I'm looking at the current state of both teams. The Texans cannot score consistently and the Pats are getting healthy and better on Defense. This one doesn't appear close to me at all.
As a Pats fan, I sure hope so.I'm looking at the current state of both teams. The Texans cannot score consistently and the Pats are getting healthy and better on Defense. This one doesn't appear close to me at all.
Seems like there is a slight difference between the 2010 Jets and the 2012 Pats.I really don't see another blowout happening. Maybe I'm just having nightmares of 2010 when we blew out the Jets in the same fashion in December. Everyone was saying it would be another blowout in the Divisional game and we got stomped.
Very true..lol'pizzatyme said:Seems like there is a slight difference between the 2010 Jets and the 2012 Pats.'devouredbychaos said:I really don't see another blowout happening. Maybe I'm just having nightmares of 2010 when we blew out the Jets in the same fashion in December. Everyone was saying it would be another blowout in the Divisional game and we got stomped.![]()
'firstseason1988 said:As an Oiler fan with no emotional ties to the Texans. They look pathetic, except maybe Watt and Foster. New England utilizes their bye weeks better than anyone and come out strong. If the line is -9.5, I am betting the house on New England and would also bet it moves closer to -14 before week's end.
Because past events have absolutely no value in predicting future occurrences?Of course they do.'David Yudkin said:While I think NE will win, I will continue to caution people that the outcome of an earlier game has no bearing on the next game (yet that will always serve to sway people into thinking the outcome will be the same). I don't see the Pats winning by 30 points.
People just don't get it. If a baseball team won the first game of a series 22-1, most people are smart enough to understand that the game the next night is not going to be 22-1 again.Yet in football there are TONS of people that point to a blow out first game and expect a blow out the next game. To which I ask . . . WHY?So I agree in principle that the predictive value is there that the Pats were the better team last time and they should be favored this time around, but IMO the chances of another mauling are not that great.I don't have the time or the desire to research it, but I would be interested to hear the last time a team beat a playoff team twice in the same season (regular or post season) by at least 28 points in each game.Because past events have absolutely no value in predicting future occurrences?Of course they do.'David Yudkin said:While I think NE will win, I will continue to caution people that the outcome of an earlier game has no bearing on the next game (yet that will always serve to sway people into thinking the outcome will be the same). I don't see the Pats winning by 30 points.
Did they change starting pitchers for the 2nd game of the series?If it's mostly the same parts, one tends to think it's likely to happen again in a football game.People just don't get it. If a baseball team won the first game of a series 22-1, most people are smart enough to understand that the game the next night is not going to be 22-1 again.Yet in football there are TONS of people that point to a blow out first game and expect a blow out the next game. To which I ask . . . WHY?So I agree in principle that the predictive value is there that the Pats were the better team last time and they should be favored this time around, but IMO the chances of another mauling are not that great.I don't have the time or the desire to research it, but I would be interested to hear the last time a team beat a playoff team twice in the same season (regular or post season) by at least 28 points in each game.Because past events have absolutely no value in predicting future occurrences?Of course they do.'David Yudkin said:While I think NE will win, I will continue to caution people that the outcome of an earlier game has no bearing on the next game (yet that will always serve to sway people into thinking the outcome will be the same). I don't see the Pats winning by 30 points.
OK, use basketball instead. Same teams, same players, same venue, same post season series. One team wins by 40. How often does the same team win by 40 the next game? Not very often.In any sport, each game is different. The Texans will make adjustments. They will have different schemes. Balls will bounce differently. Refs will call different penalties. In blow out games between two top teams, normally one team is firing on all cylinders while the other can't do anything right. The likelihood that things play out the same in the rematch is remote.IMO, there's more of a chance of a blow out game in a rematch when the first game was close. But maybe that's just me.Did they change starting pitchers for the 2nd game of the series?If it's mostly the same parts, one tends to think it's likely to happen again in a football game.People just don't get it. If a baseball team won the first game of a series 22-1, most people are smart enough to understand that the game the next night is not going to be 22-1 again.Yet in football there are TONS of people that point to a blow out first game and expect a blow out the next game. To which I ask . . . WHY?So I agree in principle that the predictive value is there that the Pats were the better team last time and they should be favored this time around, but IMO the chances of another mauling are not that great.I don't have the time or the desire to research it, but I would be interested to hear the last time a team beat a playoff team twice in the same season (regular or post season) by at least 28 points in each game.Because past events have absolutely no value in predicting future occurrences?Of course they do.'David Yudkin said:While I think NE will win, I will continue to caution people that the outcome of an earlier game has no bearing on the next game (yet that will always serve to sway people into thinking the outcome will be the same). I don't see the Pats winning by 30 points.
