What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Going heavy WR in Dynasty PPR Startup Drafts (1 Viewer)

jonboltz

Footballguy
This thread is a discussion of my thoughts in going heavy-WR in a dynasty startup draft. Hopefully this would help others that have similar strategies.

Draft website: http://football17.myfantasyleague.com/2011/options?L=52751&O=17

Rosters: http://football17.myfantasyleague.com/2011/options?L=52751&O=07

Lineup and scoring: QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 flex te/rb/wr, 1 K, 1 Def. 24 roster spots, PPR, 6 pts for all TDs

Predraft strategy:

I am very risk averse in dynasties, and knew I would be looking at WR or Rodgers in the first round, depending on where I landed in the draft order. I ended up getting 1.01, which is a first for me in a startup dynasty. I really didn't like this spot, and would have preferred to have been drafting towards the middle of the round, but after several turns, I started to enjoy this spot. In dynasty startups, I often look to go heavy on WRs, stud TE, and solid QB, and while 1.01 isn't a great spot for this, following rounds ended up working out well for this strategy.

1.01 WR Calvin Johnson, DET (26)

I attempted to move out of 1.01 to slide down and still end up with Calvin, but there was very little interest in this spot, and no offer that I gave any serious consideration to. Perhaps two years ago I would have went with AP, but ultimately I didn't have a good feeling about him and wanted a safer pick in this PPR. While this is earlier than Calvin normally goes, I felt this is a safe pick and only a few spots earlier than he would normally go.

2.12 WR Brandon Marshall, MIA (27)

3.01 WR Dwayne Bowe, KCC (27)

My belief was there was unlikely to be any RBs at this spot that I would be willing to move on unless there was a strong run on WRs. Ultimately, there was a pretty fair mix of positions taken and going WR-strong here was easy to decide. In my predraft mock, I had been hoping to pull Marshall and Austin, but Miles went a few picks prior. I was still able to get Marshall, and paired my other WR to Bowe and Mike Williams, ultimately going with a Bowe who I felt, while he won't do what he did last year again in terms of his TD rate, should still be a 75-1000-8 kind of WR and pretty solidly in the top 15. Aside from his 2009 season where he was suspended, he has been very solid with bad teams and should KC regress, I still expect a solid year.

4.12 RB DeAngelo Williams, CAR (27)

5.01 TE Vernon Davis, SFO (27)

Coming up on these picks, I gave serious consideration to going WR-TE or QB-TE, depending on who dropped to me. I was pretty certain that I would be taken Vernon if he fell to this spot, and I had him 2nd on my list of dynasty TEs. Luckily, he was able to fall to me and was an easy pick. For the other spot, I had been hoping for Welker, Ryan Mathews, Holmes, Deangelo, and Romo. Out of these, the only one that fell to me was DeAngelo, making this pick also rather easy. I had briefly considered Brady, but felt there was a slight chance that I could move up into the early-mid 6th to get him if he fell some.

6.07 QB Ben Rothlisberger, PIT (29)

Having seen another owner trade their 5th round pick for a 2012 1st rounder, I immediately sent an offer of my 2012 first round pick for their 6th rounder, which was quickly accepted. I would do this trade 100/100 times, and it ended up being a key to my draft enabling me to get Rothlisberger for my first next year. No brainer for me, as I try to build dynasties to win immediately. The only other consideration I had was to go for Collie here and then Ben/Stafford at the end of the round. Ultimately, I was a bit worried about Ben falling to 6.12, and worried about Staffords health and felt I would need to spend another pick on a backup. Stafford looks spectacular so far, but so has Ben and I know I won't need to move early on a backup with him.

6.12 WR Anquan Boldin, BAL (31)

7.01 RB Marshawn Lynch, SEA (25)

At this point, I am trying to work on my starting lineup, which I expected to be 2rb/4wr for most weeks. I want to go best available WR and RB here, and two guys I had pegged in my predraft mock were still fallling to me--Lynch and Boldin. I had Collie a little ahead of Boldin, but he got picked a few before me. I had Boldin as the last WR in my "safe top-25" WR tier, and felt Lynch would be a good enough #2. Overall, I think I spent about 8 seconds making these two picks.

8.12 RB Joseph Addai, IND (28)

9.01 WR Steve Smith, CAR (33)

Continuing with my plan to get a starting lineup complete, I wanted to once again go RB-WR here. With this starting lineup requirements, we are looking at 8 starting spots between qb-rb-wr-te, and given bye weeks, I really wanted 9-10 strong here before I started taking any "projection" type of players (marginal rookies and unproven players). Ultimately, I feel a lot of these guys are not worth the risk, and I'd much rather take a guy that will help me win immediately then hoping that a guy I pick makes good on his talent. I knew I wanted one of three RBs-- Reggie Bush, Addai, and Fred Jackson. All three guys I project to be right in the 26-32 rb range in a PPR league, and the ability to flex if possible during bye weeks. I was fairly confident in the role of Addai and Bush, but a bit weery on F-Jax as earlier in the day was the report about him being unhappy in his role. Ultimately, Bush and Jackson went before I was on the clock, making the Addai pick rather quickly. For the WR spot, I had it narrowed down to three options--Lance Moore, Steve Smith (CAR), and Jordy Nelson. I had worries about all three guys for various reasons, and eventually went with the veteran in Smith. I don't expect him to hit 1000 yards again, but would be a bit suprised if he didn't end up with 60-800-5 and good for WR5 and Flex player during bye weeks. I had several suggestions that I should have went Delone Carter and securing the Indy RB, but I didn't want to spend a 9th round pick on a guy that I frankly don't believe is very talented, and not likely a long term solution. I felt confident I could find a few scatbacks in the teens that would give me similar numbers to what Delone would have in the event of an injury to Addai.

