What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hakeem Nicks (1 Viewer)

smoker

Footballguy
How likely will he be to play most of the game ?

Im getting the feeling he will not be practicing all year and will be questionable all year as well

 
No weather related worries? Isn't Issac (what's left of it) going to be right on top of NYC tomorrow night? Last I checked Met Life stadium didn't have a roof.

 
I keep going back and forth between him and Marshawn Lynch in my flex. My gut says to go with Nicks if he plays, because he has a history of performing well when he has played after an injury scare. Lynch is also battling an injury of his own, so his practice status over today and tomorrow will probably play into my decision as well. The weather also concerns me.

Right now I have Lynch in my lineup, but if I hear some positive news about Nicks today, I may change my mind.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I keep going back and forth between him and Marshawn Lynch in my flex. My gut says to go with Nicks if he plays, because he has a history of performing well when he has played after an injury scare. Lynch is also battling an injury of his own, so his practice status over today and tomorrow will probably play into my decision as well. The weather also concerns me.Right now I have Lynch in my lineup, but if I hear some positive news about Nicks today, I may change my mind.
You have to decide between Lynch and Nicks in your Flex? How many teams are in the league? How shallow are the rosters?
 
I keep going back and forth between him and Marshawn Lynch in my flex. My gut says to go with Nicks if he plays, because he has a history of performing well when he has played after an injury scare. Lynch is also battling an injury of his own, so his practice status over today and tomorrow will probably play into my decision as well. The weather also concerns me.Right now I have Lynch in my lineup, but if I hear some positive news about Nicks today, I may change my mind.
Is this a 6 team league? How do you have 2 players that go within the first 4 rounds at your flex spot?
 
No weather related worries? Isn't Issac (what's left of it) going to be right on top of NYC tomorrow night? Last I checked Met Life stadium didn't have a roof.
Some. From what I've read, there will be bands of heavy rain between tonight and tomorrow night. One report I read had the worst of it ending around halftime. I don't have Nicks, but I'd start him.
 
I keep going back and forth between him and Marshawn Lynch in my flex. My gut says to go with Nicks if he plays, because he has a history of performing well when he has played after an injury scare. Lynch is also battling an injury of his own, so his practice status over today and tomorrow will probably play into my decision as well. The weather also concerns me.Right now I have Lynch in my lineup, but if I hear some positive news about Nicks today, I may change my mind.
Is this a 6 team league? How do you have 2 players that go within the first 4 rounds at your flex spot?
Not sure if you play in 10 team leagues, but sometimes those rosters can be pretty stacked.
 
I keep going back and forth between him and Marshawn Lynch in my flex. My gut says to go with Nicks if he plays, because he has a history of performing well when he has played after an injury scare. Lynch is also battling an injury of his own, so his practice status over today and tomorrow will probably play into my decision as well. The weather also concerns me.Right now I have Lynch in my lineup, but if I hear some positive news about Nicks today, I may change my mind.
I agree. Go with Lynch.
 
To answer the questions... I play in a 12 team, two person keeper and was lucky enough to keep Lynch as an 8th rounder and Murray as a 17th rounder.

I am starting Murray and Mcfadden at RB. Marshall and Harvin at WR. The flex comes down to Nicks or Lynch (or Stevie Johnson, who I am benching this week).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I keep going back and forth between him and Marshawn Lynch in my flex. My gut says to go with Nicks if he plays, because he has a history of performing well when he has played after an injury scare. Lynch is also battling an injury of his own, so his practice status over today and tomorrow will probably play into my decision as well. The weather also concerns me.Right now I have Lynch in my lineup, but if I hear some positive news about Nicks today, I may change my mind.
Is this a 6 team league? How do you have 2 players that go within the first 4 rounds at your flex spot?
Not sure if you play in 10 team leagues, but sometimes those rosters can be pretty stacked.
Or dynasty.
 
To answer the questions... I play in a 12 team, two person keeper and was lucky enough to keep Lynch as an 8th rounder and Murray as a 17th rounder. I am starting Murray and Mcfadden at RB. Marshall and Harvin at WR. The flex comes down to Nicks or Lynch (or Stevie Johnson, who I am benching this week).
Embarrassment of riches.I would honestly start Nicks and Johnsons over Marshall and Harvin this week. Feels like an AC thread now.I like Stevies matchup against the Jets, I also like Nicks matchup against the Boys.Marshall and Harvin are obviously studs (as you most likely drafted both ahead of Nicks and Johnson) but they have way more question marks imo than Nicks or Johnson. Jets pass D is over stated and Stevie has Revis' number. Expect the Bills to take an early lead and run FJax opening up the pass game even more for a few big plays.
 
I have Harvin and AJ Green going with Nicks and Wallace on the bench (no flex), yes I'm loaded at wr. I do remember sitting and injured Nicks once and he had 2 td's and a bunch of yards so I'm in a quandry! Green is v Baltim ore and that worries me too...