Still waiting for an example of a team blowing out a playoff team twice in the same season.No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
Ah, now they have to be a playoff team?Still waiting for an example of a team blowing out a playoff team twice in the same season.No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
I said that the first time, too.Ah, now they have to be a playoff team?Still waiting for an example of a team blowing out a playoff team twice in the same season.No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
I just dont see how an example is necessarily relevant. We see new things happen all the time in sports. Furthermore, any example wouldnt be these two particular teams. I agree with you to an extent that a blowout ahould not predict a blowout, but an example to the contrary would not be my arguement. I still think the Pats could cover the number if it hovers around 9 or 10. The holes the patriots exposed in the texan defense are still there. Andy Dalton just couldnt expose them.I said that the first time, too.Ah, now they have to be a playoff team?Still waiting for an example of a team blowing out a playoff team twice in the same season.No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
Houston is a shell of what they were. Thought Schaub looked horrible. Pats will destroy 'em. Book it.'David Yudkin said:While I think NE will win, I will continue to caution people that the outcome of an earlier game has no bearing on the next game (yet that will always serve to sway people into thinking the outcome will be the same). I don't see the Pats winning by 30 points.
I'll save you the trouble of an example. Last year, the Pats destoyed the Broncos twice. However, a case could be made that a Tebow-led team is not exactly the same as a more well rounded team like the Texans (8-8 is quite a bit different than 12-4).I still say that Houston's coaching staff will retool what they did last time and do things a lot differently. Maybe the new plan will bust like the last one did. But that's why they play the games.I just dont see how an example is necessarily relevant. We see new things happen all the time in sports. Furthermore, any example wouldnt be these two particular teams. I agree with you to an extent that a blowout ahould not predict a blowout, but an example to the contrary would not be my arguement. I still think the Pats could cover the number if it hovers around 9 or 10. The holes the patriots exposed in the texan defense are still there. Andy Dalton just couldnt expose them.I said that the first time, too.Ah, now they have to be a playoff team?Still waiting for an example of a team blowing out a playoff team twice in the same season.No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
Yep, that's what I said in my original post.Houston is a shell of what they were. Thought Schaub looked horrible. Pats will destroy 'em. Book it.'David Yudkin said:While I think NE will win, I will continue to caution people that the outcome of an earlier game has no bearing on the next game (yet that will always serve to sway people into thinking the outcome will be the same). I don't see the Pats winning by 30 points.
Tease?'Ray Hueston said:That line seems high to me, as a Pat's fan I'm not sure I would lay that many points. I will probably look to tease it with the O/U.
Dec 6, 2010 (Week 13) The Patriots embarrassed The Jets 45-3 and were rollingJan 16, 2011 (Divisional round) The 11-5 Jets upset the 14-2 Patriots 28-21. The Jets lost 3 of their final 5 that season, including the 45-3 loss to the Patriots. The Jets seemed to be slipping an awful lot like The Texans did at the end of this season.Both teams have a lot of talent. The 9.5 points seems excessive. I think the Pats will win, but I won't be surprised if The Texans upset. In fact, I think all 8 teams left are all talented and won't be surprised to see any upsets this weekend.Note: Edited for accuracy'David Yudkin said:I'll save you the trouble of an example. Last year, the Pats destoyed the Broncos twice. However, a case could be made that a Tebow-led team is not exactly the same as a more well rounded team like the Texans (8-8 is quite a bit different than 12-4).I still say that Houston's coaching staff will retool what they did last time and do things a lot differently. Maybe the new plan will bust like the last one did. But that's why they play the games.