10.12 TE Brandon Pettigrew, DET (26)

11.01 QB Cam Newton, CAR (22)

At this point, we had a mix of strategies employed by other owners. Some teams taking backup QBs, taking their first TE, and a lot of unproven youth flying off the board. I had two guys targetted in the 10-14 rounds that I really wanted to have on this team--Pettigrew and Cam Newton. On Pettigrew, I feel he is grossly undervalued. 70 receptions, over 700 yards without the franchise QB last year. Brandon has everything you need for great ppr TE fantasy successful -- a great QB, great WR that stretches the field, mediocre but dependable WR2. TDs are hard to predict, and he only had 4 last year. An uptick of just two TDs this year puts him right after the top 5-6 TEs in the league, and an overall improvement in just his 3rd year with the franchise QB back at the helm has him pushing the elite. Clearly, I'm higher on him that others but at this point, he should be good value for his age/production, even if he only finishes around 12th for TEs. I went with Newton as the second pick, and who will ultimately likely be my backup to Ben (and has a average matchup vs Detroit on Ben's bye). I have no illusions of Cam being a strong NFL QB this year, or perhaps ever. I do expect him to push into the 15-20 range on his feet alone. He obviously has a huge floor, but also a big big ceiling with his arm and feet.

12.12 WR Jordy Nelson, GBP (26)

13.01 WR Steve Smith, PHI (26)

Lots of TEs come off the board after I picked, making me feel secure in the fact that I had to have drafted Pettigrew during the last turn or I would have missed him. A great deal of WRs come off the list, and I notice that my 9.01 consideration, Jordy Nelson, continues to plummet. I guess the resigning of James Jones scared some off, but the upside of Jordy was too high for me to pass on, and considering I had him on my short list 4 rounds ago, I instantly took him. I also feel he is a guy that could have some good trade value if he performs well thie year. I had similar thoughts to the other pick, and chose Steve Smith--Philly version. Consider this--while a great deal of WRs were flying off the board, many who had never sniffed 50 receptions or 500 yards, or were rookies and had no likelihood of contributing this year, here is what I got in Smith: a 26 year old possession receiver who has put up over 100 catches in one season, and was on pace again the following year. Having signed only a one-year deal, he is eligible for FA next year and can choose his team. Tons of upside here, in my opinion, assuming he makes it back from his injury.

14.12 RB Jerome Harrison, DET (28)

15.01 QB Tim Tebow, DEN (24)

Similar to Cam, Tebow is a guy that has great potential with his feet, but needs tons of work to be an NFL QB. Continuing my theme of shooting for high upside picks, I am glad to have him on board. With the second pick, I wanted to start to assemble some RB depth and players I felt could be good bargains in the teens. Harrison fit this mold, as a guy that is well-suited for the system in Detroit. Despite moving around a great deal, Jerome has a fair amount of talent. With Best's injury hisotry, he is certainly someone that could get a few starts if things work out. So far, Best is still struggling with injuries, and Harrison has performed decently this preseason, but would likely have some competition for carries .

16.12 RB Darren Sproles, NOS (28)

17.01 D Baltimore Ravens

At this point, several defenses have come off the board, and I don't want to be left with two mediocre squads. The Ravens were the top team on my board at this time. With the second pick, I wanted to get a pass-catching Rb that I could hope for something in a spot start. I generally shy away from drafting RBs like Dion Lewis, Powell, or Johnny White-- guys that I don't believe are talented enough to be bell-cows. Instead of chasing a guy who *might* end up getting enough work to be a part-timer or change-of-pace back, I'd rather just get that person already. I was hoping for Woodhead, but he was well gone at this point and was ok with Sproles. Ingram and Thomas are two guys who both have injury histories, which may provide Sproles to get a few more carries in the event one of them went down. A guy like Darren doesn't need a ton of touches to be flex startable, and I like the insurance with him here. Hopefully I will never have to start him.

18.12 RB Justin Forsett, SEA (25)

19.01 RB Steve Slaton, HOU (25)

I want to get Forsette, as some sort of protection against a Lynch injury. I do really like Leon, and had him in leagues when he was a Jet. I expect him to cut into both Lynch and Forsett, but believe that Forsett would be the more valuable overall back. While I think he would split with Leon, he might be a RB3 if something happened to Lynch. He slid to me and was an easy pick. For a while, it had been speculated that Slaton would be the odd man out in Houston. This is likely the case, the only thing we don't know is where he ends up. Arizona, Tampa, or Indy would be fabulous and well worth the pick. If he ends up in a bad situation, he is an easy cut.

20.12 WR Marcus Easley, BUF (23)

21.01 K Stephen Gostkowski, NEP (27)

I got quite nervous in the 20th, as a guy I had pegged for my last pick, Marcus Easley, had a fantasatic half starting in a preseason game. It caused me to make a move on him earlier than I had planned, and luckily he was able to fall to me. A guy with a ton of talent, if he remains a starter could be a steal here. If he falls down the chart, another easy cut. Sidenote--one thing I like in my flier picks is "cuttability". I'd rather not sit on a guy that is not getting any playing time, as I have no idea his talent level. With Easley, I should know pretty quickly what to do with him. With the second pick, I didn't really have anyone that stood out in the rest of the draft, so I decided to take a kicker that I wouldn't have to worry about in Gostkowski.

