Gurley, Jennings, Rawls: Pick 2 to Start!! (1 Viewer)

[lsufan]

1pt per reception league:

T. Gurley @ New Orleans

R. Jennings @ Cleveland 

T. Rawls @ Tampa Bay

One will be flex. Other flex options are. Booker, K. Benjamin, T. Pryor Sr

ESPN and Yahoo have Rawls ranked highest of the group. Im really thinking about benching Gurley since he is on the weakest offense of the group. Sucks I can't start all 3 but D. Murray is not coming out of my lineup lol.

Full Roster: Currently in 1st Place 8-3 Record

QB: D. Brees

WR: D. Thomas, A. Cooper, J. Nelson, K. Benjamin, G. Tate, T. Pryor Sr

RB: D. Murray, T. Gurley, T. Rawls, R. Jennings, D. Booker, J. Starks

TE: E. Ebron

K: M. Bryant 

Def: Buffalo 

 

[funty]

I'd go Rawls and Gurley.  I can't convince myself Jennings is a worthy play any week even against the lowly Browns.. Besides, that game will most likely be a blowout (and fast) and ends up bing a Paul Perkins cleanup show.

 

[lsufan]

Thanks Funty.

Gurley does get more guaranteed touches but with Goff in there I just feel like the Saints are going to try to shut down the run. We will see Gurley running into a stacked defensive line all game. Saints at home could put up some nice points also. If the Rams get down 2 scores they will have to throw more. Gurley has been running into stacked defensive lines all season. If he was going to have a good game maybe it will be against the Saints bad defense. 

Giants may blow out the Browns. If they do get up a few scores they could turn to Jennings more to burn out the clock. They didn't use Paul Perkins much last two weeks. I do see the Perkins time share before though. I do get your points lol.

 

[TheKillerBrees]

I would go Rawls for sure. And probably Gurley. but that's close

I slammed on Jennings last week on this board and then he made me look bad, but do I think he'll do it twice in a row? not really....

 

[Gally]

Gurley and Rawls.  No way to trust Jennings even with his resurgence.  Gurley and Rawls both have great matchups so it's easy to go there.