Help me out here.... (1 Viewer)

[thatguythere]

Okay I lost because the Raiders suck and they gave up all those sacks and a shutout.

Here's my question though. Walter gets flushed from the pocket and scrambles to the sidelines and runs out of bounds behind the LOS without being touched. It is credited as a sack.

Later in the game Senaca Wallace gets flushed out of the pocket and runs to the sidelines and out of bounds behind the LOS without being touched and the three amigos ooh and aah about how great he is at getting away from pressure.....no mention of a sack and I don't think it was ruled a sack.

What is the rule....? I also had a game earlier in the year where Losman muffed the snap in the shotgun but caught the ball and tried to run...he was tackled 2 yds behind the line of scrimmage and it was ruled a run, not a sack.

 

[GregR_2]

...Later in the game Senaca Wallace gets flushed out of the pocket and runs to the sidelines and out of bounds behind the LOS without being touched and the three amigos ooh and aah about how great he is at getting away from pressure.....no mention of a sack and I don't think it was ruled a sack....

The play by play and game stats would seem to show it was counted as a sack, as he doesn't have any rushes for negative yardage.

 

[thatguythere]

...Later in the game Senaca Wallace gets flushed out of the pocket and runs to the sidelines and out of bounds behind the LOS without being touched and the three amigos ooh and aah about how great he is at getting away from pressure.....no mention of a sack and I don't think it was ruled a sack....

The play by play and game stats would seem to show it was counted as a sack, as he doesn't have any rushes for negative yardage.

Thanks. That proves theisman is an idiot when he says how great Senaca is at avoiding the sack.