22.12 WR Darrius Heyward-Bey, OAK (24)

23.01 D Arizona Cardinals

With my final two picks, I wanted to pair the Ravens with another defense, as they had several rough weeks to start the season. The Cardinals have a week schedule overall, and open with the Panthers. DHB is a terp that I loved from his college days, who has obviously been a disappointment. But he is one guy late that has a great amount of upside -- even without the Raiders reaching he would have been a first rounder. Another guy with cuttability that I should know 3-4 weeks into the seaon if he was worth keeping.

Final Roster

QB: Rothlisberger, Newton, Tebow

RB: D Williams, Lynch, Addai, Harrison, Sproles, Forsett, Slaton

WR: C Johnson, Marshall, Bowe, Boldin, S Smith (car), S Smith (phi), Nelson, Easley, Heyward-Bey

TE: Davis, Pettigrew

K: Gostkowski

D: Ravens, Cardinals

Overall, I'm pretty happy with how this draft turned out. The only pick I second guessed at the time was Steve Smith (car) at 9.01, but being able to get Nelson four rounds later eliminated that worry. Seattle offense is scaring me so far in the preseason, so I'm slightly worried about how Lynch will fare, but feel that Addai should be able to hold down RB2 until the bye weeks begin, when I'll have a better idea of what to expect from Marshawn. Health of the RB crew will be a concern-- if the main three stay healthy, I really like my chances this year. Obviously, the WRs are going to carry me and I will likely be starting 4 wide every week. I also feel my TEs will be stronger than most. I think Rothlisberger will be fantastic this year, with a great schedule for him and the Steelers. He should be able to have me middle of the pack in total QB scoring if he remains healthy. The heavy WR strategy is one that I am pretty familiar with and generally works to what I feel is my stronger points-- finding startable quality RBs to suppliment the rest of my lineup.

 
I see you purposely went WR heavy, but your RB's are still looking really weak IMO...though again, I know you did this by design.

The problem as I see it is that there appears not to be any developmental prospects at rb. How about a Bilal Powell or a Taiwan Jones or someone who looks to have at least a shot at being a decent and start worthy rb in the future? You traded away your next year's #1 too (for Big Ben) so you are without a top rookie pick next year.

You had the #1 overall dynasty pick and you went with Calvin Johnson and followed it up with Brandon Marshall at 24th overall. I dunno...I think you could have done a lot better with those first two picks and still pursued your WR heavy agenda. Could have gone with Jamaal Charles there and then later on nabbed AJ Green or Julio Jones or Dez Bryant to serve as an anchor at WR for years to come? I give you credit for trying to take the unconventional route, but I can see you maybe struggling at RB with what you did. This team is going to need some additional players for you to compete.

Are you able to post the draft summary for all teams so we can see who you passed on?

 
I think it's a mistake to go WR heavy and win-now. All your RBs have little future upside. Your 6.12, 7.1, 8.12, 9.1 picks were all heavily win-now, and all your RB picks in the teens, you're just hoping for C-level production from. If you don't like Delone, take Kendall Hunter or Ben Tate instead - would have balanced your roster out better to have a couple guys like that.

 
I just had my own startup a little bit ago where I had the exact same lineup/scoring. I also went WR early, starting from the 1.08, ended up with:

QB Romo, Bradford, Locker

RB Blount, Wells, Murray, Powell

WR Calvin Johnson, Jennings, Austin, Boldin, Hester, Avery, Jerome Simpson, Torrey Smith, Louis Murphy, Austin Pettis

TE Winslow, Kendricks, Pettigrew, Watson

With a brief comparison, I think it would have helped a lot if you'd been able to trade out of the 1.01, which I know you tried. I think WR heavy is more viable if you're drafting towards the end of a round.

 
'pghrob said:
I see you purposely went WR heavy, but your RB's are still looking really weak IMO...though again, I know you did this by design.
I'll try to keep this general to dynasty draft strategy, as this was not intended to be a rate-my-team discussion. Yes, I often do prefer to take stud-WRs over RBs, for longetivity and consistency reasons. I also feel my strongest post-draft abilities are finding plug-and-play mid-level RBs. These guys are often undervalued, in my opinion, in most dynasty leagues.
The problem as I see it is that there appears not to be any developmental prospects at rb. How about a Bilal Powell or a Taiwan Jones or someone who looks to have at least a shot at being a decent and start worthy rb in the future? You traded away your next year's #1 too (for Big Ben) so you are without a top rookie pick next year.
I briefly touched upon my thoughts regarding "developmental" rb propects, like Powell and Jones. My main argument is this--- what do you expect from Powell and Jones going forward? Do you ever expect either of these guys to be the primary ball carrier for either of their teams? I very much do not think either of these guys will ever have more than a 50/50 split, at best.Powell went 15.11, I could have taken him 14.12 but took Harrison, who I feel is stronger this year and could get significant playing time depending on Best injuries.Jones went 17.12--I think his upside is Darren Sproles. Instead of taking Jones and waiting for him to develop, I just went ahead and took Sproles.
You had the #1 overall dynasty pick and you went with Calvin Johnson and followed it up with Brandon Marshall at 24th overall. I dunno...I think you could have done a lot better with those first two picks and still pursued your WR heavy agenda. Could have gone with Jamaal Charles there and then later on nabbed AJ Green or Julio Jones or Dez Bryant to serve as an anchor at WR for years to come? I give you credit for trying to take the unconventional route, but I can see you maybe struggling at RB with what you did. This team is going to need some additional players for you to compete.
In my pre-draft strategy I addressed this briefly--I'm very risk adverse, and if someone was to guarantee me that Jamal Charles, or any other RB, would be top 10 over the next three years, I would have taken them. There is so much turnover every year in the top 10 RBs, I usually would rather dominate at other positions and do my best not to lose much at RB. RBs have so many injuries, and it is a real crapshoot, in my opinion. Just already look at what we are seeing with Foster. If this was two years ago, I would have went Peterson, but this year I felt it was best to reach 4-5 picks for Calvin, which really isn't a huge reach. I tried to trade down to 5-6 area, but there were no takers, as many stated that they viewed much of the first round talent similarly. Regarding Dez/AJ/Julio, I believe going that strategy hurts a team in the short run, and brings a lot of risk. You seem to dismiss Brandon Marshall, when in reality if Dez/AJ/Julio do what Marshall did his first 5 years, it would be a rousing success for them and their teams. Instead of hoping that Dez/AJ/Julio blossom and turn into the next Marshall or Bowe (instead of the next Charles Rodgers, David Terrell, or Mike Williams), I just went ahead and took the guys that are still young and have proven their abilities. You say Dez/AJ/Julio could anchor the team for years to come, but I believe I already got 3 guys to do this.
Are you able to post the draft summary for all teams so we can see who you passed on?
The full draft list and rosters should be in the initial post at the top, assuming I linked them correctly.
 