I disagree, like someone said above, Cincy didn't play well at all and AJ Green was wide open twice to go ahead late in the game and Dalton made terrible throws. Brady has more weapons and is about 4 tiers above Dalton, at home against a struggling Texan team. I hope I am wrong, I would love the Texans to win this. I just see them playing it close.I think the Patriots win, but almost double-digits against the #3 team in the conference is a bit much. The difference between the Broncos/Pats and everyone else is not THAT high.
What do does the tape of the previous game do for the Texans? The Pats will have Gronk for this game so their offense will be very different.The only positive I can think of for my Texans would be that we've got a lot of tape to watch on New England from our game earlier. Hopefully, they've got nothing to take away on us from that game because we will have completely thrown that game plan out the window and are starting from scratch. If Kubiak comes out with the same conservative crap game plan as he did last time then I wouldn't be sad if we Shottenheimered him.I guess there is one more positive - our defense looked alive for the first time in a while. If we play next week like we did this week then we hold NE to less than 30 (provided Schaub doesn't throw a pick 6). If we can't score 30 points against NE then we don't deserve to win.
I absolutely think it is that high.I know opinions vary on the predictive powers of DVOA but, by that measure, the Ravens and Texans at #8 and #11 respectively are the AFC's two highest-rated teams after DEN (#2) and NE (#3). On a weighted DVOA basis it looks even worse (the Texans rank #19).I think the Patriots win, but almost double-digits against the #3 team in the conference is a bit much. The difference between the Broncos/Pats and everyone else is not THAT high.
Didn't Dallas destroy the Eagles the last game of the regular season and then the very next week put another beat down on them in the Wildcard round? Might've been 2009 or 2010. I forget what the point totals were but I can remember them being high for Dallas.Still waiting for an example of a team blowing out a playoff team twice in the same season.No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
2009. Won 24-0 and then 34-14. Still not back to back 28-30 point victories but close to it.Didn't Dallas destroy the Eagles the last game of the regular season and then the very next week put another beat down on them in the Wildcard round? Might've been 2009 or 2010. I forget what the point totals were but I can remember them being high for Dallas.Still waiting for an example of a team blowing out a playoff team twice in the same season.No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
Not much. But hey, I'm grasping here!What do does the tape of the previous game do for the Texans? The Pats will have Gronk for this game so their offense will be very different.The only positive I can think of for my Texans would be that we've got a lot of tape to watch on New England from our game earlier. Hopefully, they've got nothing to take away on us from that game because we will have completely thrown that game plan out the window and are starting from scratch. If Kubiak comes out with the same conservative crap game plan as he did last time then I wouldn't be sad if we Shottenheimered him.I guess there is one more positive - our defense looked alive for the first time in a while. If we play next week like we did this week then we hold NE to less than 30 (provided Schaub doesn't throw a pick 6). If we can't score 30 points against NE then we don't deserve to win.
For full disclosure, you picked the Bengals to beat the Texans, Yes?No other sport is like football in that regard. NFL has many moving parts. I'd take a Brady-led offense that has blown a team out previously that year, to do the same when they meet again. We can agree to disagree.Now, if it looked like NE was now playing like crap and Houston was getting healthy, then my prediction would have changed. However, that's not the case.Blowout by 14+ IMO
Early line says NE-9.5. I say NE 45 Houston 15 (5 FGs).
At least they will be prepared for Mallett if he steps in for Brady again.The only positive I can think of for my Texans would be that we've got a lot of tape to watch on New England from our game earlier. Hopefully, they've got nothing to take away on us from that game because we will have completely thrown that game plan out the window and are starting from scratch. If Kubiak comes out with the same conservative crap game plan as he did last time then I wouldn't be sad if we Shottenheimered him.
I guess there is one more positive - our defense looked alive for the first time in a while. If we play next week like we did this week then we hold NE to less than 30 (provided Schaub doesn't throw a pick 6). If we can't score 30 points against NE then we don't deserve to win.