson is not getting the ball?
When is Nolan going to take the chains off of A Smith? Other than a couple great Gore runs, the only time SF has moved the ball is when Smith has improvised and has been given the chance to make plays. Of course, with a chance to create some space at the end of the game, we get three Gore runs (clearly going nowhere).
That was a heck of a kick, barely missed.FG??? Better odds of getting 4th and 2, doncha think?
They couldn't run the ball today. I don't think giving Jackson more carries at <3 ypc would have helpedAnother reason why Bulger throwing ALL the time is not always a goo ddecision, HE CANT RUN annd gets sacks A LOT.2 rushes over the final 22 minutes last week when only down 1 lost them the game.5 rushes over the final 18 minutes this week lost them the game.Nice play calling St. Louis, way to take your best player out of the game and rely on your D, which sucks!
I honestly think he gets better with more carries. Anyway, what I'm trying to say is they become one demensional. When that happens it's easy to stop them.They couldn't run the ball today. I don't think giving Jackson more carries at <3 ypc would have helpedAnother reason why Bulger throwing ALL the time is not always a goo ddecision, HE CANT RUN annd gets sacks A LOT.2 rushes over the final 22 minutes last week when only down 1 lost them the game.5 rushes over the final 18 minutes this week lost them the game.Nice play calling St. Louis, way to take your best player out of the game and rely on your D, which sucks!
Exactly. Even by calling that last timeout, I think they were showing a lack of confidence in the passing game... "if they make this kick, there's no way we can drive and score with 1 min and a TO"Put Hostler in the box like a real OC and let him see how horrible these playcalls look from upstairs.A win is a win but that's two in a row with absolutely NO CONFIDENCE in the passing game by the Niners. It's not like they are facing SD or CHI.
I see your point but he still had a decent number of carries (21). Either the SF defense is really good or I'd be concerned that the STL O-line won't be able to open any holes for him this yearI honestly think he gets better with more carries. Anyway, what I'm trying to say is they become one demensional. When that happens it's easy to stop them.They couldn't run the ball today. I don't think giving Jackson more carries at <3 ypc would have helpedAnother reason why Bulger throwing ALL the time is not always a goo ddecision, HE CANT RUN annd gets sacks A LOT.2 rushes over the final 22 minutes last week when only down 1 lost them the game.5 rushes over the final 18 minutes this week lost them the game.Nice play calling St. Louis, way to take your best player out of the game and rely on your D, which sucks!
Actually, I thought he looked pretty good when he had time to throw the ball. Made some very good throws. Last 6mins or so, I think he attempted one pass. Hoss's playcalling was horrible the final two or three drives.....ETA: 11/17 126yrds. I wished they would pass a lil more down the stretch.Ugh. Alex Smith is killing me.How bad did he look today?
The Bucs were averaging just over 1ypc at one point in the second half and still only threw the ball 16 times and came out on top.The Jags ran for under 3ypc and thew it 25 times (next to 37 rushes) and won their game.This game was never out of hand as the defense played well. I don't think StL ever trailed by more than one score so there was no reason to abandon the run like that. I don't know what it is, I just think it the StL coaches get frustrated any time they're not getting 15 yards on a play. If you run it on 1st down and only get 2 yards that's ok. But for StL it's like oh no, better start chucking it downfield. It's so predictable....any run play that doesn't go for 5+ yards is followed up with a pass. There's something to be said for running it again and leaving yourself with 3rd and 4 rather than 3rd and 8 or 3rd and 15 after a sack. That's the other problem. Any sack was basically a drive-killer and when you have a quarterback that has been known to get sacked a lot dropping back 50 times in a game that's a LOT of drive-killers.So basically I guess I'm just saying that I disagree in that I think giving Jackson more carries even if his 3ypc didn't improve (which for a back like him I think that it would have) that WOULD have helped.They couldn't run the ball today. I don't think giving Jackson more carries at <3 ypc would have helpedAnother reason why Bulger throwing ALL the time is not always a goo ddecision, HE CANT RUN annd gets sacks A LOT.2 rushes over the final 22 minutes last week when only down 1 lost them the game.5 rushes over the final 18 minutes this week lost them the game.Nice play calling St. Louis, way to take your best player out of the game and rely on your D, which sucks!
The Bucs were averaging just over 1ypc at one point in the second half and still only threw the ball 16 times and came out on top.The Jags ran for under 3ypc and thew it 25 times (next to 37 rushes) and won their game.This game was never out of hand as the defense played well. I don't think StL ever trailed by more than one score so there was no reason to abandon the run like that. I don't know what it is, I just think it the StL coaches get frustrated any time they're not getting 15 yards on a play. If you run it on 1st down and only get 2 yards that's ok. But for StL it's like oh no, better start chucking it downfield. It's so predictable....any run play that doesn't go for 5+ yards is followed up with a pass. There's something to be said for running it again and leaving yourself with 3rd and 4 rather than 3rd and 8 or 3rd and 15 after a sack. That's the other problem. Any sack was basically a drive-killer and when you have a quarterback that has been known to get sacked a lot dropping back 50 times in a game that's a LOT of drive-killers.So basically I guess I'm just saying that I disagree in that I think giving Jackson more carries even if his 3ypc didn't improve (which for a back like him I think that it would have) that WOULD have helped.They couldn't run the ball today. I don't think giving Jackson more carries at <3 ypc would have helpedAnother reason why Bulger throwing ALL the time is not always a goo ddecision, HE CANT RUN annd gets sacks A LOT.2 rushes over the final 22 minutes last week when only down 1 lost them the game.5 rushes over the final 18 minutes this week lost them the game.Nice play calling St. Louis, way to take your best player out of the game and rely on your D, which sucks!