I think it's a mistake to go WR heavy and win-now. All your RBs have little future upside. Your 6.12, 7.1, 8.12, 9.1 picks were all heavily win-now, and all your RB picks in the teens, you're just hoping for C-level production from. If you don't like Delone, take Kendall Hunter or Ben Tate instead - would have balanced your roster out better to have a couple guys like that.
Both Tate and Hunter were guys I had targtted and would have liked to have had, but went earlier than I would have picked them. Those picks you identified were exactly what you suggested, win-now, which even in dynasty leagues I believe is the point. Of them, we have Lynch, Boldin, Addai, and Steve Smith. I expect at least Boldin certainly to be startable next year, Lynch is a wild-card and depends on what Seattle does, but he is still 25. Addai and Smith are meant to help the team this year, and if they are able to help next year, thats fantastic. If not, it shouldn't be too hard to replace them.
 
Not horrible but it is neither designed to be an up and comer nor good enough to win now. I think you are destined to be middle of the road at best for the next couple of years minimum.

 
I don't get the Calvin at 1.01 strategy so many employ. All I hear about is how RB's have a short shelf life and the avg is 3 years or something. Well that is because so many get waiver, hurt or suck.

In gerneral the great RB's last longer unless they get a career ending injury. How long did LT last ? Would he have been a good pick in 2004 going into his 4th season ? You would have got 2004-2008 monster production.

4-5 years of being right there to win championships.

All the top backs right now are young enough where they have 4-5 years of top level production left.

Calvin probably has 6-7 years of top level production left.

 
I don't get the Calvin at 1.01 strategy so many employ. All I hear about is how RB's have a short shelf life and the avg is 3 years or something. Well that is because so many get waiver, hurt or suck.In gerneral the great RB's last longer unless they get a career ending injury. How long did LT last ? Would he have been a good pick in 2004 going into his 4th season ? You would have got 2004-2008 monster production.4-5 years of being right there to win championships.All the top backs right now are young enough where they have 4-5 years of top level production left.Calvin probably has 6-7 years of top level production left.
I think the common response you will see is: "Well, that's Tomlinson. It's a lot easier to make that pick if you have Tomlinson there"What if, instead of picking Tomlinson, you went Jamal Lewis, just off his 2000 yard campaign? Or 25 year old super stud Deuce McAllister, or Ahmad Green, who was 26 and coming off a huge 2200 yard 15 td campaign in the prime of his career?
 
Not horrible but it is neither designed to be an up and comer nor good enough to win now. I think you are destined to be middle of the road at best for the next couple of years minimum.
Might be the case, but again I'm looking to generalize more on strategy in a dynasty when you are WR heavy. I've already had a few owners that have hinted at wanting to swap a RB for one of my WRs. I think if you go WR-heavy, the key is to have the flexibility to move some of your parts around if needed. Obviously in my case, if one of the three main RBs gets hurt, or severely underperforms, I would have to make a move. I've generally found that it is a lot easier to trade for a RB in the 12-20 range, than it is to get a WR in this range.
 
I think you lose too much value taking Calvin there. I would think about taking AP or Foster and drafting with the intent to trade him in a package. You can't guarantee you'd get Johnson but you ought to be able to make a move for White or Nicks etc for a little less. Pre-draft trade are fuzzy, post or mid draft you can find a team that is clearly looking to make a run quickly and flash the big name at them, fair chance you end up with a better trade than you would have before. Worst case you end up with a great player.

And i really dislike your running backs. You passed on Felix Jones and Blount for DeAngelo- i get that he's probably rated a little higher but its the opportunity cost that worries me. Williams isn't going to break out and end up a top 5 back in the next couple years, the other two could. So if you're not drafting stud RBs based on their longevity, I think you better try to capture some lightning in a bottle. Otherwise you probably just end up very mediocre while some team full of what looks like wild cards now ends up running away with it. Same thing with Lynch over Hightower etc. Point being, if you just want some safe modest production out of your running backs, I think you can get it later with the Freddie Jacksons and Ced Bensons of the world while still taking some chances on the question mark RBs that could make your team a champion. DWilliams/Lynch is not a superbowl backfield. Felix/Blount? Could be I think.

 
Eh, I understand and agree with this strategy for the most part, but I'm a bit underwhelmed by the execution of it. Like others have said, I feel like there should have been a way to get more value the 1.01 pick, whether by grabbing a stud RB early and trading the pick for a top WR + some additional value or finding a way, any way, to move down to the middle of the draft.

