:finger:People still really smoking cigarettes in 2014? I see a guy smoking on the street and it feels like 1985. Are that many people stupid?
:finger:People still really smoking cigarettes in 2014? I see a guy smoking on the street and it feels like 1985. Are that many people stupid?
Because our state and federal governments are now 50/50 partners with the tobacco companies and just like them they make so much money off the cigarettes and chew (and all the disease they cause) they will never ever outlaw them.How are cigarette companies still in business?
Never smoked?People still really smoking cigarettes in 2014? I see a guy smoking on the street and it feels like 1985. Are that many people stupid?
I invest in a fund that puts a lot of money in the cigarette companies. My recent returns have been excellent.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
not to mention blowing up gas stations.Take a road trip and stop for gas in some backwater #### town, you'll see lots of hillbillies smoking.
:finger:People still really smoking cigarettes in 2014? I see a guy smoking on the street and it feels like 1985. Are that many people stupid?
Not if numbnuts keep voting to outlaw e-cigs everywhere. Technology created a win-win situation for smokers and non - smokers but the nanny staters who want to "win" the smoking debate at all costs are going to take away a major impetus for smokers to convert to the non - carcinogenic substitute.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
I guess you think it's the same thing?
Would you trade your obesity for a flamboyantly gay lifestyle?I guess you think it's the same thing?
That's weird.
This amazes me as well. I work at a hospital and the amount of doctors and nurses outside smoking is mind boggling.I'm most shocked when I see teenagers and people in their early 20's still smoking. Idiots
Would you trade your obesity for a flamboyantly gay lifestyle?I guess you think it's the same thing?
That's weird.
he likes the stogies. do those give you cancer?I swear Otis is/was both fat and a smoker.
Both are bad for youI guess you think it's the same thing?That's weird.
Why replace, when you can just collect double?They will be illegal once the government finds a way to replace the taxes levied on the smoker.
Chicago working their way there. As for why, because it's Chicago.Why replace, when you can just collect double?I actually think there are less smokers now in general.They will be illegal once the government finds a way to replace the taxes levied on the smoker.
There are e-cig bans? Why?
Not if numbnuts keep voting to outlaw e-cigs everywhere. Technology created a win-win situation for smokers and non - smokers but the nanny staters who want to "win" the smoking debate at all costs are going to take away a major impetus for smokers to convert to the non - carcinogenic substitute.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
A lot of smokers in the inner city I assume...There are a ton of studies that show smokers are less educated, so to answer the OP's question, yes.
https://www.google.com/search?q=smokers+are+less+educated&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari
Actually there are still detectable levels of carcinogenic chemicals in E-cigs. They use propylene glycol which is known to increase your risk for asthma when breathed in. Further vaping itself is known to cause respiratory issues. Several of the nicotine refills were tested and were found to have chemicals in them that were toxic to human cells. Not to mention the metals you inhale off the heating filament. I could go on. Don't kid yourself with this is some safe alternative.Not if numbnuts keep voting to outlaw e-cigs everywhere. Technology created a win-win situation for smokers and non - smokers but the nanny staters who want to "win" the smoking debate at all costs are going to take away a major impetus for smokers to convert to the non - carcinogenic substitute.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
Better or worse than "regular" cigarettes?Actually there are still detectable levels of carcinogenic chemicals in E-cigs. They use propylene glycol which is known to increase your risk for asthma when breathed in. Further vaping itself is known to cause respiratory issues. Several of the nicotine refills were tested and were found to have chemicals in them that were toxic to human cells. Not to mention the metals you inhale off the heating filament. I could go on. Don't kid yourself with this is some safe alternative.Not if numbnuts keep voting to outlaw e-cigs everywhere. Technology created a win-win situation for smokers and non - smokers but the nanny staters who want to "win" the smoking debate at all costs are going to take away a major impetus for smokers to convert to the non - carcinogenic substitute.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
We don't really know do we? What we know now is they aren't "safe". We don't know how unsafe they are and we won't until we can get some long term testing done. They are still a nicotine delivery system. Nicotine is still a deadly poison.Better or worse than "regular" cigarettes?Actually there are still detectable levels of carcinogenic chemicals in E-cigs. They use propylene glycol which is known to increase your risk for asthma when breathed in. Further vaping itself is known to cause respiratory issues. Several of the nicotine refills were tested and were found to have chemicals in them that were toxic to human cells. Not to mention the metals you inhale off the heating filament. I could go on. Don't kid yourself with this is some safe alternative.Not if numbnuts keep voting to outlaw e-cigs everywhere. Technology created a win-win situation for smokers and non - smokers but the nanny staters who want to "win" the smoking debate at all costs are going to take away a major impetus for smokers to convert to the non - carcinogenic substitute.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
Would you mind providing links to some of this? Not doubting you, just that the GF puffs away on an eCig and I'd like to give her some reading material and I'm not sure "Guy from the football forum" is going to be very convincingActually there are still detectable levels of carcinogenic chemicals in E-cigs. They use propylene glycol which is known to increase your risk for asthma when breathed in. Further vaping itself is known to cause respiratory issues. Several of the nicotine refills were tested and were found to have chemicals in them that were toxic to human cells. Not to mention the metals you inhale off the heating filament. I could go on. Don't kid yourself with this is some safe alternative.Not if numbnuts keep voting to outlaw e-cigs everywhere. Technology created a win-win situation for smokers and non - smokers but the nanny staters who want to "win" the smoking debate at all costs are going to take away a major impetus for smokers to convert to the non - carcinogenic substitute.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
Yeah, and condoms don't protect against STDs as reliably as abstinence. But teens aren't going to not have sex and smokers aren't going to quit smoking.We don't really know do we? What we know now is they aren't "safe". We don't know how unsafe they are and we won't until we can get some long term testing done. They are still a nicotine delivery system. Nicotine is still a deadly poison.Better or worse than "regular" cigarettes?Actually there are still detectable levels of carcinogenic chemicals in E-cigs. They use propylene glycol which is known to increase your risk for asthma when breathed in. Further vaping itself is known to cause respiratory issues. Several of the nicotine refills were tested and were found to have chemicals in them that were toxic to human cells. Not to mention the metals you inhale off the heating filament. I could go on. Don't kid yourself with this is some safe alternative.Not if numbnuts keep voting to outlaw e-cigs everywhere. Technology created a win-win situation for smokers and non - smokers but the nanny staters who want to "win" the smoking debate at all costs are going to take away a major impetus for smokers to convert to the non - carcinogenic substitute.Foreign markets are propping them up. I imagine they'll quickly move into e-cigs in a big way if those are deemed "safe"
I can assure you that this is not necessarily true.teens aren't going to not have sex