BLOX said:
Most people say they are equal.I believe that Wins are the most important in the entire equation, even more than losses.This is why I believe that team A is the better team. Although I understand the arguement for them being equal, and I also understand that team A has more losses. Wins are bigger than losses though.In my mind, Wins>Ties>Losses.
So by your "logic", a 1-7-0 record is better than 0-0-8, right?
I believe that the standings are determined by winning percentage. Therefore, 1-7 is better than 0-0-8. This isnt hockey or soccer. If you havent won a game, you cant be better than a team that has. ETA: In keeping within the spirit of the day - have a fabulous and blessed day.6-7 equals winning percentage of 46.15%5-6 equals winning percentage of 45.45%Ties do not factor into winning percentage. You see this in baseball all the time where one team has played more games.
Wow! I am amazed at how todays schools are failing in teaching basic math.Both teams have played 13 games.To get the "winning percentage" for ANY team - you do the following math:1. Divide wins by total games played (Team A (6/13) - 46.15%; Team B (5/13) - 38.5%)2. Divide non-losses by total games played (Team A (6/13) - 46.15%; Team B (7/13) - 53.8%)3. Add the two numbers together and divide by 2 (Team A - 46.15%; Team B 46.15%)This formula is the ONLY way to determine winning percentage. A 6-7 team is better than a 5-6 team, but in this case the team is not 5-6, but rather 5-6-2. You cannot simply ignore the two ties as if they do not exist, or that the team did not play those games.ETA: In keeping with the spirit of the day, have a fabulous and blessed day!!