Of course there would always be other players that play the same position that I would have plugged in for some of your picks, but from a strategic perspective, the one positional pick I really don't like is taking a TE at 5.01. Especially since you chose to forego RBs early, I would have taken a guy like J. Stewart, Felix Jones or Blount there to shore up your RB corps or even if you wanted to go WR again, guys like B. Lloyd, R. Wayne, or Manningham would have given you another top flight WR, and you could have still picked up a solid TE later. TE is a luxury pick there I think, and especially when you don't have a ton of stability at RB you have to major in the majors, which for me means locking up another RB with that mid round pick or at least another WR for potential trade later on.

Still, thanks for posting your thoughts -- it's definitely a starting point for some good discussion.

 
As someone that is in your league I think that you are WAY too light in RB's even with the flex lineup. Plus you have little in the way of upside for the future.

As for WR, Calvin and Bowe will be good to great for a while but Marshall is a loon, and Boldin and Smith will be done quite soon.

If you dont draft right in the next few years going so WR heavy could cost you.

 
Love the idea of going WR heavy, hate the execution in this instance. I went with this WR theory in my latest startup, about two months ago.

Ended up trading down from 1.2 to 1.6 and picking up a 3rd, which I know is insane value, especially since I wanted Calvin all along.

1st: Calvin

2nd: Wallace

3rd: Austin

3rd: Finley

5th: Sidney Rice

I'm having trouble remembering who I took in what rounds, but I did lots of trading back and didn't have a pick in rounds 4, 6, or 7. But between various trade backs, I accumulated 5 (yes, FIVE) 2012 1sts. They would come in handy later when a surprise trade offer completely changed my team from a "build for the future with WR/QB/TE and no RB team" to a definite "win now" team. But more on that later.

Anyways, I ended up with all of these RB's in the mid-late rounds: LeShoure, Beanie, Powell, Carter, Quizz, Taiwan, Tate, Ringer, Harper, Scott. Not great, but not horrible. And this was obviously before LeShoure's value went way down with injury, and before Beanie's value skyrocketed with another injury.

I took other developmental TE's in Dickson, Kendricks, and Housler. Other WR's in Ford, Moore, Salas, Jernigan, Edwards, Ogletree, etc.

Took Matt Stafford in the 9th or 10th round, and Shaun Hill later.

Basically, all of this was adding up to a team that would look great in a year or two, after using a bunch of those 5 1sts on RB's like Trent Richardson, or trading them, and if Stafford worked out (I'm very bullish on Stafford, and am perfectly okay building a dynasty around him).

Then, I got a ridiculous trade offer that changed everything. LeShoure (again, pre-injury), Kendricks, Salas, 3 1sts for CJ2K. I instantly took it, making my window for competition NOW rather than in a year or two, with a stud RB like Chris Johnson in my possession. I realize that not everyone can expect a lopsided trade to kick-start their dynasty dominance, but that's how it may have worked for me with this strategy. So I kept trading, to win now AND later. I was no longer obssesssed with collecting draft picks.

Traded Sidney Rice (pre-Seahawks), Jacoby Ford, and my two remaining 1sts for Hakeem Nicks. Only happened because one of those 1sts is DEFINITELY going to be #1 overall.

Traded Denarius Moore, draft picks, and other depth for Addai and Cam Newton, thinking that between Beanie and Addai, and with Tate looking good if Foster gets injured, I'd have my RB2 spot patched up for now. Especially with Ringer/Harper handcuffing CJ2K if the worst happened.

Turned around and traded Addai, Carter, Beanie, and a 2012 2nd for Ingram.

So now, after all these trades, and after my "team goal" changing completely with a single trade after a long draft geared towards readying myself to compete in a year or two and THEN be dominant, my starting lineup now looks like this, with young but questionable depth.

Stafford

CJ2K, Ingram

Calvin, Nicks, Wallace, Austin

Finley

Now, I know that this is straying a bit from the thread because I eventually veered from this strategy of loading up on WR's and draft picks to compete later, but I didn't have a choice when presented with the CJ2K trade. What I've done since is just icing on the cake, and I'm very proud of this roster.

But I'll defend this strategy to the death. I started out focusing on WR's, TE's, and a QB I could build my team around, and got young RB's with potential later, in the process acquiring 5 2012 1sts, so that I could build a complete, true dynasty in a year or two with young stud RB's.

I always intended to use or flip those draft picks for RB help to make my team balanced and complete: It just happened to go that way MUCH quicker than I expected, and with some luck. So its feasible, if unlikely.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you compare WR longevity to RB longevity, you ignore VORP. When you ignore VORP, you don't maximize value. When you don't maximize value, you draft average teams. Your team is average and will be for a couple years.

 
Love the idea of going WR heavy, hate the execution in this instance. I went with this WR theory in my latest startup, about two months ago.
You went WR heavy, then fixed your mistake by trades. Not sure that is a strategy.
Going WR heavy, with the intention to trade down for picks whenever possible, allowed me to accumulate 5 2012 1sts and a haggle of young RB's with potential, all of which I traded to acquire RB's later, once their value dipped a bit post-startup, while keeping my stud WR's. It still fits into the strategy, I would just argue that its the ideal outcome that is difficult to acheive. I'll admit that it took some luck to work out this way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I always intended to use or flip those draft picks for RB help to make my team balanced and complete: It just happened to go that way MUCH quicker than I expected, and with some luck. So its feasible, if unlikely.
I think you could have had a computer draft your team randomly and still done well if your leaguemates are willing to make some of the trades they did.
 
Going WR heavy allowed me to accumulate 5 2012 1sts and a haggle of young RB's with potential, all of which I traded to acquire RB's later, once their value dipped a bit post-startup, while keeping my stud WR's. It still fits into the strategy, I would just argue that its the ideal outcome that is difficult to acheive. I'll admit that it took some luck to work out this way.
I don't think it fits into any strategy. You were able to take advantage of teams willing to make poor trades. That has nothing to do with who you drafted, when.Not only that, but replace Calvin with a stud RB, and your team is better.
 
