Sort of.So, it's making the case for Atkins again?
http://2.images.southparkstudios.com/images/shows/south-park/clip-thumbnails/season-18/1802/south-park-s18e02c14-flip-the-pyramid_16x9.jpg?quality=0.8After Jeff Saturday retired, he quickly lost 50 lbs.
When asked how he did it, he replied: "I ate nothing but meat and vegetables, and walked for an hour a day."
The obesity and diabetes epidemic in the US is a direct result of the Standard American Diet and the disastrous fedgov Food Pyramid.
Want to be healthy and slim? Turn the pyramid upside down.
No doubt, assuming the butter is unsalted organic.Nothing like a little butter and coconut oil in a quart of coffee to start the day off right.
Dude, that's awesome.http://2.images.southparkstudios.com/images/shows/south-park/clip-thumbnails/season-18/1802/south-park-s18e02c14-flip-the-pyramid_16x9.jpg?quality=0.8After Jeff Saturday retired, he quickly lost 50 lbs.
When asked how he did it, he replied: "I ate nothing but meat and vegetables, and walked for an hour a day."
The obesity and diabetes epidemic in the US is a direct result of the Standard American Diet and the disastrous fedgov Food Pyramid.
Want to be healthy and slim? Turn the pyramid upside down.
I purposely allowed myself to eat as much as I wanted two weeks prior and during the super-fat experiment. When I switched to fat, I ended up eating fewer calories. Fat is more satiating, per calorie, than carbs, and it curbed my otherwise ravenous appetite. I didn't even count calories; I just went with my hunger pangs.
So let me get this straight...Packed on 16 pounds eating anything he wanted in two weeks. Then lost 7 on a calorie restriction over the course of a month?I dropped about seven pounds and 1 percent of body fat over the month. Prior to the fat diet, I had gained 16 pounds eating whatever I wanted (which included lots of carbs). As soon as I cut carbs and loaded up on fat, the my widening waistline halted.
Not sure it's possible to get that first quote straight...he said he ate fewer calories on the fat diet, and in the same paragraph says he didn't count calories.I purposely allowed myself to eat as much as I wanted two weeks prior and during the super-fat experiment. When I switched to fat, I ended up eating fewer calories. Fat is more satiating, per calorie, than carbs, and it curbed my otherwise ravenous appetite. I didn't even count calories; I just went with my hunger pangs.So let me get this straight...Packed on 16 pounds eating anything he wanted in two weeks. Then lost 7 on a calorie restriction over the course of a month?I dropped about seven pounds and 1 percent of body fat over the month. Prior to the fat diet, I had gained 16 pounds eating whatever I wanted (which included lots of carbs). As soon as I cut carbs and loaded up on fat, the my widening waistline halted.
This is stupid. The title should simply say Desserts are bad for you. I think that is universally agreed upon.
It's an easier way to eat low-calories, because you aren't hungry. But these people are losing weight because they are consuming less calories, bottom line. Even in that article the guy said he ended up eating LESS calories, not more.Sort of.So, it's making the case for Atkins again?
It's more paleo/primal now.
Google Mark Sisson (my go-to guru for primal living) or Robb Wolf (strict paleo guy) to learn more.
It's life-changing stuff, to be sure.
Exactly. Primal is great, but you are depriving yourself of a ton of stuff, just like you are if you eat low calorie, low carb, low fat or any other "magic" weight loss program.Not sure this really gives hope to anyone. Your body will crave whatever you deprive it of (fat, calories, sugar, carbs, etc). Until a magic pill is invented, losing weight will always require some degree of self control.
First of all, "fewer," not "less."Exactly. Primal is great, but you are depriving yourself of a ton of stuff, just like you are if you eat low calorie, low carb, low fat or any other "magic" weight loss program.Not sure this really gives hope to anyone. Your body will crave whatever you deprive it of (fat, calories, sugar, carbs, etc). Until a magic pill is invented, losing weight will always require some degree of self control.
There is no magic to any of it. It's all about consuming less calories. The 5-2 plan is a great example. Just another interesting and different way to structure calorie restriction.
The goal for anyone losing weight is to find a plan that works for you and stick to it, which is the hard part of ANY plan.
Actually this guy doesn't even prove that. He proves that he is more hungry when he eats anything he wants compared to eating as much as he wants of high fat foods.It's an easier way to eat low-calories, because you aren't hungry. But these people are losing weight because they are consuming less calories, bottom line. Even in that article the guy said he ended up eating LESS calories, not more.Sort of.So, it's making the case for Atkins again?
It's more paleo/primal now.
Google Mark Sisson (my go-to guru for primal living) or Robb Wolf (strict paleo guy) to learn more.
It's life-changing stuff, to be sure.