 
I keep going back and forth between him and Marshawn Lynch in my flex. My gut says to go with Nicks if he plays, because he has a history of performing well when he has played after an injury scare. Lynch is also battling an injury of his own, so his practice status over today and tomorrow will probably play into my decision as well. The weather also concerns me.Right now I have Lynch in my lineup, but if I hear some positive news about Nicks today, I may change my mind.
Is this a 6 team league? How do you have 2 players that go within the first 4 rounds at your flex spot?
ever heard of dynasty or keeper leagues? or even an auction league? they're a lot of fun!!
 
(KFFL) New York Giants WR Hakeem Nicks (foot) was limited in practice Tuesday, Sept. 4, and is questionable for Week 1.

 
Here is what I read from my fantasy site today:

The New York Giants expect WR Hakeem Nicks (foot) to play in Week 1; however, there is concern as to how effective he will be in the game.

Fantasy Impact: We still think you have to play Nicks in the game. He has too much upside.

I'll probably role with him.

 
Went through this some owning Nicks last year. The reality is that a less-than-100% Nicks is still dominant enough to warrant sitting some otherwise solid WR's. He may not stretch the field all night but you sure as hell better have him starting if the Giants are gonna be anywhere near the goal line.

 
Thanks to the Lynch injury scare, he's back in my starting lineup. I can't say I'm happy about having to do it, but hopefully it will work out.

Anyone have weather updates?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know the dude toughs out injuries, but I'm still worried about how many snaps he'll be able to be on the field. I need to take some chances this week, given my opponent's roster/matchups. I just need to decide whether Nate Washington vs NEP is "upside" relative to a Nicks who may not be on the field as much as usual.

 
I know the dude toughs out injuries, but I'm still worried about how many snaps he'll be able to be on the field. I need to take some chances this week, given my opponent's roster/matchups. I just need to decide whether Nate Washington vs NEP is "upside" relative to a Nicks who may not be on the field as much as usual.
Everyone will disagree, but I think NE defense is better than Dallas this year (brace for ####storm)
 
I know the dude toughs out injuries, but I'm still worried about how many snaps he'll be able to be on the field. I need to take some chances this week, given my opponent's roster/matchups. I just need to decide whether Nate Washington vs NEP is "upside" relative to a Nicks who may not be on the field as much as usual.
It's the first football game of the season and you're already in "I need to take some chances" mode. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
I know the dude toughs out injuries, but I'm still worried about how many snaps he'll be able to be on the field. I need to take some chances this week, given my opponent's roster/matchups. I just need to decide whether Nate Washington vs NEP is "upside" relative to a Nicks who may not be on the field as much as usual.
Everyone will disagree, but I think NE defense is better than Dallas this year (brace for ####storm)
I think New England will be a better fantasy defense, because offenses are forced to take more chances to keep up with them (sacks, turnovers, etc. as a result). In terms of scoring defense and the things that matter to offensive fantasy players, I think Dallas will be better.
 
I know the dude toughs out injuries, but I'm still worried about how many snaps he'll be able to be on the field. I need to take some chances this week, given my opponent's roster/matchups. I just need to decide whether Nate Washington vs NEP is "upside" relative to a Nicks who may not be on the field as much as usual.
Everyone will disagree, but I think NE defense is better than Dallas this year (brace for ####storm)
I think New England will be a better fantasy defense, because offenses are forced to take more chances to keep up with them (sacks, turnovers, etc. as a result). In terms of scoring defense and the things that matter to offensive fantasy players, I think Dallas will be better.
Plus they have a legitimate pass rusher now in Chandler Jones. New England will give up a ton of yards like last year since they will force teams into passing situations from behind.
 
Back on track, Fellas - What news from Nicks? Is he ready to go?
No additional news at this point. Everyone is assuming he'll play, but I've heard nothing about how hard he can go.Maybe we'll get some more news around the time active/inactive lists come out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First game of the season, under the lights against a embittered division rival who are itching to go out and prove themselves as world champ beaters to get on the right track?

I don't see how Nicks would not play his heart and soul out tonight. It may be that his snaps may be limited, and the Giants have Cruz to take some of the pressure off, but Nicks is a guy who can net you 100 and a TD even playing for half the snaps, and I do not want to miss out on that opportunity in the season opener.

 
First game of the season, under the lights against a embittered division rival who are itching to go out and prove themselves as world champ beaters to get on the right track?I don't see how Nicks would not play his heart and soul out tonight. It may be that his snaps may be limited, and the Giants have Cruz to take some of the pressure off, but Nicks is a guy who can net you 100 and a TD even playing for half the snaps, and I do not want to miss out on that opportunity in the season opener.
:goodposting: I was salivating waiting for him to make it back to me in the league I got him in. If he's playing, there's zero chance I bench him.
 
I'm sure I read 60 snaps i.e. more than enough.

I'd love to see the stats but Nicks seem to produce more when he's severely questionable.

 
Really hoping this is one of those cases where around halftime we have a bunch of people in this thread saying...

"ALWAYS START YOUR STUDS!"

Rather than the discussion about why it isn't always a good idea.

 
Is he playing for sure? If so, I start with confidence. Just want to make sure he is in fact playing due to be listed as "questionable"

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top