I always intended to use or flip those draft picks for RB help to make my team balanced and complete: It just happened to go that way MUCH quicker than I expected, and with some luck. So its feasible, if unlikely.
I think you could have had a computer draft your team randomly and still done well if your leaguemates are willing to make some of the trades they did.
Its a very competetive league with owners that have very strong opinions about players, and are willing to bet on that. We'll see how it works out, but besides a couple of trades that I personally have been able to "pull off", I haven't had a reason to doubt the competetiveness of this league. We have DEEP offense-only rosters at 36 players, and people are in this for the long haul. I will say that I think 1st round picks are being overvalued, but it also happened that the teams that I traded all of those picks to (in the CJ2K and Nicks trade) seem like they'll be "perpetual rebuilders" always coveting draft picks and young, unproven players. It could work out in a couple of years, but for now I took advantage of that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Going WR heavy allowed me to accumulate 5 2012 1sts and a haggle of young RB's with potential, all of which I traded to acquire RB's later, once their value dipped a bit post-startup, while keeping my stud WR's. It still fits into the strategy, I would just argue that its the ideal outcome that is difficult to acheive. I'll admit that it took some luck to work out this way.
I don't think it fits into any strategy. You were able to take advantage of teams willing to make poor trades. That has nothing to do with who you drafted, when.Not only that, but replace Calvin with a stud RB, and your team is better.
To each his own, but I don't agree. Charles, Rice, Peterson, Foster, and ironically CJ2K were gone at that point. There isn't another RB I'd rather have than Calvin, except probably McCoy, and not making that trade from 1.2 to 1.6 means I don't get another 3rd, and Finley.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you compare WR longevity to RB longevity, you ignore VORP. When you ignore VORP, you don't maximize value. When you don't maximize value, you draft average teams. Your team is average and will be for a couple years.
It might end up being average, and perhaps I am just wrong in my optimism on some of the guys I got. However, my main concern with going so WR-heavy wasn't because of RB longevity, it has to do with RB *turnover*. Here are the top 10 rbs over the past three years:
2008deangelofortemjdturnert-jonesltdslatonwestbrookpetersonportis2009johnsonpetersonricemjdgorericky waddais-jaxtjonescharles2010fosterhillismccoycharlespetersonjohnsonricemcfaddenfortebradshaw
I'm much more confident that Calvin will be a top 5 WR than I am at picking who will remain on this top-10 list in 2011, let alone in 2012+
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm much more confident that Calvin will be a top 5 WR than I am at picking who will remain on this top-10 list in 2011, let alone in 2012+
You're making a point for the top RBs to be valued more. The more turnover, the more value those that are consistant have. If you are not comfortable with CJ,ADP, and Rice finishing top 10 next season...that is a personal issue. Not a strategy. Adrian Peterson, Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, et cetera, ALL have major value over their competition, based on consistency alone. Calvin does not - most good WRs are consistant, as you pointed out.
 
I'm much more confident that Calvin will be a top 5 WR than I am at picking who will remain on this top-10 list in 2011, let alone in 2012+
You're making a point for the top RBs to be valued more. The more turnover, the more value those that are consistant have.
And if you were to tell me which one of CJ, ADP, Rice, or whomever would be top 10 the next two seasons, I would have picked them. My point is that, based on what we see every single year in the amount of turnover the in RB top 10, I'm not as confident. If this was two years ago, I would have taken ADP without second thought. I would also argue that two years ago, I would have recieved A LOT more interest in the 1.01 pick. The lack of interest in people wanting that pick also makes me think others aren't in a consensus.
Adrian Peterson, Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, et cetera, ALL have major value over their competition, based on consistency alone. Calvin does not - most good WRs are consistant, as you pointed out.
Peterson was the only RB I considered at 1.01. I don't believe that CJ2K and Rice, based on the past two years, have me sold on their consistency any more than Duece McAllister or Ahman Green did in 2003.
 
Just to ease my own thoughts, I ended up doing a quick comparison of some of the teams in the league that I felt were strong competitors for this year. I took their projected starters and projected points, using FBG calculations based on this leagues scoring format. I calculated for the QB, RB, WR, TE, and Flex position, leaving out the kicker and defenses.

My team

QB: Ben

RB1: Williams

RB2: Lynch

WR1: C Johnson

WR2: Marshall

WR3: Bowe

Flex: Boldin

TE: Davis

Team A

QB: Vick

RB1: Peterson

RB2: Hillis

WR1: Welker

WR2: Lloyd

WR3: Moore

Flex: Amendola

TE: Gronkoski

Team B

QB: Freeman

RB1: Rice

RB2: Best

WR1: M Williams (TB)

WR2: S Johnson

WR3: Manningham

Flex: Collie

TE: Keller

Team C

QB: Brady

RB1: Foster

RB2: Felix

WR1: R White

WR2: V Jackson

WR3: Ford

Flex: Blount

TE: Daniels

The Results:

Team C 125.7 ppg

My team 118.5 ppg

Team A 117.6 ppg

Team B 116.5 ppg

 
I'm much more confident that Calvin will be a top 5 WR than I am at picking who will remain on this top-10 list in 2011, let alone in 2012+
You're making a point for the top RBs to be valued more. The more turnover, the more value those that are consistant have.
And if you were to tell me which one of CJ, ADP, Rice, or whomever would be top 10 the next two seasons, I would have picked them. My point is that, based on what we see every single year in the amount of turnover the in RB top 10, I'm not as confident. If this was two years ago, I would have taken ADP without second thought. I would also argue that two years ago, I would have recieved A LOT more interest in the 1.01 pick. The lack of interest in people wanting that pick also makes me think others aren't in a consensus.
Adrian Peterson, Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, et cetera, ALL have major value over their competition, based on consistency alone. Calvin does not - most good WRs are consistant, as you pointed out.
Peterson was the only RB I considered at 1.01. I don't believe that CJ2K and Rice, based on the past two years, have me sold on their consistency any more than Duece McAllister or Ahman Green did in 2003.
You are comparing WRs to RBs again. Rice, Foster, McCoy, Charles, Johnson, Peterson ALL provide more value over replacement than CJ does, when we are talking about projected consistancy.If you think Calvin is 90% likely to finish top 10 and Rice, Johnson are only 80% likely, Rice and Johnson still offer more Vorp. The reason being, guys like Jennnings, Marshall, Austin, Bowe are all around 80% likelyhood, while guys like Forte, Bradshaw, Ingram are well below that. You can't compare WRs to RBs in ANY regard on a universal level. It is about comparing WRs to WRs and RBs to RBs. Afterall, TEs are the most consistant and you aren't drafting Jason Witten at 1.01. QBs too.
 
I would like this theory ONLY if you had a mid to late round pick. I'm testing my theory out right now in a 12-team Dynasty. I had the 7th overall pick, and so far through four rounds. I'm heavy on WR's but have a stud RB to boot. My lineup so far...

1.07 - Jamal Charles

2 - Dez Bryant (a bit of a reach, but I love him in Dynasty. Young and very talented :thumbup: )

3 - Reggie Wayne (PPR Machine)

4 - Brandon Marshall - (PPR Monster)

Like how my roster is shaping up so far. There seems to still be some talent left at the RB position too like Chris Wells, Tolbert, DeAngelo, etc... We'll see how it work, but I like what I have... :boxing:

 
You are comparing WRs to RBs again. Rice, Foster, McCoy, Charles, Johnson, Peterson ALL provide more value over replacement than CJ does, when we are talking about projected consistancy.If you think Calvin is 90% likely to finish top 10 and Rice, Johnson are only 80% likely, Rice and Johnson still offer more Vorp. The reason being, guys like Jennnings, Marshall, Austin, Bowe are all around 80% likelyhood, while guys like Forte, Bradshaw, Ingram are well below that. You can't compare WRs to RBs in ANY regard on a universal level. It is about comparing WRs to WRs and RBs to RBs. Afterall, TEs are the most consistant and you aren't drafting Jason Witten at 1.01. QBs too.
I'm fully aware that if Foster, Rice, etc etc etc perform at their projected level, their VORP will be higher than CJ. I'm also fully aware that if the guy I pick finishes at RB15 or worse, I'd rather have CJ. A simple look at the past 10 years or so shows that probably 2-3 of the 7 guys you listed won't finish in the top 10. If you have a crystal ball and can tell me which will remain, I'd gladly attempt to go back and redo my pick.If I was 80% sure on any of the RBs I would have picked that person w/o hesitation. I was pretty close to that with ADP. Nowhere close with the others.
 
I'm fully aware that if Foster, Rice, etc etc etc perform at their projected level, their VORP will be higher than CJ. I'm also fully aware that if the guy I pick finishes at RB15 or worse, I'd rather have CJ. A simple look at the past 10 years or so shows that probably 2-3 of the 7 guys you listed won't finish in the top 10. If you have a crystal ball and can tell me which will remain, I'd gladly attempt to go back and redo my pick.If I was 80% sure on any of the RBs I would have picked that person w/o hesitation. I was pretty close to that with ADP. Nowhere close with the others.
I don't think you are getting what I am saying. Nobody is 100% - not even Calvin. In this example, RBA is the most valuable, based on likelyhood of top 10 finish alone, than WRA, based on VORP. Again, QBs and TEs are the most consistant positions. Once you understand why you wouldn't draft them first overall, you will understand why Calvin was a reach. WRA - 90% RBA - 70%WRB - 85%RBB - 55%
 
Not sure i would have taken Wayne at 3.07 in a Dynasty start up
I know Wayne is getting older, however there are a couple of things you can't ignore:1 - NEVER missed a game2 - Always seems to be over or atleast close to 100 catches.3 - Colts always seem to have an easy schedule4- I'm not convinced Collie is healthy enough to take away any of Wayne's usual targets.5 - Hall of Fame QBI believe on a Dynasty, you have to have a bit of a mix of young players and vets. Wayne has at least another year or two productive years IMO.
 
I'm fully aware that if Foster, Rice, etc etc etc perform at their projected level, their VORP will be higher than CJ. I'm also fully aware that if the guy I pick finishes at RB15 or worse, I'd rather have CJ. A simple look at the past 10 years or so shows that probably 2-3 of the 7 guys you listed won't finish in the top 10. If you have a crystal ball and can tell me which will remain, I'd gladly attempt to go back and redo my pick.If I was 80% sure on any of the RBs I would have picked that person w/o hesitation. I was pretty close to that with ADP. Nowhere close with the others.
I don't think you are getting what I am saying. Nobody is 100% - not even Calvin. In this example, RBA is the most valuable, based on likelyhood of top 10 finish alone, than WRA, based on VORP. Again, QBs and TEs are the most consistant positions. Once you understand why you wouldn't draft them first overall, you will understand why Calvin was a reach. WRA - 90% RBA - 70%WRB - 85%RBB - 55%
Using my data, WR1 at 90% is scoring just a touch higher than RB1 at 70%
 
Just to ease my own thoughts, I ended up doing a quick comparison of some of the teams in the league that I felt were strong competitors for this year. I took their projected starters and projected points, using FBG calculations based on this leagues scoring format. I calculated for the QB, RB, WR, TE, and Flex position, leaving out the kicker and defenses.My teamQB: BenRB1: WilliamsRB2: LynchWR1: C JohnsonWR2: MarshallWR3: BoweFlex: BoldinTE: DavisTeam AQB: VickRB1: PetersonRB2: HillisWR1: WelkerWR2: LloydWR3: MooreFlex: AmendolaTE: GronkoskiTeam BQB: FreemanRB1: RiceRB2: BestWR1: M Williams (TB)WR2: S JohnsonWR3: ManninghamFlex: CollieTE: KellerTeam CQB: BradyRB1: FosterRB2: FelixWR1: R WhiteWR2: V JacksonWR3: FordFlex: BlountTE: DanielsThe Results:Team C 125.7 ppgMy team 118.5 ppgTeam A 117.6 ppgTeam B 116.5 ppg
I am team B. I think you can be competitive this year, however your RBs in this format arent great to begin with and you dont have much depth. The biggest concern is long term as this is a dynasty you have some pretty old/beat up players. So while you can compete now, 2 years from now you are in big trouble I think.
 
He nailed the draft. Cam newton, Darren sproles and marshawn lynch were exactly the type of gambles you need to hit to go along with the stud wrs. Someone mentioned Peterson, cj2k, and ray rice being the pick at 1.1 and as studly as they were, it demonstrates the pitfalls over investing in a position that takes 15-20 hits week in and week out (obviously rice worked out but 2 out of 3 odds is exactly what you're up against).

 
FWIW, the OP won his league this year
I think striking gold on the later round picks had as much to do with this than anything else not because he went WR heavy.Lynch round 7S-Smith round 9Pettigrew round 10Newton round 11J-Nelson round 12Sproles round 16
 
Better to be lucky than good-- obviously couldn't have expected those type of late hits with Jordy, Sproles, Lynch, Cam. Had no major troubles, whilesome of the other stronger teams lost some players to injuries.

 
Better to be lucky than good-- obviously couldn't have expected those type of late hits with Jordy, Sproles, Lynch, Cam. Had no major troubles, whilesome of the other stronger teams lost some players to injuries.
more often than not, a deep team outperforms the stud laden but shallow team, late in the season. i sually prefer to have strong WR/QB instead of relying on 1 or 2 stud RBs. but my title this season can be attributed to brees, and a strong te/k/def combination. in theory, i agree with going wr as long as you get consistency from your RBs. but being that the end of your draft was the core of your team, i dont think this draft proved anything.
 
Better to be lucky than good-- obviously couldn't have expected those type of late hits with Jordy, Sproles, Lynch, Cam. Had no major troubles, whilesome of the other stronger teams lost some players to injuries.
I think that is the point of this type of strategy. You get some sure things early (as close as you can get to a sure thing) then take a ton of shots late.Draft was well done. Probably won the league this year and is set up well for the future.
 
Better to be lucky than good-- obviously couldn't have expected those type of late hits with Jordy, Sproles, Lynch, Cam. Had no major troubles, whilesome of the other stronger teams lost some players to injuries.
more often than not, a deep team outperforms the stud laden but shallow team, late in the season. i sually prefer to have strong WR/QB instead of relying on 1 or 2 stud RBs. but my title this season can be attributed to brees, and a strong te/k/def combination. in theory, i agree with going wr as long as you get consistency from your RBs. but being that the end of your draft was the core of your team, i dont think this draft proved anything.
Sure it did. Early in the drafted he used his resources on the position that busts the least, and is also the position that is hardest to replace off the wire.
 
'Dez said:
'DexterDew said:
FWIW, the OP won his league this year
I think striking gold on the later round picks had as much to do with this than anything else not because he went WR heavy.Lynch round 7S-Smith round 9Pettigrew round 10Newton round 11J-Nelson round 12Sproles round 16
Agreed- he didn't win because his first 3 picks were Calvin, Marshall and Bowe, he won because his later picks were home runs.
 
'Dez said:
'DexterDew said:
FWIW, the OP won his league this year
I think striking gold on the later round picks had as much to do with this than anything else not because he went WR heavy.Lynch round 7S-Smith round 9Pettigrew round 10Newton round 11J-Nelson round 12Sproles round 16
Agreed- he didn't win because his first 3 picks were Calvin, Marshall and Bowe, he won because his later picks were home runs.
Calvin wasn't a homerun?Marshall and Bowe didn't bust in PPR leagues but they held their own. I doubt anyone had a better first 3 picks.
 
'Dez said:
'DexterDew said:
FWIW, the OP won his league this year
I think striking gold on the later round picks had as much to do with this than anything else not because he went WR heavy.Lynch round 7S-Smith round 9Pettigrew round 10Newton round 11J-Nelson round 12Sproles round 16
Agreed- he didn't win because his first 3 picks were Calvin, Marshall and Bowe, he won because his later picks were home runs.
Calvin wasn't a homerun?Marshall and Bowe didn't bust in PPR leagues but they held their own. I doubt anyone had a better first 3 picks.
Where did I say Calvin wasn't a homerun?Calvin was great, Bowe and Marshall were just okay. I looked at the link for his draft, and it's hard to tell because it looks like there were a bunch of trades. Guys who took Rodgers, Foster, Rice or McCoy in the first could have very easily had a better first 3 picks than the OP. I highly doubt anyone had better later round picks.The point remains, he didn't win his league because of his first 3 picks, or the fact that he went WR with them, he won it because some of his later picks blew up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top